Bringsjord, E. L. (2001). Computerized-adaptive versus paper-and-pencil testing environments: An experimental analysis of examinee experience.

Makransky, G. (2012). Computerized adaptive testing in industrial and organizational psychology. University of Twente, Twente, The Netherlands.

Gorman, S. (1980). A comparative evaluation of two Bayesian adaptive ability estimation procedures with a conventional test strategy. Catholic University of America, Washington DC.

HUnter, D. R. (1982). Comparison of live and simulated adaptive tests (No. AFHRL-TP-82-35). Air Force Human Resources Laborarory. presented at the December 1982, Brooks Air Force Base, Texas: Air Force Systems Command.

McKinley, R. L.,, & Reckase, M. D.. (1981). A comparison of a Bayesian and a maximum likelihood tailored testing procedure. Research Report 81-2. Columbia MO: University of Missouri, Department of Educational Psychology, Tailored Testing Research Laboratory.

Schaeffer, G. A., Bridgeman, B., Golub-Smith, M. L., Lewis, C., Potenza, M. T., & Steffen, M.. (1998). Comparability of paper-and-pencil and computer adaptive test scores on the GRE General Test (No. ETS Research Report 98-38). presented at the August, 1998, Princeton, N.J.: Educational Testing Services.

Nandakumar, R., & Roussos, L.. (2001). CATSIB: A modified SIBTEST procedure to detect differential item functioning in computerized adaptive tests (Research report). Newton, PA: Law School Admission Council.

van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A., & Meijer, R. R.. (1999). CUSUM-based person-fit statistics for adaptive testing (Research Report 99-05). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.

Zenisky, A. L. (1999). Current and future research in multi-stage testing (Research Report No 370). Amherst MA: University of Massachusetts, Laboratory of Pychometric and Evaluative Research.

Giesinger, J. M., Petersen, M. A., Groenvold, M., Aaronson, N. K., Arraras, J. I., Conroy, T., et al.. (2011). Cross-cultural development of an item list for computer-adaptive testing of fatigue in oncological patients. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. presented at the March 29, 2011.

Thompson, J. G., & Weiss, D. J.. (1980). Criterion-related validity of adaptive testing strategies (Research Report 80-3). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Stocking, M. L. (1993). Controlling item exposure rates in a realistic adaptive testing paradigm (Research Report 93-2). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Stocking, M. L., & Lewis, C.. (1995). Controlling item exposure conditional on ability in computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 95-25). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Bayroff, A. G., Thomas, J. J., & Anderson, A. A.. (1960). Construction of an experimental sequential item test (Research Memorandum 60-1). Washington DC: Personnel Research Branch, Department of the Army.

Laros, J. A., & Tellegen, P. J.. (1991). Construction and validation of the SON-R 5-17, the Snijders-Oomen non-verbal intelligence test. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.

Bejar, I. I., & Weiss, D. J.. (1978). A construct validation of adaptive achievement testing (Research Report 78-4). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

van der Linden, W. J., & Veldkamp, B. P.. (2005). Constraining item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with shadow tests. Law School Admission Council Computerized Testing Report 02-03.

van der Linden, W. J., & Veldkamp, B. P.. (2002). Constraining item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with shadow tests (Research Report No. 02-06). University of Twente, The Netherlands.

Wingersky, M. S. (1989). A consideration for variable length adaptive tests (Research Report 89-40). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Oltman, P. K. (1994). Computerized Testing (Research Report 94-22). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Du, Y., Lewis, C., & Pashley, P. J.. (1994). Computerized mastery testing using fuzzy set decision theory (Research Report 94-37). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Kalisch, S. J. (1980). Computerized instructional adaptive testing model: Formulation and validation (AFHRL-TR-79-33, Final Report). Brooks Air Force Base TX: Air Force Human Resources Laboratory", Also Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, February 1981, 11, 20 (Ms. No, 2217) .

Grist, S., Rudner, L. M., & Wise,. (1989). Computerized adaptive tests. ERIC Clearinghouse on Tests, Measurement, and Evaluation, no. 107.

Shermis, M. D., Mzumara, H., Brown, M., & Lillig, C.. (1997). Computerized adaptive testing through the World Wide Web. (ERIC No. ED414536).

League-for-Innovation-in-the-Community-College,. (1988). Computerized adaptive testing: The state of the art in assessment at three community colleges. Laguna Hills CA: Author.

McBride, J. R. (1979). Computerized adaptive testing: The state of the art (ARI Technical Report 423). Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.

McBride, J. R. (1982). Computerized Adaptive Testing system development and project management. Minutes of the ASVAB (Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery) Steering Committee. Washington, DC: Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Manpower, Reserve Affairs and Logistics), Accession Policy Directorate.

Croll, P. R. (1982). Computerized adaptive testing system design: Preliminary design considerations (Tech. Report 82-52). San Diego CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center. (AD A118 495).

McBride, J. R. (1982). Computerized adaptive testing project: Objectives and requirements (Tech Note 82-22). San Diego CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center. (AD A118 447).

Storm, E. G. (1999). Computerized adaptive testing in the Bundeswehr. Unpublished manuscript.

Eggen, T., & Straetmans, G. J. J. M.. (1996). Computerized adaptive testing for classifying examinees into three categories (Measurement and Research Department Rep 96-3). Arnhem, The Netherlands: Cito.

Borman, W. C., Hanson, M. A., Kubisiak, U. C., & Buck, D. E.. (2000). Computerized adaptive rating scales (CARS): Development and evaluation of the concept. (Institute Rep No. 350). Tampa FL: Personnel Decisions Research Institute.

Larson, J. W. (1987). Computerized adaptive language testing: A Spanish placement exam. In Language Testing Research Selected Papers from the Colloquium, Monterey CA.

Engdahl, B. (1992). Computerized adaptive assessment of cognitive abilities among disabled adults. ERIC Document No ED301274.

Hambleton, R. K., & Xing, D.. (2004). Computer-based test designs with optimal and non-optimal tests for making pass-fail decisions. Research Report, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.

Hansen, D. N., Johnson, B. F., Fagan, R. L., Tan, P., & Dick, W.. (1974). Computer-based adaptive testing models for the Air Force technical training environment: Phase I: Development of a computerized measurement system for Air Force technical Training. JSAS Catalogue of Selected Documents in Psychology, 5, 1-86 (MS No. 882). AFHRL Technical Report 74-48.

Urry, V. W. (1976). Computer-assisted testing with live examinees: A rendezvous with reality (TN 75-3). Washington DC: U. S. Civil Service Commission, Personnel Research and Development Center.

Urry, V. W. (1974). Computer-assisted testing: The calibration and evaluation of the verbal ability bank (Technical Study 74-3). Washington DC: U. S. Civil Service Commission, Personnel Research and Development Center.

Schmidt, F. L., Urry, V. W., & Gugel, J. F.. (1977). Computer-assisted tailored testing: Examinee reactions and evaluation (PB-276 748). Washington DC: U. S. Civil Service Commission, Personnel Research and Development Center.

Ferguson, R. L. (1969). Computer-assisted criterion-referenced measurement (Working Paper No 49). Pittsburgh PA: University of Pittsburgh, Learning and Research Development Center. (ERIC No. ED 037 089).

Linacre, J. M. (2000). Computer-adaptive testing: A methodology whose time has come. MESA Memorandum No 9. Chicago : MESA psychometric laboratory, Unversity of Chicago.

De Witt, J. J., & Weiss, D. J.. (1974). A computer software system for adaptive ability measurement (Research Report 74-1). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Linacre, J. M. (1987). A computer program for adaptive testing by microcomputer (MESA Memorandum No 40). Chicago: University of Chicago. (ERIC ED 280 895.).

Ferguson, R. L. (1970). Computer assistance for individualizing measurement. Pittsburgh PA: University of Pittsburgh, Learning Research and Development Center.

Ferguson, R. L. (1971). Computer assistance for individualizing measurement. Pittsburgh PA: University of Pittsburgh R and D Center.

Armstrong, R. D., & Jones, D. H.. (1998). Computer adaptive testing – Approaches for item selection and measurement. Rutgers Center for Operations Research, New Brunswick NJ.

Bergstrom, B. A., & Lunz, M. E.. (1991). Comparisons of computer adaptive and pencil and paper tests. Chicago IL: American Society of Clinical Pathologists.

Nicewander, W. A., Chang, H. S., & Doody, E. N.. (1981). A comparison of two methods of interactive testing Final report. National Institute of Education Grant 79-1045.

Pine, S. M., & Weiss, D. J.. (1978). A comparison of the fairness of adaptive and conventional testing strategies (Research Report 78-1). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Schnipke, D. L., & Reese, L. M.. (1999). A comparison of testlet-based test designs for computerized adaptive testing (LSAC Computerized Testing Report 97-01). Newtown, PA: LSAC.

Parker, S. B., & McBride, J. R.. (1990). A comparison of Rasch and three-parameter logistic models in computerized adaptive testing. Unpublished manuscript.

Bryson, R. (1971). A comparison of four methods of selecting items for computer-assisted testing (Technical Bulletin STB 72-5). San Diego: Naval Personnel and Training Research Laboratory.

Frick, T. W. (1989). A comparison of an expert systems approach to computerized adaptive testing and an IRT model. Unpublished manuscript (submitted to American Educational Research Journal).

Kingsbury, G. G., & Weiss, D. J.. (1980). A comparison of adaptive, sequential, and conventional testing strategies for mastery decisions (Research Report 80-4). Minneapolis, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Chang, S. - W., & Twu, B. - Y.. (1998). A comparative study of item exposure control methods in computerized adaptive testing. Research Report Series 98-3, Iowa City: American College Testing.

Schaeffer, G., Bridgeman, B., Golub-Smith, M. L., Lewis, C., Potenza, M. T., & Steffen, M.. (1998). Comparability of paper-and-pencil and computer adaptive test scores on the GRE General Test (GRE Board Professional Report No 95-08P; Educational Testing Service Research Report 98-38). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Ward, W. C., Kline, R. G., & Flaugher, J.. (1986). College Board computerized placement tests: Validation of an adaptive test of basic skills (Research Report 86-29). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Stenson, H., Graves, P., Gardiner, J., & Dally, L.. (1991). Collected works on the legal aspects of computerized adaptive testing. Chicago, IL: National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc.

Robin, F. (2000). CBTS: Computer-based testing simulation and analysis [computer software]. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts, School of Education.

Geranpayeh, A. (2001). CB BULATS: Examining the reliability of a computer based test using test-retest method. Cambridge ESOL Research Notes, Issue 5, July 2001, pp.