Export 2294 results:
Filters: Filter is   [Clear All Filters]
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
D
Laurier, M. (1999). The development of an adaptive test for placement in french. Studies in language testing, 10, 122-135.
Hart, D. L., & Wright, B. D.. (2002). Development of an index of physical functional health status in rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 83, 655-65. presented at the May.
Park, R., Kim, J., Chung, H., & Dodd, B. G.. (2017). The Development of MST Test Information for the Prediction of Test Performances. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 77, 570-586. doi:10.1177/0013164416662960
McBride, J. R. (2002). The Development of STAR Early Literacy. In Presentation to the 32rd Annual National Conference on Large-Scale Assessment.. Desert Springs CA.
Giouroglou, H., & Economides, A. A.. (2005). The development of the adaptive item language assessment (AILA) for mixed-ability students. In . Proceedings E-Learn 2005 World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, 643-650, Vancouver, Canada, AACE, October 2005.
Segall, D. O., & Moreno, K. E.. (1999). Development of the computerized adaptive testing version of the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery. In . F. Drasgow and J. Olson-Buchanan (Eds.). Innovations in computerized assessment. Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum.
PDF icon debe03-02.pdf (562.16 KB)
PDF icon si02-01.pdf (1.06 MB)
Simms, L. J. (2003). Development, reliability, and validity of a computerized adaptive version of the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 63, 3485.
Xiao, B. (1990). Dichotomous search strategies for computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
Kubinger, K. D. (1989). Die Optimierung der Mebgenauikeit beim branched adaptiven Testen [Optimization of measurement precision for branched-adaptive testing. In . K. D. Kubinger (Ed.), Moderne Testtheorie Ein Abrib samt neusten Beitrgen [Modern test theory Overview and new issues] (pp. 187-218). Weinhem, Germany: Beltz.
Wang, J., Weiss, D. J., & Wang, C.. (2017). DIF-CAT: Doubly Adaptive CAT Using Subgroup Information to Improve Measurement Precision. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Gu4FR06qM5EZNp_Ns0Kt3HzBqWAv3LPy
Zwick, R. (1992). Differential item functioning analysis for computer-adaptive tests and other IRT-scored measures. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Military Testing Association. San Diego CA.
Belov, D. I., & Armstrong, R. D.. (2009). Direct and Inverse Problems of Item Pool Design for Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 533-547. doi:10.1177/0013164409332224
Bock, R. D. (1975). Discussion. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Computerized adaptive trait measurement: Problems and Prospects (Research Report 75-5), pp. 46-49. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon bo75-01.pdf (413.98 KB)
Green, B. F. (1976). Discussion. In . C. K. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing (pp. pp. 118-119). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
PDF icon gr75-01.pdf (346.01 KB)
Linn, R. L. (1975). Discussion. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Computerized adaptive trait measurement: Problems and Prospects (Research Report 75-5), pp. 44-46. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon li75-01.pdf (413.98 KB)
Lord, F. M. (1976). Discussion. In . C. K. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing (pp. 113-117). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
PDF icon lo75-03.pdf (317.31 KB)
Reckase, M. D. (1982). Discussion: Adaptive and sequential testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 1982 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 290-294). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon re82-01.pdf (287.3 KB)
Waters, B. K. (1980). Discussion: Session 1. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1979 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 51-55). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
PDF icon wa80-01.pdf (327.07 KB)
Novick, M. R. (1980). Discussion: Session 3. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1979 Item Response Theory and Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 140-143). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laborat.
PDF icon no80-01.pdf (362.46 KB)
Johnson, S. H. (1996). Dispelling myths about the new NCLEX exam. Recruitment, Retention, and Restructuring Report, 9, 6-7. presented at the Jan-Feb.
Gershon, R. C., & Bergstrom, B.. (1995). Does cheating on CAT pay: Not. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco.
Kang, H. - A., Zhang, S., & Chang, H. - H.. (2017). Dual-Objective Item Selection Criteria in Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 54, 165–183. doi:10.1111/jedm.12139
PDF icon wa99-04.pdf (74.49 KB)
Berg, S. R. (1996). Dynamic scaling: An ipsative procedure using techniques from computer adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 56, 5824.
E
McBride, J. R. (1994). Early psychometric research in the CAT-ASVAB Project. In Paper presented at the 102nd Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association. Los Angeles. CA.
Fan, M., & Hsu, Y.. (1995). The effect of ability estimation for polytomous CAT in different item selection procedures. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Minneapolis MN.
Abdel-Fattah, A. A., Lau, C. A., & Spray, J. A.. (1996). Effect of altering passing score in CAT when unidimensionality is violated. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. presented at the April, New York NY.
Guyer, R. D. (2008). Effect of early misfit in computerized adaptive testing on the recovery of theta. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis MN.
PDF icon gu08001.pdf (1003.26 KB)
Guyer, R. D., & Weiss, D. J.. (2009). Effect of early misfit in computerized adaptive testing on the recovery of theta. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat09guyer.pdf (211.25 KB)
PDF icon br03-01.pdf (87.76 KB)
PDF icon Colvin FINAL.pdf (630.27 KB)
Gershon, R. C. (1996). The effect of individual differences variables on the assessment of ability for Computerized Adaptive Testing. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 57, 4085.
Reckase, M. D. (1975). The effect of item choice on ability estimation when using a simple logistic tailored testing model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Washington, D.C.
Spray, J. A., & Reckase, M. D.. (1987). The effect of item parameter estimation error on decisions made using the sequential probability ratio test (No. Research Report 87-1). ACT Research Report Series. Iowa City, IA. USA: DTIC Document.
Reckase, M. D. (1976). The effect of item pool characteristics on the operation of a tailored testing procedure. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Murray Hill NJ.

Pages