A global information approach to computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 20, 213-229.
. (1996). A comparative study of item exposure control methods in computerized adaptive testing. Research Report Series 98-3, Iowa City: American College Testing.
. (1998). Patient-reported outcomes measurement and management with innovative methodologies and technologies. Quality of Life Research, 16 Suppl 1, 157-66.
. (2007). Assessing CAT security breaches by the item pooling index. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
. (2003). Inter-subtest branching in computerized adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 140-141.
. (1991). a-stratified multistage computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 211–222.
. (1999). . (2000).
Building a statistical foundation for computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Banff, Alberta, Canada.
. (1996). Optimal stratification of item pools in α-stratified computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 262-274.
. (2003). A Global Information Approach to Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 20(3), 213-229.
. (1996). v20n3p213.pdf (1.91 MB)Recursive maximum likelihood estimation, sequential design, and computerized adaptive testing. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1996). A comparative study of item exposure control methods in computerized adaptive testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa , Iowa City IA.
. (1998). Computerized Adaptive Testing for Cognitive Diagnosis in Classroom: A Nonparametric Approach. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.
. (2017). Identify the lower bounds for item sharing and item pooling in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
. (2002). Sequential estimation in variable length computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 121, 249-264.
. (2004). A model for score maximization within a computerized adaptive testing environment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the NMCE. New York NY.
. (1996). a-Stratified multistage computerized adaptive testing with b blocking. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25, 333-341.
. (2001). Item Parameter Drifting and Online Calibration. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.
. (2017). Effects of changes in the examinees’ ability distribution on the exposure control methods in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle WA.
. (2001). ch01-02.pdf (694.64 KB)Implementing content constraints in a-stratified adaptive testing using a shadow test approach (Research Report 01-001). University of Twente, Department of Educational Measurement and Data Analysis.
. (2001). Rescuing CAT by fixing the problems. In National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
. (2005). Understanding computerized adaptive testing: From Robbins-Munro to Lord and beyond. In . D. Kaplan (Ed.), The Sage handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences (pp. 117-133). New York: Sage.
. (2004). . (2002).
Effects of practical constraints on item selection rules at the early stages of computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 41, 149-174.
. (2004). A comparison of item selection rules at the early stages of computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 241-255.
. (2000). A Dynamic Stratification Method for Improving Trait Estimation in Computerized Adaptive Testing Under Item Exposure Control. Applied Psychological Measurement, 44, 182-196. doi:10.1177/0146621619843820
. (2020). . (1999).
Controlling item exposure and test overlap on the fly in computerized adaptive testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 61, 471-92. presented at the Nov.
. (2008). ffects of practical constraints on item selection rules at the early stages of computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 41, 149-174.
. (2004). An Imputation Approach to Handling Incomplete Computerized Tests. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1vznZeO3nsZZK0k6_oyw5c9ZTP8uyGnXh
. (2017). The relationship between item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40, 129-145.
. (2003). The effect of population distribution and methods of theta estimation on computerized adaptive testing (CAT) using the rating scale model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 422-439.
. (1997). Predicting item exposure parameters in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.
. (2003). ch03-01.pdf (238.7 KB)Online Item Calibration for Q-Matrix in CD-CAT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 39, 5-15. doi:10.1177/0146621613513065
. (2015). Exploring the relationship between item exposure rate and test overlap rate in computerized adaptive testing. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Montreal, Canada.
. (1999). Controlling item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 204-217.
. (2005). General Test Overlap Control: Improved Algorithm for CAT and CCT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38, 229-244. doi:10.1177/0146621613513494
. (2014). The effect of population distribution and method of theta estimation on computerized adaptive testing (CAT) using the rating scale model. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 57, 422-439.
. (1997). A comparison of maximum likelihood estimation and expected a posteriori estimation in CAT using the partial credit model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 569-595.
. (1998). The effect of population distribution and methods of theta estimation on CAT using the rating scale model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco.
. (1995). Predicting item exposure parameters in computerized adaptive testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 61, 75-91. presented at the May.
. (2008). Controlling item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29(2), 204–217.
. (2005). Controlling Item Exposure and Test Overlap in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 204-217. doi:10.1177/0146621604271495
. (2005). Item Selection and Exposure Control Methods for Computerized Adaptive Testing with Multidimensional Ranking Items. Journal of Educational Measurement, 57, 343-369. doi:10.1111/jedm.12252
. (2020). A comparison of maximum likelihood estimation and expected a posteriori estimation in computerized adaptive testing using the generalized partial credit model. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 58, 453.
. (1997). The relationship between item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40, 129-145.
. (2003). A Procedure for Controlling General Test Overlap in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34, 393-409. doi:10.1177/0146621610367788
. (2010). A new approach to simulation studies in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle WA.
. (2001). ch01-01.pdf (250.96 KB)Comparison of adaptive Bayesian estimation and weighted Bayesian estimation in multidimensional computerized adaptive testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
. (2009). cat09chen.pdf (307.42 KB)A comparison of item selection rules at the early stages of computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 241-255.
. (2000). The relationship between item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40, 129-145.
. (2003). The comparison of maximum likelihood estimation and expected a posteriori in CAT using the graded response model. Journal of Elementary Education, 19, 339-371.
. (2007). Constraints-weighted information method for item selection of severely constrained computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco.
. (2006). a-Stratified Computerized Adaptive Testing in the Presence of Calibration Error. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 75, 260-283. doi:10.1177/0013164414530719
. (2015). The maximum priority index method for severely constrained item selection in computerized adaptive testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 62, 369-83. presented at the May.
. (2009). The modified maximum global discrimination index method for cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
. (2007). cat07cheng.pdf (171.07 KB)Computerized adaptive testing using the nearest-neighbors criterion. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 204-216.
. (2003). . (2009).
Computerized adaptive testing for cognitive diagnosis. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
. (2009). cat09cheng.pdf (313.85 KB)Computerized adaptive testing using the nearest-neighbors criterion. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 204-216.
. (2003).