Jette, A.,, Haley, S., Tao, W., Ni, P., Moed, R., Meyers, D., & Zurek, M.. (2007). Prospective evaluation of the am-pac-cat in outpatient rehabilitation settings. Physical Therapy, 87, 385-398.

Volans, P. J. (1982). Pros and cons of tailored testing: An examination of issues highlighted with an automated testing system. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 17, 301-304.

Moreira Junior, F. J., & Andrade, D. F.. (2009). Proposta para a construo de um Teste Adaptativo Informatizado baseado na Teoria da Resposta ao Item (Proposal for the construction of a Computerized Adaptive Testing based on the Item Response Theory). Poster session presented at the Congresso Brasileiro de Teoria da Resposta ao Item, Florianpolis SC Brazil.

Olea., J., Ponsoda, V., Revuelta, J., & Belchi, J.. (1996). Propiedades psicometricas du un test adaptivo informatizado do vocabulario ingles [Psychometric properties of a computerized adaptive tests for the measurement of English vocabulary]. Estudios de Psicologica, 55, 61-73.

Aguado, D., Rubio, V. J., Hontangas, P. M., & Hernández, J. M.. (2005). Propiedades psicométricas de un test Adaptativo Informatizado para la medición del ajuste emocional [Psychometric properties of an Emotional Adjustment Computerized Adaptive Test]. Psicothema, 17, 484-491.

Divgi, D. R. (1987). Properties of some Bayesian scoring procedures for computerized adaptive tests (Research Memorandum CRM 87-161). Alexandria VA: Center for Naval Analyses.

Wang, T., & Vispoel, W. P.. (1998). Properties of ability estimation methods in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35, 109-135.

Green, B. F. (1983). The promise of tailored tests. In . H. Wainer and S. Messick (Eds.). Principals of modern psychological measurement (pp. 69-80). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.

Fries, J. F., Bruce, B., & Cella, D.. (2005). The promise of PROMIS: using item response theory to improve assessment of patient-reported outcomes. Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, 23, S53-7.

Luo, X., Kim, D., & Dickison, P.. (2017). Projection-Based Stopping Rules for Computerized Adaptive Testing in Licensure Testing. Applied Psychological MeasurementApplied Psychological Measurement, 42(4), 275 - 290. presented at the 2018/06/01. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621617726790

Krathwohl, D. (1959). Progress report on the sequential item test. East Lansing MI: Michigan State University, Bureau of Educational Research.

Fries, J. F., Cella, D., Rose, M., Krishnan, E., & Bruce, B.. (2009). Progress in assessing physical function in arthritis: PROMIS short forms and computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Rheumatology, 36, 2061-2066. presented at the Sep.

Hubbard, J. P. (1966). Programmed testing in the examinations of the National Board of Medical Examiners. In . A. Anastasi (Ed.), Testing problems in perspective. Washington DC: American Council on Education.

Clark, C. K. (1976). Proceedings of the first conference on computerized adaptive testing. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Weiss, D. J. (1985). Proceedings of the 1982 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Weiss, D. J. (1980). Proceedings of the 1979 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Weiss, D. J. (1978). Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Zara, A.. (1989). Procedures for selecting items for computerized adaptive tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 2, 359-375.

Reckase, M. D. (1976). Procedures for computerized testing. In Paper presented at the sixth annual meeting of the National Conference on the Use of On-Line Computers in Psychology. St. Louis MO.

Reckase, M. D. (1977). Procedures for computerized testing. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 70, 351-356.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Zara, A.. (1999). A procedure to compare conventional and adaptive testing procedures for making single-point decisions. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Segall, D. O. (1988). A procedure for scoring incomplete adaptive tests in high stakes testing. Unpublished manuscript. San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

Reckase, M. D. (1983). A procedure for decision making using tailored testing. In New horizons in testing: Latent trait theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 237-254). New York, NY. USA: Academic Press.

Chen, S. - Y. (2010). A Procedure for Controlling General Test Overlap in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34, 393-409. doi:10.1177/0146621610367788

Koch, W. J., & Reckase, M. D.. (1979). Problems in application of latent-trait models to tailored testing (Research Report 79-1). Columbia MO: University of Missouri, Department of Psychology", (also presented at National Council on Measurement in Education, 1979: ERIC No. ED 177 196) note = ".

Doebler, A. (2012). The Problem of Bias in Person Parameter Estimation in Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36, 255-270. doi:10.1177/0146621612443304

Segall, D. O. (2010). Principles of Multidimensional Adaptive Testing. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 57-76). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8

Segall, D. O. (2000). Principles of multidimensional adaptive testing. In . W. J. van der Linden and C. A. W. Glas (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp. 53-73). Norwell MA: Kluwer.

Miller, T., & Davey, T.. (1999). Principles for administering adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal Canada.

Raîche, G.. (2001). Principes et enjeux du testing adaptatif : de la loi des petits nombres à la loi des grands nombres. In Communication présentée à l’intérieur du 69e congrès de l’Association canadienne française pour l’avancement de la science. Acfas.

Davey, T., Pommerich, M., & Thompson, D. T.. (1999). Pretesting alongside an operational CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Dowling, C. E., & Kaluscha, R.. (1995). Prerequisite relationships for the adaptive assessment of knowledge. In . Greer, J. (Ed.) Proceedings of AIED'95, 7th World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Washington, DC, AACE 43-50.

Huh, S. (2008). Preparing the implementation of computerized adaptive testing for high-stakes examinations. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.

McBride, J. R., Wetzel, C. D., & Hetter, R. D.. (1997). Preliminary psychometric research for CAT-ASVAB: Selecting an adaptive testing strategy. In . W. A. Sands, B. K. Waters, and J. R. McBride (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp. 83-95). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.

Waters, C. J. (1964). Preliminary evaluation of simulated branching tests. U.S. Army Personnel Research Office Technical Research Note 140.

Hogan, P. F., Dall, T., & McBride, J. R.. (1996). Preliminary cost-effectiveness analysis of alternative ASVAB testing concepts at MET sites. Interim report to Defense Manpower Data Center. Fairfax, VA: Lewin-VHI, Inc.

Taherbhai, H. M., & Young, M. J.. (2004). Pre-equating: a simulation study based on a large scale assessment model. Journal of Applied Measurement, 5, 301-18.

Sympson, J. B., Weiss, D. J., & Ree, M. J.. (1982). Predictive validity of conventional and adaptive tests in an Air Force training environment (Report AFHRL-TR-81-40). Brooks Air Force Base TX: Air Force Human Resources Laboratory, Manpower and Personnel Division.

Sympson, J. B., Weiss, D. J., & Ree, M. J.. (1984). Predictive validity of computerized adaptive testing in a military training environment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.

Hardwicke, S., & White, K. E.. (1983). Predictive utility evaluation of adaptive testing: Results of the Navy research. Falls Church VA: The Rehab Group Inc.

van der Linden, W. J. (2009). Predictive Control of Speededness in Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 25-41. doi:10.1177/0146621607314042

Kirisci, L., & Hsu, T. - C.. (1988). A predictive analysis approach to adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.

Brooks, S., & Hartz, M. A.. (1978). Predictive ability of a branching test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38, 415-419.

Chen, S. - Y., & Doong, H.. (2003). Predicting item exposure parameters in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.

Chen, S. - Y., & Doong, S. H.. (2008). Predicting item exposure parameters in computerized adaptive testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 61, 75-91. presented at the May.

Wang, S., & Wang, T.. (1999). Precision of Warm's weighted likelihood estimation of ability for a polytomous model in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Montreal.

Wang, S.,, & Wang, T.. (2001). Precision of Warm’s weighted likelihood estimation of ability for a polytomous model in CAT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25, 317-331.

Wang, T. (1995). The precision of ability estimation methods in computerized adaptive testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa, Iowa City (UM No. 9945102).

Wang, T., & Vispoel, W. P.. (1995). Precision of ability estimation methods in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Minneapolis.

Wang, S. (1999). The precision of ability estimation methods for computerized adaptive testing using the generalized partial credit model. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.

Wainer, H.,. (1995). Precision and differential item functioning on a testlet-based test: The 1991 Law School Admissions Test as an example. Applied Measurement in Education, 8, 157-187.

Thompson, N. A. (2007). A practitioner's guide to variable-length computerized classification testing. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation. presented at the 7/1/2009.

Thompson, N. A. (2007). A Practitioner’s Guide for Variable-length Computerized Classification Testing. Practical Assessment Research and Evaluation, 12(1), 1-13.

Meng, H., Steinkamp, S., Jones, P., & Matthews-Lopez, J.. (2011). Practitioner’s Approach to Identify Item Drift in CAT. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.

Lord, F. M. (1974). Practical methods for redesigning a homogeneous test, also for designing a multilevel test (RB-74-30). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Holman, R., Glas, C. A., Lindeboom, R., Zwinderman, A. H., & de Haan, R. J.. (2004). Practical methods for dealing with 'not applicable' item responses in the AMC Linear Disability Score project. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. presented at the Jun 16.

Sireci, S. G., & Clauser, B. E.. (2001). Practical issues in setting standards on computerized adaptive tests. In Setting performance standards: Concepts, methods, and perspectives (pp. 355-369). Mahwah, N.J. USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Mills, C. N., & Stocking, M. L.. (1995). Practical issues in large-scale high-stakes computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 95-23). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Mills, C. N.,, & Stocking, M. L.. (1996). Practical issues in large-scale computerized adaptive testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 9, 287-304.

Wise, S. L., & Kingsbury, G. G.. (2000). Practical issues in developing and maintaining a computerized adaptive testing program. Psicologica, 21, 135-155.