A new stopping rule for computerized adaptive testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70, 1-17. presented at the Dec 1.
. (2010). Firestar: Computerized adaptive testing simulation program for polytomous IRT models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 644–645.
. (2009). A New Stopping Rule for Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71, 37-53. doi:10.1177/0013164410387338
. (2011). Firestar: Computerized adaptive testing simulation program for polytomous IRT models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 644-645. presented at the Nov 1.
. (2009). Optimal Reassembly of Shadow Tests in CAT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 40, 469-485. doi:10.1177/0146621616654597
. (2016). Comparison of CAT item selection criteria for polytomous items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 419–440.
. (2009). Efficiency of static and computer adaptive short forms compared to full-length measures of depressive symptoms. Quality of Life Research, 19(1), 125–136.
. (2010). Scripted On-the-fly Multistage Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1wKuAstITLXo6BM4APf2mPsth1BymNl-y
. (2017). Reduction in patient burdens with graphical computerized adaptive testing on the ADL scale: tool development and simulation. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 7, 39.
. (2009). A Heuristic Of CAT Item Selection Procedure For Testlets. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing.
. (2011). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
. (2009).
Computerized adaptive testing using the nearest-neighbors criterion. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 204-216.
. (2003). The Effect of Upper and Lower Asymptotes of IRT Models on Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 39, 551-565. doi:10.1177/0146621615585850
. (2015). a-Stratified Computerized Adaptive Testing in the Presence of Calibration Error. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 75, 260-283. doi:10.1177/0013164414530719
. (2015). Computerized adaptive testing using the nearest-neighbors criterion. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 204-216.
. (2003). The modified maximum global discrimination index method for cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
. (2007). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
Two-phase item selection procedure for flexible content balancing in CAT. Applied Psychological. Measurement, 3, 467–482.
. (2007). Estimation of trait level in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 257-265.
. (2000). Computerized adaptive testing for cognitive diagnosis. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
. (2009). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
Constraint-weighted a-stratification for computerized adaptive testing with nonstatistical constraints: Balancing measurement efficiency and exposure control. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 35-49.
. (2009). Constraints-weighted information method for item selection of severely constrained computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco.
. (2006). The maximum priority index method for severely constrained item selection in computerized adaptive testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 62, 369-83. presented at the May.
. (2009). Predicting item exposure parameters in computerized adaptive testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 61, 75-91. presented at the May.
. (2008). Item Selection and Exposure Control Methods for Computerized Adaptive Testing with Multidimensional Ranking Items. Journal of Educational Measurement, 57, 343-369. doi:10.1111/jedm.12252
. (2020). A comparison of maximum likelihood estimation and expected a posteriori estimation in CAT using the partial credit model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 569-595.
. (1998). Exploring the relationship between item exposure rate and test overlap rate in computerized adaptive testing. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Montreal, Canada.
. (1999). The effect of population distribution and methods of theta estimation on CAT using the rating scale model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco.
. (1995). A comparison of maximum likelihood estimation and expected a posteriori estimation in computerized adaptive testing using the generalized partial credit model. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 58, 453.
. (1997). Controlling item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29(2), 204–217.
. (2005). A comparison of item selection rules at the early stages of computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 241-255.
. (2000). The relationship between item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40, 129-145.
. (2003). Online Item Calibration for Q-Matrix in CD-CAT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 39, 5-15. doi:10.1177/0146621613513065
. (2015). A new approach to simulation studies in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle WA.
. (2001). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
Controlling Item Exposure and Test Overlap in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 204-217. doi:10.1177/0146621604271495
. (2005). The relationship between item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40, 129-145.
. (2003). Effects of practical constraints on item selection rules at the early stages of computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 41, 149-174.
. (2004). General Test Overlap Control: Improved Algorithm for CAT and CCT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38, 229-244. doi:10.1177/0146621613513494
. (2014). A Procedure for Controlling General Test Overlap in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34, 393-409. doi:10.1177/0146621610367788
. (2010). A Dynamic Stratification Method for Improving Trait Estimation in Computerized Adaptive Testing Under Item Exposure Control. Applied Psychological Measurement, 44, 182-196. doi:10.1177/0146621619843820
. (2020). The comparison of maximum likelihood estimation and expected a posteriori in CAT using the graded response model. Journal of Elementary Education, 19, 339-371.
. (2007). Controlling item exposure and test overlap on the fly in computerized adaptive testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 61, 471-92. presented at the Nov.
. (2008). Comparison of adaptive Bayesian estimation and weighted Bayesian estimation in multidimensional computerized adaptive testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
. (2009). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
An Imputation Approach to Handling Incomplete Computerized Tests. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1vznZeO3nsZZK0k6_oyw5c9ZTP8uyGnXh
. (2017). A comparison of item selection rules at the early stages of computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 241-255.
. (2000). The relationship between item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40, 129-145.
. (2003). ffects of practical constraints on item selection rules at the early stages of computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 41, 149-174.
. (2004). Controlling item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 204-217.
. (2005). The effect of population distribution and methods of theta estimation on computerized adaptive testing (CAT) using the rating scale model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 422-439.
. (1997). . (1999).
Predicting item exposure parameters in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.
. (2003). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
The effect of population distribution and method of theta estimation on computerized adaptive testing (CAT) using the rating scale model. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 57, 422-439.
. (1997). . (2002).
Developing tailored instruments: Item banking and computerized adaptive assessment. In Paper presented at the conference “Advances in Health Outcomes Measurement: Exploring the Current State and the Future of Item Response Theory. Item Banks, and Computer-Adaptive Testing,” Bethesda MD.
. (2004). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
Item Parameter Drifting and Online Calibration. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.
. (2017). . (1997).
Performance of item exposure control methods in computerized adaptive testing: Further explorations. In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans , LA.
. (2000). Patient-reported outcomes measurement and management with innovative methodologies and technologies. Quality of Life Research, 16 Suppl 1, 157-66.
. (2007). To Weight Or Not To Weight? Balancing Influence Of Initial Items In Adaptive Testing. Psychometrica, 73(3), 441-450. doi:10.1007/S11336-007-9047-7
. (2008). Inter-subtest branching in computerized adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 140-141.
. (1991). Multi-stage CAT with stratified design. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Gatlinburg TN.
. (1997).