Export 2294 results:
Filters: Filter is   [Clear All Filters]
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
C
Pine, S. M., & Weiss, D. J.. (1978). A comparison of the fairness of adaptive and conventional testing strategies (Research Report 78-1). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon pi78-01.pdf (1.91 MB)
Bill, B. C. (1984). A comparison of the maximum likelihood strategy and stradaptive test on a micro-computer. Unpublished M.S. thesis, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
Jodoin, M., Zenisky, A. L., & Hambleton, R. K.. (2002). Comparison of the psychometric properties of several computer-based test designs for credentialing exams. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
PDF icon jo02-01.pdf (280.31 KB)
Yi, Q., Hanson, B., Widiatmo, H., & Harris, D. J.. (2001). Comparison of the SPRT and CMT procedures in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle WA.
Tang, K. L. (1996). A comparison of the traditional maximum information method and the global information method in CAT item selection. In annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York, NY USA.
Ho, R., & Hsu, T. C.. (1989). A comparison of three adaptive testing strategies using MicroCAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco.
Seo, D. Gi. (2017). A Comparison of Three Empirical Reliability Estimates for Computerized Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gXgH-epPIWJiE0LxMHGiCAxZZAwy4dAH/view?usp=sharing
Costa, D. R., Karino, C. A., Moura, F. A. S., & Andrade, D. F.. (2009). A comparison of three methods of item selection for computerized adaptive testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat09costa.pdf (530.39 KB)
Way, W. D., Lewis, C., & Smith, R. L.. (1995). A comparison of two IRT-based models for computerized mastery testing when item parameter estimates are uncertain. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco.
Ben-Porath, Y. S., Waller, N. G., Slutske, W. S., & Butcher, J. N.. (1988). A comparison of two methods for the adaptive administration of the MMPI-2 content scales. In Paper presented at the 86th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association. Atlanta GA.
Tang, L., Jiang, H., & Chang, H. - H.. (1998). A comparison of two methods of controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Diego CA.
PDF icon th07-03.pdf (362.16 KB)
Bergstrom, B. A., & Lunz, M. E.. (1991). Comparisons of computer adaptive and pencil and paper tests. Chicago IL: American Society of Clinical Pathologists.
Bezruczko, N. (1999). Competency gradient for child-parent centers. Journal of Outcomes Measurement, 3, 35-52.
Sapinkopf, R. C. (1977). A computer adaptive approach to the measurement of personality variables. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, Baltimore.
Gershon, R. C. (2005). Computer adaptive testing. Journal of Applied Measurement, 6, 109-27.
Gershon, R. C. (2005). Computer adaptive testing. Journal of Applied Measurement , 6, 109-27.
Lunz, M. E., Bergstrom, B. A., & Gershon, R. C.. (1994). Computer adaptive testing. International journal of Educational Research, 6, 623-634.
Smittle, P. (1993). Computer adaptive testing: A new era. Journal of Developmental Education, 17 (1), 8-10.
Carlson, R. (1994). Computer adaptive testing: A shift in the evaluation paradigm. Educational Technology Systems, 22 (3), 213-224.
Kingsbury, G. G., & Hauser, C.. (2004). Computer adaptive testing and the No Child Left Behind Act. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Diego CA.
PDF icon ki04-01.pdf (116.03 KB)
Armstrong, R. D., & Jones, D. H.. (1998). Computer adaptive testing – Approaches for item selection and measurement. Rutgers Center for Operations Research, New Brunswick NJ.
Diones, R., & Everson, H.. (1994). Computer adaptive testing: Assessment of the future. Curriculum/Technology Quarterly, 4 (2), 1-3.
Morrison, C. A., & Nungester, R. J.. (1995). Computer adaptive testing in a medical licensure setting: A comparison of outcomes under the one- and two- parameter logistic models. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco.
Economides, A. A. (2005). Computer adaptive testing quality requirements. In . Proceedings E-Learn 2005 World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, pp. 288-295, Vancouver, Canada, AACE, October 2005.
Tonidandel, S. (2002). Computer adaptive testing: The impact of test characteristics on perceived performance and test takers' reactions. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 62, 3410.
Bergstrom, B. (1992). Computer adaptive versus paper-and-pencil tests. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.
Gierl, M. J., & Zhou, J.. (2008). Computer Adaptive-Attribute Testing A New Approach to Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment. Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 216(1), 29-39. doi:10.1027/0044-3409.216.1.29
PDF icon Computer Adaptive-Attribute Testing.pdf (444.58 KB)
Levitt, H. (1980). Computer applications in audiology and rehabilitation of the hearing impaired. Journal of Communication Disorders, 13, 471-481.
McKinley, R. L.,, & Reckase, M. D.. (1980). Computer applications to ability testing. Association for Educational Data Systems Journal, 13, 193-203.
Case, S. M., & Luecht, R. M.. (1997). Computer assembly of tests so that content reigns supreme. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
Ferguson, R. L. (1970). Computer assistance for individualizing measurement. Computers and Automation, March 1970, 19.
Ferguson, R. L. (1970). Computer assistance for individualizing measurement. Pittsburgh PA: University of Pittsburgh, Learning Research and Development Center.
Ferguson, R. L. (1971). Computer assistance for individualizing measurement. Pittsburgh PA: University of Pittsburgh R and D Center.
Linacre, J. M. (1987). A computer program for adaptive testing by microcomputer (MESA Memorandum No 40). Chicago: University of Chicago. (ERIC ED 280 895.).
De Witt, J. J., & Weiss, D. J.. (1974). A computer software system for adaptive ability measurement (Research Report 74-1). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
PDF icon de74-1.pdf (2.67 MB)
Rudner, L. M. (1990). Computer testing: Pragmatic issues and research needs. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 9 (2), 19-20.
Shermis, M. D. (1986). A computer-adaptive placement test for college mathematics. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.
Luecht, R. M., & Nungester, R. J.. (2000). Computer-adaptive sequential testing. In . W. J. van der Linden (Ed.), Computerized Adaptive Testing: Theory and Practice (pp. 289-209). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Macdonald, P. L. (2003). Computer-adaptive test for measuring personality factors using item response theory. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 64, 999.
Luecht, R. M. (2004). Computer-adaptive testing. In . B. Everett, and D. Howell (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science. New York: Wiley.
Linacre, J. M. (2000). Computer-adaptive testing: A methodology whose time has come. In U. Kang, Jean, E., & Linacre, J. M., Development of Computerised Middle School Achievement Tests (Vol. 69). Chicago, IL. USA: MESA.

Pages