. (1988). Introduction to item response theory and computerized adaptive testing as applied in licensure and certification testing. National Clearinghouse of Examination Information Newsletter, 6, 11-17.
. (2006). An Introduction to Multistage Testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 19, 185-187. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame1903_1
. (2008). Investigating item exposure control on the fly in computerized adaptive testing. Psychological Testing, 55, 1-32.
. (2012). Investigating the Effect of Item Position in Computer-Based Tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 49, 362–379. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2012.00181.x
. (2019). An Investigation of Exposure Control Methods With Variable-Length CAT Using the Partial Credit Model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 43, 624-638. doi:10.1177/0146621618824856
. (1989). An investigation of procedures for computerized adaptive testing using partial credit scoring. Applied Measurement in Education, 2, 335-357.
. (1995). An investigation of procedures for computerized adaptive testing using the successive intervals Rasch model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 976-990.
. (2015). Investigation of Response Changes in the GRE Revised General Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 75, 1002-1020. doi:10.1177/0013164415573988
. (1997). An investigation of self-adapted testing in a Spanish high school population. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 210-221.
. (2007). IRT health outcomes data analysis project: an overview and summary. Quality of Life Research, 16, 121-132.
. (2016). On the Issue of Item Selection in Computerized Adaptive Testing With Response Times. Journal of Educational Measurement, 53, 212–228. doi:10.1111/jedm.12110
. (2005). An item bank was created to improve the measurement of cancer-related fatigue. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 58, 190-7. presented at the Feb.
. (2003). Item banking to improve, shorten and computerized self-reported fatigue: an illustration of steps to create a core item bank from the FACIT-Fatigue Scale. Quality of Life Research, 12, 485-501. presented at the Aug.
. (2006). Item banks and their potential applications to health status assessment in diverse populations. Medical Care, 44, S189-S197. presented at the Nov.
. (2020). Item Calibration Methods With Multiple Subscale Multistage Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 57, 3-28. doi:10.1111/jedm.12241
. (2005). [Item characteristic curve equating under graded response models in IRT]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 37, 832-838.
. (1987). Item clusters and computerized adaptive testing: A case for testlets. Journal of Educational Measurement, 24(3), 185-201.
. (2003). Item exposure constraints for testlets in the verbal reasoning section of the MCAT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 335-356.
. (2008). Item exposure control in a-stratified computerized adaptive testing. Psychological Testing, 55, 793-811.
. (2000). Item exposure control in computer-adaptive testing: The use of freezing to augment stratification. Florida Journal of Educational Research, 40, 28-52.
. (1984). Item Location Effects and Their Implications for IRT Equating and Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 8(2), 147-154.
v08n2p147.pdf (573.02 KB). (2013). Item Ordering in Stochastically Curtailed Health Questionnaires With an Observable Outcome. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 1(3), 38-66. doi:10.7333/1304-0103038
. (2012). Item Overexposure in Computerized Classification Tests Using Sequential Item Selection. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 17(12).
v17n12.pdf (296.59 KB). (2013). Item Pocket Method to Allow Response Review and Change in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 259-275. doi:10.1177/0146621612473638
. (2014). Item Pool Design for an Operational Variable-Length Computerized Adaptive Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 74, 473-494. doi:10.1177/0013164413509629
. (1988). Item pool maintenance in the presence of item parameter drift. Journal of Educational Measurement, 25, 275-285.
. (2002). An item response model for characterizing test compromise. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 27, 163-179.
. (2009). Item response theory and clinical measurement. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 5, 27-48.
. (1983). On item response theory and computerized adaptive testing: The coming technical revolution in testing. Journal of College Admissions, 28, 9-16.
. (2000). Item response theory and health outcomes measurement in the 21st century. Medical Care, 38, II28-II42.
. (2005). Item response theory in computer adaptive testing: implications for outcomes measurement in rehabilitation. Rehabil Psychol, 50, 71-78.
. (2005). An item response theory-based pain item bank can enhance measurement precision. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 30, 278-88.
. (2012). Item Selection and Ability Estimation Procedures for a Mixed-Format Adaptive Test. Applied Measurement in Education, 25, 305-326. doi:10.1080/08957347.2012.714686
. (2020). Item Selection and Exposure Control Methods for Computerized Adaptive Testing with Multidimensional Ranking Items. Journal of Educational Measurement, 57, 343-369. doi:10.1111/jedm.12252
. (2010). Item Selection and Hypothesis Testing for the Adaptive Measurement of Change. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34(4), 238-254. doi:10.1177/0146621609344844
. (2011). Item Selection Criteria With Practical Constraints for Computerized Classification Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71, 20-36. doi:10.1177/0013164410387336
. (2019). Item Selection Criteria With Practical Constraints in Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 79, 335-357. doi:10.1177/0013164418790634
. (2018). Item Selection Criteria With Practical Constraints in Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 0013164418790634. doi:10.1177/0013164418790634
. (1999). Item selection in adaptive testing with the sequential probability ratio test. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 249-261.
. (2002). Item selection in computerized adaptive testing: Improving the a-stratified design with the Sympson-Hetter algorithm. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 376-392.
. (2002). Item selection in computerized adaptive testing: Improving the a-stratified design with the Sympson-Hetter algorithm. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 376-392.
. (1998). Item selection in computerized adaptive testing: Should more discriminating items be used first?. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38, 249-266.
. (2001). Item selection in computerized adaptive testing: Should more discriminating items be used first?. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38, 249-266.
. (2009). Item selection in computerized classification testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 778-793.
. (2009). Item Selection in Computerized Classification Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 778-793. doi:10.1177/0013164408324460
. (2014). Item Selection Methods Based on Multiple Objective Approaches for Classifying Respondents Into Multiple Levels. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38, 187-200. doi:10.1177/0146621613509723
. (2018). Item Selection Methods in Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing With Polytomously Scored Items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 42, 677-694. doi:10.1177/0146621618762748
. (2009). Item selection rules in computerized adaptive testing: Accuracy and security. Methodology, 5, 7-17.
ba09007.pdf (444.91 KB). (2006). [Item Selection Strategies of Computerized Adaptive Testing based on Graded Response Model.]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 38, 461-467.
. (1992). Item selection using an average growth approximation of target information functions. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 41-51.
. (1995). Item times in computerized testing: A new differential information. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 11 (Suppl. 1), 108-109.
. (2017). Item usage in a multidimensional computerized adaptive test (MCAT) measuring health-related quality of life. Quality of Life Research, 26, 2909–2918. doi:10.1007/s11136-017-1624-3
itemusage_QLR.pdf (641.22 KB). (2009). I've Fallen and I Can't Get Up: Can High-Ability Students Recover From Early Mistakes in CAT?. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 83-101. doi:10.1177/0146621608324023
. (2009). I've Fallen and I Can't Get Up: Can High-Ability Students Recover From Early Mistakes in CAT?. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 83-101. doi:10.1177/0146621608324023
. (2009). I've fallen and I can't get up: can high-ability students recover from early mistakes in CAT?. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33(2), 83-101.
. (2011). JATT Special Issue on Adaptive Testing: Welcome and Overview. Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 12. presented at the 05/2011. Retrieved from http://www.testpublishers.org/journal-of-applied-testing-technology
. (2004). Kann die Konfundierung von Konzentrationsleistung und Aktivierung durch adaptives Testen mit dern FAKT vermieden werden? [Avoiding the confounding of concentration performance and activation by adaptive testing with the FACT]. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 25, 1-17.
. (2009). A Knowledge-Based Approach for Item Exposure Control in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 34, 530-558. doi:10.3102/1076998609336667