Export 2294 results:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
E
PDF icon v16n1p033.pdf (584.06 KB)
Ito, K., & Sykes, R. C.. (1994). The effect of restricting ability distributions in the estimation of item difficulties: Implications for a CAT implementation. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans.
Chen, S., Hou, L., Fitzpatrick, S. J., & Dodd, B. G.. (1995). The effect of population distribution and methods of theta estimation on CAT using the rating scale model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco.
Abdel-Fattah, A. A., & Lau, C. - M. A.. (1995). The effect of model misspecification on classification decisions made using a computerized test: UIRT versus MIRT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Minneapolis MN.
PDF icon v14n4p355.pdf (885.93 KB)
Kalohn, J. C., & Spray, J. A.. (1998). Effect of item selection on item exposure rates within a computerized classification test. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego CA.
Li, Y. H., & Schafer, W. D.. (2003). The effect of item selection method on the variability of CAT’s ability estimates when item parameters are contaminated with measurement errors. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
PDF icon li03-03.pdf (274.97 KB)
Reckase, M. D. (1976). The effect of item pool characteristics on the operation of a tailored testing procedure. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Murray Hill NJ.
Spray, J. A., & Reckase, M. D.. (1987). The effect of item parameter estimation error on decisions made using the sequential probability ratio test (No. Research Report 87-1). ACT Research Report Series. Iowa City, IA. USA: DTIC Document.
Reckase, M. D. (1975). The effect of item choice on ability estimation when using a simple logistic tailored testing model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Washington, D.C.
Gershon, R. C. (1996). The effect of individual differences variables on the assessment of ability for Computerized Adaptive Testing. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 57, 4085.
PDF icon Colvin FINAL.pdf (630.27 KB)
PDF icon br03-01.pdf (87.76 KB)
Guyer, R. D. (2008). Effect of early misfit in computerized adaptive testing on the recovery of theta. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis MN.
PDF icon gu08001.pdf (1003.26 KB)
Guyer, R. D., & Weiss, D. J.. (2009). Effect of early misfit in computerized adaptive testing on the recovery of theta. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat09guyer.pdf (211.25 KB)
Abdel-Fattah, A. A., Lau, C. A., & Spray, J. A.. (1996). Effect of altering passing score in CAT when unidimensionality is violated. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. presented at the April, New York NY.
Fan, M., & Hsu, Y.. (1995). The effect of ability estimation for polytomous CAT in different item selection procedures. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Minneapolis MN.
McBride, J. R. (1994). Early psychometric research in the CAT-ASVAB Project. In Paper presented at the 102nd Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association. Los Angeles. CA.
D
Berg, S. R. (1996). Dynamic scaling: An ipsative procedure using techniques from computer adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 56, 5824.
PDF icon wa99-04.pdf (74.49 KB)
Kang, H. - A., Zhang, S., & Chang, H. - H.. (2017). Dual-Objective Item Selection Criteria in Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 54, 165–183. doi:10.1111/jedm.12139
Gershon, R. C., & Bergstrom, B.. (1995). Does cheating on CAT pay: Not. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco.
Johnson, S. H. (1996). Dispelling myths about the new NCLEX exam. Recruitment, Retention, and Restructuring Report, 9, 6-7. presented at the Jan-Feb.
Novick, M. R. (1980). Discussion: Session 3. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1979 Item Response Theory and Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 140-143). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laborat.
PDF icon no80-01.pdf (362.46 KB)
Waters, B. K. (1980). Discussion: Session 1. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1979 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 51-55). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
PDF icon wa80-01.pdf (327.07 KB)
Reckase, M. D. (1982). Discussion: Adaptive and sequential testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 1982 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 290-294). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon re82-01.pdf (287.3 KB)
Bock, R. D. (1975). Discussion. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Computerized adaptive trait measurement: Problems and Prospects (Research Report 75-5), pp. 46-49. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon bo75-01.pdf (413.98 KB)
Green, B. F. (1976). Discussion. In . C. K. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing (pp. pp. 118-119). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
PDF icon gr75-01.pdf (346.01 KB)
Linn, R. L. (1975). Discussion. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Computerized adaptive trait measurement: Problems and Prospects (Research Report 75-5), pp. 44-46. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon li75-01.pdf (413.98 KB)
Lord, F. M. (1976). Discussion. In . C. K. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing (pp. 113-117). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
PDF icon lo75-03.pdf (317.31 KB)
Belov, D. I., & Armstrong, R. D.. (2009). Direct and Inverse Problems of Item Pool Design for Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 533-547. doi:10.1177/0013164409332224
Zwick, R. (1992). Differential item functioning analysis for computer-adaptive tests and other IRT-scored measures. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Military Testing Association. San Diego CA.
Wang, J., Weiss, D. J., & Wang, C.. (2017). DIF-CAT: Doubly Adaptive CAT Using Subgroup Information to Improve Measurement Precision. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Gu4FR06qM5EZNp_Ns0Kt3HzBqWAv3LPy
Kubinger, K. D. (1989). Die Optimierung der Mebgenauikeit beim branched adaptiven Testen [Optimization of measurement precision for branched-adaptive testing. In . K. D. Kubinger (Ed.), Moderne Testtheorie Ein Abrib samt neusten Beitrgen [Modern test theory Overview and new issues] (pp. 187-218). Weinhem, Germany: Beltz.
Xiao, B. (1990). Dichotomous search strategies for computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.

Pages