Theunissen, M. H. C., de Wolff, M. S., Deurloo, J. A., & Vogels, A. G. C.. (2020). Computerized adaptive testing to screen children for emotional and behavioral problems by preventive child healthcare. BMC Pediatrics, 20(Article number: 119 ). Retrieved from https://bmcpediatr.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12887-020-2018-1

Lunz, M. E., & Bergstrom, B. A.. (1995). Computerized adaptive testing: Tracking candidate response patterns. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 13, 151-162.

Xu, X., & Douglas, J.. (2006). Computerized adaptive testing under nonparametric IRT models. Psychometrika, 71, 121-137.

Huang, H. - Y., Chen, P. - H., & Wang, W. - C.. (2012). Computerized Adaptive Testing Using a Class of High-Order Item Response Theory Models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36, 689-706. doi:10.1177/0146621612459552

Cheng, P. E., & Liou, M.. (2003). Computerized adaptive testing using the nearest-neighbors criterion. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 204-216.

Cheng, P. E., & Liou, M.. (2003). Computerized adaptive testing using the nearest-neighbors criterion. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 204-216.

Dodd, B. G., Koch, W. R., & de Ayala, R. J.. (1993). Computerized adaptive testing using the partial credit model: Effects of item pool characteristics and different stopping rules. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 61-77.

Straetmans, G. J. J. M., & Eggen, T.. (1998). Computerized adaptive testing: What it is and how it works. Educational Technology, 38, 45-52.

Legg, S. M.,, & Buhr, D. C.. (1992). Computerized adaptive testing with different groups. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 11 (2), 23-27.

van der Linden, W. J. (2001). Computerized adaptive testing with equated number-correct scoring. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25, 343-355.

Glas, C. A. W., & van der Linden, W. J.. (2003). Computerized adaptive testing with item cloning. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 247-261.

Armstrong, R. D., Jones, D. H., Koppel, N. B., & Pashley, P. J.. (2004). Computerized adaptive testing with multiple-form structures. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28, 147-164.

Armstrong, R. D., Jones, D. H., Koppel, N. B., & Pashley, P. J.. (2004). Computerized Adaptive Testing With Multiple-Form Structures. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28, 147-164. doi:10.1177/0146621604263652

Dodd, B. G., de Ayala, R. J., & Koch, W. R.. (1995). Computerized adaptive testing with polytomous items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19, 5–22.

Dodd, B. G., De Ayala, R. J., & Koch. W.R.,. (1995). Computerized Adaptive Testing With Polytomous Items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19(1), 5-22.

Roberts, J. S., Lin, Y., & Laughlin, J. E.. (2001). Computerized adaptive testing with the generalized graded unfolding model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25, 177-196.

Gorin, J. S., Dodd, B. G., Fitzpatrick, S. J., & Shieh, Y. Y.. (2005). Computerized Adaptive Testing With the Partial Credit Model: Estimation Procedures, Population Distributions, and Item Pool Characteristics. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 433-456. doi:10.1177/0146621605280072

Gorin, J. S. (2005). Computerized adaptive testing with the partial credit model: Estimation procedures, population distributions, and item pool characteristics. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 433-456.

Gorin, J., Dodd, B. G., Fitzpatrick, S. J., & Shieh, Y. Y.. (2005). Computerized adaptive testing with the partial credit model: Estimation procedures, population distributions, and item pool characteristics. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 533-546.

Stark, S., & Chernyshenko, O. S.. (2011). Computerized Adaptive Testing with the Zinnes and Griggs Pairwise Preference Ideal Point Model. International Journal of Testing, 11, 231-247. doi:10.1080/15305058.2011.561459

Wang, W. - C., & Liu, C. - W.. (2011). Computerized Classification Testing Under the Generalized Graded Unfolding Model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71, 114-128. doi:10.1177/0013164410391575

Wang, W. - C., & Huang, S. - Y.. (2011). Computerized Classification Testing Under the One-Parameter Logistic Response Model With Ability-Based Guessing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71, 925-941. doi:10.1177/0013164410392372

MCArthur, D. L., & Choppin, B. H.. (1984). Computerized diagnostic testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 21, 391-397.

Lewis, C., & Sheehan, K.. (1988). Computerized mastery testing. Machine-Mediated Learning, 2, 283-286.

Du, Y., Lewis, C., & Pashley, P. J.. (1993). Computerized mastery testing using fuzzy set decision theory. Applied Measurement in Education, 6, 181-193.

Sheehan, K.,, & Lewis, C.. (1992). Computerized mastery testing with nonequivalent testlets. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 65-76.

Sheehan, K., & Lewis, C.. (1992). Computerized Mastery Testing With Nonequivalent Testlets. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16(1), 65-76.

Burke, M. J,, Normand, J., & Raju, N. M.. (1987). Computerized psychological testing: Overview and critique. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 1, 42-51.

Wolfe, J. H. (1986). Computerized testing technology. Advances in Reading/Language Research, 4, 71-78.

Vispoel, W. P.,, & Coffman, D. D.. (1994). Computerized-adaptive and self-adapted music-listening tests: Features and motivational benefits. Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 25-51.

Mueller, K., Liebig, C., & Hattrup, K.. (2007). Computerizing Organizational Attitude Surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 658-678. doi:10.1177/0013164406292084

Butcher, J. N., Perry, J. L., & Hahn, J. A.. (2004). Computers in clinical assessment: Historical developments, present status, and future challenges. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60, 331-345.

Huebner, A. R., & Finkelman, M. D.. (2016). On Computing the Key Probability in the Stochastically Curtailed Sequential Probability Ratio Test. Applied Psychological Measurement, 40, 142-156. doi:10.1177/0146621615611633

Norris, J. M., Kenyon, D. M., & Malabonga, V.. (2001). Concerns with computerized adaptive oral proficiency assessment. A commentary on "Comparing examinee attitudes Toward computer-assisted and other oral proficient assessments": Response to the Norris Commentary. Language Learning and Technology, 5, 95-108.

Finkelman, M., Nering, M. L., & Roussos, L. A.. (2009). A Conditional Exposure Control Method for Multidimensional Adaptive Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 46, 84–103. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2009.01070.x

Finkelman, M., Nering, M. L., & Roussos, L. A.. (2009). A conditional exposure control method for multidimensional adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 46, 84-103.

van der Linden, W. J., & Veldkamp, B. P.. (2007). Conditional Item-Exposure Control in Adaptive Testing Using Item-Ineligibility Probabilities. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 32, 398-418. doi:10.3102/1076998606298044

Roos, L. L., Wise, S. L., Yoes, M. E., & Rocklin, T. R.. (1996). Conducting self-adapted testing using MicroCAT. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 821-827.

Bergstrom, B. A. (1992). Confidence in pass/fail decisions for computer adaptive and paper and pencil examinations. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 15(4), 435-464.

Bergstrom, B. A. (1992). Confidence in pass/fail decisions for computer adaptive and paper and pencil examinations. Evaluation and The Health Professions, 15(4), 435-464.

Bergstrom, B. A., & Lunz, M. E.. (1992). Confidence in pass/fail decisions for computer adaptive and paper and pencil examinations. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 15, 453-464.

Raiche, G., & Blais, J. G.. (2009). Considerations about expected a posteriori estimation in adaptive testing: adaptive a priori, adaptive correction for bias, and adaptive integration interval. Journal of Applied Measurement, 10, 138-56.

Wyse, A. E., & Albano, A. D.. (2015). Considering the Use of General and Modified Assessment Items in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 28(2). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2014.1002921

van der Linden, W. J., & Veldkamp, B. P.. (2004). Constraining item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with shadow tests. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 273-291.

van der Linden, W. J., & Veldkamp, B. P.. (2004). Constraining Item Exposure in Computerized Adaptive Testing With Shadow Tests. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 273-291. doi:10.3102/10769986029003273

Ying Cheng,, Chang, H. - H., Douglas, J., & Fanmin Guo,. (2009). Constraint-Weighted a-Stratification for Computerized Adaptive Testing With Nonstatistical Constraints. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 35-49. doi:10.1177/0013164408322030

Cheng, Y., Chang, H. - H., Douglas, J., & Guo, F.. (2009). Constraint-weighted a-stratification for computerized adaptive testing with nonstatistical constraints: Balancing measurement efficiency and exposure control. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 35-49.

Moshinsky, A., & Kazin, C.. (2005). Constructing a Computerized Adaptive Test for University Applicants With Disabilities. Applied Measurement in Education, 18, 381-405. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame1804_3

Ariel, A., Veldkamp, B. P., & van der Linden, W. J.. (2004). Constructing rotating item pools for constrained adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 41, 345-359.

Diao, Q., & Ren, H.. (2018). Constructing Shadow Tests in Variable-Length Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 42, 538-552. doi:10.1177/0146621617753736

Adema, J. J. (1990). The construction of customized two-staged tests, 27, 241-253.

Jette, A. M., & Haley, S. M.. (2005). Contemporary measurement techniques for rehabilitation outcomes assessment. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 37, 339-345.

Montpetit, K., Haley, S., Bilodeau, N., Ni, P., Tian, F., Gorton, G., 3rd, & Mulcahey, M. J.. (2011). Content range and precision of a computer adaptive test of upper extremity function for children with cerebral palsy. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 31, 90-102.

Huebner, A., Wang, C., Daly, B., & Pinkelman, C.. (2018). A Continuous a-Stratification Index for Item Exposure Control in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 42, 523-537. doi:10.1177/0146621618758289

Chen, S. - Y., & Lei, P. - W.. (2005). Controlling item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 204-217.

Chen, S. - Y., & Lei, P. - W.. (2005). Controlling Item Exposure and Test Overlap in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 204-217. doi:10.1177/0146621604271495

Chen, S. Y., & Lei, P. W.. (2005). Controlling item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29(2), 204–217.

Chen, S. - Y., Lei, P. W., & Liao, W. H.. (2008). Controlling item exposure and test overlap on the fly in computerized adaptive testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 61, 471-92. presented at the Nov.

Stocking, M. L., & Lewis, C.. (1998). Controlling item exposure conditional on ability in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational & Behavioral Statistics, 23, 57-75.

Sympson, J. B., & Hetter, R. D.. (1985). Controlling item exposure conditional on ability in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 23, 57-75.