Hou, L., Chen, S., G., D. B., & Fitzpatrick, S. J.. (1996). The effects of methods of theta estimation, prior distribution, and number of quadrature points on CAT using the graded response model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New York NY.

Hsu, T. - C., & Shermis, M. D.. (1988). The development and evaluation of a microcomputerized adaptive placement testing system for college mathematics. In Paper(s) presented at the annual meeting(s) of the American Educational Research Association. 1986 (San Francisco CA) and 1987 (Washington DC).

Hsu, C. - L., Wang, W. - C., & Chen, S. Y.. (2017). Using Bayesian Decision Theory in Cognitive Diagnosis Computerized Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.

Hsu, C. - L., & Wang, W. - C.. (2015). Variable-Length Computerized Adaptive Testing Using the Higher Order DINA Model. Journal of Educational Measurement, 52, 125–143. doi:10.1111/jedm.12069

Hsu, T. C., & Tseng, F. L.. (1995). Using simulation to select an adaptive testing strategy: An item bank evaluation program. Unpublished manuscript, University of Pittsburgh.

Hsu, C. - L., Wang, W. - C., & Chen, S. - Y.. (2013). Variable-Length Computerized Adaptive Testing Based on Cognitive Diagnosis Models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 563-582. doi:10.1177/0146621613488642

Hsu, T., & Pingel, K.. (1974). A Bayesian approach in sequential testing. In American Educational Research Association. presented at the 04/1974, Chicago IL.

Hsu, C. - L., & Wang, W. - C.. (2019). Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing Using Non-Compensatory Item Response Theory Models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 43, 464-480. doi:10.1177/0146621618800280

Hsu, Y., Thompson, T. D., & Chen, W. - H.. (1998). CAT item calibration. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego.

Huang, Y. - M., Lin, Y. - T., & Cheng, S. - C.. (2009). An adaptive testing system for supporting versatile educational assessment. Computers and Education, 52, 53-67.

Huang, C. - Y., Kalohn, J. C., Lin, C. - J., & Spray, J.. (2000). Estimating item parameters from classical indices for item pool development with a computerized classification test (Research Report 2000-4). Iowa City IA: ACT Inc.

Huang, C. - Y., Kalohn, J. C., Lin, C. - J., & Spray, J. A.. (2000). Estimating Item Parameters from Classical Indices for Item Pool Development with a Computerized Classification Test. (No. Research Report 2000-4). Iowa City, Iowa: ACT, Inc.

Huang, S. X. (1996). A content-balanced adaptive testing algorithm for computer-based training systems. In . Frasson, C. and Gauthier, G. and Lesgold, A. (Eds.), Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Third International Conference, ITS'96, Montr�al, Canada, June 1996 Proceedings. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1086. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag 306-314.

Huang, H. - Y., Chen, P. - H., & Wang, W. - C.. (2012). Computerized Adaptive Testing Using a Class of High-Order Item Response Theory Models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36, 689-706. doi:10.1177/0146621612459552

Hubbard, J. P. (1966). Programmed testing in the examinations of the National Board of Medical Examiners. In . A. Anastasi (Ed.), Testing problems in perspective. Washington DC: American Council on Education.

Huebner, A., Finkelman, M. D., & Weissman, A.. (2018). Factors Affecting the Classification Accuracy and Average Length of a Variable-Length Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Test. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 6(1), 1-14. doi:10.7333/1802-060101

Huebner, A., & Li, Z.. (2012). A Stochastic Method for Balancing Item Exposure Rates in Computerized Classification Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36, 181-188. doi:10.1177/0146621612439932

Huebner, A., Wang, B., & Lee, S.. (2009). Practical issues concerning the application of the DINA model to CAT data. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Huebner, A. (2012). Item Overexposure in Computerized Classification Tests Using Sequential Item Selection. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 17(12).

Huebner, A., Wang, C., Daly, B., & Pinkelman, C.. (2018). A Continuous a-Stratification Index for Item Exposure Control in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 42, 523-537. doi:10.1177/0146621618758289

Huebner, A., & Li, Z.. (2012). A Stochastic Method for Balancing Item Exposure Rates in Computerized Classification Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36, 181-188. doi:10.1177/0146621612439932

Huebner, A. R., & Finkelman, M. D.. (2016). On Computing the Key Probability in the Stochastically Curtailed Sequential Probability Ratio Test. Applied Psychological Measurement, 40, 142-156. doi:10.1177/0146621615611633

Huff, K. L., & Sireci, S. G.. (2001). Validity issues in computer-based testing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 20(3), 16-25.

Huh, S. (2008). Preparing the implementation of computerized adaptive testing for high-stakes examinations. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.

Huisman, J. M. E. (1999). Item nonresponse: Occurrence, causes and imputation of missing answers to test items. (M and T Series No 32). Leiden: DSWO Press.

Huitzing, H. A. (2004). Using Set Covering with Item Sampling to Analyze the Infeasibility of Linear Programming Test Assembly Models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28, 355-375. doi:10.1177/0146621604266152

Huitzing, H. A., Veldkamp, B. P., & Verschoor, A. J.. (2005). Infeasibility in automated test assembly models: A comparison study of different methods. Journal of Educational Measurement, 42, 223-243.

Hung, P. - H. (1989). Application of computerized adaptive testing to the University Entrance Exam of Taiwan, R.O.C. Dissertation Abstracts International, 49, 3662.

HUnter, D. R. (1982). Comparison of live and simulated adaptive tests (No. AFHRL-TP-82-35). Air Force Human Resources Laborarory. presented at the December 1982, Brooks Air Force Base, Texas: Air Force Systems Command.

Hutt, M. L. (1947). A clinical study of consecutive and adaptive testing with the revised Stanford-Binet. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 11, 93-103.

Imai, S. (2017). Is CAT Suitable for Automated Speaking Test?. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.

Imai, S., Ito, S., Nakamura, Y., Kikuchi, K., Akagi, Y., Nakasono, H., et al.. (2009). Features of J-CAT (Japanese Computerized Adaptive Test). In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Immekus, J. C., Gibbons, R. D., & Rush, J. A.. (2007). Patient-reported outcomes measurement and computerized adaptive testing: An application of post-hoc simulation to a diagnostic screening instrument. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Ireland, C. M. (1977). An application of the Rasch one-parameter logistic model to individual intelligence testing in a tailored testing environment. Dissertation Abstracts International, 37 (9-A), 5766.

Ito, K., Pommerich, M., & Segall, D.. (2009). An evaluation of a new procedure for computing information functions for Bayesian scores from computerized adaptive tests. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Ito, K., & Sykes, R. C.. (1994). The effect of restricting ability distributions in the estimation of item difficulties: Implications for a CAT implementation. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans.

Ito, K., & Segall, D. O.. (2013). A Comparison of Four Methods for Obtaining Information Functions for Scores From Computerized Adaptive Tests With Normally Distributed Item Difficulties and Discriminations. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 1(5), 88-107. doi:10.7333/1312-0105088

Iwamoto, C. K., Nungester, R. J., & Luecht, R. M.. (1999). Study of methods to detect aberrant response patterns in computerized testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Jacobs-Cassuto, M. S. (2005). A comparison of adaptive mastery testing using testlets with the 3-parameter logistic model. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.

Jacobsen, J., Ackermann, R., Egüez, J., Ganguli, D., Rickard, P., & Taylor, L.. (2011). Design of a Computer-Adaptive Test to Measure English Literacy and Numeracy in the Singapore Workforce: Considerations, Benefits, and Implications. Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 12(1). Retrieved from http://www.testpublishers.org/journal-of-applied-testing-technology

Jacobson, R. L. (1995). Shortfall of questions curbs use of computerized graduate exam. The Chronicle of Higher Education.

Jacobson, R. L. (1993). New computer technique seen producing a revolution in testing. The Chronicle of Higher Education, pp. 22-23, 26.

Jacobusse, G., & Buuren, S.. (2007). Computerized adaptive testing for measuring development of young children. Statistics in Medicine, 26, 2629-38. presented at the Jun 15.

Janczewski, D., & Lowe, P.. (1992). The Language Training Division's computer adaptive reading proficiency test. Provo, UT: Language Training Division, Office of Training and Education.

Jennings, J. A., Dodd, B. G., & Fitzpatrick, S.. (2001). An investigation of the impact of items that exhibit mild DIF on ability estimation in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.

Jensema, C. J. (1974). An application of latent trait mental test theory. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 27, 29-48.

Jensema, C. J. (1976). Bayesian tailored testing and the influence of item bank characteristics. In . C. K. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing (pp. 82-89). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Jensema, C. J. (1977). Bayesian Tailored Testing and the Influence of Item Bank Characteristics. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(1), 111-120.

Jensema, C. J. (1977). Bayesian tailored testing and the influence of item bank characteristics. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 111-120.

Jensema, C. J. (1972). An application of latent trait mental test theory to the Washington Pre-College Testing Battery. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Washington.

Jensema, C. J. (1974). The validity of Bayesian tailored testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34, 757-756.

Jette, A. M., & Haley, S. M.. (2005). Contemporary measurement techniques for rehabilitation outcomes assessment. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 37, 339-345.

Jette, A.,, Haley, S., Tao, W., Ni, P., Moed, R., Meyers, D., & Zurek, M.. (2007). Prospective evaluation of the am-pac-cat in outpatient rehabilitation settings. Physical Therapy, 87, 385-398.

Jette, A. M., Haley, S. M., Ni, P., & Moed, R.. (2008). Adaptive short forms for outpatient rehabilitation outcome assessment. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 87, 842-52. presented at the Oct.

Jhu, Y.-J.,, & Chen, S. - Y.. (2008). Item exposure control in a-stratified computerized adaptive testing. Psychological Testing, 55, 793-811.

Jiao, H., Wang, S., & Lau, A.. (2004). An investigation of two combination procedures of SPRT for three-category decisions in computerized classification test. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego CA.

Jiao, H., Wang, S., & Lau, C. A.. (2004). An investigation of two combination procedures of SPRT for three-category classification decisions in computerized classification test. annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. presented at the 04/2004, San Antonio, Texas.

Jiao, H., & Lau, A. C.. (2003). The effects of model misfit in computerized classification test. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Chicago IL.

Jiao, H. (2003). The effects of model specification error in item response theory-based computerized classification test using sequential probability ratio test. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, 64, 478.

Jiao, H., Liu, J., Haynie, K., Woo, A., & Gorham, J.. (2012). Comparison Between Dichotomous and Polytomous Scoring of Innovative Items in a Large-Scale Computerized Adaptive Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72, 493-509. doi:10.1177/0013164411422903