Lunz, M. E., & Deville, C. W.. (1996). Validity of item selection: A comparison of automated computerized adaptive and manual paper and pencil examinations. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 8, 152-157.

Lunz, M. E., Bergstrom, B. A., & Gershon, R. C.. (1990). Test-retest consistency of computer adaptive tests. annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. presented at the 04/1990, Boston, MA USA.

Lunz, M. E., Stahl, J. A., & Bergstrom, B. A.. (1993). Test targeting and precision before and after review on computer-adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Atlanta GA.

Bergstrom, B. A., & Lunz, M. E.. (1990). The stability of Rasch pencil and paper item calibrations on computer adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the Midwest Objective Measurement Seminar. Chicago IL.

Lunz, M. E., Bergstrom, B. A., & Wright, B. D.. (1994). Reliability of alternate computer adaptive tests. In Objective measurement, theory into practice (Vol. II). New Jersey: Ablex.

Lunz, M. E., & Stahl, J. A.. (1998). Patterns of item exposure using a randomized CAT algorithm. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego, CA.

Stone, G. E., & Lunz, M. E.. (1994). Item calibration considerations: A comparison of item calibrations on written and computerized adaptive examinations. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.

O'Neill, T., Lunz, M. E., & Thiede, K.. (2000). The impact of receiving the same items on consecutive computer adaptive test administrations. Journal of Applied Measurement, 1, 131-151.

Bergstrom, B. A., & Lunz, M. E.. (1994). The equivalence of Rasch item calibrations and ability estimates across modes of administration. In Objective measurement: Theory into practice (Vol. 2, pp. 122-128). Norwood, N.J. USA: Ablex Publishing Co.

Lunz, M. E., & Bergstrom, B. A.. (1995). Equating computerized adaptive certification examinations: The Board of Registry series of studies. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco.

Lunz, M. E., & Bergstrom, B. A.. (1994). An empirical study of computerized adaptive test administration conditions. Journal of Educational Measurement, 31, 251-263. presented at the Fal.

Stone, G. E., & Lunz, M. E.. (1994). The effect of review on the psychometric characterstics of computerized adaptive tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 211-222.

Stone, G. E., & Lunz, M. E.. (1994). The effect of review on the psychometric characteristics of computerized adaptive tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 211-222.

Lunz, M. E., & Stone, G. E.. (1994). The effect of review on the psychometric characteristics of computerized adaptive tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 7(3), 211-222.

Lunz, M. E., Berstrom, B. A., & Wright, B. D.. (1992). The Effect of Review on Student Ability and Test Efficiency for Computerized Adaptive Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16(1), 33-40.

Lunz, M. E., Bergstrom, B. A., & Wright, B. D.. (1992). The effect of review on student ability and test efficiency for computerized adaptive tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 33-40.

Bergstrom, B. B., & Lunz, M. E.. (1991). Confidence in pass/fail decisions for computer adaptive and paper and pencil examinations. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.

Bergstrom, B. A., & Lunz, M. E.. (1992). Confidence in pass/fail decisions for computer adaptive and paper and pencil examinations. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 15, 453-464.

Lunz, M. E., & Bergstrom, B. A.. (1995). Computerized adaptive testing: Tracking candidate response patterns. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 13, 151-162.

Lunz, M. E., Bergstrom, B. A., & Gershon, R. C.. (1994). Computer adaptive testing. International journal of Educational Research, 6, 623-634.

Bergstrom, B. A., & Lunz, M. E.. (1991). Comparisons of computer adaptive and pencil and paper tests. Chicago IL: American Society of Clinical Pathologists.

Lunz, M. E., & Bergstrom, B. A.. (1991). Comparability of decisions for computer adaptive and written examinations. Journal of Allied Health, 20, 15-23.

Bergstrom, B. A., & Lunz, M. E.. (1999). CAT for certification and licensure. In Innovations in computerized assessment (pp. 67-91). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Bergstrom, B. A., Lunz, M. E., & Gershon, R. C.. (1992). Altering the level of difficulty in computer adaptive testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 5, 137-149.