Title: Biblio RTF Export
Author: Biblio 7.x

Theunissen, M. H. C., de Wolff, M. S., Deurloo, J. A., & Vogels, A. G. C..  (2020).  Computerized adaptive testing to screen children for emotional and behavioral problems by preventive child healthcare. BMC Pediatrics, 20(Article number: 119 ). Retrieved from https://bmcpediatr.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12887-020-2018-1

Yigit, H. D., Sorrel, M. A., & de la Torre, J..  (2019).  Computerized Adaptive Testing for Cognitively Based Multiple-Choice Data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 43, 388-401. doi:10.1177/0146621618798665

Albano, A. D., Cai, L., Lease, E. M., & McConnell, S. R..  (2019).  Computerized Adaptive Testing in Early Education: Exploring the Impact of Item Position Effects on Ability Estimation. Journal of Educational Measurement, 56, 437-451. doi:10.1111/jedm.12215

Li, J., & van der Linden, W. J..  (2018).  A Comparison of Constraint Programming and Mixed-Integer Programming for Automated Test-Form Generation. Journal of Educational Measurement, 55, 435-456. doi:10.1111/jedm.12187

Diao, Q., & Ren, H..  (2018).  Constructing Shadow Tests in Variable-Length Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 42, 538-552. doi:10.1177/0146621617753736

Huebner, A., Wang, C., Daly, B., & Pinkelman, C..  (2018).  A Continuous a-Stratification Index for Item Exposure Control in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 42, 523-537. doi:10.1177/0146621618758289

Imai, S.  (2017).  Is CAT Suitable for Automated Speaking Test?. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.

Meng, H., & Han, C..  (2017).  Comparison of Pretest Item Calibration Methods in a Computerized Adaptive Test (CAT). In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.

Seo, D. Gi.  (2017).  A Comparison of Three Empirical Reliability Estimates for Computerized Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gXgH-epPIWJiE0LxMHGiCAxZZAwy4dAH/view?usp=sharing

Ling, G., Attali, Y., Finn, B., & Stone, E. A..  (2017).  Is a Computerized Adaptive Test More Motivating Than a Fixed-Item Test?. Applied Psychological Measurement, 41, 495-511. doi:10.1177/0146621617707556

Chang, Y. - P., Chiu, C. - Y., & Tsai, R. - C..  (2017).  Computerized Adaptive Testing for Cognitive Diagnosis in Classroom: A Nonparametric Approach. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.

Stillwell, D.  (2017).  Concerto 5 Open Source CAT Platform: From Code to Nodes. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=11eu1KKILQEoK5c-CYO1P1AiJgiQxX0E0

Chajewski, M., & Harnisher, J..  (2017).  Considerations in Performance Evaluations of Computerized Formative Assessments. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.

Arbiyah, N.  (2017).  Construction of Gratitude Scale Using Polytomous Item Response Theory Model. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1pHhO4cq2-wh24ht3nBAoXNHv7234_mjH

Su, Y. - H.  (2016).  A Comparison of Constrained Item Selection Methods in Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 40, 346-360. doi:10.1177/0146621616639305

Huebner, A. R., & Finkelman, M. D..  (2016).  On Computing the Key Probability in the Stochastically Curtailed Sequential Probability Ratio Test. Applied Psychological Measurement, 40, 142-156. doi:10.1177/0146621615611633

Oswald, F. L., Shaw, A., & Farmer, W. L..  (2015).  Comparing Simple Scoring With IRT Scoring of Personality Measures: The Navy Computer Adaptive Personality Scales. Applied Psychological Measurement, 39, 144-154. doi:10.1177/0146621614559517

Kim, S., Moses, T., & Yoo, H. (Henry).  (2015).  A Comparison of IRT Proficiency Estimation Methods Under Adaptive Multistage Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 52, 70?79. doi:10.1111/jedm.12063

Wyse, A. E., & Albano, A. D..  (2015).  Considering the Use of General and Modified Assessment Items in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 28(2). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2014.1002921

Finkelman, M. D., Kim, W., Weissman, A., & Cook, R. J..  (2014).  Cognitive Diagnostic Models and Computerized  Adaptive Testing: Two New Item-Selection Methods That Incorporate Response Times. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 2(4), 59-76. doi:10.7333/1412-0204059

He, W., Diao, Q., & Hauser, C..  (2014).  A Comparison of Four Item-Selection Methods for Severely Constrained CATs. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 74, 677-696. doi:10.1177/0013164413517503

Brossman, B. G., & Guille, R. A..  (2014).  A Comparison of Multi-Stage and Linear Test Designs for Medium-Size Licensure and Certification Examinations. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 2(2), 18-36. presented at the 02-2014. doi:10.7333/1402-0202018

Crabbe, M., & Vandebroek, M..  (2014).  Computerized Adaptive Testing for the Random Weights Linear Logistic Test Model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38, 415-431. doi:10.1177/0146621614533987

Yan, D., von Davier, A. A., & Lewis, C..  (2014).  Computerized multistage testing: Theory and applications. Boca Raton FL: CRC Press.

Yao, L.  (2013).  Comparing the Performance of Five Multidimensional CAT Selection Procedures With Different Stopping Rules. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 3-23. doi:10.1177/0146621612455687

Smits, N., & Finkelman, M. D..  (2013).  A Comparison of Computerized Classification Testing and Computerized Adaptive Testing in Clinical Psychology. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 1(2), 19-37. doi:10.7333/1302-0102019

Boyd, A. M., Dodd, B., & Fitzpatrick, S..  (2013).  A Comparison of Exposure Control Procedures in CAT Systems Based on Different Measurement Models for Testlets. Applied Measurement in Education, 26, 113-135. doi:10.1080/08957347.2013.765434

Leroux, A. J., Lopez, M., Hembry, I., & Dodd, B. G..  (2013).  A Comparison of Exposure Control Procedures in CATs Using the 3PL Model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73, 857-874. doi:10.1177/0013164413486802

Ito, K., & Segall, D. O..  (2013).  A Comparison of Four Methods for Obtaining Information Functions for Scores From Computerized Adaptive Tests With Normally Distributed Item Difficulties and Discriminations. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 1(5), 88-107. doi:10.7333/1312-0105088

Jiao, H., Liu, J., Haynie, K., Woo, A., & Gorham, J..  (2012).  Comparison Between Dichotomous and Polytomous Scoring of Innovative Items in a Large-Scale Computerized Adaptive Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72, 493-509. doi:10.1177/0013164411422903

Lee, H. Y., & Dodd, B. G..  (2012).  Comparison of Exposure Controls, Item Pool Characteristics, and Population Distributions for CAT Using the Partial Credit Model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72, 159-175. doi:10.1177/0013164411411296

Riley, B. B., & Carle, A. C..  (2012).  Comparison of two Bayesian methods to detect mode effects between paper-based and computerized adaptive assessments: a preliminary Monte Carlo study. BMC Med Res Methodol, 12, 124. presented at the 2012. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-12-124

Kalender, I.  (2012).  Computerized Adaptive Testing for Student Selection to Higher Education. Journal of Higher Education.

Makransky, G.  (2012).  Computerized adaptive testing in industrial and organizational psychology. University of Twente, Twente, The Netherlands.

Huang, H. - Y., Chen, P. - H., & Wang, W. - C..  (2012).  Computerized Adaptive Testing Using a Class of High-Order Item Response Theory Models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36, 689-706. doi:10.1177/0146621612459552

Magis, D., & Raîche, G..  (2011).  catR: An R Package for Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement. doi:10.1177/0146621611407482

Green, B. F.  (2011).  A Comment on Early Student Blunders on Computer-Based Adaptive Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 35(2), 165-174. doi:10.1177/0146621610377080

Green, B. F.  (2011).  A Comment on Early Student Blunders on Computer-Based Adaptive Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 35, 165-174. doi:10.1177/0146621610377080

Rudner, L. M., & Guo, F..  (2011).  Computer adaptive testing for small scale programs and instructional systems. Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 12(1).

Simms, L. J., Goldberg, L. R., Roberts, J. E., Watson, D., Welte, J., & Rotterman, J. H..  (2011).  Computerized adaptive assessment of personality disorder: Introducing the CAT?PD project. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 380-389.

Stark, S., & Chernyshenko, O. S..  (2011).  Computerized Adaptive Testing with the Zinnes and Griggs Pairwise Preference Ideal Point Model. International Journal of Testing, 11, 231-247. doi:10.1080/15305058.2011.561459

Wang, W. - C., & Liu, C. - W..  (2011).  Computerized Classification Testing Under the Generalized Graded Unfolding Model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71, 114-128. doi:10.1177/0013164410391575

Wang, W. - C., & Huang, S. - Y..  (2011).  Computerized Classification Testing Under the One-Parameter Logistic Response Model With Ability-Based Guessing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71, 925-941. doi:10.1177/0013164410392372

Montpetit, K., Haley, S., Bilodeau, N., Ni, P., Tian, F., Gorton, G., 3rd, & Mulcahey, M. J..  (2011).  Content range and precision of a computer adaptive test of upper extremity function for children with cerebral palsy. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 31, 90-102.

Kingsbury, G. G.  (2011).  Continuous Testing (an avenue for CAT research). In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Wise, S. L..  (2011).  Creating a K-12 Adaptive Test: Examining the Stability of Item Parameter Estimates and Measurement Scales. Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 12. Retrieved from http://www.testpublishers.org/journal-of-applied-testing-technology

Giesinger, J. M., Petersen, M. A., Groenvold, M., Aaronson, N. K., Arraras, J. I., Conroy, T., et al..  (2011).  Cross-cultural development of an item list for computer-adaptive testing of fatigue in oncological patients. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. presented at the March 29, 2011.

Riley, B. B., Dennis, M. L., & Conrad, K. J..  (2010).  A comparison of content-balancing procedures for estimating multiple clinical domains in computerized adaptive testing: Relative precision, validity, and detection of persons with misfitting responses. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34, 410-423.

Riley, B. B., Dennis, M. L., & Conrad, K. J..  (2010).  A Comparison of Content-Balancing Procedures for Estimating Multiple Clinical Domains in Computerized Adaptive Testing: Relative Precision, Validity, and Detection of Persons With Misfitting Responses. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34, 410-423. doi:10.1177/0146621609349802

Murphy, D. L., Dodd, B. G., & Vaughn, B. K..  (2010).  A Comparison of Item Selection Techniques for Testlets. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34, 424-437. doi:10.1177/0146621609349804

Ueno, M., & Songmuang, P..  (2010).  Computerized adaptive testing based on decision trees. In 10th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (Vol. 58, pp. 191-193). Sousse, Tunisia: IEEE Computer Sience.

van der Linden, W. J.  (2010).  Constrained Adaptive Testing with Shadow Tests. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 31-56). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8

Masters, J. S., Muckle, T. J., & Bontempo, B..  (2009).  Comparing methods to recalibrate drifting items in computerized adaptive testing. In American Educational Research Association. San Diego, CA.

Diao, Q., & Reckase, M..  (2009).  Comparison of ability estimation and item selection methods in multidimensional computerized adaptive testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Chen, P. H.  (2009).  Comparison of adaptive Bayesian estimation and weighted Bayesian estimation in multidimensional computerized adaptive testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Choi, S. W., & Swartz, R. J..  (2009).  Comparison of CAT Item Selection Criteria for Polytomous Items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 419-440. doi:10.1177/0146621608327801

Choi, S. W., & Swartz, R. J..  (2009).  Comparison of CAT item selection criteria for polytomous items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 419?440.

Barrada, J. R., Abad, F. J., & Veldkamp, B. P..  (2009).  Comparison of methods for controlling maximum exposure rates in computerized adaptive testing. Psicothema, 21, 313-320. presented at the May.

Costa, D. R., Karino, C. A., Moura, F. A. S., & Andrade, D. F..  (2009).  A comparison of three methods of item selection for computerized adaptive testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Thissen-Roe, A.  (2009).  Computerized adaptive testing by mutual information and multiple imputations. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Cheng, Y.  (2009).  Computerized adaptive testing for cognitive diagnosis. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Shih, H. - J., & Wang, W. - C..  (2009).  Computerized adaptive testing using the two parameter logistic model with ability-based guessing. In Paper presented at the International Meeting of the Psychometric Society. Cambridge.

Wouda, J. T., & Eggen, T..  (2009).  Computerized classification testing in more than two categories by using stochastic curtailment. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Finkelman, M., Nering, M. L., & Roussos, L. A..  (2009).  A conditional exposure control method for multidimensional adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 46, 84-103.

Finkelman, M., Nering, M. L., & Roussos, L. A..  (2009).  A Conditional Exposure Control Method for Multidimensional Adaptive Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 46, 84?103. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2009.01070.x

Raiche, G., & Blais, J. G..  (2009).  Considerations about expected a posteriori estimation in adaptive testing: adaptive a priori, adaptive correction for bias, and adaptive integration interval. Journal of Applied Measurement, 10, 138-56.

Wouda, J. T., & Eggen, T..  (2009).  Constrained item selection using a stochastically curtailed SPRT. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Ying Cheng,, Chang, H. - H., Douglas, J., & Fanmin Guo,.  (2009).  Constraint-Weighted a-Stratification for Computerized Adaptive Testing With Nonstatistical Constraints. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 35-49. doi:10.1177/0013164408322030

Cheng, Y., Chang, H. - H., Douglas, J., & Guo, F..  (2009).  Constraint-weighted a-stratification for computerized adaptive testing with nonstatistical constraints: Balancing measurement efficiency and exposure control. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 35-49.

Schneider, R. J., McLellan, R. A., Kantrowitz, T. M., Houston, J. S., & Borman, W. C..  (2009).  Criterion-related validity of an innovative CAT-based personality measure. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Triantafillou, E., Georgiadou, E., & Economides, A. A..  (2008).  CAT-MD: Computerized adaptive testing on mobile devices. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 3, 13-20.

McGlohen, M., & Chang, H. - H..  (2008).  Combining computer adaptive testing technology with cognitively diagnostic assessment. Behavioral Research Methods , 40, 808-21. presented at the Aug.

Shudong Wang,, Hong Jiao,, Young, M. J., Brooks, T., & Olson, J..  (2008).  Comparability of Computer-Based and Paper-and-Pencil Testing in K?12 Reading Assessments. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 5-24. doi:10.1177/0013164407305592

Gierl, M. J., & Zhou, J..  (2008).  Computer Adaptive-Attribute Testing A New Approach to Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment. Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 216(1), 29-39. doi:10.1027/0044-3409.216.1.29

Kim, D. - H., & Huynh, H..  (2008).  Computer-Based and Paper-and-Pencil Administration Mode Effects on a Statewide End-of-Course English Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 554-570. doi:10.1177/0013164407310132

Haley, S. M., Gandek, B., Siebens, H., Black-Schaffer, R. M., Sinclair, S. J., Tao, W., et al..  (2008).  Computerized adaptive testing for follow-up after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation: II. Participation outcomes. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 89, 275-283. presented at the Feb.

Hart, D. L., Wang, Y. - C., Stratford, P. W., & Mioduski, J. E..  (2008).  Computerized adaptive testing for patients with knee inpairments produced valid and responsive measures of function. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 61, 1113-1124.

Kopec, J. A., Badii, M., McKenna, M., Lima, V. D., Sayre, E. C., & Dvorak, M..  (2008).  Computerized adaptive testing in back pain: Validation of the CAT-5D-QOL. Spine, 33, 1384-90. presented at the May 20.

Hol, A. M., Vorst, H. C. M., & Mellenbergh, G. J..  (2008).  Computerized Adaptive Testing of Personality Traits. Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 216(1), 12-21. doi:10.1027/0044-3409.216.1.12

Chen, S. - Y., Lei, P. W., & Liao, W. H..  (2008).  Controlling item exposure and test overlap on the fly in computerized adaptive testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 61, 471-92. presented at the Nov.

Guo, F.  (2007).  CAT Security: A practitioner?s perspective. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Eggen, T.  (2007).  Choices in CAT models in the context of educational testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Eggen, T.  (2007).  Choices in CAT models in the context of educattional testing. In GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the June 7, 2007, St. Paul, MN: Graduate Management Admission Council.

Kim-Kang, G., & Weiss, D. J..  (2007).  Comparison of computerized adaptive testing and classical methods for measuring individual change. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Chen, S. - K.  (2007).  The comparison of maximum likelihood estimation and expected a posteriori in CAT using the graded response model. Journal of Elementary Education, 19, 339-371.

Thompson, N. A.  (2007).  A comparison of two methods of polytomous computerized classification testing for multiple cutscores. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.

Forbey, J. D., & Ben-Porath, Y. S..  (2007).  Computerized adaptive personality testing: A review and illustration with the MMPI-2 Computerized Adaptive Version. Psychological Assessment, 19, 14-24. presented at the Mar.

Jacobusse, G., & Buuren, S..  (2007).  Computerized adaptive testing for measuring development of young children. Statistics in Medicine, 26, 2629-38. presented at the Jun 15.

Hol, M. A., Vorst, H. C. M., & Mellenbergh, G. J..  (2007).  Computerized Adaptive Testing for Polytomous Motivation Items: Administration Mode Effects and a Comparison With Short Forms. Applied Psychological Measurement, 31, 412-429. doi:10.1177/0146621606297314

Hol, A. M., Vorst, H. C. M., & Mellenbergh, G. J..  (2007).  Computerized adaptive testing for polytomous motivation items: Administration mode effects and a comparison with short forms. Applied Psychological Measurement, 31, 412-429.

Weiss, D. J., & Gibbons, R. D..  (2007).  Computerized adaptive testing with the bifactor model. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Zhou, J., Gierl, M. J., & Cui, Y..  (2007).  Computerized attribute-adaptive testing: A new computerized adaptive testing approach incorporating cognitive psychology. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Thompson, N. A., & Ro, S..  (2007).  Computerized classification testing with composite hypotheses. GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing. St. Paul, MN: Graduate Management Admissions Council.

Thompson, N. A., & Ro, S..  (2007).  Computerized classification testing with composite hypotheses. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Mueller, K., Liebig, C., & Hattrup, K..  (2007).  Computerizing Organizational Attitude Surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 658-678. doi:10.1177/0013164406292084

van der Linden, W. J., & Veldkamp, B. P..  (2007).  Conditional Item-Exposure Control in Adaptive Testing Using Item-Ineligibility Probabilities. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 32, 398-418. doi:10.3102/1076998606298044

Ro, S., & Thompson, N. A..  (2007).  Cutscore location and classification accuracy in computerized classification testing. In Paper presented at the international meeting of the Psychometric Society. Tokyo, Japan.

Hol, A. M.  (2006).  A CAT with personality and attitude. Enschede, The Netherlands: PrintPartners Ipskamp B.

Lei, P. - W., Chen, S. - Y., & Yu, L..  (2006).  Comparing methods of assessing differential item functioning in a computerized adaptive testing environment. Journal of Educational Measurement, 43, 245-264.

Lei, P. - W., Chen, S. - Y., & Yu, L..  (2006).  Comparing Methods of Assessing Differential Item Functioning in a Computerized Adaptive Testing Environment. Journal of Educational Measurement, 43, 245?264. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2006.00015.x

Hai-qi, D., De-zhi, C., Shuliang, D., & Taiping, D..  (2006).  The comparison among item selection strategies of CAT with multiple-choice items. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 38, 778-783.

Morgan, D. L., Way, W. D., & Augemberg, K. E..  (2006).  A comparison of online calibration methods for a CAT. In Presented at the National Council on Measurement on Education. San Francisco, CA.

Jodoin, M. G., Zenisky, A., & Hambleton, R. K..  (2006).  Comparison of the Psychometric Properties of Several Computer-Based Test Designs for Credentialing Exams With Multiple Purposes. Applied Measurement in Education, 19, 203-220. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame1903_3

Haley, S. M., Ni, P., Hambleton, R. K., Slavin, M. D., & Jette, A. M..  (2006).  Computer adaptive testing improved accuracy and precision of scores over random item selection in a physical functioning item bank. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59, 1174-82. presented at the Nov.

Haley, S., Ni, P., Hambleton, R. K., Slavin, M., & Jette, A..  (2006).  Computer adaptive testing improved accuracy and precision of scores over random item selection in a physical functioning item bank. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59, 1174-1182.

Drasgow, F., & Chuah, S. C..  (2006).  Computer-based testing. In Handbook of multimethod measurement in psychology (Vol. xiv, pp. 87-100). Washington D.C. USA: American Psychological Association.

Haley, S. M., Siebens, H., Coster, W. J., Tao, W., Black-Schaffer, R. M., Gandek, B., et al..  (2006).  Computerized adaptive testing for follow-up after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation: I. Activity outcomes. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 87, 1033-42. presented at the Aug.

Schwartz, C., Welch, G., Santiago-Kelley, P., Bode, R., & Sun, X..  (2006).  Computerized adaptive testing of diabetes impact: a feasibility study of Hispanics and non-Hispanics in an active clinic population. Quality of Life Research, 15, 1503-18. presented at the Nov.

Xu, X., & Douglas, J..  (2006).  Computerized adaptive testing under nonparametric IRT models. Psychometrika, 71, 121-137.

Cheng, Y., Chang, H. - H., & Wang, X. B..  (2006).  Constraints-weighted information method for item selection of severely constrained computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco.

Vispoel, W. P., Clough, S. J., & Bleiler, T..  (2005).  A closer look at using judgments of item difficulty to change answers on computerized adaptive tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 42, 331-350.

Jacobs-Cassuto, M. S.  (2005).  A comparison of adaptive mastery testing using testlets with the 3-parameter logistic model. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.

van der Linden, W. J.  (2005).  A comparison of item-selection methods for adaptive tests with content constraints. Journal of Educational Measurement, 42, 283-302.

van der Linden, W. J.  (2005).  A comparison of item-selection methods for adaptive tests with content constraints. Journal of Educational Measurement, 42, 283-302.

Gershon, R. C.  (2005).  Computer adaptive testing. Journal of Applied Measurement , 6, 109-27.

Gershon, R. C.  (2005).  Computer adaptive testing. Journal of Applied Measurement, 6, 109-27.

Haley, S. M., Ni, P., Fragala-Pinkham, M. A., Skrinar, A. M., & Corzo, D..  (2005).  A computer adaptive testing approach for assessing physical functioning in children and adolescents. Developmental Medicine and Child Neuropsychology, 47, 113-120. presented at the Feb.

Economides, A. A.  (2005).  Computer adaptive testing quality requirements. In . Proceedings E-Learn 2005 World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, pp. 288-295, Vancouver, Canada, AACE, October 2005.

He, Q., & Tymms, P..  (2005).  A computer-assisted test design and diagnosis system for use by classroom teachers. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 419-429.

Leung, C. K., Chang, H. - H., & Hau, K. T..  (2005).  Computerized adaptive testing: a mixture item selection approach for constrained situations. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 58, 239-57. presented at the Nov.

Gorin, J., Dodd, B. G., Fitzpatrick, S. J., & Shieh, Y. Y..  (2005).  Computerized adaptive testing with the partial credit model: Estimation procedures, population distributions, and item pool characteristics. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 533-546.

Gorin, J. S., Dodd, B. G., Fitzpatrick, S. J., & Shieh, Y. Y..  (2005).  Computerized Adaptive Testing With the Partial Credit Model: Estimation Procedures, Population Distributions, and Item Pool Characteristics. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 433-456. doi:10.1177/0146621605280072

Gorin, J. S.  (2005).  Computerized adaptive testing with the partial credit model: Estimation procedures, population distributions, and item pool characteristics. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 433-456.

Peterson, K. A., L., D. M., & Hjelseth, L..  (2005).  Computerizing statewide assessments in Minnesota: A report on the feasibility of converting the Minnesota Comprehensive Assessments to a computerized adaptive format. Office of Educational Accountability, College of Education and Human Development, University of Minnesota.

van der Linden, W. J., & Veldkamp, B. P..  (2005).  Constraining item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with shadow tests. Law School Admission Council Computerized Testing Report 02-03.

Moshinsky, A., & Kazin, C..  (2005).  Constructing a Computerized Adaptive Test for University Applicants With Disabilities. Applied Measurement in Education, 18, 381-405. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame1804_3

Jette, A. M., & Haley, S. M..  (2005).  Contemporary measurement techniques for rehabilitation outcomes assessment. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 37, 339-345.

Chen, S. - Y., & Lei, P. - W..  (2005).  Controlling Item Exposure and Test Overlap in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 204-217. doi:10.1177/0146621604271495

Chen, S. - Y., & Lei, P. - W..  (2005).  Controlling item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 204-217.

Chen, S. Y., & Lei, P. W..  (2005).  Controlling item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29(2), 204?217.

McGlohen, M. K., Chang, H. - H., & Wills, J. T..  (2004).  Combining computer adaptive testing technology with cognitively diagnostic assessment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego CA.

Andres, P. L., Black-Schaffer, R. M., Ni, P., & Haley, S. M..  (2004).  Computer adaptive testing: a strategy for monitoring stroke rehabilitation across settings. Stroke Rehabilitation, 11, 33-39. presented at the Spring.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Hauser, C..  (2004).  Computer adaptive testing and the No Child Left Behind Act. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Diego CA.

Luecht, R. M.  (2004).  Computer-adaptive testing. In . B. Everett, and D. Howell (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science. New York: Wiley.

Hambleton, R. K., & Xing, D..  (2004).  Computer-based test designs with optimal and non-optimal tests for making pass-fail decisions. Research Report, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.

Roex, A., & Degryse, J..  (2004).  A computerized adaptive knowledge test as an assessment tool in general practice: a pilot study. Medical Teacher, 26, 178-83. presented at the Mar.

Gardner, W., Shear, K., Kelleher, K. J., Pajer, K. A., Mammen, O., Buysse, D., & Frank, E..  (2004).  Computerized adaptive measurement of depression: A simulation study. BMC Psychiatry, 4, 13-23.

Segall, D. O.  (2004).  Computerized adaptive testing. In . Encyclopedia of social measurement. Academic Press.

Bjorner, J. B., Kosinski, M., Ware, J. E., & Jr.,.  (2004).  Computerized adaptive testing and item banking. In . P. M. Fayers and R. D. Hays (Eds.) Assessing Quality of Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Weiss, D. J.  (2004).  Computerized Adaptive Testing for Effective and Efficient Measurement in Counseling and Education. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 37, 70-84.

Armstrong, R. D., Jones, D. H., Koppel, N. B., & Pashley, P. J..  (2004).  Computerized adaptive testing with multiple-form structures. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28, 147-164.

Armstrong, R. D., Jones, D. H., Koppel, N. B., & Pashley, P. J..  (2004).  Computerized Adaptive Testing With Multiple-Form Structures. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28, 147-164. doi:10.1177/0146621604263652

Butcher, J. N., Perry, J. L., & Hahn, J. A..  (2004).  Computers in clinical assessment: Historical developments, present status, and future challenges. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60, 331-345.

van der Linden, W. J., & Veldkamp, B. P..  (2004).  Constraining item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with shadow tests. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 273-291.

van der Linden, W. J., & Veldkamp, B. P..  (2004).  Constraining Item Exposure in Computerized Adaptive Testing With Shadow Tests. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 273-291. doi:10.3102/10769986029003273

Ariel, A., Veldkamp, B. P., & van der Linden, W. J..  (2004).  Constructing rotating item pools for constrained adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 41, 345-359.

Li, Y. H., & Schafer, W. D..  (2004).  The context effects of multidimensional CAT on the accuracy of multidimensional abilities and the item exposure rates. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Diego CA.

Eggen, T.  (2004).  Contributions to the theory and practice of computerized adaptive testing. Arnhem, The Netherlands: Citogroep.

Segall, D. O.  (2003).  Calibrating CAT item pools and online pretest items using MCMC methods. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Pommerich, M., & Segall, D. O..  (2003).  Calibrating CAT pools and online pretest items using marginal maximum likelihood methods. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Krass, I. A., & Williams, B..  (2003).  Calibrating CAT pools and online pretest items using nonparametric and adjusted marginal maximum likelihood methods. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Bjorner, J. B., Kosinski, M., & Ware, J. E., J..  (2003).  Calibration of an item pool for assessing the burden of headaches: an application of item response theory to the Headache Impact Test (HIT). Quality of Life Research, 12, 913-933.

Lai, J. - S., Dineen, K., Cella, D., & Von Roenn, J..  (2003).  Can an item response theory-based pain item bank enhance measurement precision?. Clinical Therapeutics, 25, D34-D36.

McBride, J. R.  (2003).  Can We Assess Pre-K Kids With Computer-Based Tests: STAR Early Literacy Data. In Presentation to the 33rd Annual National Conference on Large-Scale Assessment.. San Antonio TX.

Sticha, P. J., & Barber, G..  (2003).  CAT-ASVAB prototype Internet delivery system: Final report (FR-03-06). Arlington VA: Human Resources Rsearch Organization.

Giouroglou, H., & Economides, A. A..  (2003).  Cognitive CAT in foreign language assessment. In Proceedings 11th International PEG Conference. Powerful ICT Tools for Learning and Teaching, PEG '03, CD-ROM, 2003.

Chang, S. - W., & Ansley, T. N..  (2003).  A comparative study of item exposure control methods in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40, 71-103.

Boyd, A. M., Dodd, B. G., & Fitzpatrick, S. J..  (2003).  A comparison of exposure control procedures in CAT systems based on different measurement models for testlets using the verbal reasoning section of the MCAT. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Burt, W. M., Kim, S. - J., Davis, L. L., & Dodd, B. G..  (2003).  A comparison of item exposure control procedures using a CAT system based on the generalized partial credit model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.

De Beer, M.  (2003).  A comparison of learning potential results at various educational levels. In Paper presented at the 6th Annual Society for Industrial and Organisational Psychology of South Africa (SIOPSA) conference. 25-27 June 2003.

Rotou, O., Patsula, L., Steffen, M., & Rizavi, S..  (2003).  Comparison of multi-stage tests with computer adaptive and paper and pencil tests. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Dijkers, M. P.  (2003).  A computer adaptive testing simulation applied to the FIM instrument motor component. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 84, 384-393.

Macdonald, P. L.  (2003).  Computer-adaptive test for measuring personality factors using item response theory. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 64, 999.

Schneider, R. J., Goff, M., Anderson, S., & Borman, W. C..  (2003).  Computerized adaptive rating scales for measuring managerial performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11, 237-246.

Ponsoda, V., & Olea, J..  (2003).  Computerized adaptive testing. In . R. Fernández-Ballesteros (Ed.): Encyclopaedia of Psychological Assessment. London: Sage.

Leung, C. - K., Chang, H. - H., Hau, K. - T., & Wen, z..  (2003).  Computerized adaptive testing: A comparison of three content balancing methods. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Leung, C. - K., Chang, H. - H., & Hau, K. - T..  (2003).  Computerized adaptive testing: A comparison of three content balancing methods. The Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 2, 1-15.

Cheng, P. E., & Liou, M..  (2003).  Computerized adaptive testing using the nearest-neighbors criterion. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 204-216.

Cheng, P. E., & Liou, M..  (2003).  Computerized adaptive testing using the nearest-neighbors criterion. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 204-216.

Glas, C. A. W., & van der Linden, W. J..  (2003).  Computerized adaptive testing with item cloning. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 247-261.

van der Linden, W. J., & Veldkamp, B. P..  (2003).  Constraining item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with shadow tests. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Ariel, A., Veldkamp, B., & van der Linden, W. J..  (2003).  Constructing rotating item pools for constrained adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

van der Linden, W. J., & Veldkamp, B. P..  (2003).  Controlling item exposure and item eligibility in computerized adaptive testing. In .

Samejima, F.  (2003).  Criterion item characteristic curve function for evaluating the differential weight procedure adjusted to on-line item calibration. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the NCME. Chicago IL.

Vispoel, W. P., Clough, S. J., Bleiler, T., Hendrickson, A. B., & Ihrig, D..  (2002).  Can examinees use judgments of item difficulty to improve proficiency estimates on computerized adaptive vocabulary tests? . Journal of Educational Measurement, 39,  311-330.

Leung, C. - K., Chang, H. - H., & Hau, K. - T..  (2002).  Comparing three item selection approaches for computerized adaptive testing with content balancing requirement. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.

Smith, R. L., & Lewis, C..  (2002).  A comparison of computer mastery models when pool characteristics vary. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.

Pastor, D. A., Dodd, B. G., & Chang, H. - H..  (2002).  A comparison of item selection techniques and exposure control mechanisms in CATs using the generalized partial credit model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 147-163.

Hockemeyer, C.  (2002).  A comparison of non-deterministic procedures for the adaptive assessment of knowledge. Psychologische Beitrge, 44, 495-503.

Jodoin, M., Zenisky, A. L., & Hambleton, R. K..  (2002).  Comparison of the psychometric properties of several computer-based test designs for credentialing exams. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.

Tonidandel, S.  (2002).  Computer adaptive testing: The impact of test characteristics on perceived performance and test takers' reactions. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 62, 3410.

Tonidandel, S., Quiñones, M. A., & Adams, A. A..  (2002).  Computer-adaptive testing: The impact of test characteristics on perceived performance and test takers? reactions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 320-332.

Latu, E., & Chapman, E..  (2002).  Computerised adaptive testing. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33, 619-22.

Segall, D. O.  (2002).  Confirmatory item factor analysis using Markov chain Monte Carlo estimation with applications to online calibration in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans, LA.

van der Linden, W. J., & Veldkamp, B. P..  (2002).  Constraining item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with shadow tests (Research Report No. 02-06). University of Twente, The Netherlands.

Guille, R. Lipner, R. S., & Norcini, J. J..  (2002).  Content-stratified random item selection in computerized classification testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.

Davey, T., & Nering, M..  (2002).  Controlling item exposure and maintaining item security. In . C. N. Mills, M. T. Potenza, and J. J. Fremer (Eds.), Computer-Based Testing: Building the Foundation for Future Assessments (pp. 165-191). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Vispoel, W. P., Clough, S. J., Bleiler, T. Hendrickson, A. B., & Ihrig, D..  (2001).  Can examinees use judgments of item difficulty to improve proficiency estimates on computerized adaptive vocabulary tests?. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education.  Seattle WA.

Nandakumar, R., & Roussos, L..  (2001).  CATSIB: A modified SIBTEST procedure to detect differential item functioning in computerized adaptive tests (Research report). Newton, PA: Law School Admission Council.

Geranpayeh, A.  (2001).  CB BULATS: Examining the reliability of a computer based test using test-retest method. Cambridge ESOL Research Notes, Issue 5, July 2001, pp.

Ban, J. C., Hanson, B. A., Wang, T., Yi, Q., & Harris, D. J..  (2001).  A comparative study of on line pretest item?Calibration/scaling methods in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38, 191-212.

Yi, Q., Hanson, B., Widiatmo, H., & Harris, D. J..  (2001).  Comparison of the SPRT and CMT procedures in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle WA.

van der Linden, W. J.  (2001).  Computerized adaptive testing with equated number-correct scoring. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25, 343-355.

Roberts, J. S., Lin, Y., & Laughlin, J. E..  (2001).  Computerized adaptive testing with the generalized graded unfolding model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25, 177-196.

Bringsjord, E. L.  (2001).  Computerized-adaptive versus paper-and-pencil testing environments: An experimental analysis of examinee experience.

Norris, J. M., Kenyon, D. M., & Malabonga, V..  (2001).  Concerns with computerized adaptive oral proficiency assessment. A commentary on "Comparing examinee attitudes Toward computer-assisted and other oral proficient assessments": Response to the Norris Commentary. Language Learning and Technology, 5, 95-108.

van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A., & Meijer, R. R..  (2001).  CUSUM-based person-fit statistics for adaptive testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 26, 199-218.

van der Linden, W. J., & Glas, C. A. W..  (2000).  Capitalization on item calibration error in adaptive testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 13, 35-53.

Stahl, J., Bergstrom, B., & Gershon, R. C..  (2000).  CAT administration of language placement examinations. Journal of Applied Measurement, 1, 292-302.

Wainer, H.,, & Eignor, D. R..  (2000).  Caveats, pitfalls, and unexpected consequences of implementing large-scale computerized testing. In . Wainer, H. (Ed). Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (2nd ed.). pp. 271-299. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Robin, F.  (2000).  CBTS: Computer-based testing simulation and analysis [computer software]. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts, School of Education.

Krass, I. A.  (2000).  Change in distribution of latent ability with item position in CAT sequence. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education in New Orleans. LA.

Hontangas, P., Ponsoda, V., Olea, J., & Wise, S. L..  (2000).  The choice of item difficulty in self adapted testing. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 16(1), 3-12.

Robin, F., Xing, D., Scrams, D., & Potenza, M..  (2000).  Classification accuracy and test security for a computerized adaptive mastery test calibrated with different IRT models. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.

Patsula, L. N.  (2000).  A comparison of computerized adaptive testing and multistage testing. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 60, 5829.

Chen, S. - Y., Ankenmann, R. D., & Chang, H. - H..  (2000).  A comparison of item selection rules at the early stages of computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 241-255.

Chen, S. Y., Ankenmann, R. D., & Chang, H. - H..  (2000).  A comparison of item selection rules at the early stages of computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 241-255.

Luecht, R. M., & Nungester, R. J..  (2000).  Computer-adaptive sequential testing. In . W. J. van der Linden (Ed.), Computerized Adaptive Testing: Theory and Practice (pp. 289-209). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

Linacre, J. M.  (2000).  Computer-adaptive testing: A methodology whose time has come. In U.  Kang, Jean, E., & Linacre, J. M., Development of Computerised Middle School Achievement Tests (Vol. 69). Chicago, IL. USA: MESA.

Linacre, J. M.  (2000).  Computer-adaptive testing: A methodology whose time has come. MESA Memorandum No 9. Chicago : MESA psychometric laboratory, Unversity of Chicago.

Reise, S. P., & Henson, J. M..  (2000).  Computerization and adaptive administration of the NEO PI-R. Assessment, 7, 347-64.

LaVelle, T., Zaglaniczny, K.,, & Spitzer, L. E..  (2000).  Computerized adaptive administration of the self-evaluation examination. AANA.J, 68, 226-31.

Borman, W. C., Hanson, M. A., Kubisiak, U. C., & Buck, D. E..  (2000).  Computerized adaptive rating scales (CARS): Development and evaluation of the concept. (Institute Rep No. 350). Tampa FL: Personnel Decisions Research Institute.

Wainer, H.,, Dorans, N., Eignor, D. R., Flaugher, R., Green, B. F., Mislevy, R., et al..  (2000).  Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (2nd edition). Hillsdale, N. J. : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Eggen, T., & Straetmans, G. J. J. M..  (2000).  Computerized adaptive testing for classifying examinees into three categories. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 713-34.

van der Linden, W. J., & Glas, C. A. W..  (2000).  Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Reckase, M. D.  (2000).  Computerized testing ? the adolescent years: Juvenile delinquent or positive role model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.

van der Linden, W. J.  (2000).  Constrained adaptive testing with shadow tests. In . W. J. van der Linden and C. A. W. Glas (eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp.27-52). Norwell MA: Kluwer.

De Beer, M.  (2000).  The construction and evaluation of a dynamic computerised adaptive test for the measurement of learning potential. Unpublished D. Litt et Phil dissertation. University of South Africa, Pretoria.

Leung, C. - K., Chang, H. - H., & Hau, K. - T..  (2000).  Content balancing in stratified computerized adaptive testing designs. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA.

van der Linden, W. J., & Glas, C. A. W..  (2000).  Cross-validating item parameter estimation in adaptive testing. In . A. Boorsma, M. A. J. van Duijn, and T. A. B. Snijders (Eds.) (pp. 205-219), Essays on item response theory. New York: Springer.

Vispoel, W. P., Rocklin, T. R., Wang, T., & Bleiler, T..  (1999).  Can examinees use a review option to obtain positively biased ability estimates on a computerized adaptive test? . Journal of Educational Measurement, 36, 141-157.

Stahl, J., Gershon, R. C., & Bergstrom, B..  (1999).  CAT administration of language placement exams. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Bergstrom, B. A., & Lunz, M. E..  (1999).  CAT for certification and licensure. In Innovations in computerized assessment (pp. 67-91). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Patsula, L. N., & Hambleton, R. K..  (1999).  A comparative study of ability estimates from computer-adaptive testing and multi-stage testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal Canada.

Patsula, L. N.  (1999).  A comparison of computerized-adaptive testing and multi-stage testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Zara, A..  (1999).  A comparison of conventional and adaptive testing procedures for making single-point decisions. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Wise, S. L.  (1999).  Comparison of stratum scored and maximum likelihood scoring. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Schnipke, D. L., & Reese, L. M..  (1999).  A comparison of testlet-based test designs for computerized adaptive testing (LSAC Computerized Testing Report 97-01). Newtown, PA: LSAC.

Ban, J., Wang, T., & Yi, Q..  (1999).  Comparison of the a-stratified method, the Sympson-Hetter method, and the matched difficulty method in CAT administration. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Lawrence KS.

Bezruczko, N.  (1999).  Competency gradient for child-parent centers. Journal of Outcomes Measurement, 3, 35-52.

Handel, R. W., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Watt, M. E..  (1999).  Computerized adaptive assessment with the MMPI-2 in a clinical setting. Psychological Assessment, 11, 369-380.

Storm, E. G.  (1999).  Computerized adaptive testing in the Bundeswehr. Unpublished manuscript.

Meijer, R. R., & Nering, M. L..  (1999).  Computerized Adaptive Testing: Overview and Introduction. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 187-94.

Meijer, R. R., & Nering, M. L..  (1999).  Computerized adaptive testing: Overview and introduction. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 187-194.

Lau, C. A,, & Wang, T..  (1999).  Computerized classification testing under practical constraints with a polytomous model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Montreal.

Lau, C. A., & Wang, T..  (1999).  Computerized classification testing under practical constraints with a polytomous model. annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. presented at the 04/1999, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Parshall, C., Davey, T., Spray, J., & Kalohn, J..  (1999).  Computerized testing ? Issues and applications (Mini-course manual). In Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal.

Fan, M., Thompson, T., & Davey, T..  (1999).  Constructing adaptive tests to parallel conventional programs. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National council on Measurement in Education. Montreal.

Vispoel, W. P.  (1999).  Creating computerized adaptive tests of music aptitude: Problems, solutions, and future directions. In . F. Drasgow and J. B. Olson-Buchanan (Eds.), Innovations in computerized assessment (pp. 151-176). Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum.

Zenisky, A. L.  (1999).  Current and future research in multi-stage testing (Research Report No 370). Amherst MA: University of Massachusetts, Laboratory of Pychometric and Evaluative Research.

van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A., & Meijer, R. R..  (1999).  CUSUM-based person-fit statistics for adaptive testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 26, 199-218.

van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A., & Meijer, R. R..  (1999).  CUSUM-based person-fit statistics for adaptive testing (Research Report 99-05). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.

van der Linden, W. J., & Glas, C. A. W..  (1998).  Capitalization on item calibration error in adaptive testing (Research Report 98-07). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.

Luecht, R. M.  (1998).  CASTISEL [Computer software]. Philadelphia, PA: National Board of Medical Examiners.

Hsu, Y., Thompson, T. D., & Chen, W. - H..  (1998).  CAT item calibration. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego.

Thomasson, G. L.  (1998).  CAT Item exposure control: New evaluation tools, alternate methods and integration into a total CAT program. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council of Measurement in Education. San Diego, CA.

Schaeffer, G. A., Bridgeman, B., Golub-Smith, M. L., Lewis, C., Potenza, M. T., & Steffen, M..  (1998).  Comparability of paper-and-pencil and computer adaptive test scores on the GRE General Test (No. ETS Research Report 98-38). presented at the August, 1998, Princeton, N.J.: Educational Testing Services.

Schaeffer, G., Bridgeman, B., Golub-Smith, M. L., Lewis, C., Potenza, M. T., & Steffen, M..  (1998).  Comparability of paper-and-pencil and computer adaptive test scores on the GRE General Test (GRE Board Professional Report No 95-08P; Educational Testing Service Research Report 98-38). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Chang, S. - W., & Twu, B. - Y..  (1998).  A comparative study of item exposure control methods in computerized adaptive testing. Research Report Series 98-3, Iowa City: American College Testing.

Chang, S. - W.  (1998).  A comparative study of item exposure control methods in computerized adaptive testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa , Iowa City IA.

Lau, C. A., & Wang, T..  (1998).  Comparing and combining dichotomous and polytomous items with SPRT procedure in computerized classification testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Diego.

Revuelta, J.,, & Ponsoda, V..  (1998).  A comparison of item exposure control methods in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35, 311-327.

Chen, S., Hou, L., & Dodd, B. G..  (1998).  A comparison of maximum likelihood estimation and expected a posteriori estimation in CAT using the partial credit model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 569-595.

Tang, L., Jiang, H., & Chang, H. - H..  (1998).  A comparison of two methods of controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Diego CA.

Armstrong, R. D., & Jones, D. H..  (1998).  Computer adaptive testing ? Approaches for item selection and measurement. Rutgers Center for Operations Research, New Brunswick NJ.

Luecht, R. M.  (1998).  Computer-assisted test assembly using optimization heuristics. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22 , 224-236.

Borman, W. C., Hanson, M. A., Montowidlo, S. J., Drasgow, F., Foster, L., & Kubisiak, U. C..  (1998).  Computerized adaptive rating scales that measure contextual performance. In Paper presented at the 3th annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Dallas TX.

Straetmans, G. J. J. M., & Eggen, T..  (1998).  Computerized adaptive testing: What it is and how it works. Educational Technology, 38, 45-52.

Armstrong, R. D., Jones, D. H., & Berliner, N..  (1998).  Computerized adaptive testing with multiple form structures. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Urbana, IL.

Thompson, T., Davey, T., & Nering, M. L..  (1998).  Constructing adaptive tests to parallel conventional programs. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego.

Thompson, T., Davey, T., & Nering, M. L..  (1998).  Constructing passage-based tests that parallel conventional programs. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Urbana, IL.

Davey, T., & Nering, M. L..  (1998).  Controlling item exposure and maintaining item security. In Paper presented at an Educational Testing Service-sponsored colloquium entitled ?Computer-based testing: Building the foundations for future assessments. ? Philadelphia PA.

Stocking, M. L., & Lewis, C..  (1998).  Controlling item exposure conditional on ability in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational & Behavioral Statistics, 23, 57-75.

Spray, J. A., Parshall, C. G., & Huang, C. - H..  (1997).  Calibration of CAT items administered online for classification: Assumption of local independence. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Gatlinburg TN.

McBride, J. R., & Cooper, R. R..  (1997).  CAST 5 for Windows users' guide. Contract No. "MDA903-93-D-0032, DO 0054. Alexandria, VA: Human Resources Research Organization.

Wise, L. L., Curran, L. T., & McBride, J. R..  (1997).  CAT-ASVAB cost and benefit analyses. In . W. A. Sands, B. K. Waters, and J. R. McBride (Eds.), Computer adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp. 227-236). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Moreno, K. E.  (1997).  CAT-ASVAB operational test and evaluation. In . W. A. Sands, B. K. Waters, and . R. McBride (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp. 199-205). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.

Nandakumar, R., & Roussos, L..  (1997).  CATSIB: A modified SIBTEST procedure to detect differential item functioning in computerized adaptive tests (Research report). Newtown, PA: Law School Admission Council.

Handel, R. W., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Watt, M..  (1997).  Comparability and validity of computerized adaptive testing with the MMPI-2 using a clinical sample. In Paper presented at the 32nd Annual Symposium and Recent Developments in the use of the MMPI-2 and MMPI-A. Minneapolis MN.

Chen, S. - K.  (1997).  A comparison of maximum likelihood estimation and expected a posteriori estimation in computerized adaptive testing using the generalized partial credit model. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 58, 453.

Schnipke, D. L., & Reese, L. M..  (1997).  A comparison of testlet-based test designs for computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the meeting of American Educational Research Association. Chicago, IL.

Case, S. M., & Luecht, R. M..  (1997).  Computer assembly of tests so that content reigns supreme. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Dunkel, P. A.  (1997).  Computer-adaptive testing of listening comprehension: A blueprint of CAT Development. The Language Teacher Online 21, no. 10. .

Vispoel, W. P.,, & Wang, T..  (1997).  Computerized adaptive and fixed-item testing of music listening skill: A comparison of efficiency, precision, and concurrent validity. Journal of Educational Measurement, 34, 43-63.

Vispoel, W. P., Wang, T., & Bleiler, T..  (1997).  Computerized adaptive and fixed-item testing of music listening skill: A comparison of efficiency, precision, and concurrent validity. Journal of Educational Measurement, 34, 43-63.

Sands, W. A., Waters, B. K., & McBride, J. R..  (1997).  Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation. Washington, D.C., USA: American Psychological Association.

Bochner, J., Garrison, W., Palmer, L., MacKenzie, D., & Braveman, A..  (1997).  A computerized adaptive testing system for speech discrimination measurement: The Speech Sound Pattern Discrimination Test. Journal of the Accoustical Society of America, 101, 2289-298.

Shermis, M. D.  (1997).  Computerized adaptive testing through the World Wide Web. In .

Shermis, M. D., Mzumara, H., Brown, M., & Lillig, C..  (1997).  Computerized adaptive testing through the World Wide Web. (ERIC No. ED414536).

Baek, S. G.  (1997).  Computerized adaptive testing using the partial credit model for attitude measurement. In . M. Wilson, G. Engelhard Jr and K. Draney (Eds.), Objective measurement: Theory into practice, volume 4. Norwood NJ: Ablex.

Shermis, M. D., Mzumara, H., & Bublitz, S..  (1997).  Controlling test and computer anxiety: Test performance under CAT and SAT conditions. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Segall, D. O., & Moreno, K. E..  (1997).  Current and future challenges. In . W. A. Sands, B. K. Waters, and J. R. McBride (Eds.). Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp 257-269). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.

Rocklin, T. R., Vispoel, W. P., Wang, T., & Bleiler, T. L..  (1996).  Can examinees use a review option to positively bias their scores on a computerized adaptive test? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National council on Measurement in Education, New York. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National council on Measurement in Education. New York NY.

VanLoy, W. J.  (1996).  A comparison of adaptive self-referenced testing and classical approaches to the measurement of individual change. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.

Spray, J. A., & Reckase, M. D..  (1996).  Comparison of SPRT and sequential Bayes procedures for classifying examinees into two categories using a computerized test. Journal of Educational & Behavioral Statistics, 21, 405-414.

Tang, K. L.  (1996).  A comparison of the traditional maximum information method and the global information method in CAT item selection. In annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York, NY USA.

Shermis, M. D., Stemmer, P. M., & Webb, P. M..  (1996).  Computerized adaptive skill assessment in a statewide testing program. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 29(1), 49-67.

Eggen, T., & Straetmans, G. J. J. M..  (1996).  Computerized adaptive testing for classifying examinees into three categories (Measurement and Research Department Rep 96-3). Arnhem, The Netherlands: Cito.

Shermis, M. D., & et. al.,.  (1996).  Computerized adaptive testing for reading assessment and diagnostic assessment. Journal of Developmental Education, 18-20.

Bergstrom, B. A.  (1996).  Computerized adaptive testing for the national certification examination.

Bergstrom, B. A.  (1996).  Computerized adaptive testing for the national certification examination. AANA.J, 64, 119-124.

Slater, S. C., & Schaffer, G. A..  (1996).  Computing scores for incomplete GRE General computer adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York NY.

Roos, L. L., Wise, S. L., Yoes, M. E., & Rocklin, T. R..  (1996).  Conducting self-adapted testing using MicroCAT. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 821-827.

Davey, T., & Thomas, L..  (1996).  Constructing adaptive tests to parallel conventional programs. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New York.

Huang, S. X.  (1996).  A content-balanced adaptive testing algorithm for computer-based training systems. In . Frasson, C. and Gauthier, G. and Lesgold, A. (Eds.), Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Third International Conference, ITS'96, Montr?al, Canada, June 1996 Proceedings. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1086. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag 306-314.

Wise, S. L.  (1996).  A critical analysis of the argument for and against item review in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York.

McBride, J. R.  (1996).  Current research in computer-based testing for personnel selection and classification in the United States. In Invited address to the Centre for Recruitment and Selection, Belgian Armed Forces".

Roper, B. L., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Butcher, J. N..  (1995).  Comparability and validity of computerized adaptive testing with the MMPI-2. Journal of Personality Assessment, 65, 358-71. presented at the Oct.

Eignor, D. R., & Schaffer, G. A..  (1995).  Comparability studies for the GRE CAT General Test and the NCLEX using CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco.

Lewis, M. J., Subhiyah, R. G., & Morrison, C. A..  (1995).  A comparison of classification agreement between adaptive and full-length test under the 1-PL and 2-PL models. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.

Bridgeman, B., & Schaeffer, G. A..  (1995).  A comparison of gender differences on paper-and-pencil and computer-adaptive versions of the Graduate Record Examination. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.

Schnipke, D. L.,, & Green, B. F..  (1995).  A comparison of item selection routines in linear and adaptive tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 32, 227-242.

Way, W. D., Lewis, C., & Smith, R. L..  (1995).  A comparison of two IRT-based models for computerized mastery testing when item parameter estimates are uncertain. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco.

Morrison, C. A., & Nungester, R. J..  (1995).  Computer adaptive testing in a medical licensure setting: A comparison of outcomes under the one- and two- parameter logistic models. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco.

Ruiz, B., Fitz, P. A., Lewis, C., & Reidy, C..  (1995).  Computer-adaptive testing: A new breed of assessment. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 95, 1326-1327.

Ruiz, B., Fitz, P. A., Lewis, C., & Reidy, C..  (1995).  Computer-adaptive testing: A new breed of assessment. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 95, 1326-1327.

Linacre, J. M.  (1995).  Computer-adaptive testing: CAT: A Bayesian maximum-falsification approach. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 9, 412.

Baek, S. G.  (1995).  Computerized adaptive attitude testing using the partial credit model. Dissertation Abstracts International-A, 55(7-A), 1922 (UMI No. AAM9430378).

Lunz, M. E., & Bergstrom, B. A..  (1995).  Computerized adaptive testing: Tracking candidate response patterns. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 13, 151-162.

Dodd, B. G., de Ayala, R. J., & Koch, W. R..  (1995).  Computerized adaptive testing with polytomous items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19, 5?22.

Dodd, B. G., De Ayala, R. J., & Koch. W.R.,.  (1995).  Computerized Adaptive Testing With Polytomous Items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19(1), 5-22.

Vale, C. D.  (1995).  Computerized testing for licensure. In . J. Impara (ed.), Licensure testing: Purposes, procedures, and Practices (pp. 291-320). Lincoln NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.

Stocking, M. L., & Lewis, C..  (1995).  Controlling item exposure conditional on ability in computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 95-25). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Gershon, R. C.  (1994).  CAT software system [computer program. Chicago IL: Computer Adaptive Technologies.

Segall, D. O.  (1994).  CAT-GATB simulation studies. San Diego CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

Wise, S. L., Roos, L. L., & Plake, B. S..  (1994).  Comparing computerized adaptive and self-adapted tests: The influence of examinee achievement locus of control. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.

Hetter, R. D., Segall, D. O., & Bloxom, B. M..  (1994).  A Comparison of Item Calibration Media in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 18(3).

Hetter, R. D., Segall, D. O., & Bloxom, B. M..  (1994).  A comparison of item calibration media in computerized adaptive tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 18, 197-204.

Lunz, M. E., Bergstrom, B. A., & Gershon, R. C..  (1994).  Computer adaptive testing. International journal of Educational Research, 6, 623-634.

Carlson, R.  (1994).  Computer adaptive testing: A shift in the evaluation paradigm. Educational Technology Systems, 22 (3), 213-224.

Diones, R., & Everson, H..  (1994).  Computer adaptive testing: Assessment of the future. Curriculum/Technology Quarterly, 4 (2), 1-3.

Bergstrom, B., & Gershon, R. C..  (1994).  Computerized adaptive testing exploring examinee response time using hierarchical linear modeling. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.

Bergstrom, B. A., & Gershon, R. C..  (1994).  Computerized adaptive testing for licensure and certification. CLEAR Exam Review, Winter 1994, 25-27.

Smittle, P.  (1994).  Computerized adaptive testing: Revolutionizing academic assessment. Community College Journal, 65 (1), 32-35.

Du, Y., Lewis, C., & Pashley, P. J..  (1994).  Computerized mastery testing using fuzzy set decision theory (Research Report 94-37). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Oltman, P. K.  (1994).  Computerized Testing (Research Report 94-22). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Vispoel, W. P.,, & Coffman, D. D..  (1994).  Computerized-adaptive and self-adapted music-listening tests: Features and motivational benefits. Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 25-51.

Eignor, D. R., Stocking, M. L., Way, W. D., & Steffen, M..  (1993).  Case studies in computer adaptive test design through simulation (Research Report RR-93-56). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Eignor, D. R., Way, W. D., Stocking, M., & Steffen, M..  (1993).  Case studies in computerized adaptive test design through simulation (Research Report 93-56). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Roper, B. L.  (1993).  Comparability and validity of computerized adaptive testing with the MMPI-2. Dissertation Abstracts International, 53, 3791.

Dolan, S.  (1993).  A comparison of computer adaptive test administration methods. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.

Spray, J. A., & Reckase, M. D..  (1993).  Comparison of SPRT and sequential Bayes procedures for classifying examinees into two categories using an adaptive test. In Unpublished manuscript. (.

Carlson, R. D.  (1993).  Computer adaptive testing: A comparison of four item selection strategies when used with the golden section search strategy for estimating ability. Dissertation Abstracts International, 54, 1772.

Smittle, P.  (1993).  Computer adaptive testing: A new era. Journal of Developmental Education, 17 (1), 8-10.

Vispoel, W. P.  (1993).  Computerized adaptive and fixed-item versions of the ITED Vocabulary test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 779-788.

Syang, A., & Dale, N. B..  (1993).  Computerized adaptive testing in computer science: assessing student programming abilities. In Proceedings of the twenty-fourth SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. Indianapolis IN.

Welch, R. E.,, & Frick, T..  (1993).  Computerized adaptive testing in instructional settings. Educational Technology Research and Development, 41(3), 47-62.

Xiao, B.  (1993).  Computerized adaptive testing strategies: Golden section search, dichotomous search, and Z-score strategies (Doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University, 1990). Dissertation Abstracts International, 54-03B, 1720.

Halkitis, P. N., & Leahy, J. M..  (1993).  Computerized adaptive testing: the future is upon us. Nurs Health Care, 14, 378-85. presented at the Sep.

Dodd, B. G., Koch, W. R., & de Ayala, R. J..  (1993).  Computerized adaptive testing using the partial credit model: Effects of item pool characteristics and different stopping rules. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 61-77.

Du, Y., Lewis, C., & Pashley, P. J..  (1993).  Computerized mastery testing using fuzzy set decision theory. Applied Measurement in Education, 6, 181-193.

Stocking, M. L.  (1993).  Controlling item exposure rates in a realistic adaptive testing paradigm (Research Report 93-2). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Moreno, K. E.,, & Segall, D. O..  (1992).  CAT-ASVAB precision. Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Military Testing Association, 1, 22-26.

Zara, A.  (1992).  A comparison of computerized adaptive and paper-and-pencil versions of the national registered nurse licensure examination. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.

Bergstrom, B., & Gershon, R. C..  (1992).  Comparison of item targeting strategies for pass/fail adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.

Tam, S. S.  (1992).  A comparison of methods for adaptive estimation of a multidimensional trait. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia University.

Wise, S. L., Plake, S. S., Johnson, P. L., & Roos, S. L..  (1992).  A comparison of self-adapted and computerized adaptive achievement tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 29, 329-339.

De Ayala, R. J., Dodd, B. G., & Koch, W. R..  (1992).  A comparison of the partial credit and graded response models in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 5, 17-34.

Wainer, H.,, Kaplan, B., & Lewis, C..  (1992).  A comparison of the performance of simulated hierarchical and linear testlets. Journal of Educational Measurement, 29, 243-251.

Bergstrom, B.  (1992).  Computer adaptive versus paper-and-pencil tests. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.

Bowers, D. R.  (1992).  Computer-based adaptive testing in music research and instruction. Psychomusicology, 10, 49-63.

Engdahl, B.  (1992).  Computerized adaptive assessment of cognitive abilities among disabled adults. ERIC Document No ED301274.

Frick, T. W.  (1992).  Computerized adaptive mastery tests as expert systems. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 8, 187-213.

Frick, T. W.  (1992).  Computerized adaptive mastery tests as expert systems. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 8(2), 187-213.

Fields, F. A.  (1992).  Computerized adaptive testing for NCLEX-PN. Journal of Practical Nursing, 42, 8-10. presented at the Jun.

Embretson, S. E.  (1992).  Computerized adaptive testing: Its potential substantive contribution to psychological research and assessment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 129-133.

Vispoel, W. P.,, & Coffman, D. D..  (1992).  Computerized adaptive testing of music-related skills. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 112, 29-49.

Legg, S. M.,, & Buhr, D. C..  (1992).  Computerized adaptive testing with different groups. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 11 (2), 23-27.

Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Roper, B. L..  (1992).  Computerized adaptive testing with the MMPI-2: Reliability, validity, and comparability to paper and pencil administration. In Paper presented at the 27th Annual Symposium on Recent Developments in the MMPI/MMPI-2. Minneapolis MN.

Sheehan, K.,, & Lewis, C..  (1992).  Computerized mastery testing with nonequivalent testlets. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 65-76.

Sheehan, K., & Lewis, C..  (1992).  Computerized Mastery Testing With Nonequivalent Testlets. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16(1), 65-76.

Bergstrom, B. A.  (1992).  Confidence in pass/fail decisions for computer adaptive and paper and pencil examinations. Evaluation and The Health Professions, 15(4), 435-464.

Bergstrom, B. A., & Lunz, M. E..  (1992).  Confidence in pass/fail decisions for computer adaptive and paper and pencil examinations. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 15, 453-464.

Bergstrom, B. A.  (1992).  Confidence in pass/fail decisions for computer adaptive and paper and pencil examinations. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 15(4), 435-464.

Stenson, H., Graves, P., Gardiner, J., & Dally, L..  (1991).  Collected works on the legal aspects of computerized adaptive testing. Chicago, IL: National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc.

Roper, B. L., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Butcher, J. N..  (1991).  Comparability of computerized adaptive and conventional testing with the MMPI-2. Journal of Personality Assessment, 57, 278-290. presented at the Oct.

Lunz, M. E., & Bergstrom, B. A..  (1991).  Comparability of decisions for computer adaptive and written examinations. Journal of Allied Health, 20, 15-23.

Kuan, T. H.  (1991).  A comparison of paper-and-pencil, computer-administered, computerized feedback, and computerized adaptive testing methods for classroom achievement testing. Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 1719.

Kingsbury, G. G.  (1991).  A comparison of procedures for content-sensitive item selection. Applied Measurement in Education.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Zara, A..  (1991).  A comparison of procedures for content-sensitive item selection in computerized adaptive tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 4, 241-261.

Bergstrom, B. A., & Lunz, M. E..  (1991).  Comparisons of computer adaptive and pencil and paper tests. Chicago IL: American Society of Clinical Pathologists.

Hambleton, R. K., Zaal, J. N., & Pieters, J. P. M..  (1991).  Computerized adaptive testing: Theory, applications, and standards. In . R. K. Hambleton and J. N. Zaal (Eds.), Advances in educational and psychological testing: Theory and Applications (pp. 341-366). Boston: Kluwer.

Bergstrom, B. B., & Lunz, M. E..  (1991).  Confidence in pass/fail decisions for computer adaptive and paper and pencil examinations. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.

Laros, J. A., & Tellegen, P. J..  (1991).  Construction and validation of the SON-R 5-17, the Snijders-Oomen non-verbal intelligence test. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.

Johnson, J. L., Roos, L. L., Wise, S. L., & Plake, B. S..  (1991).  Correlates of examinee item choice behavior in self-adapted testing. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 4, 25-28.

Parker, S. B., & McBride, J. R..  (1990).  A comparison of Rasch and three-parameter logistic models in computerized adaptive testing. Unpublished manuscript.

Frick, T. W.  (1990).  A comparison of three decision models for adapting the length of computer-based mastery tests. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 6(4), 479-513.

Rudner, L. M.  (1990).  Computer testing: Pragmatic issues and research needs. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 9 (2), 19-20.

Koch, W. R., Dodd, B. G., & Fitzpatrick, S. J..  (1990).  Computerized adaptive measurement of attitudes. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 23, 20-30.

Vispoel, W. P.  (1990).  Computerized adaptive music tests: A new solution to three old problems. In Paper presented at the biannual meeting of the Music Educators National Conference. Washington DC.

Wainer, H.,, Dorans, N. J., Flaugher, R., Green, B. F., Mislevy, R. J., Steinberg, L., & Thissen, D..  (1990).  Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (Eds.). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.

Adema, J. J.  (1990).  The construction of customized two-staged tests, 27, 241-253.

Vispoel, W. T., & Twing, J. S..  (1990).  Creating adaptive tests of musical ability with limited-size item pools. In . D. Dalton (Ed.), ADCIS 32nd International Conference Proceedings (pp. 105-112). Columbus OH: Association for the Development of Computer-Based Instructional Systems.

Gershon, R. C.  (1989).  CAT administrator [Computer program]. Chicago: Micro Connections.

McBride, J. R.  (1989).  Commercial applications of computerized adaptive testing. In C.E. Davis Chair, Computerized Adaptive Testing?Military and Commercial Developments Ten Years Later: Symposium conducted at the Annual Conference of the Military Testing Association (524-529). San Antonio, TX.

Frick, T. W.  (1989).  A comparison of an expert systems approach to computerized adaptive testing and an IRT model. Unpublished manuscript (submitted to American Educational Research Journal).

de Ayala, R. J.  (1989).  A comparison of the nominal response model and the three-parameter logistic model in computerized adaptive testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49, 789-805.

Ho, R., & Hsu, T. C..  (1989).  A comparison of three adaptive testing strategies using MicroCAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco.

Olson, J. B., Maynes, D. D., Slawson, D., & Ho, K..  (1989).  Comparisons of paper-administered, computer-administered and computerized adaptive achievement tests. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5, 311-326.

McBride, J. R.  (1989).  A computerized adaptive mathematics screening test. In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the California Educational Research Association. Burlingame, CA.

Waller, N. G.  (1989).  Computerized adaptive personality assessment. Unpublished master?s thesis, Harvard University, Cambridge MA.

Grist, S., Rudner, L. M., & Wise,.  (1989).  Computerized adaptive tests. ERIC Clearinghouse on Tests, Measurement, and Evaluation, no. 107.

Wingersky, M. S.  (1989).  A consideration for variable length adaptive tests (Research Report 89-40). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Ward, W. C.  (1988).  The College Board computerized placement tests: An application of computerized adaptive testing. Machine-Mediated Learning, 2, 271-282.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Houser, R. L..  (1988).  A comparison of achievement level estimates from computerized adaptive testing and paper-and-pencil testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.

Ben-Porath, Y. S., Waller, N. G., Slutske, W. S., & Butcher, J. N..  (1988).  A comparison of two methods for the adaptive administration of the MMPI-2 content scales. In Paper presented at the 86th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association. Atlanta GA.

Dodd, B. G., Koch, W. R., & de Ayala, R. J..  (1988).  Computerized adaptive attitude measurement: A comparison of the graded response and rating scale models. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans.

de Ayala, R. J.  (1988).  Computerized adaptive testing: A comparison of the nominal response model and the three parameter model. Dissertation Abstracts International, 48, 3148.

Kingsbury, G. G., & et. al.,.  (1988).  Computerized adaptive testing: A four-year-old pilot study shows that CAT can work. Technological Horizons in Education, 16 (4), 73-76.

Reckase, M. D.  (1988).  Computerized adaptive testing: a good idea waiting for the right technology. In Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, April 1988.

Schinoff, R. B., & Stead, L..  (1988).  Computerized adaptive testing program at Miami-Dade Community College, South Campous. In Laguna Hill CA: League for Innovation in the community College.

Doucette, D.  (1988).  Computerized adaptive testing: The state of the art in assessment at three community colleges. Laguna Hills CA: League for Innovation in the Community College.

League-for-Innovation-in-the-Community-College,.  (1988).  Computerized adaptive testing: The state of the art in assessment at three community colleges. Laguna Hills CA: Author.

McBride, J. R.  (1988).  A computerized adaptive version of the Differential Aptitude Tests. In Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association. Atlanta GA.

Lewis, C., & Sheehan, K..  (1988).  Computerized mastery testing. Machine-Mediated Learning, 2, 283-286.

Green, B. F.  (1988).  Construct validity of computer-based tests. In . H. Wainer and H. Braun (Eds.), Test validity (pp. 77-103). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.

Green, B. F.  (1988).  Critical problems in computer-based psychological measurement, , ,. Applied Measurement in Education, 1, 223-231.

Wainer, H.,, & Kiely, G. L..  (1987).  CATS, testlets, and test construction: A rationale for putting test developers back into CAT. Journal of Educational Measurement, 32, 185-202.

Linacre, J. M.  (1987).  A computer program for adaptive testing by microcomputer (MESA Memorandum No 40). Chicago: University of Chicago. (ERIC ED 280 895.).

Larson, J. W.  (1987).  Computerized adaptive language testing: A Spanish placement exam. In Language Testing Research Selected Papers from the Colloquium, Monterey CA.

de Ayala, R. J., & Koch, W. R..  (1987).  Computerized adaptive testing: A comparison of the nominal response model and the three-parameter logistic model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Washington DC.

Weiss, D. J., & Vale, C. D..  (1987).  Computerized adaptive testing for measuring abilities and other psychological variables. In . J. N. Butcher (Ed.), Computerized personality measurement: A practitioners guide (pp. 325-343). New York: Basic Books.

McBride, J. R.  (1987).  Computerized adaptive testing made practical: The Computerized Adaptive Edition of the Differential Aptitude Tests. In Presented at the U.S. Department of Labor National Test Development Conference. San Francisco, CA.

Dodd, B. G.  (1987).  Computerized adaptive testing with the rating scale model. In Paper presented at the Fourth International Objective Measurement Workshop. Chicago.

Burke, M. J,, Normand, J., & Raju, N. M..  (1987).  Computerized psychological testing: Overview and critique. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 1, 42-51.

Wainer, H.,, & Kiely, G. L..  (1986).  CATs, testlets, and test construction: A rationale for putting test developers back into CAT (Technical Report 86-71). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service, Program Statistics Research.

Tatsuoka, K. K.  (1986).  A cognitive error diagnostic adaptive testing system. In . the 28th ADCIS International Conference Proceedings. Washington DC: ADCIS.

Ward, W. C., Kline, R. G., & Flaugher, J..  (1986).  College Board computerized placement tests: Validation of an adaptive test of basic skills (Research Report 86-29). Princeton NJ:  Educational Testing Service.

Olsen, J. B., Maynes, D. D., Slawson, D., & Ho, K..  (1986).  Comparison and equating of paper-administered, computer-administered, and computerized adaptive tests of achievement. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.

Shermis, M. D.  (1986).  A computer-adaptive placement test for college mathematics. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.

McBride, J. R., & Moe, K. C..  (1986).  Computerized adaptive achievement testing: A prototype. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco CA.

McBride, J. R.  (1986).  A computerized adaptive edition of the Differential Aptitude Tests. In Presented at the National Assessment Conference of the Education Commission of the States. Boulder, CO.

McBride, J. R.  (1986).  A computerized adaptive edition of the Differential Aptitude Tests. In Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association. Washington DC.

Kingsbury, G. G.  (1986).  Computerized adaptive testing: A pilot project. In . W. C. Ryan (ed.), Proceedings: NECC 86, National Educational Computing Conference (pp.172-176). Eugene OR: University of Oregon, International Council on Computers in Education.

Wolfe, J. H.  (1986).  Computerized testing technology. Advances in Reading/Language Research, 4, 71-78.

Koch, W. R., & Dodd, B. G..  (1985).  Computerized adaptive attitude measurement. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago.

McBride, J. R.  (1985).  Computerized adaptive testing. Educational Leadership, 43, 25-28.

McBride, J. R.  (1985).  Computerized adaptive testing: An overview and an example. In Presented at the Assessment Conference of the Education Commission of the States. Boulder, CO.

Sympson, J. B., & Hetter, R. D..  (1985).  Controlling item exposure conditional on ability in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 23, 57-75.

Sympson, J. B., & Hetter, R. D..  (1985).  Controlling item-exposure rates in computerized adaptive testing. In . Proceedings of the 27th annual meeting of the Military Testing Association (pp. 973-977). San Diego CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

Butcher, J. N., Keller, L. S., & Bacon, S. F..  (1985).  Current developments and future directions in computerized personality assessment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 803-815.

Bill, B. C.  (1984).  A comparison of the maximum likelihood strategy and stradaptive test on a micro-computer. Unpublished M.S. thesis, University of Wisconsin, Madison.

Stevenson, J.  (1984).  Computerized adaptive testing in the Maryland Public Schools. MicroCAT News, 1, 1.

MCArthur, D. L., & Choppin, B. H..  (1984).  Computerized diagnostic testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 21, 391-397.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Weiss, D. J..  (1983).  A comparison of IRT-based adaptive mastery testing and a sequential mastery testing procedure. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), New horizons in testing: Latent trait test theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 257-283). New York: Academic Press.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Weiss, D. J..  (1983).  A comparison of IRT-based adaptive mastery testing and a sequential mastery testing procedure. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), New horizons in testing: Latent trait theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 1-8). New York: Academic Press.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Weiss, D. J..  (1983).  A comparison of IRT-based adaptive mastery testing and a sequential mastery testing procedure. In New horizons in testing: Latent trait test theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 258-283). New York, NY. USA: Academic Press.

HUnter, D. R.  (1982).  Comparison of live and simulated adaptive tests (No. AFHRL-TP-82-35). Air Force Human Resources Laborarory. presented at the December 1982, Brooks Air Force Base, Texas: Air Force Systems Command.

McBride, J. R.  (1982).  Computerized adaptive testing project: Objectives and requirements (Tech Note 82-22). San Diego CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center. (AD A118 447).

Croll, P. R.  (1982).  Computerized adaptive testing system design: Preliminary design considerations (Tech. Report 82-52). San Diego CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center. (AD A118 495).

McBride, J. R.  (1982).  Computerized Adaptive Testing system development and project management. Minutes of the ASVAB (Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery) Steering Committee. Washington, DC: Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Manpower, Reserve Affairs and Logistics), Accession Policy Directorate.

McBride, J. R., & Sympson, J. B..  (1982).  The computerized adaptive testing system development project. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1982 Item Response Theory and Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 342-349). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology.

Wildgrube, W.  (1982).  Computerized testing in the German Federal Armed Forces (FAF): Empirical approaches. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1982 Item Response Theory and Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp.353-359). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

McKinley, R. L.,, & Reckase, M. D..  (1981).  A comparison of a Bayesian and a maximum likelihood tailored testing procedure. Research Report 81-2. Columbia MO: University of Missouri, Department of Educational Psychology, Tailored Testing Research Laboratory.

Rosso, M. A., & Reckase, M. D..  (1981).  A comparison of a maximum likelihood and a Bayesian estimation procedure for tailored testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Los Angeles CA.

Nicewander, W. A., Chang, H. S., & Doody, E. N..  (1981).  A comparison of two methods of interactive testing Final report. National Institute of Education Grant 79-1045.

Gorman, S.  (1980).  A comparative evaluation of two Bayesian adaptive ability estimation procedures with a conventional test strategy. Catholic University of America, Washington DC.

Gorman, S.  (1980).  A comparative evaluation of two Bayesian adaptive ability estimation procedures. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, the Catholic University of America.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Weiss, D. J..  (1980).  A comparison of adaptive, sequential, and conventional testing strategies for mastery decisions (Research Report 80-4). Minneapolis, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Weiss, D. J..  (1980).  A comparison of ICC-based adaptive mastery testing and the Waldian probability ratio method. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 1979 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 120-139). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Gorman, S.  (1980).  A comparison of the accuracy of Bayesian adaptive and static tests using a correction for regression. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1979 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 35-50). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Levitt, H.  (1980).  Computer applications in audiology and rehabilitation of the hearing impaired. Journal of Communication Disorders, 13, 471-481.

McKinley, R. L.,, & Reckase, M. D..  (1980).  Computer applications to ability testing. Association for Educational Data Systems Journal, 13, 193-203.

Kalisch, S. J.  (1980).  Computerized instructional adaptive testing model: Formulation and validation (AFHRL-TR-79-33, Final Report). Brooks Air Force Base TX: Air Force Human Resources Laboratory", Also Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, February 1981, 11, 20 (Ms. No, 2217) .

Wildgrube, W.  (1980).  Computerized testing in the German Federal Armed Forces (FAF). In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1979 Item Response Theory and Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 68-77). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laborator.

Thompson, J. G., & Weiss, D. J..  (1980).  Criterion-related validity of adaptive testing strategies (Research Report 80-3). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Harris, J. D., & Smith, P. F..  (1979).  A comparison of a standard and a computerized adaptive paradigm in Bekesy fixed-frequency audiometry. Journal of Auditory Research, 19, 1-22.

McBride, J. R.  (1979).  Computerized adaptive testing: The state of the art (ARI Technical Report 423). Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.

Sympson, J. B.  (1979).  Criterion-related validity of conventional and adaptive tests in a military environment. In Paper presented at the 1979 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN.

Steele, J. A., Binnie, C. A., & Cooper, W. A..  (1978).  Combining auditory and visual stimuli in the adaptive testing of speech discrimination. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 43, 115-122.

Maurelli, V. A.  (1978).  A comparison of Bayesian and maximum likelihood scoring in a simulated stradaptive test. Unpublished Masters thesis, St. Mary?s University of Texas, San Antonio TX.

Pine, S. M., & Weiss, D. J..  (1978).  A comparison of the fairness of adaptive and conventional testing strategies (Research Report 78-1). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Schmidt, F. L., Urry, V. W., & Gugel, J. F..  (1978).  Computer-assisted tailored testing: Examinee reactions and evaluation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38, 265-273.

Kreitzberg, C. B.  (1978).  Computerized adaptive testing: Principles and directions. Computers and Education, 2 (4), 319-329.

Kreitzberg, C. B., Stocking, M.,, & Swanson, L..  (1978).  Computerized adaptive testing: Principles and directions. Computers and Education, 2, 319-329.

Bejar, I. I., & Weiss, D. J..  (1978).  A construct validation of adaptive achievement testing (Research Report 78-4). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Bejar, I. I., Weiss, D. J., & Kingsbury, G. G..  (1977).  Calibration of an item pool for the adaptive measurement of achievement (Research Report 77-5). Minneapolis: Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Bejar, I. I.  (1977).  A comparison of conventional and adaptive achievement testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Brooks, S.  (1977).  A comparison of the classification of students by two methods of administration of a mathematics placement test. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University, 1977.

Sapinkopf, R. C.  (1977).  A computer adaptive approach to the measurement of personality variables. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, Baltimore.

Spineti, J. P., & Hambleton, R. K..  (1977).  A computer simulation study of tailored testing strategies for objective-based instructional programs. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 37, 139-158.

Schmidt, F. L., Urry, V. W., & Gugel, J. F..  (1977).  Computer-assisted tailored testing: Examinee reactions and evaluation (PB-276 748). Washington DC: U. S. Civil Service Commission, Personnel Research and Development Center.

Underwood, M. A.  (1977).  Computerized Adaptive Testing and Personnel Accessioning System Design. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

McBride, J. R.  (1977).  Computerized Adaptive Testing research and development. In . H. Taylor, Proceedings of the Second Training and Personnel Technology Conference. Washington, DC: Office of the Director of Defense Research and Engineering.

Gorman, S.  (1977).  Computerized Adaptive Testing with a Military Population. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolls MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

McKillip, R. H., & Urry, V. W..  (1976).  Computer-assisted testing: An orderly transition from theory to practice. In . C. K. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing (pp. 95-96). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Urry, V. W.  (1976).  Computer-assisted testing with live examinees: A rendezvous with reality (TN 75-3). Washington DC: U. S. Civil Service Commission, Personnel Research and Development Center.

Cliff, N. A.  (1975).  Complete orders from incomplete data: Interactive ordering and tailored testing. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 259-302.

Weiss, D. J.  (1975).  Computerized adaptive ability measurement. Naval Research Reviews, 28, 1-18.

Weiss, D. J.  (1975).  Computerized adaptive trait measurement: Problems and prospects (Research Report 75-5). In . Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Kalisch, S. J.  (1974).  The comparison of two tailored testing models and the effects of the models variables on actual loss. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University.

De Witt, J. J., & Weiss, D. J..  (1974).  A computer software system for adaptive ability measurement (Research Report 74-1). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Urry, V. W.  (1974).  Computer-assisted testing: The calibration and evaluation of the verbal ability bank (Technical Study 74-3). Washington DC: U. S. Civil Service Commission, Personnel Research and Development Center.

Hansen, D. N., Johnson, B. F., Fagan, R. L., Tan, P., & Dick, W..  (1974).  Computer-based adaptive testing models for the Air Force technical training environment: Phase I: Development of a computerized measurement system for Air Force technical Training. JSAS Catalogue of Selected Documents in Psychology, 5, 1-86 (MS No. 882). AFHRL Technical Report 74-48.

Jones, D., & Weinman, J..  (1973).  Computer-based psychological testing. In . A. Elithorn and D. Jones (Eds.), Artificial and human thinking (pp. 83-93). San Francisco CA: Jossey-Bass.

Waters, C. J., & Bayroff, A. G..  (1971).  A comparison of computer-simulated conventional and branching tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 31, 125-136.

Bryson, R.  (1971).  A comparison of four methods of selecting items for computer-assisted testing (Technical Bulletin STB 72-5). San Diego: Naval Personnel and Training Research Laboratory.

Ferguson, R. L.  (1971).  Computer assistance for individualizing measurement. Pittsburgh PA: University of Pittsburgh R and D Center.

Wood, R. L.  (1971).  Computerized adaptive sequential testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.

Green, B. F.  (1970).  Comments on tailored testing. In . W. H. Holtzman, (Ed.), Computer-assisted instruction, testing, and guidance (pp. 184-197). New York: Harper and Row.

Ferguson, R. L.  (1970).  Computer assistance for individualizing measurement. Computers and Automation, March 1970, 19.

Ferguson, R. L.  (1970).  Computer assistance for individualizing measurement. Pittsburgh PA: University of Pittsburgh, Learning Research and Development Center.

Ferguson, R. L.  (1969).  Computer-assisted criterion-referenced measurement (Working Paper No 49). Pittsburgh PA: University of Pittsburgh, Learning and Research Development Center. (ERIC No. ED 037 089).

Harman, H. H., Helm, C. E., & Loye, D. E..  (1968).  Computer-assisted testing (Eds.). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Bayroff, A. G., Thomas, J. J., & Anderson, A. A..  (1960).  Construction of an experimental sequential item test (Research Memorandum 60-1). Washington DC: Personnel Research Branch, Department of the Army.

Hutt, M. L.  (1947).  A clinical study of consecutive and adaptive testing with the revised Stanford-Binet. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 11, 93-103.