Luo, X., & Kim, D.. (2018). A Top-Down Approach to Designing the Computerized Adaptive Multistage Test. Journal of Educational Measurement, 55, 243-263. doi:10.1111/jedm.12174

Hol, A. M., Vorst, H. C. M., & Mellenbergh, G. J.. (2001). Toepassing van een computergestuurde adaptieve testprocedure op persoonlijkheidsdata [Application of a computerised adaptive test procedure on personality data]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie en haar Grensgebieden, 56, 119-133.

Chang, H. - H., & Ying, Z.. (2008). To Weight Or Not To Weight? Balancing Influence Of Initial Items In Adaptive Testing. Psychometrica, 73(3), 441-450. doi:10.1007/S11336-007-9047-7

Chang, H. - H., & Ying, Z.. (2002). To weight or not to weight – balancing influence of initial and later items in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.

Deng, H., & Ansley, T.. (2003). To stratify or not: An investigation of CAT item selection procedures under practical constraints. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Rammsayer, T., & Brandler, S.. (2003). Timing behavior in computerized adaptive testing: Response times for correct and incorrect answers are not related to general fluid intelligence/Zum Zeitverhalten beim computergestützten adaptiveb Testen: Antwortlatenzen bei richtigen und falschen Lösun. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 24, 57-63.

Finkelman, M., & Wang, C.. (2019). Time-Efficient Adaptive Measurement of Change. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 7(2), 15-34. doi:10.7333/1909-0702015

Eggen, T. (2010). Three-Category Adaptive Classification Testing. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 373-387). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8

Bennett, R. E., Morley, M., & Quardt, D.. (1998). Three response types for broadening the conception of mathematical problem solving in computerized-adaptive tests (Research Report 98-45). Princeton NJ : Educational Testing Service.

Stocking, M. L. (1994). Three practical issues for modern adaptive testing item pools (Research Report 94-5),. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Wise, S. L.. (2020). Three Measures of Test Adaptation Based on Optimal Test Information. Journal of Computerized Adaotive Testing, 8(1), 1-19. doi:10.7333/2002-0801001

Kingsbury, G. G., & Wise, S. L.. (2020). Three Measures of Test Adaptation Based on Optimal Test Information. Journal of Computerized Adaotive Testing, 8(1), 1-19. doi:10.7333/2002-0801001

Kolen, M. J. (1999). Threats to score comparability with applications to performance assessments and computerized adaptive tests. Educational Assessment, 6, 73-96.

Kolen, M. J. (1999). Threats to score comparability with applications to performance assessments and computerized adaptive tests. Educational Assessment, 6, 73-96.

Cliff, N. A. (1977). A theory of consistency ordering generalizable to tailored testing. Psychometrika, 375-399.

Lord, F. M. (1971). A theoretical study of two-stage testing. Psychometrika, 36, 227-242.

Lord, F. M. (1971). A theoretical study of the measurement effectiveness of flexilevel tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 31, 805-813.

Hemker, B. T., Sijtsma, K., & Molenaar, I. W.. (1995). Theoretical results and item selection from multidimensional item bank in the Mokken IRT model for polytomous items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19, 337–352.

Steffen, M., & Way, W. D.. (1999). Test-taking strategies in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Steffen, M. (1999). Test-taking strategies. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Chang, H. - H., & Ying, Z.. (2003). Test-score comparability, ability estimation, and item-exposure control in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Olea, J., Abad, F. J., & Barrada, J. R.. (2010). Tests informatizados y otros nuevos tipos de tests [Computerized and other new types of tests]. Papeles del Psicólogo, 31, 94-107.

Olea, J., Ponsoda, V., & Prieto, G., E.. (1999). Tests informatizados: Fundamentos y aplicaciones (Computerized testing: Fundamentals and applications. Madrid: Pirmide.

Olea, J., Ponsoda, V., & Wise, S. L.. (1995). Tests adaptivos y autoadaptados informatizados: Effects en la ansiedad y en la pecision de las estimaciones [SATs and CATS: Effects on enxiety and estimate precision]. In Paper presented at the Fourth Symposium de Metodologia de las Ciencies del Comportamiento. Murcia, Spain.

Olea, J., & Ponsoda, V.. (2003). Tests adaptativos informatizados (Computerized adaptive testing). Madrid: UNED Ediciones.

Lunz, M. E., Bergstrom, B. A., & Gershon, R. C.. (1990). Test-retest consistency of computer adaptive tests. annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. presented at the 04/1990, Boston, MA USA.

Pitoniak, M. J. (2000). Testlet-based Designs for Computer-Based Testing in a Certification and Licensure Setting. Jersey City, NJ: AICPA Technical Report.

Vos, H. J., & Glas, C. A. W.. (2000). Testlet-based adaptive mastery testing, W. In . J. van der Linden (Ed.), Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp. 289-309). Norwell MA: Kluwer.

Vos, H. J., & Glas, C. A. W.. (2010). Testlet-Based Adaptive Mastery Testing. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 387-409). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8

Wainer, H.,, Bradlow, E. T., & Du, Z.. (2000). Testlet response theory: An analog for the 3PL model useful in testlet-based adaptive testing. In . W. J. van der Linden and C. A. W. Glas (Eds.), Computerized Adaptive Testing: Theory and Practice (pp. 245-270). Norwell MA: Kluwer.

Luecht, R., Brumfield, T., & Breithaupt, K.. (2006). A testlet assembly design for the uniform CPA Examination. Applied Measurement in Education, 19, 189-202. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame1903_2

Luecht, R. M., Brumfield, T., & Breithaupt, K.. (2002). A testlet assembly design for the uniform CPA examination. In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education.. New Orleans.

Legree, P. J., Fischl, M. A., Gade, P. A., & Wilson, M.. (1998). Testing word knowledge by telephone to estimate general cognitive aptitude using an adaptive test. Intelligence, 26, 91-98.

Laufer, B., & Goldstein, Z.. (2004). Testing vocabulary knowledge: Size, strength, and computer adaptiveness. Language Learning, 54, 399-436. presented at the Sep.

McBride, J. R., Paddock, A. F., Wise, L. L., Strickland, W. J., & Waters, B. K.. (2001). Testing via the Internet: A literature review and analysis of issues for Department of Defense Internet testing of the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) in high schools (FR-01-12). Alexandria VA: Human Resources Research Organization.

Stone, C. A. (1989). Testing software review: MicroCAT Version 3. . Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 8 (3), 33-38.

Hambleton, R. K. (1974). Testing and decision-making procedures for selected individualized instruction programs. Review of Educational Research, 10, 371-400.

Wainer, H.,, & Mislevy, R. J.. (1990). Testing algorithms. In . H. Wainer (Ed.), Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (pp. 103-135). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.

Thissen, D., & Mislevy, R. J.. (1990). Testing algorithms. In . H. Wainer (Ed.), Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (pp. 103-135). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.

Laurier, M. (1999). Testing adaptatif et évaluation des processus cognitifs. In . C. Depover and B. Noël (Éds) : L’évaluation des compétences et des processus cognitifs - Modèles, pratiques et contextes. Bruxelles : De Boeck Université.

Simms, L. (2001). Testing a computerized adaptive personality inventory using simulated response data. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association. San Francisco CA.

Lord, F. M. (1976). Test theory and the public interest. Proceedings of the Educational Testing Service Invitational Conference.

Lunz, M. E., Stahl, J. A., & Bergstrom, B. A.. (1993). Test targeting and precision before and after review on computer-adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Atlanta GA.

Guo, F., Way, W. D., & Reshetar, R.. (2000). Test security and the development of computerized tests. In Paper presented at the National Council on Measurement in Education invited symposium: Maintaining test security in computerized programs–Implications for practice. New Orleans.

Kalohn, J. (2000). Test security and item exposure control for computer-based . In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Educatio. Chicago.

Barrada, J. R., Olea, J., Ponsoda, V., & Abad, F. J.. (2009). Test overlap rate and item exposure rate as indicators of test security in CATs. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Luecht, R. M., & Clauser, B. E.. (2002). Test models for complex computer-based testing. In . C. N. Mille,. M. T. Potenza, J. J. Fremer, and W. C. Ward (Eds.). Computer-based testing: Building the foundation for future assessments (pp. 67-88). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.

Luecht, R. M., & Burgin, W. L.. (2003). Test information targeting strategies for adaptive multistage testlet designs. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Stricker, L. J.,, & Bejar, I. I.. (2004). Test difficulty and stereotype threat on the GRE General Test. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(3), 563-597.

Parshall, C. G., Davey, T., & Nering, M. L.. (1998). Test development exposure control for adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego, CA.

Passos, V. L., Berger, M. P. F., & Tan, F. E.. (2007). Test design optimization in CAT early stage with the nominal response model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 31, 213-232.

Henson, R. K., & Douglas, J.. (2005). Test construction for cognitive diagnosis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 262-277.

Verschoor, A., Radtke, I., & Eggen, T.. (2011). A Test Assembly Model for MST. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.

Powell, Z. E. (1992). Test anxiety and test performance under computerized adaptive testing methods. In Richmond IN: Indiana University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 334910 and/or TM018223). Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.

Powell, Z. - H. E. (1992). Test anxiety and test performance under computerized adaptive testing methods. Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 2518.

Powers, D. E. (1999). Test anxiety and test performance: Comparing paper-based and computer-adaptive versions of the GRE General Test (Research Report 99-15). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Powers, D. E. (2001). Test anxiety and test performance: Comparing paper-based and computer-adaptive versions of the Graduate Record Examinations (GRE) General test. Journal of educational computing research, 24 (3), 249-273.

Olea, J., & Ponsoda, V.. (1996). Test adaptativos informatizados [Computerized adaptive testing]. In Psicometría. Madrid, UNED: Universitas.

Babcock, B., & Weiss, D. J.. (2009). Termination criteria in computerized adaptive tests: Variable-length CATs are not biased. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Babcock, B., & Weiss, D. J.. (2012). Termination Criteria in Computerized Adaptive Tests: Do Variable-Length CATs Provide Efficient and Effective Measurement?. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 1(1), 1-18. doi:10.7333/1212-0101001