Export 2294 results:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
M
Meijer, R. R., & van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A.. (1998). Simulating the null distribution of person-fit statistics for conventional and adaptive tests (Research Report 98-02). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.
Meijer, R. R. (2002). Outlier detection in high-stakes certification testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 39, 219-233.
Meijer, R. R., & van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A.. (2005). The use of person-fit statistics in computerized adaptive testing. LSAC Research Report Series. presented at the September, 2005, Newton, PA. USA: Law School Administration Council.
Melican, G. J., Breithaupt, K., & Zhang, Y.. (2010). Designing and Implementing a Multistage Adaptive Test: The Uniform CPA Exam. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 167-190). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8
Mendez, F. A. (2001). Application of data mining to response data in a computerized adaptive test. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Seattle WA.
Meng, H., Steinkamp, S., Jones, P., & Matthews-Lopez, J.. (2011). Practitioner’s Approach to Identify Item Drift in CAT. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.
PDF icon IACAT 2011Meng Item Drift.pdf (337.44 KB)
Meng, H., & Han, C.. (2017). Comparison of Pretest Item Calibration Methods in a Computerized Adaptive Test (CAT). In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.
Millan, E., Trella, M., Perez-de-la-Cruz, J. - L., & Conejo, R.. (2000). Using Bayesian Networks in Computerized Adaptive Tests. In . M. Ortega and J. Bravo (Eds.),Computers and Education in the 21st Century. Kluwer, pp. 217228.
Miller, T. R. (1992). Practical considerations for conducting studies of differential item functioning (DIF) in a CAT environment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.
Miller, T., & Davey, T.. (1999). Principles for administering adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal Canada.
Millman, J. (1984). Using microcomputers to administer tests: An alternate point of view. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 3(2), 20-21.
Millman, J., & Arter, J. A.. (1984). Issues in item banking. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1, 315-330.
Mills, C. N., & Steffen, M.. (2000). The GRE computer adaptive test: Operational issues. In . W. J. van der Linden and C. A. W. Glas (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp. 75-99). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
Mills, C. N. (1999). Development and introduction of a computer adaptive Graduate Record Examination General Test. In . F. Drasgow and J .B. Olson-Buchanan (Eds.). Innovations in computerized assessment (pp. 117-135). Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum.
Mills, C. N.,, & Stocking, M. L.. (1996). Practical issues in large-scale computerized adaptive testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 9, 287-304.
Mislevy, J. L., Rupp, A. A., & Harring, J. R.. (2012). Detecting Local Item Dependence in Polytomous Adaptive Data. Journal of Educational Measurement, 49, 127–147. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2012.00165.x
PDF icon v08n2p155.pdf (594.04 KB)
Moreno, K. E., & Segall, O. D.. (1997). Reliability and construct validity of CAT-ASVAB. In . W. A. Sands, B. K. Waters, and J. R. McBride (Eds.). Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp. 169-179). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
Moreno, K. E. (1997). CAT-ASVAB operational test and evaluation. In . W. A. Sands, B. K. Waters, and . R. McBride (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp. 199-205). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
Moreno, K. E.,, & Segall, D. O.. (1992). CAT-ASVAB precision. Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Military Testing Association, 1, 22-26.
Morgan, D. L., Way, W. D., & Augemberg, K. E.. (2006). A comparison of online calibration methods for a CAT. In Presented at the National Council on Measurement on Education. San Francisco, CA.
Morin, M. (2017). Adapting Linear Models for Optimal Test Design to More Complex Test Specifications. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.
Morrison, C., Subhiyah, R,, & Nungester, R.. (1995). Item exposure rates for unconstrained and content-balanced computerized adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.
Morrison, C. A., & Nungester, R. J.. (1995). Computer adaptive testing in a medical licensure setting: A comparison of outcomes under the one- and two- parameter logistic models. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco.
Moshinsky, A., & Kazin, C.. (2005). Constructing a Computerized Adaptive Test for University Applicants With Disabilities. Applied Measurement in Education, 18, 381-405. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame1804_3
Moyer, E. L., Galindo, J. L., & Dodd, B. G.. (2012). Balancing Flexible Constraints and Measurement Precision in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72, 629-648. doi:10.1177/0013164411431838
Mueller, K., Liebig, C., & Hattrup, K.. (2007). Computerizing Organizational Attitude Surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 658-678. doi:10.1177/0013164406292084
Mulder, J., & van der Linden, W. J.. (2010). Multidimensional Adaptive Testing with Kullback–Leibler Information Item Selection. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 77-102). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8
Murphy, D. L., Dodd, B. G., & Vaughn, B. K.. (2010). A Comparison of Item Selection Techniques for Testlets. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34, 424-437. doi:10.1177/0146621609349804
Mussio, J. J. (1972). A modification to Lord’s model for tailored tests. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto.
N
Nandakumar, R., & Roussos, L. A.. (2004). Evaluation of the CATSIB DIF procedure in a pretest setting. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 177-199.
Nandakumar, R., & Roussos, L. A.. (1997). Validation of CATSIB To investigate DIF of CAT data. In annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago, IL. USA.
Nering, M. L., Davey, T., & Thompson, T.. (1998). A hybrid method for controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Urbana, IL.
Nering, M., Thompson, T. D., & Davey, T.. (1997). Simulation of realistic ability vectors. In Paper presented at the Psychometric Society meeting. Gatlinburg TN.
Nering, M. L., Davey, T., & Thompson, T.. (1998). A hybrid method for controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Urbana, IL.
Nering, M. L. (1996). The effects of person misfit in computerized adaptive testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
Newton, D. W., Boyle, M., & Catizone, C. A.. (2008). The NAPLEX: evolution, purpose, scope, and educational implications. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 72, 33. presented at the Apr 15.
Nicewander, W. A., & Thomasson, G. L.. (1998). Some reliability estimators for computerized adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Urbana, IL.

Pages