A multidimensional IRT mechanism for better understanding adaptive test behavior. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Chicago IL.
. (2003). Comparison of the Psychometric Properties of Several Computer-Based Test Designs for Credentialing Exams With Multiple Purposes. Applied Measurement in Education, 19, 203-220. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame1903_3
. (2006). Comparison of the psychometric properties of several computer-based test designs for credentialing exams. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
. (2002). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
Psychometric properties of several computer-based test designs with ideal and constrained item pools. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 64, 2978.
. (2003). Reliability and decision accuracy of linear parallel form and multi stage tests with realistic and ideal item pools. In Paper presented at the International Conference on Computer-Based Testing and the Internet. Winchester, England.
. (2002). Student reaction to computerized adaptive testing in the classroom. In Paper presented at the 87th annual meeting of the American Psychological Association. New York.
. (1979). Dispelling myths about the new NCLEX exam. Recruitment, Retention, and Restructuring Report, 9, 6-7. presented at the Jan-Feb.
. (1996). Parallel forms reliability and measurement accuracy comparison of adaptive and conventional testing strategies. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1979 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 16-34). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
. (1980). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
Correlates of examinee item choice behavior in self-adapted testing. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 4, 25-28.
. (1991). Mathematical programming approaches to computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
. (1997). Computer-based psychological testing. In . A. Elithorn and D. Jones (Eds.), Artificial and human thinking (pp. 83-93). San Francisco CA: Jossey-Bass.
. (1973). Moving in a new direction: Computerized adaptive testing (CAT). Nursing Management, 24, 80, 82. presented at the Jan.
. (1993). Small-Sample Shadow Testing. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing.
. (2011). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
[Item characteristic curve equating under graded response models in IRT]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 37, 832-838.
. (2005). Toward efficient and comprehensive measurement of the alcohol problems continuum in college students: The Brief Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire. Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research, 29, 1180-1189.
. (2005). Effects of Different Computerized Adaptive Testing Strategies of Recovery of Ability. THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF NATURAL AND APPLIED SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY.
. (2011). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
Computerized Adaptive Testing for Student Selection to Higher Education. Journal of Higher Education.
. (2012). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
Stratified Item Selection and Exposure Control in Unidimensional Adaptive Testing in the Presence of Two-Dimensional Data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38, 563-576. doi:10.1177/0146621614536768
. (2014). The comparison of two tailored testing models and the effects of the models variables on actual loss. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University.
. (1974). A model for computerized adaptive testing related to instructional situations. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 1979 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 101-119). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
. (1980). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
A tailored testing model employing the beta distribution and conditional difficulties. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 1, 22-28.
. (1974). Computerized instructional adaptive testing model: Formulation and validation (AFHRL-TR-79-33, Final Report). Brooks Air Force Base TX: Air Force Human Resources Laboratory", Also Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, February 1981, 11, 20 (Ms. No, 2217) .
. (1980). A tailored testing model employing the beta distribution and conditional difficulties. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 1, 111-120.
. (1973). A tailored testing model employing the beta distribution (unpublished manuscript). Florida State University, Educational Evaluation and Research Design Program.
. (1974). Effect of item selection on item exposure rates within a computerized classification test. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego CA.
. (1998). The effect of model misspecification on classification decisions made using a computerized test. Journal of Educational Measurement, 36, 47-59.
. (1999). Test security and item exposure control for computer-based . In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Educatio. Chicago.
. (2000). Tailored interviewing: An application of item response theory for personality measurement. Journal of Personality Assessment, 53, 502-519.
. (1989). A new adaptive testing algorithm for shortening health literacy assessments. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 11(52). doi:10.1186/1472-6947-11-52
. (2011). Parameter Drift Detection in Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing Based on Informational Distance/Divergence Measures. Applied Psychological Measurement, 40, 534-550. doi:10.1177/0146621616663676
. (2016). Dual-Objective Item Selection Criteria in Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 54, 165–183. doi:10.1111/jedm.12139
. (2017). A Blocked-CAT Procedure for CD-CAT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 44, 49-64. doi:10.1177/0146621619835500
. (2020). New Item Selection Methods for Cognitive Diagnosis Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 39, 167-188. doi:10.1177/0146621614554650
. (2015). Use of an on-line computer for psychological testing with the up-and-down method. American Psychologist, 24, 207-211.
. (1969). Adequacy of an item pool measuring proficiency in English language to implement a CAT procedure. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
. (2009). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
Alternate forms reliability and concurrent validity of adaptive and conventional tests with military recruits. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
. (1983). A review of research in tailored testing (Report APRE No. 9/76, Farnborough, Hants, U. K.: Ministry of Defence, Army Personnel Research Establishment.).
. (1976). Real-data simulation of a proposal for tailored teting. In Third International Conference on Educational Testing. presented at the 06/1977, Leyden, The Netherlands.
. (1977). A tailored testing system for selection and allocation in the British Army. In Paper presented at the 18th International Congress of Applied Psychology. Montreal Canada.
. (1974). The potential use of tailored testing for allocation to army employments. In NATO Conference on Utilisation of Human Resources. presented at the 06/1973, Lisbon, Portugal.
. (1973). The influence of examinee test-taking behavior motivation in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco CA.
. (1995). A Comparison of IRT Proficiency Estimation Methods Under Adaptive Multistage Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 52, 70–79. doi:10.1111/jedm.12063
. (2015). Panel Design Variations in the Multistage Test Using the Mixed-Format Tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72, 574-588. doi:10.1177/0013164411428977
. (2012). Monte Carlo simulation comparison of two-stage testing and computerized adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, 54, 2548.
. (1994). Individual differences in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
. (1993). Computer-Based and Paper-and-Pencil Administration Mode Effects on a Statewide End-of-Course English Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 554-570. doi:10.1177/0013164407310132
. (2008). Monte Carlo simulation comparison of two-stage testing and computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Atlanta, GA.
. (1993). Comparison of computerized adaptive testing and classical methods for measuring individual change. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
. (2007). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
Adaptive measurement of individual change. Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 216, 49-58. doi:10.1027/0044-3409.216.1.49
. (2008). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
Continuous Testing (an avenue for CAT research). In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.
. (2011). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
Standard errors of proficiency estimates in stratum scored CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
. (1999). Developing computerized adaptive tests for school children. In . F. Drasgow and J. B. Olson-Buchanan (Eds.), Innovations in computerized assessment (pp. 93-115). Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum.
. (1999). . (1985).
A comparison of procedures for content-sensitive item selection. Applied Measurement in Education.
. (1991). Assessing the utility of item response models: Computerized adaptive testing. In A paper presented to the annual meeting of the National Council of Measurement in Education. Boston MA.
. (1990). A validity comparison of adaptive and conventional strategies for mastery testing (Research Report 81-3). Minneapolis, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
. (1981). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
A comparison of IRT-based adaptive mastery testing and a sequential mastery testing procedure. In New horizons in testing: Latent trait test theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 258-283). New York, NY. USA: Academic Press.
. (1983). Some questions that must be addressed to develop and maintain an item pool for use in an adaptive test. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
. (1997). Three Measures of Test Adaptation Based on Optimal Test Information. Journal of Computerized Adaotive Testing, 8(1), 1-19. doi:10.7333/2002-0801001
. (2020). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
A procedure to compare conventional and adaptive testing procedures for making single-point decisions. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
. (1999).