. (2012). Comparison of two Bayesian methods to detect mode effects between paper-based and computerized adaptive assessments: a preliminary Monte Carlo study. BMC Med Res Methodol, 12, 124. presented at the 2012. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-12-124
. (2009). A comparison of three methods of item selection for computerized adaptive testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
cat09costa.pdf (530.39 KB). (2017). A Comparison of Three Empirical Reliability Estimates for Computerized Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gXgH-epPIWJiE0LxMHGiCAxZZAwy4dAH/view?usp=sharing
. (1990). A comparison of three decision models for adapting the length of computer-based mastery tests. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 6(4), 479-513.
. (1989). A comparison of three adaptive testing strategies using MicroCAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco.
. (1996). A comparison of the traditional maximum information method and the global information method in CAT item selection. In annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York, NY USA.
. (2001). Comparison of the SPRT and CMT procedures in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle WA.
. (2002). Comparison of the psychometric properties of several computer-based test designs for credentialing exams. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
jo02-01.pdf (280.31 KB). (2006). Comparison of the Psychometric Properties of Several Computer-Based Test Designs for Credentialing Exams With Multiple Purposes. Applied Measurement in Education, 19, 203-220. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame1903_3
. (1992). A comparison of the performance of simulated hierarchical and linear testlets. Journal of Educational Measurement, 29, 243-251.
. (1992). A comparison of the partial credit and graded response models in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 5, 17-34.
. (1989). A comparison of the nominal response model and the three-parameter logistic model in computerized adaptive testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49, 789-805.
. (1984). A comparison of the maximum likelihood strategy and stradaptive test on a micro-computer. Unpublished M.S. thesis, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
. (1978). A comparison of the fairness of adaptive and conventional testing strategies (Research Report 78-1). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
pi78-01.pdf (1.91 MB). (1977). A comparison of the classification of students by two methods of administration of a mathematics placement test. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University, 1977.
. (1999). Comparison of the a-stratified method, the Sympson-Hetter method, and the matched difficulty method in CAT administration. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Lawrence KS.
. (1980). A comparison of the accuracy of Bayesian adaptive and static tests using a correction for regression. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1979 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 35-50). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
go80-02_0.pdf (762.83 KB). (1997). A comparison of testlet-based test designs for computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the meeting of American Educational Research Association. Chicago, IL.
. (1999). A comparison of testlet-based test designs for computerized adaptive testing (LSAC Computerized Testing Report 97-01). Newtown, PA: LSAC.
. (1999). Comparison of stratum scored and maximum likelihood scoring. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
. (1993). Comparison of SPRT and sequential Bayes procedures for classifying examinees into two categories using an adaptive test. In Unpublished manuscript. (.
. (1996). Comparison of SPRT and sequential Bayes procedures for classifying examinees into two categories using a computerized test. Journal of Educational & Behavioral Statistics, 21, 405-414.
. (1992). A comparison of self-adapted and computerized adaptive achievement tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 29, 329-339.
. (1990). A comparison of Rasch and three-parameter logistic models in computerized adaptive testing. Unpublished manuscript.
. (1991). A comparison of procedures for content-sensitive item selection in computerized adaptive tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 4, 241-261.
. (1991). A comparison of procedures for content-sensitive item selection. Applied Measurement in Education.
. (2017). Comparison of Pretest Item Calibration Methods in a Computerized Adaptive Test (CAT). In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.
. (1991). A comparison of paper-and-pencil, computer-administered, computerized feedback, and computerized adaptive testing methods for classroom achievement testing. Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 1719.
. (2006). A comparison of online calibration methods for a CAT. In Presented at the National Council on Measurement on Education. San Francisco, CA.
. (2002). A comparison of non-deterministic procedures for the adaptive assessment of knowledge. Psychologische Beitrge, 44, 495-503.
. (2003). Comparison of multi-stage tests with computer adaptive and paper and pencil tests. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
ro03-01.pdf (694.76 KB). (2014). A Comparison of Multi-Stage and Linear Test Designs for Medium-Size Licensure and Certification Examinations. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 2(2), 18-36. presented at the 02-2014. doi:10.7333/1402-0202018
. (2009). Comparison of methods for controlling maximum exposure rates in computerized adaptive testing. Psicothema, 21, 313-320. presented at the May.
ba09313.pdf (93.66 KB). (1992). A comparison of methods for adaptive estimation of a multidimensional trait. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia University.
. (1997). A comparison of maximum likelihood estimation and expected a posteriori estimation in computerized adaptive testing using the generalized partial credit model. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 58, 453.
. (2007). The comparison of maximum likelihood estimation and expected a posteriori in CAT using the graded response model. Journal of Elementary Education, 19, 339-371.
. (1998). A comparison of maximum likelihood estimation and expected a posteriori estimation in CAT using the partial credit model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 569-595.
. (1982). Comparison of live and simulated adaptive tests (No. AFHRL-TP-82-35). Air Force Human Resources Laborarory. presented at the December 1982, Brooks Air Force Base, Texas: Air Force Systems Command.
. (2003). A comparison of learning potential results at various educational levels. In Paper presented at the 6th Annual Society for Industrial and Organisational Psychology of South Africa (SIOPSA) conference. 25-27 June 2003.
debe03-01.pdf (390.1 KB). (2005). A comparison of item-selection methods for adaptive tests with content constraints. Journal of Educational Measurement, 42, 283-302.
. (2005). A comparison of item-selection methods for adaptive tests with content constraints. Journal of Educational Measurement, 42, 283-302.
. (1992). Comparison of item targeting strategies for pass/fail adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.
. (2010). A Comparison of Item Selection Techniques for Testlets. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34, 424-437. doi:10.1177/0146621609349804
. (2002). A comparison of item selection techniques and exposure control mechanisms in CATs using the generalized partial credit model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 147-163.
. (2000). A comparison of item selection rules at the early stages of computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 241-255.
. (2000). A comparison of item selection rules at the early stages of computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 241-255.
. (1995). A comparison of item selection routines in linear and adaptive tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 32, 227-242.
. (2003). A comparison of item exposure control procedures using a CAT system based on the generalized partial credit model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.
bu03-01.pdf (264.96 KB). (1998). A comparison of item exposure control methods in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35, 311-327.
. (1994). A comparison of item calibration media in computerized adaptive tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 18, 197-204.
. (1994). A Comparison of Item Calibration Media in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 18(3).
v18n3p197.pdf (1.07 MB). (1983). A comparison of IRT-based adaptive mastery testing and a sequential mastery testing procedure. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), New horizons in testing: Latent trait test theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 257-283). New York: Academic Press.
. (1983). A comparison of IRT-based adaptive mastery testing and a sequential mastery testing procedure. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), New horizons in testing: Latent trait theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 1-8). New York: Academic Press.
Kingsbury & weiss #1.pdf (642.36 KB). (1983). A comparison of IRT-based adaptive mastery testing and a sequential mastery testing procedure. In New horizons in testing: Latent trait test theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 258-283). New York, NY. USA: Academic Press.
. (2015). A Comparison of IRT Proficiency Estimation Methods Under Adaptive Multistage Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 52, 70–79. doi:10.1111/jedm.12063
. (1980). A comparison of ICC-based adaptive mastery testing and the Waldian probability ratio method. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 1979 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 120-139). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
ki80-01.pdf (1.32 MB). (1995). A comparison of gender differences on paper-and-pencil and computer-adaptive versions of the Graduate Record Examination. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.
. (1971). A comparison of four methods of selecting items for computer-assisted testing (Technical Bulletin STB 72-5). San Diego: Naval Personnel and Training Research Laboratory.
. (2013). A Comparison of Four Methods for Obtaining Information Functions for Scores From Computerized Adaptive Tests With Normally Distributed Item Difficulties and Discriminations. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 1(5), 88-107. doi:10.7333/1312-0105088
. (2014). A Comparison of Four Item-Selection Methods for Severely Constrained CATs. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 74, 677-696. doi:10.1177/0013164413517503