Smith, R., & Zhu, R.. (1999). More efficient use of item inventories. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Smith, R. L., Wang, M. M., Wingersky, M., & Zhao, C.. (2001). Monitoring items for changes in performance in computerized adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual conference of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle, Washington.

Smith, R. W., Plake, B. S., & de Ayala, R. J.. (2001). Item and passage selection algorithm simulations for a computerized adaptive version of the verbal section of the Medical College Admission Test (MCAT). MCAT Monograph Series.

Smith, R., & Lewis, C.. (1998). Expected losses for individuals in Computerized Mastery Testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego.

Smits, N. (2016). On the effect of adding clinical samples to validation studies of patient-reported outcome item banks: a simulation study. Quality of Life Research, 25, 1635–1644. doi:10.1007/s11136-015-1199-9

Smits, N., Finkelman, M. D., & Kelderman, H.. (2016). Stochastic Curtailment of Questionnaires for Three-Level Classification: Shortening the CES-D for Assessing Low, Moderate, and High Risk of Depression. Applied Psychological Measurement, 40, 22-36. doi:10.1177/0146621615592294

Smits, N., Cuijpers, P., & van Straten, A.. (2011). Applying computerized adaptive testing to the CES-D scale: A simulation study. Psychiatry Research, 188(1), 147–155.

Smits, N., & Finkelman, M. D.. (2013). A Comparison of Computerized Classification Testing and Computerized Adaptive Testing in Clinical Psychology. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 1(2), 19-37. doi:10.7333/1302-0102019

Smits, N., Cuijpers, P., & van Straten, A.. (2011). Applying computerized adaptive testing to the CES-D scale: A simulation study. Psychiatry Research. presented at the Jan 3.

Smits, N., Paap, M. C. S., & Böhnke, J. R.. (2018). Some recommendations for developing multidimensional computerized adaptive tests for patient-reported outcomes. Quality of Life Research, 27, 1055–1063. presented at the Apr. doi:10.1007/s11136-018-1821-8

Smittle, P. (1993). Computer adaptive testing: A new era. Journal of Developmental Education, 17 (1), 8-10.

Smittle, P. (1994). Computerized adaptive testing: Revolutionizing academic assessment. Community College Journal, 65 (1), 32-35.

Spineti, J. P., & Hambleton, R. K.. (1977). A computer simulation study of tailored testing strategies for objective-based instructional programs. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 37, 139-158.

Spoden, C., Frey, A., & Bernhardt, R.. (2018). Implementing Three CATs Within Eighteen Months. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 6(3), 38-55. presented at the 09/2018. doi:10.7333/1809-060338

Spray, J. A., & Reckase, M. D.. (1984). The selection of items for decision making with a computer adaptive test. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.

Spray, J. A., & Reckase, M. D.. (1987). The effect of item parameter estimation error on the decisions made using the sequential probability ratio test (ACT Research Report Series 87-17). Iowa City IA: American College Testing.

Spray, J. A., Parshall, C. G., & Huang, C. - H.. (1997). Calibration of CAT items administered online for classification: Assumption of local independence. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Gatlinburg TN.

Spray, J. A., & Reckase, M. D.. (1996). Comparison of SPRT and sequential Bayes procedures for classifying examinees into two categories using a computerized test. Journal of Educational & Behavioral Statistics, 21, 405-414.

Spray, J. A., Abdel-Fattah, A. A., Huang, C. - Y., & Lau, C. A.. (1997). Unidimensional approximations for a computerized adaptive test when the item pool and latent space are multidimensional (Research Report 97-5). Iowa City IA: ACT Inc.

Spray, J. A., Kalohn, J. C., Schulz, M., & Fleer, J. P.. (1995). The effect of model misspecification on classification decisions made using a computerized test: 3-PLM vs. 1PLM (and UIRT versus MIRT). In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Psychometric Society. Minneapolis, MN.

Spray, J. A., & Reckase, M. D.. (1987). The effect of item parameter estimation error on decisions made using the sequential probability ratio test (No. Research Report 87-1). ACT Research Report Series. Iowa City, IA. USA: DTIC Document.

Spray, J. A. (1993). Multiple-category classification using a sequential probability ratio test (Research report 93-7). Iowa City: American College Testing.

Spray, J. A., & Reckase, M. D.. (1994). The selection of test items for decision making with a computer adaptive test. In Paper presented at the national meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.

Spray, J. A., & Reckase, M. D.. (1993). Comparison of SPRT and sequential Bayes procedures for classifying examinees into two categories using an adaptive test. In Unpublished manuscript. (.

Stahl, J., Shumway, R., Bergstrom, B., & Fisher, A.. (1997). On-line performance assessment using rating scales. Journal of Outcomes Measurement, 1, 173-191.

Stahl, J., Bergstrom, B., & Gershon, R. C.. (2000). CAT administration of language placement examinations. Journal of Applied Measurement, 1, 292-302.

Stahl, J., Gershon, R. C., & Bergstrom, B.. (1999). CAT administration of language placement exams. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Stark, S., & Drasgow, F.. (1998). Application of an IRT ideal point model to computer adaptive assessment of job performance. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organization Psychology. Dallas TX.

Stark, S., & Chernyshenko, O. S.. (2011). Computerized Adaptive Testing with the Zinnes and Griggs Pairwise Preference Ideal Point Model. International Journal of Testing, 11, 231-247. doi:10.1080/15305058.2011.561459

Stark, S., & Chernyshenko, O. S.. (2007). Adaptive testing with the multi-unidimensional pairwise preference model. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Stark, S., & Drasgow, F.. (2002). An EM approach to parameter estimation for the Zinnes and Griggs paired comparison IRT model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 208-227.

Stark, S., & Chernyshenko, O. S.. (2006). Multistage Testing: Widely or Narrowly Applicable?. Applied Measurement in Education, 19, 257-260. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame1903_6

Steele, J. A., Binnie, C. A., & Cooper, W. A.. (1978). Combining auditory and visual stimuli in the adaptive testing of speech discrimination. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 43, 115-122.

Steffen, M. (1999). Test-taking strategies. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Steffen, M., & Way, W. D.. (1999). Test-taking strategies in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Steffen, M., & Liu, M.. (1998). Evaluation of methods for the use of underutilized items in a CAT environment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Urbana, IL.

Steinberg, L., Thissen, D., & Wainer, H.,. (1990). Validity. In . H. Wainer (Ed.), Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (pp. 187-231). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.

Stenson, H., Graves, P., Gardiner, J., & Dally, L.. (1991). Collected works on the legal aspects of computerized adaptive testing. Chicago, IL: National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc.

Stevenson, J. (1984). Computerized adaptive testing in the Maryland Public Schools. MicroCAT News, 1, 1.

Sticha, P. J., & Barber, G.. (2003). CAT-ASVAB prototype Internet delivery system: Final report (FR-03-06). Arlington VA: Human Resources Rsearch Organization.

Stillwell, D. (2017). Concerto 5 Open Source CAT Platform: From Code to Nodes. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=11eu1KKILQEoK5c-CYO1P1AiJgiQxX0E0

Stocking, M. L. (1988). Scale drift in on-line calibration (Tech Rep. No. ERIC ED389710). Educational Testing Service, Princeton, N.J.

Stocking, M.,, & Swanson, L.. (1993). A model and heuristic for solving very large item selection problems. Applied Psychological Measurement, 17, 151-166.

Stocking, M. L., & Swanson, L.. (1996). Optimal design of item pools for computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 96-34). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Stocking, M. L., Ward, W. C., & Potenza, M. T.. (1998). Simulating the use of disclosed items in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35, 48-68.

Stocking, M. L. (1988). Some considerations in maintaining adaptive test item pools (Research Report 88-33-ONR). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Stocking, M. L., & Lewis, C.. (1995). Controlling item exposure conditional on ability in computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 95-25). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Stocking, M. L. (1998). A framework for comparing adaptive test designs. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Stocking, M.,, & Swanson, L.. (1993). A method for severely constrained item selection in adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 17, 277-292.

Stocking, M. L., & Swanson, L.. (1992). A method for severely constrained item selection in adaptive testing. Educational Testing Service Research Report (RR-92-37): Princeton NJ.

Stocking, M. L., & Lewis, C.. (2000). Methods of controlling the exposure of items in CAT. In . W. J. van der Linden and C. A. W. Glas (eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp. 163-182). Norwell MA: Kluwer.

Stocking, M. L., & Lewis, C.. (1998). Controlling item exposure conditional on ability in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational & Behavioral Statistics, 23, 57-75.

Stocking, M. L. (1988). Scale drift in on-line calibration (Research Report RR-88-28-ONR). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Stocking, M. L., & Lewis, C.. (1995). A new method of controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 95-25). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Stocking, M. L. (1993). Modern computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the Joint Statistics and Psychometric Seminar. Princeton NJ.

Stocking, M. L. (1996). Revising item responses in computerized adaptive testing: A comparison of three models (RR-96-12). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Stocking, M. L. (1997). An alternative method for scoring adaptive tests. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 21, 365-389.

Stocking, M., Steffen, M. Golub-Smith, M. L., & Eignor, D. R.. (2002). An exploration of potentially problematic adaptive tests. Research Report 02-05).

Stocking, M. L., & Swanson, L.. (1993). A Method for Severely Constrained Item Selection in Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 17(3), 277-292.

Stocking, M. L. (1997). Revising item responses in computerized adaptive tests: A comparison of three models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21, 129-142.