Psychometric properties of several computer-based test designs with ideal and constrained item pools. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 64, 2978.
. (2003). Comparison of the psychometric properties of several computer-based test designs for credentialing exams. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
. (2002). jo02-01.pdf (280.31 KB)Reliability and decision accuracy of linear parallel form and multi stage tests with realistic and ideal item pools. In Paper presented at the International Conference on Computer-Based Testing and the Internet. Winchester, England.
. (2002). A multidimensional IRT mechanism for better understanding adaptive test behavior. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Chicago IL.
. (2003). Comparison of the Psychometric Properties of Several Computer-Based Test Designs for Credentialing Exams With Multiple Purposes. Applied Measurement in Education, 19, 203-220. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame1903_3
. (2006). Parallel forms reliability and measurement accuracy comparison of adaptive and conventional testing strategies. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1979 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 16-34). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
. (1980). jo80-01.pdf (993 KB)Correlates of examinee item choice behavior in self-adapted testing. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 4, 25-28.
. (1991). Dispelling myths about the new NCLEX exam. Recruitment, Retention, and Restructuring Report, 9, 6-7. presented at the Jan-Feb.
. (1996). Student reaction to computerized adaptive testing in the classroom. In Paper presented at the 87th annual meeting of the American Psychological Association. New York.
. (1979). Mathematical programming approaches to computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
. (1997). Computer-based psychological testing. In . A. Elithorn and D. Jones (Eds.), Artificial and human thinking (pp. 83-93). San Francisco CA: Jossey-Bass.
. (1973). Moving in a new direction: Computerized adaptive testing (CAT). Nursing Management, 24, 80, 82. presented at the Jan.
. (1993). Small-Sample Shadow Testing. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing.
. (2011). IACAT Judd Small-Sample Shadow Testing.pdf (439.46 KB)[Item characteristic curve equating under graded response models in IRT]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 37, 832-838.
. (2005). Toward efficient and comprehensive measurement of the alcohol problems continuum in college students: The Brief Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire. Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research, 29, 1180-1189.
. (2005). Effects of Different Computerized Adaptive Testing Strategies of Recovery of Ability. THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF NATURAL AND APPLIED SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY.
. (2011). kalender_dissertation1.pdf (993.04 KB)Computerized Adaptive Testing for Student Selection to Higher Education. Journal of Higher Education.
. (2012). CAT_StudentSelection1.pdf (120.81 KB)Stratified Item Selection and Exposure Control in Unidimensional Adaptive Testing in the Presence of Two-Dimensional Data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38, 563-576. doi:10.1177/0146621614536768
. (2014). A tailored testing model employing the beta distribution and conditional difficulties. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 1, 111-120.
. (1973). A tailored testing model employing the beta distribution (unpublished manuscript). Florida State University, Educational Evaluation and Research Design Program.
. (1974). The comparison of two tailored testing models and the effects of the models variables on actual loss. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University.
. (1974). A model for computerized adaptive testing related to instructional situations. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 1979 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 101-119). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
. (1980). ka80-01.pdf (1 MB)A tailored testing model employing the beta distribution and conditional difficulties. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 1, 22-28.
. (1974). Computerized instructional adaptive testing model: Formulation and validation (AFHRL-TR-79-33, Final Report). Brooks Air Force Base TX: Air Force Human Resources Laboratory", Also Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, February 1981, 11, 20 (Ms. No, 2217) .
. (1980). Test security and item exposure control for computer-based . In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Educatio. Chicago.
. (2000). Effect of item selection on item exposure rates within a computerized classification test. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego CA.
. (1998). The effect of model misspecification on classification decisions made using a computerized test. Journal of Educational Measurement, 36, 47-59.
. (1999). Tailored interviewing: An application of item response theory for personality measurement. Journal of Personality Assessment, 53, 502-519.
. (1989). A new adaptive testing algorithm for shortening health literacy assessments. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 11(52). doi:10.1186/1472-6947-11-52
. (2011). Dual-Objective Item Selection Criteria in Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 54, 165–183. doi:10.1111/jedm.12139
. (2017). Parameter Drift Detection in Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing Based on Informational Distance/Divergence Measures. Applied Psychological Measurement, 40, 534-550. doi:10.1177/0146621616663676
. (2016). New Item Selection Methods for Cognitive Diagnosis Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 39, 167-188. doi:10.1177/0146621614554650
. (2015). A Blocked-CAT Procedure for CD-CAT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 44, 49-64. doi:10.1177/0146621619835500
. (2020). Use of an on-line computer for psychological testing with the up-and-down method. American Psychologist, 24, 207-211.
. (1969). Adequacy of an item pool measuring proficiency in English language to implement a CAT procedure. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
. (2009). cat09karino.pdf (159.63 KB)Alternate forms reliability and concurrent validity of adaptive and conventional tests with military recruits. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
. (1983). The potential use of tailored testing for allocation to army employments. In NATO Conference on Utilisation of Human Resources. presented at the 06/1973, Lisbon, Portugal.
. (1973). A review of research in tailored testing (Report APRE No. 9/76, Farnborough, Hants, U. K.: Ministry of Defence, Army Personnel Research Establishment.).
. (1976). Real-data simulation of a proposal for tailored teting. In Third International Conference on Educational Testing. presented at the 06/1977, Leyden, The Netherlands.
. (1977). A tailored testing system for selection and allocation in the British Army. In Paper presented at the 18th International Congress of Applied Psychology. Montreal Canada.
. (1974). Monte Carlo simulation comparison of two-stage testing and computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Atlanta, GA.
. (1993). A Comparison of IRT Proficiency Estimation Methods Under Adaptive Multistage Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 52, 70–79. doi:10.1111/jedm.12063
. (2015). The influence of examinee test-taking behavior motivation in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco CA.
. (1995). Panel Design Variations in the Multistage Test Using the Mixed-Format Tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72, 574-588. doi:10.1177/0013164411428977
. (2012). Monte Carlo simulation comparison of two-stage testing and computerized adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, 54, 2548.
. (1994). Individual differences in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
. (1993). Computer-Based and Paper-and-Pencil Administration Mode Effects on a Statewide End-of-Course English Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 554-570. doi:10.1177/0013164407310132
. (2008). Comparison of computerized adaptive testing and classical methods for measuring individual change. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
. (2007). cat07kim-kang.pdf (346.06 KB)Adaptive measurement of individual change. Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 216, 49-58. doi:10.1027/0044-3409.216.1.49
. (2008). ki08049.pdf (567.72 KB)A comparison of achievement level estimates from computerized adaptive testing and paper-and-pencil testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
. (1988). ki88-01.pdf (42.27 KB)A comparison of ICC-based adaptive mastery testing and the Waldian probability ratio method. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 1979 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 120-139). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
. (1980). ki80-01.pdf (1.32 MB)A comparison of adaptive, sequential, and conventional testing strategies for mastery decisions (Research Report 80-4). Minneapolis, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
. (1980). ki80-04.pdf (1.86 MB)Item review and adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York.
. (1996). Procedures for selecting items for computerized adaptive tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 2, 359-375.
. (1989). Assessing the utility of item response models: computerized adaptive testing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 12, 21-27.
. (1993). Computer adaptive testing and the No Child Left Behind Act. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Diego CA.
. (2004). ki04-01.pdf (116.03 KB)A comparison of IRT-based adaptive mastery testing and a sequential mastery testing procedure. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), New horizons in testing: Latent trait theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 1-8). New York: Academic Press.
. (1983). Kingsbury & weiss #1.pdf (642.36 KB)An empirical comparison of achievement level estimates from adaptive tests and paper-and-pencil tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
. (2002). ki02-01.pdf (133.01 KB)Adaptive self-referenced testing as a procedure for the measurement of individual change in instruction: A comparison of the reliabilities of change estimates obtained from conventional and adaptive testing procedures. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Univerity of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
. (1984). ICAT: An adaptive testing procedure to allow the identification of idiosyncratic knowledge patterns. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
. (2007). cat07Kingsbury.pdf (160.68 KB)