Projection-Based Stopping Rules for Computerized Adaptive Testing in Licensure Testing. Applied Psychological MeasurementApplied Psychological Measurement, 42(4), 275 - 290. presented at the 2018/06/01. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621617726790
. (2017). Computerized adaptive testing: Tracking candidate response patterns. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 13, 151-162.
. (1995). The effect of review on the psychometric characteristics of computerized adaptive tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 7(3), 211-222.
. (1994). Validity of item selection: A comparison of automated computerized adaptive and manual paper and pencil examinations. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 8, 152-157.
. (1996). An empirical study of computerized adaptive test administration conditions. Journal of Educational Measurement, 31, 251-263. presented at the Fal.
. (1994). Reliability of alternate computer adaptive tests. In Objective measurement, theory into practice (Vol. II). New Jersey: Ablex.
. (1994). . (1994).
The Effect of Review on Student Ability and Test Efficiency for Computerized Adaptive Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16(1), 33-40.
. (1992). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
Test targeting and precision before and after review on computer-adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Atlanta GA.
. (1993). The effect of review on student ability and test efficiency for computerized adaptive tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 33-40.
. (1992). Comparability of decisions for computer adaptive and written examinations. Journal of Allied Health, 20, 15-23.
. (1991). Patterns of item exposure using a randomized CAT algorithm. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego, CA.
. (1998). Test-retest consistency of computer adaptive tests. annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. presented at the 04/1990, Boston, MA USA.
. (1990). Equating computerized adaptive certification examinations: The Board of Registry series of studies. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco.
. (1995). Item selection using an average growth approximation of target information functions. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 41-51.
. (1992). Test information targeting strategies for adaptive multistage testlet designs. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
. (2003). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
A few more issues to consider in multidimensional computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco.
. (1994). A testlet assembly design for the uniform CPA Examination. Applied Measurement in Education, 19, 189-202. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame1903_2
. (2006). Some practical examples of computerized adaptive sequential testing (Internal Report). Philadelphia: National Board of Medical Examiners.
. (1996). Computer-adaptive sequential testing. In . W. J. van der Linden (Ed.), Computerized Adaptive Testing: Theory and Practice (pp. 289-209). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
. (2000). Heuristics based CAT: Balancing item information, content, and exposure. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York NY.
. (1996). Computer-assisted test assembly using optimization heuristics. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22 , 224-236.
. (1998). A testlet assembly design for the uniform CPA examination. In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education.. New Orleans.
. (2002). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
. (1992).
CASTISEL [Computer software]. Philadelphia, PA: National Board of Medical Examiners.
. (1998). Test models for complex computer-based testing. In . C. N. Mille,. M. T. Potenza, J. J. Fremer, and W. C. Ward (Eds.). Computer-based testing: Building the foundation for future assessments (pp. 67-88). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
. (2002). Heuristic-based CAT: Balancing item information, content and exposure. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York NY.
. (1996). Maintaining content validity in computerized adaptive testing. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 3, 29-41.
. (1998). Exposure control using adaptive multi-stage item bundles. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
. (2003). Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing in a Certification or Licensure Context. Applied Psychological Measurement, 20, 389-404.
. (1996). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
Some alternative CAT item selection heuristics (Internal report). Philadelphia PA: National Board of Medical Examiners.
. (1995). Adaptive computer-based tasks under an assessment engineering paradigm. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
. (2009). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
Overview of the USMLE Step 2 computerized field test. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
. (1997). Exposure control using adaptive multi-stage item bundles. In annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago, IL. USA.
. (2003). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
Implementing the computer-adaptive sequential testing (CAST) framework to mass produce high quality computer-adaptive and mastery tests. In Symposium paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans, LA.
. (2000). Some practical examples of computerized adaptive sequential testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35, 229-249.
. (1998). Computer-adaptive testing. In . B. Everett, and D. Howell (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science. New York: Wiley.
. (2004). Heuristic-based CAT: Balancing item information, content, and exposure. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York NY.
. (1996). Multidimensional computerized adaptive testing in a certification or licensure context. Applied Psychological Measurement, 20, 389-404.
. (1996). A framework for exploring and controlling risks associated with test item exposure over time. In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council for Measurement in Education. San Diego, CA.
. (1998). Evaluating computerized adaptive testing design for the MCAT with realistic simulated data. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
. (2003). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
Statistics for detecting disclosed items in a CAT environment. Metodologia de Las Ciencias del Comportamiento., 5(2).
. (2004). Evaluating a new approach to detect aberrant responses in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.
. (2003). Methods for item set selection in adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
. (2003). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
Efficiency and precision in two-stage adaptive testing. West Palm Beach Florida: Eastern ERA.
. (1984). Test theory and the public interest. Proceedings of the Educational Testing Service Invitational Conference.
. (1976). Some how and which for practical tailored testing. In . L. J. T. van der Kamp, W. F. Langerak and D.N.M. de Gruijter (Eds): Psychometrics for educational debates (pp. 189-206). New York: John Wiley and Sons. Computer-Assisted Instruction, Testing, and Guidance (pp. 139-183). New York: Harper and Row.
. (1980). . (1971).
Individualized testing and item characteristic curve theory. In . D. H. Krantz, R. C. Atkinson, R. D. Luce, and P. Suppes (Eds.), Contemporary developments in mathematical psychology (Vol. II). San Francisco: Freeman.
. (1974). The self-scoring flexilevel test (RB-7043). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1970). A broad range test of verbal ability (RB-75-5). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1975). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
Panel discussion: Future directions for computerized adaptive testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Item Response Theory and Computerized adaptive conference. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
. (1978). . (1971).
Small N justifies Rasch model. In , New horizons in testing: Latent trait test theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 51-61). New York, NY. USA: Academic Press.
. (1983). Some test theory for tailored testing. In . W. H. Holtzman (Ed.), Computer-assisted instruction, testing, and guidance (pp.139-183). New York: Harper and Row.
. (1970). Practical methods for redesigning a homogeneous test, also for designing a multilevel test (RB-74-30). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1974). Some likelihood functions found in tailored testing. In . C. K. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing (pp. 79-81). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
. (1976). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
. (1977).
v01n1p095.pdf (402.88 KB)
![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
. (1971).
. (1977).