Bradlow, E. T., & Weiss, R. E.. (2001). Outlier measures and norming methods for computerized adaptive tests. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 26, 85-104.

Cheng, P. E., & Liou, M.. (2003). Computerized adaptive testing using the nearest-neighbors criterion. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 204-216.

Pastor, D. A., Dodd, B. G., & Chang, H. - H.. (2002). A comparison of item selection techniques and exposure control mechanisms in CATs using the generalized partial credit model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 147-163.

Thissen, D., Nelson, L. A., & Swygert, K. A.. (2001). Item response theory applied to combinations of multiple-choice and constructed-response items--approximation methods for scale scores. In Test scoring (pp. 289-315). Mahwah, N.J. USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

McLeod, L., Lewis, C., & Thissen, D.. (2003). A Bayesian method for the detection of item preknowledge in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 121-137.

Gierl, M., & Bulut, O.. (2017). Generating Rationales to Support Formative Feedback in Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1O5KDFtQlDLvhNoDr7X4JO4arpJkIHKUP

Chang, S. - W., & Ansley, T. N.. (2003). A comparative study of item exposure control methods in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40, 71-103.

Ruscio, J., & Ruscio, A. M.. (2002). A structure-based approach to psychological measurement: Matching measurement models to latent structure. Assessment, 9, 4-16.

Hau, K. - T., & Chang, H. - H.. (2001). Item selection in computerized adaptive testing: Should more discriminating items be used first?. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38, 249-266.

Veldkamp, B. P., van der Linden, W. J., & Ariel, A.. (2002). Mathematical-programming approaches to test item pool design (No. RR 02-09) (pp. 93-108). Twente, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology.

Archer, R. P., Tirrell, C. A., & Elkins, D. E.. (2001). Evaluation of an MMPI-A short form: Implications for adaptive testing. Journal of Personality Assessment, 76, 76-89.

Cheng, P. E., & Liou, M.. (2000). Estimation of trait level in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 257-265.

Nering, M. L. (1997). The distribution of indexes of person fit within the computerized adaptive testing environment. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21, 115-127.

Stark, S., & Drasgow, F.. (2002). An EM approach to parameter estimation for the Zinnes and Griggs paired comparison IRT model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 208-227.

Laurier, M. (2004). Évaluation et multimédia dans l'apprentissage d'une L2 [Assessment and multimedia in learning an L2]. ReCALL, 16, 475-487.

Reckase, M. D. (2017). How Adaptive is an Adaptive Test: Are all Adaptive Tests Adaptive?. In 2017 IACAT Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Nj-zDCKk3DvHA4Jlp1qkb2XovmHeQfxu

Chang, H. - H., & Zhang, J.. (2002). Hypergeometric family and item overlap rates in computerized adaptive testing. Psychometrika, 67, 387-398.

Frey, A., & Moosbrugger, H.. (2004). Kann die Konfundierung von Konzentrationsleistung und Aktivierung durch adaptives Testen mit dern FAKT vermieden werden? [Avoiding the confounding of concentration performance and activation by adaptive testing with the FACT]. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 25, 1-17.

Rammsayer, T., & Brandler, S.. (2003). Timing behavior in computerized adaptive testing: Response times for correct and incorrect answers are not related to general fluid intelligence/Zum Zeitverhalten beim computergestützten adaptiveb Testen: Antwortlatenzen bei richtigen und falschen Lösun. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 24, 57-63.

van der Linden, W. J., & van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A.. (2003). Using response times to detect aberrant responses in computerized adaptive testing. Psychometrika, 68, 251-265.

Miceli, R., & Molinengo, G.. (2005). Somministrazione di test computerizzati di tipo adattivo: Un' applicazione del modello di misurazione di Rasch [Administration of computerized and adaptive tests: An application of the Rasch Model]. Testing Psicometria Metodologia, 12, 131-149.

Chen, S. - Y., & Lei, P. - W.. (2005). Controlling item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 204-217.

Sireci, S. G., & Clauser, B. E.. (2001). Practical issues in setting standards on computerized adaptive tests. In Setting performance standards: Concepts, methods, and perspectives (pp. 355-369). Mahwah, N.J. USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Hontangas, P., Olea, J., Ponsoda, V., Revuelta, J., & Wise, S. L.. (2004). Assisted self-adapted testing: A comparative study. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 20, 2-9.

Colvin, K., Keller, L. A., & Robin, F.. (2016). Effect of Imprecise Parameter Estimation on Ability Estimation in a Multistage Test in an Automatic Item Generation Context . Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 4(1), 1-18. doi:10.7333/1608-040101

Chang, H. - H., & van der Linden, W. J.. (2003). Optimal stratification of item pools in α-stratified computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 262-274.

Drasgow, F. (2002). The work ahead: A psychometric infrastructure for computerized adaptive tests. In M. P. Potenza, Freemer, J. J., & Ward, W. C., Computer-based tests: Building the foundation for future assessment. Mahwah, N.J. USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Ponsoda, V. (2000). Overview of the computerized adaptive testing special section. Psicológica, 21, 115-120.

van der Linden, W. J. (2005). A comparison of item-selection methods for adaptive tests with content constraints. Journal of Educational Measurement, 42, 283-302.

Meijer, R. R., & Grégoire, J.. (2001). Nouveaux développements dans le domaine du testing informatisé [New developments in the area of computerized testing]. Psychologie Française, 46, 221-230.

Wise, S. L. (2023). Expanding the Meaning of Adaptive Testing to Enhance Validity. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 10(2), 22-31. doi:10.7333/2305-1002022

Chen, S. - Y., Ankenmann, R. D., & Chang, H. - H.. (2000). A comparison of item selection rules at the early stages of computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 241-255.

Schreiber, M. D., Schneider, R. J., Schweizer, A., Beckmann, J. F., & Baltissen, R.. (2000). Diagnostische programme in der Demenzfrüherkennung: Der Adaptive Figurenfolgen-Lerntest (ADAFI) [Diagnostic programs in the early detection of dementia: The Adaptive Figure Series Learning Test (ADAFI)]. Zeitschrift für Gerontopsychologie & -Psychiatrie, 13, 16-29.

Hol, A. M., Vorst, H. C. M., & Mellenbergh, G. J.. (2007). Computerized adaptive testing for polytomous motivation items: Administration mode effects and a comparison with short forms. Applied Psychological Measurement, 31, 412-429.

Hol, A. M., Vorst, H. C. M., & Mellenbergh, G. J.. (2008). Computerized Adaptive Testing of Personality Traits. Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 216(1), 12-21. doi:10.1027/0044-3409.216.1.12

Buck, D. E. (2000). An examination of the reliability and validity of performance ratings made using computerized adaptive rating scales. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 61, 570.

Hambleton, R. K., & Xing, D.. (2006). Optimal and nonoptimal computer-based test designs for making pass-fail decisions. Applied Measurement in Education, 19, 221-239.

Häusler, J.. (2006). Adaptive success control in computerized adaptive testing. Psychology Science, 48, 436-450.

Tai, M. Him, Cooperman, A. W., DeWeese, J. N., & Weiss, D. J.. (2023). How Do Trait Change Patterns Affect the Performance of Adaptive Measurement of Change?. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 10(3), 32-58. doi:10.7333/2307-1003032

Finkelman, M., & Wang, C.. (2019). Time-Efficient Adaptive Measurement of Change. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 7(2), 15-34. doi:10.7333/1909-0702015

Riley, B. B., Funk, R., Dennis, M. L., Lennox, R. D., & Finkelman, M.. (2011). The Use of Decision Trees for Adaptive Item Selection and Score Estimation. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.

van Groen, M., Eggen, T., & Veldkamp, B.. (2011). Item Selection Methods based on Multiple Objective Approaches for Classification of Respondents into Multiple Levels. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.

Barnard, J. J. (2015). Implementing a CAT: The AMC Experience . Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 3(1), 1-12. doi:10.7333/15100301001

Anatchkova, M. D., Saris-Baglama, R. N., Kosinski, M., & Bjorner, J. B.. (2009). Development and preliminary testing of a computerized adaptive assessment of chronic pain. Journal of Pain, 10, 932-943. presented at the Sep.

Haley, S. M., Ni, P., Dumas, H. M., Fragala-Pinkham, M. A., Hambleton, R. K., Montpetit, K., et al.. (2009). Measuring global physical health in children with cerebral palsy: Illustration of a multidimensional bi-factor model and computerized adaptive testing. Quality of Life Research, 18, 359-370. presented at the Apr.

Forkmann, T., Boecker, M., Norra, C., Eberle, N., Kircher, T., Schauerte, P., et al.. (2009). Development of an item bank for the assessment of depression in persons with mental illnesses and physical diseases using Rasch analysis. Rehabilitation Psychology, 54, 186-97. presented at the May.

Bode, R. K., Cella, D., Lai, J. S., & Heinemann, A. W.. (2003). Developing an initial physical function item bank from existing sources. Journal of Applied Measurement, 4, 124-36.

Guzmán, E., Conejo, R., & García-Hervás, E.. (2005). An Authoring Environment for Adaptive Testing. Educational Technology & Society, 8(3), 66-76.

Bezruczko, N. (1999). Competency gradient for child-parent centers. Journal of Outcomes Measurement, 3, 35-52.

Jette, A. M., & Haley, S. M.. (2005). Contemporary measurement techniques for rehabilitation outcomes assessment. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 37, 339-345.

Coster, W. J., Haley, S. M., Andres, P. L., Ludlow, L. H., Bond, T. L., & Ni, P. S.. (2004). Refining the conceptual basis for rehabilitation outcome measurement: personal care and instrumental activities domain. Medical Care, 42, I62-172. presented at the Jan.

Haley, S. M., Coster, W. J., Andres, P. L., Ludlow, L. H., Ni, P., Bond, T. L., et al.. (2004). Activity outcome measurement for postacute care. Medical Care, 42, I49-161.

Siebens, H., Andres, P. L., Pengsheng, N., Coster, W. J., & Haley, S. M.. (2005). Measuring physical function in patients with complex medical and postsurgical conditions: a computer adaptive approach. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84, 741-8. presented at the Oct.

Holman, R., Lindeboom, R., Vermeulen, M., & de Haan, R. J.. (2004). The AMC Linear Disability Score project in a population requiring residential care: psychometric properties. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. presented at the Aug 3.

Holman, R., Glas, C. A., Lindeboom, R., Zwinderman, A. H., & de Haan, R. J.. (2004). Practical methods for dealing with 'not applicable' item responses in the AMC Linear Disability Score project. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. presented at the Jun 16.

Hart, D. L., Cook, K. F., Mioduski, J. E., Teal, C. R., & Crane, P. K.. (2006). Simulated computerized adaptive test for patients with shoulder impairments was efficient and produced valid measures of function. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59, 290-8.

Haley, S. M., Ni, P., Hambleton, R. K., Slavin, M. D., & Jette, A. M.. (2006). Computer adaptive testing improved accuracy and precision of scores over random item selection in a physical functioning item bank. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59, 1174-82. presented at the Nov.

Hart, D. L., Mioduski, J. E., & Stratford, P. W.. (2005). Simulated computerized adaptive tests for measuring functional status were efficient with good discriminant validity in patients with hip, knee, or foot/ankle impairments. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 58, 629-38.

Haley, S. M., Ni, P., Fragala-Pinkham, M. A., Skrinar, A. M., & Corzo, D.. (2005). A computer adaptive testing approach for assessing physical functioning in children and adolescents. Developmental Medicine and Child Neuropsychology, 47, 113-120. presented at the Feb.

Stahl, J., Shumway, R., Bergstrom, B., & Fisher, A.. (1997). On-line performance assessment using rating scales. Journal of Outcomes Measurement, 1, 173-191.