Hsu, C. - L., Wang, W. - C., & Chen, S. Y.. (2017). Using Bayesian Decision Theory in Cognitive Diagnosis Computerized Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.

Lewis, C., & Sheehan, K.. (1990). Using Bayesian Decision Theory to Design a Computerized Mastery Test. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14(4), 367-386.

Lewis, C.,, & Sheehan, K.. (1990). Using Bayesian decision theory to design a computerized mastery test. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14, 367-386.

Vos, H. J. (1999). Using Bayesian decision theory to design a computerized mastery test. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 24(3), 271–292.

Millan, E., Trella, M., Perez-de-la-Cruz, J. - L., & Conejo, R.. (2000). Using Bayesian Networks in Computerized Adaptive Tests. In . M. Ortega and J. Bravo (Eds.),Computers and Education in the 21st Century. Kluwer, pp. 217228.

Shen, Y., Bao, Y., Wang, S., & Bradshaw, L.. (2017). Using Computerized Adaptive Testing to Detect Students’ Misconceptions: Exploration of Item Selection. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.

Gibbons, R. D., Weiss, D. J., Kupfer, D. J., Frank, E., Fagiolini, A., Grochocinski, V. J., et al.. (2008). Using computerized adaptive testing to reduce the burden of mental health assessment. Psychiatric Services, 59, 361-8. presented at the Apr.

Cory, C. H. (1976). Using computerized tests to add new dimensions to the measurement of abilities which are important for on-job performance: An exploratory study. In . C. K. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing (pp. 64-74). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Abdullah, S. C., & Cooley, R. E.. (2000). Using constraints to develop and deliver adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the Computer-Assisted Testing Conference.

Vie, J. - J. (2017). Using Determinantal Point Processes for Multistage Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1GkJkKTEFWK3srDX8TL4ra_Xbsliemu1R

Flynn, K. E., Dombeck, C. B., DeWitt, E. M., Schulman, K. A., & Weinfurt, K. P.. (2008). Using item banks to construct measures of patient reported outcomes in clinical trials: investigator perceptions. Clinical Trials, 5, 575-86.

Betz, N. E., & Turner, B. M.. (2011). Using Item Response Theory and Adaptive Testing in Online Career Assessment. Journal of Career Assessment, 19, 274-286. doi:10.1177/1069072710395534

Vispoel, W. P., Clough, S. J., & Bleiler, T.. (2002). Using judgments of item difficulty to change answers on computerized adaptive vocabulary tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.

Thompson, D. L. (1986). Using microcomputer-based assessment in career counseling. Journal of Employment Counseling, 23, 50-56.

Ward, W. C. (1984). Using microcomputers to administer tests. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 3(2), 16-20.

Millman, J. (1984). Using microcomputers to administer tests: An alternate point of view. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 3(2), 20-21.

Han, N. (2003). Using moving averages to assess test and item security in computer-based testing (Center for Educational Assessment Research Report No 468). Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts, School of Education.

Yao, L., Pommerich, M., & Segall, D. O.. (2014). Using Multidimensional CAT to Administer a Short, Yet Precise, Screening Test. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38, 614-631. doi:10.1177/0146621614541514

Wei, H., & Lin, J.. (2015). Using Out-of-Level Items in Computerized Adaptive Testing. International Journal of Testing, 15(1). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2014.979492

Meijer, R. R. (2004). Using patterns of summed scores in paper-and-pencil tests and computer-adaptive tests to detect misfitting item score patterns. Journal of Educational Measurement, 41, 119-136.

H., Q., Staniewska, D., Reckase, M., & Woo, A.. (2016). Using Response Time to Detect Item Preknowledge in Computer?Based Licensure Examinations. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice., 35(1). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/emip.12102

van der Linden, W. J. (2008). Using response times for item selection in adaptive testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 33, 5–20.

van der Linden, W. J., & van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A.. (2001). Using response times to detect aberrant behavior in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.

van der Linden, W. J., & van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A.. (2000). Using response times to detect aberrant behavior in computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 00-09). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.

van der Linden, W. J., & van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A.. (2003). Using response times to detect aberrant responses in computerized adaptive testing. Psychometrika, 68, 251-265.

van der Linden, W. J., Scrams, D. J., & Schnipke, D. L.. (1999). Using response-time constraints to control for differential speededness in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 195-210.

van der Linden, W. J., Scrams, D. J., & Schnipke, D. L.. (1998). Using response-time constraints to control for differential speededness in adaptive testing (Research Report 98-06). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.

Huitzing, H. A. (2004). Using Set Covering with Item Sampling to Analyze the Infeasibility of Linear Programming Test Assembly Models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28, 355-375. doi:10.1177/0146621604266152

Hsu, T. C., & Tseng, F. L.. (1995). Using simulation to select an adaptive testing strategy: An item bank evaluation program. Unpublished manuscript, University of Pittsburgh.

Finkelman, M. D. (2008). On using stochastic curtailment to shorten the SPRT in sequential mastery testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 33, 442.

Williamson, D. M., & Bejar, I. I.. (2002). Using testlet response theory to evaluate the equivalence of automatically generated multiple-choice items. In Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Eucation. New Orleans LA.

Lau, C. A., Abdel-Fattah, A. A., & Spray, J. A.. (1996). Using unidimensional IRT models for dichotomous classification via CAT with multidimensional data. In Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Boston MA.

Raîche, G.. (1994). Utilisation de la simulation en tant que méthodologie de recherche [Simulation methodology in research]. In . Association pour la recherche au collégial (Ed.) : L'en-quête de la créativité [In quest of creativity]. Proceeding of the 6th Congress of the ARC. Montréal: Association pour la recherche au collégial (ARC).

Wise, S. L. (2014). The Utility of Adaptive Testing in Addressing the Problem of Unmotivated Examinees. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 2(1), 1-17. doi:10.7333/1401-02010001

Fan, M., & Hsu, Y.. (1996). Utility of Fisher information, global information and different starting abilities in mini CAT. In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York NY.

De Beer, M. (2002). Utility of Learning Potential Computerised Adaptive Test (LPCAT) scores in predicting academic performance of bridging students: A comparison with other predictors. In Paper presented at the 5th Annual Society for Industrial and Organisational Psychology Congress. Pretoria, South Africa.

Green, B. F., & Thomas, T. J.. (1990). Utility of predicting starting abilities in sequential computer-based adaptive tests (Research Report 90-1). Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins University, Department of Psychology.

Velozo, C. A., Wang, Y., Lehman, L. A., & Wang, J. H.. (2008). Utilizing Rasch measurement models to develop a computer adaptive self-report of walking, climbing, and running. Disability and Rehabilitation, 30, 458-467.

Sie, H., Finkelman, M. D., Riley, B., & Smits, N.. (2015). Utilizing Response Times in Computerized Classification Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 39, 389-405. doi:10.1177/0146621615569504

Thompson, N. A. (2009). Utilizing the generalized likelihood ratio as a termination criterion. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Becker, J., Walter, O. B., Fliege, H., Bjorner, J. B., Kocalevent, R. D., Schmid, G., et al.. (2004). Validating the German computerized adaptive test for anxiety on healthy sample (A-CAT). Quality of Life Research, 13, 1515.

Barthel, D., Otto, C., Nolte, S., Meyrose, A. - K., Fischer, F., Devine, J., et al.. (2017). The validation of a computer-adaptive test (CAT) for assessing health-related quality of life in children and adolescents in a clinical sample: study design, methods and first results of the Kids-CAT study. Quality of Life Research, 26, 1105–1117. presented at the May. doi:10.1007/s11136-016-1437-9

Rebollo, P., Castejon, I., Cuervo, J., Villa, G., Garcia-Cueto, E., Diaz-Cuervo, H., et al.. (2010). Validation of a computer-adaptive test to evaluate generic health-related quality of life. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes.

Simms, L. J.,, & Clark, L. A.. (2005). Validation of a computerized adaptive testing version of the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality (SNAP). Psychological Assessment, 17(1), 28-43.

Simms, L. J., & Clark, L. J.. (2005). Validation of a computerized adaptive version of the Schedule of Non-Adaptive and Adaptive Personality (SNAP). Psychological Assessment, 17, 28-43.

Nandakumar, R., & Roussos, L. A.. (1997). Validation of CATSIB To investigate DIF of CAT data. In annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago, IL. USA.

Segall, D. O., Moreno, K. E., Kieckhaefer, W. F., Vicino, F. L., & McBride, J. R.. (1997). Validation of the experimental CAT-ASVAB system. In . W. A. Sands, B. K. Waters, and J. R. McBride (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Forbey, J. D., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Gartland, D.. (2009). Validation of the MMPI-2 computerized adaptive version (MMPI-2-CA) in a correctional intake facility. Psychological Services, 6, 279-292.

Frey, A. (2006). Validitätssteigerungen durch adaptives Testen [Increasing validity by adaptive testing].

Steinberg, L., Thissen, D., & Wainer, H.,. (1990). Validity. In . H. Wainer (Ed.), Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (pp. 187-231). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.

Olsen, J. B., & Bunderson, C. V.. (2007). Validity and decision issues in selecting a CAT measurement model. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Weiss, D. J.. (1981). A validity comparison of adaptive and conventional strategies for mastery testing (Research Report 81-3). Minneapolis, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Huff, K. L., & Sireci, S. G.. (2001). Validity issues in computer-based testing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 20(3), 16-25.

Sympson, J. B., & Moreno, K. E.. (1985). Validity of adaptive testing: A summary of research results. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association.

Jensema, C. J. (1974). The validity of Bayesian tailored testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34, 757-756.

Lunz, M. E., & Deville, C. W.. (1996). Validity of item selection: A comparison of automated computerized adaptive and manual paper and pencil examinations. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 8, 152-157.

Samejima, F. (1990). Validity study in multidimensional latent space and efficient computerized adaptive testing (Final Report R01-1069-11-004-91). Knoxville TN: University of Tennessee, Department of Psychology.

Hornke, L. F., & Sauter, M. B.. (1980). A validity study of an adaptive test of reading comprehension. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1979 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 57-67). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Moreno, K. E., Segall, D. O., & Kieckhaefer, W. F.. (1985). A validity study of the computerized adaptive testing version of the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Military Testing Association.

Hsu, C. - L., Wang, W. - C., & Chen, S. - Y.. (2013). Variable-Length Computerized Adaptive Testing Based on Cognitive Diagnosis Models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 563-582. doi:10.1177/0146621613488642