. (1999). Current and future research in multi-stage testing (Research Report No 370). Amherst MA: University of Massachusetts, Laboratory of Pychometric and Evaluative Research.
ze99-01.pdf (130.25 KB). (1999). CUSUM-based person-fit statistics for adaptive testing (Research Report 99-05). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.
. (1979). The danger of relying solely on diagnostic adaptive testing when prior and subsequent instructional methods are different (CERL Report E-5). Urbana IL: Univeristy of Illinois, Computer-Based Education Research Laboratory.
. (1993). Deriving comparable scores for computer adaptive and conventional tests: An example using the SAT. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1999). Designing item pools for computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 99-03 ). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.
. (2001). Detection of misfitting item-score patterns in computerized adaptive testing. Enschede, The Netherlands: Febodruk B.
. (2000). Detection of person misfit in computerized adaptive testing with polytomous items (Research Report 00-01). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.
. (1986). Determining the sensitivity of CAT-ASVAB scores to changes in item response curves with the medium of administration (Report No.86-189). Alexandria VA: Center for Naval Analyses.
. (1998). Development and evaluation of online calibration procedures (TCN 96-216). Champaign IL: Algorithm Design and Measurement Services, Inc.
. (1968). The development and evaluation of several programmed testing methods (Research Bulletin 68-5). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (2000). Development and evaluation of test assembly procedures for computerized adaptive testing (Laboratory of Psychometric and Evaluative Methods Research Report No 391). Amherst MA: University of Massachusetts, School of Education.
. (1985). Development of a microcomputer-based adaptive testing system: Phase II Implementation (Research Report ONR 85-5). St. Paul MN: Assessment Systems Corporation.
. (1974). Development of a programmed testing system (Technical Paper 259). Arlington VA: US Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences. NTIS No. AD A001534).
. (2001). The Development of STAR Early Literacy: A report of the School Renaissance Institute. Madison, WI: Author.
. (1994). DIF analysis for pretest items in computer-adaptive testing (Educational Testing Service Research Rep No RR 94-33). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1998). Does adaptive testing violate local independence? (Research Report 98-33). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (2003). Effect of extra time on GRE® Quantitative and Verbal Scores (Research Report 03-13). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing service.
br03-01.pdf (87.76 KB). (1987). The effect of item parameter estimation error on the decisions made using the sequential probability ratio test (ACT Research Report Series 87-17). Iowa City IA: American College Testing.
. (2007). The effect of using item parameters calibrated from paper administrations in computer adaptive test administrations. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment.
. (1980). Effects of computerized adaptive testing on Black and White students (Research Report 79-2). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
pi79-02.pdf (2.27 MB). (1976). Effects of immediate knowledge of results and adaptive testing on ability test performance (Research Report 76-3). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
. (2000). Effects of item-selection criteria on classification testing with the sequential probability ratio test (Research Report 2000-8). Iowa City, IA: American College Testing.
. (2003). The effects of model misfit in computerized classification test. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Chicago IL.
ji03-01.pdf (431.5 KB). (1984). Efficiency and precision in two-stage adaptive testing. West Palm Beach Florida: Eastern ERA.
. (1976). Elements of a basic test theory generalizable to tailored testing. Unpublished manuscript.
. (1975). Empirical and simulation studies of flexilevel ability testing (Research Report 75-3). Minneapolis: Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
. (1975). An empirical comparison of two-stage and pyramidal ability testing (Research Report 75-1). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
la75-01.pdf (1.73 MB). (1974). An empirical investigation of computer-administered pyramidal ability testing (Research Report 74-3). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
la74-03.pdf (2.97 MB). (2002). An empirical investigation of selected multi-stage testing design variables on test assembly and decision accuracy outcomes for credentialing exams (Center for Educational Assessment Research Report No 469). Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts, School of Education.
. (1980). An empirical study of a broad range test of verbal ability. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1973). An empirical study of computer-administered two-stage ability testing (Research Report 73-4). Minneapolis: Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
be73-04.pdf (2.45 MB). (1988). The equivalence of scores from automated and conventional educational and psychological tests (College Board Report No. 88-8). New York: The College Entrance Examination Board.
. (1987). Equivalent-groups versus single-group equating designs for the Accelerated CAT-ASVAB Project (Research Memorandum 87-6). Alexandria VA: Center for Naval Analyses.
. (2000). Estimating item parameters from classical indices for item pool development with a computerized classification test (ACT Research 2000-4). Iowa City IA, ACT, Inc.
. (1995). An evaluation of alternative concepts for administering the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery to applicants for enlistment. DMDC Technical Report 95-013. Monterey, CA: Personnel Testing Division, Defense Manpower Data Center.
. (1979). An evaluation of computerized adaptive testing. In Proceedings of the 21st Military Testing Association Conference. SanDiego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.
. (1984). Evaluation of computerized adaptive testing of the ASVAB. San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center, unpublished manuscript.
. (1983). An evaluation of one- and three-parameter logistic tailored testing procedures for use with small item pools (Research Report ONR83-1). Iowa City IA: American College Testing Program.
. (1978). Evaluations of implied orders as a basis for tailored testing using simulations (Technical Report No. 4). Los Angeles CA: University of Southern California, Department of Psychology.
. (2001). An examination of item review on computer adaptive tests. Manuscript in preparation, University of Virginia.
. (2001). An examination of testlet scoring and item exposure constraints in the verbal reasoning section of the MCAT. MCAT Monograph Series: Association of American Medical Colleges.
. (2002). An exploration of potentially problematic adaptive tests. Research Report 02-05).
. (1962). Exploratory study of a sequential item test. U.S. Army Personnel Research Office, Technical Research Note 129.
. (1967). An exploratory study of branching tests (Technical Research Note 188). Washington DC: US Army Behavioral Science Research Laboratory. (NTIS No. AD 655263).
. (1999). Exploring the relationship between item exposure rate and test overlap rate in computerized adaptive testing. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Montreal, Canada.
. (1981). Factors influencing the psychometric characteristics of an adaptive testing strategy for test batteries (Research Rep. No. 81-4). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
ma81-04.pdf (1.65 MB). (1998). Feasibility studies of two-stage testing in large-scale educational assessment: Implications for NAEP. American Institutes for Research, CA.
. (2002). A feasibility study of on-the-fly item generation in adaptive testing (GRE Board Report No 98-12). Educational Testing Service RR02-23. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service. Note = “{PDF file, 193 KB}.
be02-01.pdf (192.6 KB). (1993). Field test of a computer-based GRE general test (GRE Board Technical Report 88-8; Educational Testing Service Research Rep No RR 93-07). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1986). Final report: Adaptive testing of spatial abilities (ONR 150 531). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1983). Final report: Computer-based measurement of intellectual capabilities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
. (1981). Final report: Computerized adaptive ability testing. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
. (1985). Final report: Computerized adaptive measurement of achievement and ability. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
. (1980). Final report: Computerized adaptive performance evaluation. Minneapolis: Univerity of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
. (1980). Final Report: Computerized adaptive testing, assessment of requirements. Falls Church VA: Author.
. (1987). Final report: Feasibility study of a computerized test administration of the CLAST. University of Florida: Institute for Student Assessment and Evaluation.
. (1981). Final report: Procedures for criterion referenced tailored testing. Columbia: University of Missouri, Educational Psychology Department.