Export 497 results:
Filters: First Letter Of Title is C [Clear All Filters]
. (1997). CAT-ASVAB operational test and evaluation. In . W. A. Sands, B. K. Waters, and . R. McBride (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp. 199-205). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
. (1992). CAT-ASVAB precision. Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Military Testing Association, 1, 22-26.
. (2006). A comparison of online calibration methods for a CAT. In Presented at the National Council on Measurement on Education. San Francisco, CA.
. (1995). Computer adaptive testing in a medical licensure setting: A comparison of outcomes under the one- and two- parameter logistic models. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco.
. (2005). Constructing a Computerized Adaptive Test for University Applicants With Disabilities. Applied Measurement in Education, 18, 381-405. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame1804_3
. (2007). Computerizing Organizational Attitude Surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 658-678. doi:10.1177/0013164406292084
. (2010). A Comparison of Item Selection Techniques for Testlets. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34, 424-437. doi:10.1177/0146621609349804
. (1997). CATSIB: A modified SIBTEST procedure to detect differential item functioning in computerized adaptive tests (Research report). Newtown, PA: Law School Admission Council.
. (2001). CATSIB: A modified SIBTEST procedure to detect differential item functioning in computerized adaptive tests (Research report). Newton, PA: Law School Admission Council.
. (1981). A comparison of two methods of interactive testing Final report. National Institute of Education Grant 79-1045.
. (2001). Concerns with computerized adaptive oral proficiency assessment. A commentary on "Comparing examinee attitudes Toward computer-assisted and other oral proficient assessments": Response to the Norris Commentary. Language Learning and Technology, 5, 95-108.
. (1986). Comparison and equating of paper-administered, computer-administered, and computerized adaptive tests of achievement. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.
. (1989). Comparisons of paper-administered, computer-administered and computerized adaptive achievement tests. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5, 311-326.
. (1994). Computerized Testing (Research Report 94-22). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (2015). Comparing Simple Scoring With IRT Scoring of Personality Measures: The Navy Computer Adaptive Personality Scales. Applied Psychological Measurement, 39, 144-154. doi:10.1177/0146621614559517
. (1990). A comparison of Rasch and three-parameter logistic models in computerized adaptive testing. Unpublished manuscript.
. (1999). Computerized testing – Issues and applications (Mini-course manual). In Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal.
. (2002). A comparison of item selection techniques and exposure control mechanisms in CATs using the generalized partial credit model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 147-163.
. (2000). A comparison of computerized adaptive testing and multistage testing. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 60, 5829.
. (1999). A comparative study of ability estimates from computer-adaptive testing and multi-stage testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal Canada.
. (1999). A comparison of computerized-adaptive testing and multi-stage testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
. (2005). Computerizing statewide assessments in Minnesota: A report on the feasibility of converting the Minnesota Comprehensive Assessments to a computerized adaptive format. Office of Educational Accountability, College of Education and Human Development, University of Minnesota.
. (1978). A comparison of the fairness of adaptive and conventional testing strategies (Research Report 78-1). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
pi78-01.pdf (1.91 MB). (2003). Calibrating CAT pools and online pretest items using marginal maximum likelihood methods. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
po03-01.pdf (283.64 KB). (2003). Computerized adaptive testing. In . R. Fernández-Ballesteros (Ed.): Encyclopaedia of Psychological Assessment. London: Sage.
. (2009). Considerations about expected a posteriori estimation in adaptive testing: adaptive a priori, adaptive correction for bias, and adaptive integration interval. Journal of Applied Measurement, 10, 138-56.
. (2000). Computerized testing – the adolescent years: Juvenile delinquent or positive role model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
. (1988). Computerized adaptive testing: a good idea waiting for the right technology. In Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, April 1988.
. (1998). A comparison of item exposure control methods in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35, 311-327.
. (2012). Comparison of two Bayesian methods to detect mode effects between paper-based and computerized adaptive assessments: a preliminary Monte Carlo study. BMC Med Res Methodol, 12, 124. presented at the 2012. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-12-124
. (2010). A Comparison of Content-Balancing Procedures for Estimating Multiple Clinical Domains in Computerized Adaptive Testing: Relative Precision, Validity, and Detection of Persons With Misfitting Responses. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34, 410-423. doi:10.1177/0146621609349802
. (2010). A comparison of content-balancing procedures for estimating multiple clinical domains in computerized adaptive testing: Relative precision, validity, and detection of persons with misfitting responses. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34, 410-423.
. (2007). Cutscore location and classification accuracy in computerized classification testing. In Paper presented at the international meeting of the Psychometric Society. Tokyo, Japan.
ro07-01.pdf (93.59 KB). (2001). Computerized adaptive testing with the generalized graded unfolding model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25, 177-196.
. (2000). CBTS: Computer-based testing simulation and analysis [computer software]. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts, School of Education.
. (2000). Classification accuracy and test security for a computerized adaptive mastery test calibrated with different IRT models. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
. (1996). Can examinees use a review option to positively bias their scores on a computerized adaptive test? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National council on Measurement in Education, New York. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National council on Measurement in Education. New York NY.
. (2004). A computerized adaptive knowledge test as an assessment tool in general practice: a pilot study. Medical Teacher, 26, 178-83. presented at the Mar.
. (1996). Conducting self-adapted testing using MicroCAT. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 821-827.
. (1995). Comparability and validity of computerized adaptive testing with the MMPI-2. Journal of Personality Assessment, 65, 358-71. presented at the Oct.
. (1991). Comparability of computerized adaptive and conventional testing with the MMPI-2. Journal of Personality Assessment, 57, 278-290. presented at the Oct.
. (1993). Comparability and validity of computerized adaptive testing with the MMPI-2. Dissertation Abstracts International, 53, 3791.
. (1981). A comparison of a maximum likelihood and a Bayesian estimation procedure for tailored testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Los Angeles CA.
. (2003). Comparison of multi-stage tests with computer adaptive and paper and pencil tests. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
ro03-01.pdf (694.76 KB). (1990). Computer testing: Pragmatic issues and research needs. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 9 (2), 19-20.
. (2011). Computer adaptive testing for small scale programs and instructional systems. Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 12(1).
. (1995). Computer-adaptive testing: A new breed of assessment. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 95, 1326-1327.
. (1995). Computer-adaptive testing: A new breed of assessment. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 95, 1326-1327.
. (2003). Criterion item characteristic curve function for evaluating the differential weight procedure adjusted to on-line item calibration. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the NCME. Chicago IL.
. (1997). Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation. Washington, D.C., USA: American Psychological Association.
. (1977). A computer adaptive approach to the measurement of personality variables. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, Baltimore.
. (1998). Comparability of paper-and-pencil and computer adaptive test scores on the GRE General Test (No. ETS Research Report 98-38). presented at the August, 1998, Princeton, N.J.: Educational Testing Services.
. (1998). Comparability of paper-and-pencil and computer adaptive test scores on the GRE General Test (GRE Board Professional Report No 95-08P; Educational Testing Service Research Report 98-38). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1988). Computerized adaptive testing program at Miami-Dade Community College, South Campous. In Laguna Hill CA: League for Innovation in the community College.
. (1978). Computer-assisted tailored testing: Examinee reactions and evaluation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38, 265-273.
. (1977). Computer-assisted tailored testing: Examinee reactions and evaluation (PB-276 748). Washington DC: U. S. Civil Service Commission, Personnel Research and Development Center.
. (2009). Criterion-related validity of an innovative CAT-based personality measure. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
cat09schneider.pdf (162.54 KB). (2003). Computerized adaptive rating scales for measuring managerial performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11, 237-246.
. (1999). A comparison of testlet-based test designs for computerized adaptive testing (LSAC Computerized Testing Report 97-01). Newtown, PA: LSAC.