Export 116 results:
Filters: First Letter Of Last Name is K  [Clear All Filters]
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
K
Kunce, C. S. (1979). The Rasch model in computerized personality testing. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Missouri, Columbia, 1979.
Kubinger, K. D. (1989). Die Optimierung der Mebgenauikeit beim branched adaptiven Testen [Optimization of measurement precision for branched-adaptive testing. In . K. D. Kubinger (Ed.), Moderne Testtheorie Ein Abrib samt neusten Beitrgen [Modern test theory Overview and new issues] (pp. 187-218). Weinhem, Germany: Beltz.
Kubinger, K. D. (1988). On a Rasch-model-based test for non-computerized adaptive testing. In . Langeheine, R. and Rost, J. (Ed.), Latent trait and latent class models. New York: Plenum Press.
Krishnan, E. (2011). High-throughput Health Status Measurement using CAT in the Era of Personal Genomics: Opportunities and Challenges. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon IACAT 2011 Health Care Krishnan.pdf (2.84 MB)
van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A., & Meijer, R. R.. (2001). CUSUM-based person-fit statistics for adaptive testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 26, 199-218.
van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A., & Meijer, R. R.. (2000). Detecting person misfit in adaptive testing using statistical process control techniques. In . W. J. van der Linden, and C. A. W. Glas (Editors). Computerized Adaptive Testing: Theory and Practice. Norwell MA: Kluwer.
van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A., & Meijer, R. R.. (2000). Detection of person misfit in computerized adaptive testing with polytomous items (Research Report 00-01). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.
van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A., & Meijer, R. R.. (2000). Detecting person misfit in adaptive testing using statistical process control techniques. In Computer adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp. 201-219). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A., & Meijer, R. R.. (1999). CUSUM-based person-fit statistics for adaptive testing (Research Report 99-05). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.
van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A., & Meijer, R. R.. (1998). Person fit based on statistical process control in an adaptive testing environment (Research Report 98-13). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.
van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A., & Meijer, R. R.. (1999). CUSUM-based person-fit statistics for adaptive testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 26, 199-218.
Kreitzberg, C. B. (1978). Computerized adaptive testing: Principles and directions. Computers and Education, 2 (4), 319-329.
Kreitzberg, C. B., & Jones, D. J.. (1980). An empirical study of a broad range test of verbal ability. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Krathwohl, D. (1959). Progress report on the sequential item test. East Lansing MI: Michigan State University, Bureau of Educational Research.
Krathwohl, D. R., & Huyser, R. J.. (1956). The sequential item test. American Psychologist, 2, 419.
Krass, I. A. (2000). Change in distribution of latent ability with item position in CAT sequence. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education in New Orleans. LA.
PDF icon kr00-01.pdf (102.42 KB)
Krass, I. A. (1998). Application of direct optimization for on-line calibration in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego CA.
PDF icon kr98-01.pdf (145.81 KB)
Krass, I. A., & Williams, B.. (2003). Calibrating CAT pools and online pretest items using nonparametric and adjusted marginal maximum likelihood methods. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
PDF icon kr03-01.pdf (127.09 KB)
Krass, I. A. (1997). Getting more precision on computer adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the 62nd Annual meeting of Psychometric Society. University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN.
Krass, I. A., & Thomasson, G. L.. (1999). Automated flawed item detection and graphical item used in on-line calibration of CAT-ASVAB. . In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
Krass, I. A. (2001). Application of score information for CAT pool development and its connection with "likelihood test information. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.
PDF icon kr01-01.pdf (391.83 KB)
Koppel, N. B. (2000). Lagrangian relaxation for constrained curve-fitting with binary variables: Applications in educational testing. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 61, 1063.
Kocher, A. T. (1974). An empirical investigation of the stability and accuracy of flexilevel tests. In Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. presented at the 03/1074, Chicago IL.
Koch, W. R., & Dodd, B. G.. (1985). Computerized adaptive attitude measurement. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago.
Koch, W. J., & Reckase, M. D.. (1979). Problems in application of latent-trait models to tailored testing (Research Report 79-1). Columbia MO: University of Missouri, Department of Psychology", (also presented at National Council on Measurement in Education, 1979: ERIC No. ED 177 196) note = ".
Koch, W. R., & Patience, W. M.. (1977). Student attitudes toward tailored testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon ko77116.pdf (684.63 KB)
Koch, W. R., Dodd, B. G., & Fitzpatrick, S. J.. (1990). Computerized adaptive measurement of attitudes. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 23, 20-30.
Koch, W. R., & G., D. B.. (1986). Operational characteristics of adaptive testing procedures using partial credit scoring. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.
Kirisci, L. (1992). Estimation of ability level by using only observable quantities in adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting if the American Educational Research Association. Chicago.
Kirisci, L., & Hsu, T. - C.. (1988). A predictive analysis approach to adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
PDF icon v08n2p147.pdf (573.02 KB)
Kingsbury, G. G., & Houser, R. L.. (1988). A comparison of achievement level estimates from computerized adaptive testing and paper-and-pencil testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
PDF icon ki88-01.pdf (42.27 KB)
Kingsbury, G. G., & Houser, R. L.. (2007). ICAT: An adaptive testing procedure to allow the identification of idiosyncratic knowledge patterns. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat07Kingsbury.pdf (160.68 KB)
Kingsbury, G. G., & Houser, R. L.. (2008). ICAT: An adaptive testing procedure for the identification of idiosyncratic knowledge patterns. Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 216(1), 40–48.
Kingsbury, G. G. (2002). An empirical comparison of achievement level estimates from adaptive tests and paper-and-pencil tests. In annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA. USA.
Kingsbury, G. G. (1996). Item review and adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York.
Kingsbury, G. G., & Hauser, C.. (2004). Computer adaptive testing and the No Child Left Behind Act. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Diego CA.
PDF icon ki04-01.pdf (116.03 KB)
Kingsbury, G. G., & Weiss, D. J.. (1980). A comparison of adaptive, sequential, and conventional testing strategies for mastery decisions (Research Report 80-4). Minneapolis, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
PDF icon ki80-04.pdf (1.86 MB)
Kingsbury, G. G. (2011). Continuous Testing (an avenue for CAT research). In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.
PDF icon IACAT 2011 Kingsbury Continuous Testing.pdf (74.37 KB)
Kingsbury, G. G. (2002). An empirical comparison of achievement level estimates from adaptive tests and paper-and-pencil tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
PDF icon ki02-01.pdf (133.01 KB)
Kingsbury, G. G., & Houser, R. L.. (1999). Developing computerized adaptive tests for school children. In . F. Drasgow and J. B. Olson-Buchanan (Eds.), Innovations in computerized assessment (pp. 93-115). Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum.
Kingsbury, G. G., & Houser, R. L.. (1993). A practical examination of the use of free-response questions in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented to the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association: Atlanta GA.
PDF icon ki93-01.pdf (29.04 KB)
Kingsbury, G. G., & Weiss, D. J.. (1979). An adaptive testing strategy for mastery decisions (Research Report 79-5). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon ki79-05.pdf (2.1 MB)
Kingsbury, G. G., & Weiss, D. J.. (1983). A comparison of IRT-based adaptive mastery testing and a sequential mastery testing procedure. In New horizons in testing: Latent trait test theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 258-283). New York, NY. USA: Academic Press.

Pages