A Top-Down Approach to Designing the Computerized Adaptive Multistage Test. Journal of Educational Measurement, 55, 243-263. doi:10.1111/jedm.12174
. (2018). Comparability of decisions for computer adaptive and written examinations. Journal of Allied Health, 20, 15-23.
. (1991). Validity of item selection: A comparison of automated computerized adaptive and manual paper and pencil examinations. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 8, 152-157.
. (1996). An empirical study of computerized adaptive test administration conditions. Journal of Educational Measurement, 31, 251-263. presented at the Fal.
. (1994). Patterns of item exposure using a randomized CAT algorithm. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego, CA.
. (1998). Reliability of alternate computer adaptive tests. In Objective measurement, theory into practice (Vol. II). New Jersey: Ablex.
. (1994). Equating computerized adaptive certification examinations: The Board of Registry series of studies. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco.
. (1995). The effect of review on student ability and test efficiency for computerized adaptive tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 33-40.
. (1992). The effect of review on the psychometric characteristics of computerized adaptive tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 7(3), 211-222.
. (1994). Test-retest consistency of computer adaptive tests. annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. presented at the 04/1990, Boston, MA USA.
. (1990). . (1994).
The Effect of Review on Student Ability and Test Efficiency for Computerized Adaptive Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16(1), 33-40.
. (1992). v16n1p033.pdf (584.06 KB)Computerized adaptive testing: Tracking candidate response patterns. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 13, 151-162.
. (1995). Test targeting and precision before and after review on computer-adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Atlanta GA.
. (1993). Overview of the USMLE Step 2 computerized field test. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
. (1997). Computer-adaptive sequential testing. In . W. J. van der Linden (Ed.), Computerized Adaptive Testing: Theory and Practice (pp. 289-209). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
. (2000). Implementing the computer-adaptive sequential testing (CAST) framework to mass produce high quality computer-adaptive and mastery tests. In Symposium paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans, LA.
. (2000). Some alternative CAT item selection heuristics (Internal report). Philadelphia PA: National Board of Medical Examiners.
. (1995). Some practical examples of computerized adaptive sequential testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35, 229-249.
. (1998). Heuristic-based CAT: Balancing item information, content, and exposure. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York NY.
. (1996). Test models for complex computer-based testing. In . C. N. Mille,. M. T. Potenza, J. J. Fremer, and W. C. Ward (Eds.). Computer-based testing: Building the foundation for future assessments (pp. 67-88). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
. (2002). A framework for exploring and controlling risks associated with test item exposure over time. In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council for Measurement in Education. San Diego, CA.
. (1998). Maintaining content validity in computerized adaptive testing. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 3, 29-41.
. (1998). Item selection using an average growth approximation of target information functions. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 41-51.
. (1992). Test information targeting strategies for adaptive multistage testlet designs. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
. (2003). lu03-03.pdf (178.13 KB)A testlet assembly design for the uniform CPA Examination. Applied Measurement in Education, 19, 189-202. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame1903_2
. (2006). Adaptive computer-based tasks under an assessment engineering paradigm. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
. (2009). cat09luecht.pdf (288.75 KB)A few more issues to consider in multidimensional computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco.
. (1994). Exposure control using adaptive multi-stage item bundles. In annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago, IL. USA.
. (2003). lu03-04.pdf (115.22 KB)Heuristics based CAT: Balancing item information, content, and exposure. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York NY.
. (1996). Computer-assisted test assembly using optimization heuristics. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22 , 224-236.
. (1998). A testlet assembly design for the uniform CPA examination. In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education.. New Orleans.
. (2002). lu02-01.pdf (191.34 KB)Some practical examples of computerized adaptive sequential testing (Internal Report). Philadelphia: National Board of Medical Examiners.
. (1996). Computer-adaptive testing. In . B. Everett, and D. Howell (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science. New York: Wiley.
. (2004). . (1992).
Multidimensional computerized adaptive testing in a certification or licensure context. Applied Psychological Measurement, 20, 389-404.
. (1996). Heuristic-based CAT: Balancing item information, content and exposure. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York NY.
. (1996). Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing in a Certification or Licensure Context. Applied Psychological Measurement, 20, 389-404.
. (1996). v20n4p389.pdf (1.19 MB)Exposure control using adaptive multi-stage item bundles. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
. (2003). CASTISEL [Computer software]. Philadelphia, PA: National Board of Medical Examiners.
. (1998). Evaluating a new approach to detect aberrant responses in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.
. (2003). Methods for item set selection in adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
. (2003). lu03-02.pdf (441.94 KB)Evaluating computerized adaptive testing design for the MCAT with realistic simulated data. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
. (2003). lu03-01.pdf (984.95 KB)Statistics for detecting disclosed items in a CAT environment. Metodologia de Las Ciencias del Comportamiento., 5(2).
. (2004). Efficiency and precision in two-stage adaptive testing. West Palm Beach Florida: Eastern ERA.
. (1984). Some how and which for practical tailored testing. In . L. J. T. van der Kamp, W. F. Langerak and D.N.M. de Gruijter (Eds): Psychometrics for educational debates (pp. 189-206). New York: John Wiley and Sons. Computer-Assisted Instruction, Testing, and Guidance (pp. 139-183). New York: Harper and Row.
. (1980). Practical methods for redesigning a homogeneous test, also for designing a multilevel test (RB-74-30). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1974). Individualized testing and item characteristic curve theory. In . D. H. Krantz, R. C. Atkinson, R. D. Luce, and P. Suppes (Eds.), Contemporary developments in mathematical psychology (Vol. II). San Francisco: Freeman.
. (1974). . (1977).
A theoretical study of the measurement effectiveness of flexilevel tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 31, 805-813.
. (1971). Panel discussion: Future directions for computerized adaptive testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Item Response Theory and Computerized adaptive conference. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
. (1978). Small N justifies Rasch model. In , New horizons in testing: Latent trait test theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 51-61). New York, NY. USA: Academic Press.
. (1983). Individualized testing and item characteristic curve theory (RB-72-50). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1972). Some test theory for tailored testing. In . W. H. Holtzman (Ed.), Computer-assisted instruction, testing, and guidance (pp.139-183). New York: Harper and Row.
. (1970). Tailored testing, an approximation of stochastic approximation. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 66, 707-711.
. (1971). Some likelihood functions found in tailored testing. In . C. K. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing (pp. 79-81). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
. (1976). lo75-02.pdf (165.27 KB)Tailored testing: An application of stochastic approximation (RM 71-2). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1971). . (1971).
Test theory and the public interest. Proceedings of the Educational Testing Service Invitational Conference.
. (1976). Discussion. In . C. K. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing (pp. 113-117). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
. (1976). lo75-03.pdf (317.31 KB)