Cella, D., Chang, C. - H., Lai, J. S., & Webster, K.. (2002). Advances in quality of life measurements in oncology patients. Seminars in Oncology, 29, 60-8. presented at the Jun.

Mulcahey, M. J., Haley, S. M., Duffy, T., Pengsheng, N., & Betz, R. R.. (2008). Measuring physical functioning in children with spinal impairments with computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics, 28, 330-5. presented at the Apr-May.

Finkelman, M. D., Weiss, D. J., & Kim-Kang, G.. (2010). Item Selection and Hypothesis Testing for the Adaptive Measurement of Change. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34(4), 238-254. doi:10.1177/0146621609344844

van Buuren, N., & Eggen, T. J. H. M.. (2017). Latent-Class-Based Item Selection for Computerized Adaptive Progress Tests. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 5(2), 22-43. doi:10.7333/1704-0502022

Belov, D. I. (2014). Detecting Item Preknowledge in Computerized Adaptive Testing Using Information Theory and Combinatorial Optimization. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 2(3), 37-58. doi:10.7333/1410-0203037

Levy, R., Behrens, J. T., & Mislevy, R. J.. (2023). An Extended Taxonomy of Variants of Computerized Adaptive Testing. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 10(1). doi:10.7333/2302-100101

Hart, D. L., Mioduski, J. E., & Stratford, P. W.. (2005). Simulated computerized adaptive tests for measuring functional status were efficient with good discriminant validity in patients with hip, knee, or foot/ankle impairments. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 58, 629-38.

Kingsbury, G., & Zara, T.. (2017). From Blueprints to Systems: An Integrated Approach to Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1CBaAfH4ES7XivmvrMjPeKyFCsFZOpQMJ

Hart, D. L., Mioduski, J. E., & Stratford, P. W.. (2005). Simulated computerized adaptive tests for measuring functional status were efficient with good discriminant validity in patients with hip, knee, or foot/ankle impairments. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 58, 629-38.

Schneider, R. J., Goff, M., Anderson, S., & Borman, W. C.. (2003). Computerized adaptive rating scales for measuring managerial performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11, 237-246.

Hol, A. M., Vorst, H. C. M., & Mellenbergh, G. J.. (2007). Computerized adaptive testing for polytomous motivation items: Administration mode effects and a comparison with short forms. Applied Psychological Measurement, 31, 412-429.

Revuelta, J. (2004). Estimating ability and item-selection strategy in self-adapted testing: A latent class approach. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 379-396.

Ping, C., Shuliang, D., Haijing, L., & Jie, Z.. (2006). [Item Selection Strategies of Computerized Adaptive Testing based on Graded Response Model.]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 38, 461-467.

Chandra, I. (2017). Item Selection Strategies for Developing CAT in Indonesia. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata Japan: Niiagata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2KuFrRATq9Q

Hai-qi, D., De-zhi, C., Shuliang, D., & Taiping, D.. (2006). The comparison among item selection strategies of CAT with multiple-choice items. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 38, 778-783.

Chen, S. - Y., & Ankenmann, R. D.. (2004). Effects of practical constraints on item selection rules at the early stages of computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 41, 149-174.

van Buuren, N., & Eggen, T. J. H. M.. (2017). Latent-Class-Based Item Selection for Computerized Adaptive Progress Tests. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 5(2), 22-43. doi:10.7333/1704-0502022

van der Linden, W. J. (2005). A comparison of item-selection methods for adaptive tests with content constraints. Journal of Educational Measurement, 42, 283-302.

van Buuren, N., Straat, H., Eggen, T., & Fox, J. - P.. (2017). Adaptive Item and Feedback Selection in Personalized Learning with a Network Approach. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.

van Groen, M., Eggen, T., & Veldkamp, B.. (2011). Item Selection Methods based on Multiple Objective Approaches for Classification of Respondents into Multiple Levels. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.

Tang, K. L. (1996). A comparison of the traditional maximum information method and the global information method in CAT item selection. In annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York, NY USA.

Finkelman, M., & Wang, C.. (2019). Time-Efficient Adaptive Measurement of Change. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 7(2), 15-34. doi:10.7333/1909-0702015

Passos, V. L., Berger, M. P. F., & Tan, F. E. S.. (2008). The D-optimality item selection criterion in the early stage of CAT: A study with the graded response model. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 33, 88-110.

Han, S. - Y., & Yoo, Y. Joo. (2017). Efficiency of Item Selection in CD-CAT Based on Conjunctive Bayesian Network Modeling Hierarchical attributes. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1RbO2gd4aULqsSgRi_VZudNN_edX82NeD

Eggen, T., & Verschoor, A. J.. (2006). Optimal testing with easy or difficult items in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 379-393.

Lei, P. - W., Chen, S. - Y., & Yu, L.. (2006). Comparing methods of assessing differential item functioning in a computerized adaptive testing environment. Journal of Educational Measurement, 43, 245-264.

Miceli, R., & Molinengo, G.. (2005). Somministrazione di test computerizzati di tipo adattivo: Un' applicazione del modello di misurazione di Rasch [Administration of computerized and adaptive tests: An application of the Rasch Model]. Testing Psicometria Metodologia, 12, 131-149.

Hambleton, R. K. (2005). Applications of item response theory to improve health outcomes assessment: Developing item banks, linking instruments, and computer-adaptive testing. In C. C. Gotay & Snyder, C., Outcomes assessment in cancer (pp. 445-464). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Sijtsma, K. (2001). Developments in measurement of persons and items by means of item response models. Behaviormetrika, 28, 65-94.

Hart, D. L., Cook, K. F., Mioduski, J. E., Teal, C. R., & Crane, P. K.. (2006). Simulated computerized adaptive test for patients with shoulder impairments was efficient and produced valid measures of function. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59(3), 290-298.

Cook, K. F., O'Malley, K. J., & Roddey, T. S.. (2005). Dynamic assessment of health outcomes: Time to let the CAT out of the bag?. Health Services Research, 40, 1694-1711.

Núñez, R. M. N., & Pina, J. A. L.. (2006). Técnicas para detectar patrones de respuesta atípicos [Aberrant patterns detection methods]. Anales de Psicología, 22, 143-154.

Thissen, D., Nelson, L. A., & Swygert, K. A.. (2001). Item response theory applied to combinations of multiple-choice and constructed-response items--approximation methods for scale scores. In Test scoring (pp. 289-315). Mahwah, N.J. USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Reckase, M. D. (2024). The Influence of Computerized Adaptive Testing on Psychometric Theory and Practice. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 11(1). doi:10.7333/2403-1101001

Hambleton, R. K. (2000). Emergence of item response modeling in instrument development and data analysis. Medical Care, 38, II60-II65.

Schneider, R. J., Goff, M., Anderson, S., & Borman, W. C.. (2003). Computerized adaptive rating scales for measuring managerial performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11, 237-246.

Hart, D. L., Mioduski, J. E., Werneke, M. W., & Stratford, P. W.. (2006). Simulated computerized adaptive test for patients with lumbar spine impairments was efficient and produced valid measures of function. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59, 947–956. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.10.017

Cheng, P. E., & Liou, M.. (2003). Computerized adaptive testing using the nearest-neighbors criterion. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 204-216.

Meijer, R. R. (2004). Using patterns of summed scores in paper-and-pencil tests and computer-adaptive tests to detect misfitting item score patterns. Journal of Educational Measurement, 41, 119-136.

Stark, S., & Drasgow, F.. (2002). An EM approach to parameter estimation for the Zinnes and Griggs paired comparison IRT model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 208-227.

Levy, R., Behrens, J. T., & Mislevy, R. J.. (2023). An Extended Taxonomy of Variants of Computerized Adaptive Testing. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 10(1). doi:10.7333/2302-100101

Eggen, T., & Verschoor, A. J.. (2006). Optimal testing with easy or difficult items in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 379-393.

Ruscio, J., & Ruscio, A. M.. (2002). A structure-based approach to psychological measurement: Matching measurement models to latent structure. Assessment, 9, 4-16.

Magis, D., & Raîche, G.. (2011). catR: An R Package for Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement. doi:10.1177/0146621611407482

Chang, H. - H., & van der Linden, W. J.. (2003). Optimal stratification of item pools in α-stratified computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 262-274.

Meijer, R. R. (2002). Outlier detection in high-stakes certification testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 39, 219-233.

Smith, R. W. (2000). An exploratory analysis of item parameters and characteristics that influence item level response time. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 61, 1812.

Hol, A. M., Vorst, H. C. M., & Mellenbergh, G. J.. (2008). Computerized Adaptive Testing of Personality Traits. Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 216(1), 12-21. doi:10.1027/0044-3409.216.1.12

Desmarais, M. C., & Pu, X.. (2005). A Bayesian student model without hidden nodes and its comparison with item response theory. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 15, 291-323.

Rubio, V. J., Aguado, D., Hontangas, P. M., & Hernández, J. M.. (2007). Psychometric properties of an emotional adjustment measure: An application of the graded response model. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23, 39-46.

Veldkamp, B. P., van der Linden, W. J., & Ariel, A.. (2002). Mathematical-programming approaches to test item pool design (No. RR 02-09) (pp. 93-108). Twente, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology.

Ban, J. - C., Hanson, B. A., Yi, Q., & Harris, D. J.. (2002). Data sparseness and on-line pretest item calibration-scaling methods in CAT. Journal of Educational Measurement, 39, 207-218.

Jun, Z., Dongming, O., Shuyuan, X., Haiqi, D., & Shuqing, Q.. (2005). [Item characteristic curve equating under graded response models in IRT]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 37, 832-838.

Smith, A. B., Rush, R., Velikova, G., Wall, L., Wright, E. P., Stark, D., et al.. (2007). The initial development of an item bank to assess and screen for psychological distress in cancer patients. Psycho-Oncology, 16, 724-732.

Guzmán, E., Conejo, R., & García-Hervás, E.. (2005). An Authoring Environment for Adaptive Testing. Educational Technology & Society, 8(3), 66-76.

Davis, L. L., & Dodd, B. G.. (2003). Item exposure constraints for testlets in the verbal reasoning section of the MCAT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 335-356.

Pastor, D. A., Dodd, B. G., & Chang, H. - H.. (2002). A comparison of item selection techniques and exposure control mechanisms in CATs using the generalized partial credit model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 147-163.

van der Linden, W. J., Veldkamp, B. P., & Reese, L. M.. (2000). An integer programming approach to item bank design. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 139-150.

Aguado, D., Rubio, V. J., Hontangas, P. M., & Hernández, J. M.. (2005). Propiedades psicométricas de un test Adaptativo Informatizado para la medición del ajuste emocional [Psychometric properties of an Emotional Adjustment Computerized Adaptive Test]. Psicothema, 17, 484-491.

Roberts, J. S., Lin, Y., & Laughlin, J. E.. (2001). Computerized adaptive testing with the generalized graded unfolding model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25, 177-196.