van der Linden, W. J., & Veldkamp, B. P.. (2002). Constraining item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with shadow tests (Research Report No. 02-06). University of Twente, The Netherlands.

Bejar, I. I., & Weiss, D. J.. (1978). A construct validation of adaptive achievement testing (Research Report 78-4). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Laros, J. A., & Tellegen, P. J.. (1991). Construction and validation of the SON-R 5-17, the Snijders-Oomen non-verbal intelligence test. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.

Bayroff, A. G., Thomas, J. J., & Anderson, A. A.. (1960). Construction of an experimental sequential item test (Research Memorandum 60-1). Washington DC: Personnel Research Branch, Department of the Army.

Stocking, M. L., & Lewis, C.. (1995). Controlling item exposure conditional on ability in computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 95-25). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Stocking, M. L. (1993). Controlling item exposure rates in a realistic adaptive testing paradigm (Research Report 93-2). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Thompson, J. G., & Weiss, D. J.. (1980). Criterion-related validity of adaptive testing strategies (Research Report 80-3). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Giesinger, J. M., Petersen, M. A., Groenvold, M., Aaronson, N. K., Arraras, J. I., Conroy, T., et al.. (2011). Cross-cultural development of an item list for computer-adaptive testing of fatigue in oncological patients. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. presented at the March 29, 2011.

Zenisky, A. L. (1999). Current and future research in multi-stage testing (Research Report No 370). Amherst MA: University of Massachusetts, Laboratory of Pychometric and Evaluative Research.

van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A., & Meijer, R. R.. (1999). CUSUM-based person-fit statistics for adaptive testing (Research Report 99-05). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.

Nandakumar, R., & Roussos, L.. (2001). CATSIB: A modified SIBTEST procedure to detect differential item functioning in computerized adaptive tests (Research report). Newton, PA: Law School Admission Council.

Schaeffer, G. A., Bridgeman, B., Golub-Smith, M. L., Lewis, C., Potenza, M. T., & Steffen, M.. (1998). Comparability of paper-and-pencil and computer adaptive test scores on the GRE General Test (No. ETS Research Report 98-38). presented at the August, 1998, Princeton, N.J.: Educational Testing Services.

McKinley, R. L.,, & Reckase, M. D.. (1981). A comparison of a Bayesian and a maximum likelihood tailored testing procedure. Research Report 81-2. Columbia MO: University of Missouri, Department of Educational Psychology, Tailored Testing Research Laboratory.

HUnter, D. R. (1982). Comparison of live and simulated adaptive tests (No. AFHRL-TP-82-35). Air Force Human Resources Laborarory. presented at the December 1982, Brooks Air Force Base, Texas: Air Force Systems Command.

Gorman, S. (1980). A comparative evaluation of two Bayesian adaptive ability estimation procedures with a conventional test strategy. Catholic University of America, Washington DC.

Makransky, G. (2012). Computerized adaptive testing in industrial and organizational psychology. University of Twente, Twente, The Netherlands.

Bringsjord, E. L. (2001). Computerized-adaptive versus paper-and-pencil testing environments: An experimental analysis of examinee experience.