Bringsjord, E. L. (2001). Computerized-adaptive versus paper-and-pencil testing environments: An experimental analysis of examinee experience.

Frey, A. (2006). Validitätssteigerungen durch adaptives Testen [Increasing validity by adaptive testing].

Seguin, S. P. (1976). An exploratory studyof the efficiency of the flexilevel testing procedure. University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Olivier, P. (1974). An evaluation of the self-scoring flexilevel testing model. Florida State University.

Kalender, I. (2011). Effects of Different Computerized Adaptive Testing Strategies of Recovery of Ability. THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF NATURAL AND APPLIED SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY.

Simms, L. J. (2002). DEVELOPMENT, RELIABILITY, AND VALIDITY OF A COMPUTERIZED ADAPTIVE VERSION OF THE SCHEDULE FOR NONADAPTIVE AND ADAPTIVE PERSONALITY. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, University of Iowa, Iowa City Iowa.

Makransky, G. (2012). Computerized adaptive testing in industrial and organizational psychology. University of Twente, Twente, The Netherlands.

Gorman, S. (1980). A comparative evaluation of two Bayesian adaptive ability estimation procedures with a conventional test strategy. Catholic University of America, Washington DC.

Schoonman, W. (1989). An applied study on computerized adaptive testing. Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences. University of Groingen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Han, K. T. (2010). SimulCAT: Windows application that simulates computerized adaptive test administration. Retrieved from http://www.hantest.net/simulcat

Weiss, D. J., & Guyer, R. D.. (2010). Manual for CATSim: Comprehensive simulation of computerized adaptive testing. St. Paul, MN: Assessment Systems Corporation.

Ackerman, T. A. (1987). The use of unidimensional item parameter estimates of multidimensional items in adaptive testing (No. 87-13). ACT Research Reports (p. 33). presented at the September, 1987, Iowa City, IA: ACT.

Meijer, R. R., & van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A.. (2005). The use of person-fit statistics in computerized adaptive testing. LSAC Research Report Series. presented at the September, 2005, Newton, PA. USA: Law School Administration Council.

Glas, C. A. W., Meijer, R. R., & van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M.. (1998). Statistical tests for person misfit in computerized adaptive testing (No. 98-01) (p. 28). Enschede, The Netherlands: Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Univeersity of Twente.

Paek, P. (2005). Recent trends in comparability studies (No. 05-05). PEM Research Report 05-05. presented at the August, 2005, Pearson.

Veldkamp, B. P., Verschoor, A. J., & Eggen, T.. (2007). A multiple objective test assembly approach for exposure control problems in computerized adaptive testing (No. 2007-1). Measurement and Research Department Reports. Arnhem, The Netherlands: Cito.

Veldkamp, B. P., van der Linden, W. J., & Ariel, A.. (2002). Mathematical-programming approaches to test item pool design (No. RR 02-09) (pp. 93-108). Twente, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology.

Nandakumar, R., Banks, J. C., & Roussos, L. A.. (2006). Kernel-smoothed DIF detection procedure for computerized adaptive tests (Computerized testing report 00-08). Newton, PA: Law School Admission Council.

Reese, L. M., Schnipke, D. L., & Luebke, S. W.. (1999). Incorporating content constraints into a multi-stage adaptive testlet design. (No. BBB16784). LSAC Computerized Testing Report. Princeton, NJ. USA: Law School Admission Council.

Han, K. T. (2009). Gradual maximum information ratio approach to item selection in computerized adaptive testing (No. RR-09-07). GMAC Research Reports. McLean, VA. USA: Graduate Management Admissions Council.

Guo, F., & Wang, L.. (2004). Evaluating scale stability of a computer adaptive testing system (No. 05-12). McLean, VA: GMAC.

Huang, C. - Y., Kalohn, J. C., Lin, C. - J., & Spray, J. A.. (2000). Estimating Item Parameters from Classical Indices for Item Pool Development with a Computerized Classification Test. (No. Research Report 2000-4). Iowa City, Iowa: ACT, Inc.

Stoloff, P. H. (1985). Equivalence of scores from computerized adaptive and paper-and-pencil ASVAB tests (No. CNR 113) (p. 100). Alexandria, VA. USA: Center for Naval Analysis.

Gialluca, K. A., & Weiss, D. J.. (1979). Efficiency of an adaptive inter-subtest branching strategy in the measurement of classroom achievement (Research Report 79-6). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Spray, J. A., & Reckase, M. D.. (1987). The effect of item parameter estimation error on decisions made using the sequential probability ratio test (No. Research Report 87-1). ACT Research Report Series. Iowa City, IA. USA: DTIC Document.

HUnter, D. R. (1982). Comparison of live and simulated adaptive tests (No. AFHRL-TP-82-35). Air Force Human Resources Laborarory. presented at the December 1982, Brooks Air Force Base, Texas: Air Force Systems Command.

McKinley, R. L.,, & Reckase, M. D.. (1981). A comparison of a Bayesian and a maximum likelihood tailored testing procedure. Research Report 81-2. Columbia MO: University of Missouri, Department of Educational Psychology, Tailored Testing Research Laboratory.

Schaeffer, G. A., Bridgeman, B., Golub-Smith, M. L., Lewis, C., Potenza, M. T., & Steffen, M.. (1998). Comparability of paper-and-pencil and computer adaptive test scores on the GRE General Test (No. ETS Research Report 98-38). presented at the August, 1998, Princeton, N.J.: Educational Testing Services.

Nandakumar, R., & Roussos, L.. (2001). CATSIB: A modified SIBTEST procedure to detect differential item functioning in computerized adaptive tests (Research report). Newton, PA: Law School Admission Council.

Jacobson, R. L. (1993). New computer technique seen producing a revolution in testing. The Chronicle of Higher Education, pp. 22-23, 26.

McBride, J. R., & Weiss, D. J.. (1974). A word knowledge item pool for adaptive ability measurement (Research Report 74-2). Minneapolis MN: Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Cito.,. (1999). WISCAT: Een computergestuurd toetspakket voor rekenen en wiskunde [A computerized test package for arithmetic and mathematics]. Cito: Arnhem, The Netherlands.

Bridgeman, B., & Cline, F.. (2000). Variations in mean response times for questions on the computer-adaptive GRE general test: Implications for fair assessment (GRE Board Professional Report No. 96-20P: Educational Testing Service Research Report 00-7).

Samejima, F. (1990). Validity study in multidimensional latent space and efficient computerized adaptive testing (Final Report R01-1069-11-004-91). Knoxville TN: University of Tennessee, Department of Psychology.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Weiss, D. J.. (1981). A validity comparison of adaptive and conventional strategies for mastery testing (Research Report 81-3). Minneapolis, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Rebollo, P., Castejon, I., Cuervo, J., Villa, G., Garcia-Cueto, E., Diaz-Cuervo, H., et al.. (2010). Validation of a computer-adaptive test to evaluate generic health-related quality of life. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes.

Green, B. F., & Thomas, T. J.. (1990). Utility of predicting starting abilities in sequential computer-based adaptive tests (Research Report 90-1). Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins University, Department of Psychology.

Hsu, T. C., & Tseng, F. L.. (1995). Using simulation to select an adaptive testing strategy: An item bank evaluation program. Unpublished manuscript, University of Pittsburgh.

van der Linden, W. J., Scrams, D. J., & Schnipke, D. L.. (1998). Using response-time constraints to control for differential speededness in adaptive testing (Research Report 98-06). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.

van der Linden, W. J., & van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A.. (2000). Using response times to detect aberrant behavior in computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 00-09). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.

Han, N. (2003). Using moving averages to assess test and item security in computer-based testing (Center for Educational Assessment Research Report No 468). Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts, School of Education.

Wang, X., Bradlow, E. T., & Wainer, H.,. (2001). Users guide for SCORIGHT (version 2) : A computer program for scoring tests built of testlets (Research Report 01-06). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Wang, X., Bradlow, E. T., & Wainer, H.,. (2001). User's guide for SCORIGHT (version 1): A computer program for scoring tests built of testlets (Research Report 01-06). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Reckase, M. D. (1981). The use of the sequential probability ratio test in making grade classifications in conjunction with tailored testing (Research Report 81-4). Columbia MO: University of Missouri, Department of Educational Psychology.

Spray, J. A., Abdel-Fattah, A. A., Huang, C. - Y., & Lau, C. A.. (1997). Unidimensional approximations for a computerized adaptive test when the item pool and latent space are multidimensional (Research Report 97-5). Iowa City IA: ACT Inc.

de Gruijter, D. N. M. (1977). A two-stage testing procedure (Memorandum 403-77). University of Leyden, The Netherlands, Educational Research Center.

Stocking, M. L. (1984). Two simulated feasibility studies in computerized adaptive testing (RR-84-15). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Bennett, R. E., Morley, M., & Quardt, D.. (1998). Three response types for broadening the conception of mathematical problem solving in computerized-adaptive tests (Research Report 98-45). Princeton NJ : Educational Testing Service.

Stocking, M. L. (1994). Three practical issues for modern adaptive testing item pools (Research Report 94-5),. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Olea, J., Ponsoda, V., & Prieto, G., E.. (1999). Tests informatizados: Fundamentos y aplicaciones (Computerized testing: Fundamentals and applications. Madrid: Pirmide.

Olea, J., & Ponsoda, V.. (2003). Tests adaptativos informatizados (Computerized adaptive testing). Madrid: UNED Ediciones.

Pitoniak, M. J. (2000). Testlet-based Designs for Computer-Based Testing in a Certification and Licensure Setting. Jersey City, NJ: AICPA Technical Report.

McBride, J. R., Paddock, A. F., Wise, L. L., Strickland, W. J., & Waters, B. K.. (2001). Testing via the Internet: A literature review and analysis of issues for Department of Defense Internet testing of the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) in high schools (FR-01-12). Alexandria VA: Human Resources Research Organization.

Lord, F. M. (1976). Test theory and the public interest. Proceedings of the Educational Testing Service Invitational Conference.

Powers, D. E. (1999). Test anxiety and test performance: Comparing paper-based and computer-adaptive versions of the GRE General Test (Research Report 99-15). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Kalisch, S. J. (1974). A tailored testing model employing the beta distribution (unpublished manuscript). Florida State University, Educational Evaluation and Research Design Program.

Urry, V. W. (1981). Tailored testing, its theory and practice. Part II: Ability and item parameter estimation, multiple ability application, and allied procedures (NPRDC TR-81). San Diego CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

Urry, V. W., & Dorans, N. J.. (1983). Tailored testing, its theory and practice. Part I: The basic model, the normal ogive submodels, and the tailored testing algorithm (NPRDC TR-83-00). San Diego CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

Lord, F. M. (1971). Tailored testing: An application of stochastic approximation (RM 71-2). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Urry, V. W. (1977). Tailored testing: A spectacular success for latent trait theory (TS 77-2). Washington DC: U. S. Civil Service Commission, Personnel Research and Development Center.