. (2001). Effective use of simulated data in an on-line item calibration in practical situations of computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle WA.
. (1977). A Use of the Information Function in Tailored Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(2), 233-247.
v01n2p233.pdf (893 KB). (2001). Efficient on-line item calibration using a nonparametric method adjusted to computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.
. (1990). Validity study in multidimensional latent space and efficient computerized adaptive testing (Final Report R01-1069-11-004-91). Knoxville TN: University of Tennessee, Department of Psychology.
. (1976). The graded response model of latent trait theory and tailored testing. In . C. K. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing (pp. 5-17). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
. (2000). Some considerations for improving accuracy of estimation of item characteristic curves in online calibration of computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
. (2007). Nonparametric online item calibration. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing. .
cat07samejima.pdf (1.83 MB). (1998). Some considerations for eliminating biases in ability estimation in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
. (2003). Criterion item characteristic curve function for evaluating the differential weight procedure adjusted to on-line item calibration. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the NCME. Chicago IL.
. (2002). A structure-based approach to psychological measurement: Matching measurement models to latent structure. Assessment, 9, 4-16.
. (2009). I've Fallen and I Can't Get Up: Can High-Ability Students Recover From Early Mistakes in CAT?. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 83-101. doi:10.1177/0146621608324023
. (2009). I've fallen and I can't get up: can high-ability students recover from early mistakes in CAT?. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33(2), 83-101.
. (2009). I've Fallen and I Can't Get Up: Can High-Ability Students Recover From Early Mistakes in CAT?. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 83-101. doi:10.1177/0146621608324023
. (1995). Computer-adaptive testing: A new breed of assessment. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 95, 1326-1327.
. (1995). Computer-adaptive testing: A new breed of assessment. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 95, 1326-1327.
. (2007). Implementing the Graduate Management Admission Test® computerized adaptive test. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
cat07rudner.pdf (134.53 KB). (1990). Computer testing: Pragmatic issues and research needs. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 9 (2), 19-20.
. (2002). An examination of decision-theory adaptive testing procedures. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA.
ru02-01.pdf (45.1 KB). (2010). Implementing the Graduate Management Admission Test Computerized Adaptive Test. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 151-166). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8
. (1998). Item banking. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation.
. (2011). Computer adaptive testing for small scale programs and instructional systems. Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 12(1).
. (2009). An examination of decision-theory adaptive testing procedures. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
cat09rudner.pdf (202.22 KB). (2007). Psychometric properties of an emotional adjustment measure: An application of the graded response model. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23, 39-46.
. (1996). A Type I error rate study of a modified SIBTEST DIF procedure with potential application to computerized adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Alberta Canada.
. (2003). Comparison of multi-stage tests with computer adaptive and paper and pencil tests. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
ro03-01.pdf (694.76 KB). (1981). A comparison of a maximum likelihood and a Bayesian estimation procedure for tailored testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Los Angeles CA.
. (1997). A simulation study of the use of the Mantel-Haenszel and logistic regression procedures for assessing DIF in a CAT environment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
. (1961). An analysis of the application of utility theory to the development of two-stage testing models. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Buffalo.
. (2009). Logistics of collecting patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical practice: an overview and practical examples. Quality of Life Research, 18, 125-36. presented at the Feb.
. (1995). Comparability and validity of computerized adaptive testing with the MMPI-2. Journal of Personality Assessment, 65, 358-71. presented at the Oct.
. (1990). Illustration of computerized adaptive testing with the MMPI-2. In Paper presented at the 98th Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association. Boston MA.
. (1991). Comparability of computerized adaptive and conventional testing with the MMPI-2. Journal of Personality Assessment, 57, 278-290. presented at the Oct.
. (1993). Comparability and validity of computerized adaptive testing with the MMPI-2. Dissertation Abstracts International, 53, 3791.
. (1992). The effects of feedback in computerized adaptive and self-adapted tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the NMCE. San Francisco.
. (1997). The role of item feedback in self-adapted testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 85-98.
. (1996). Conducting self-adapted testing using MicroCAT. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 821-827.
. (2004). A computerized adaptive knowledge test as an assessment tool in general practice: a pilot study. Medical Teacher, 26, 178-83. presented at the Mar.
. (1989). Individual differences in item selection in self adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.
. (1995). Effects and underlying mechanisms of self-adapted testing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 103-116.
. (1987). Self-adapted testing: A performance improving variation of computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 315-319.
. (1997). Self-adapted testing: Improving performance by modifying tests instead of examinees. Stress & Coping: An International Journal, 10(1), 83-104.
. (1996). Can examinees use a review option to positively bias their scores on a computerized adaptive test? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National council on Measurement in Education, New York. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National council on Measurement in Education. New York NY.
. (1991). An empirical comparison of self-adapted and maximum information item selection. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago.
. (1991). Patterns of alcohol and drug use among federal offenders as assessed by the Computerized Lifestyle Screening Instrument. Ottawa, ON. Canada: Research and Statistics Branch, Correctional Service of Canada.
. (2001). Development and evaluation of test assembly procedures for computerized adaptive testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
. (2000). CBTS: Computer-based testing simulation and analysis [computer software]. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts, School of Education.
. (2000). Classification accuracy and test security for a computerized adaptive mastery test calibrated with different IRT models. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
. (1999). Alternative item selection strategies for improving test security and pool usage in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education< Montreal. Canada.
. (2000). Development and evaluation of test assembly procedures for computerized adaptive testing (Laboratory of Psychometric and Evaluative Methods Research Report No 391). Amherst MA: University of Massachusetts, School of Education.
. (2001). Computerized adaptive testing with the generalized graded unfolding model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25, 177-196.
. (2007). Cutscore location and classification accuracy in computerized classification testing. In Paper presented at the international meeting of the Psychometric Society. Tokyo, Japan.
ro07-01.pdf (93.59 KB). (2001). The effect of test and examinee characteristics on the occurrence of aberrant response patterns in a computerized adaptive test. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle WA.
. (2002). The effect of test characteristics on aberrant response patterns in computer adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, 62, 3363.
. (2011). The Use of Decision Trees for Adaptive Item Selection and Score Estimation. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.
IACAT 2011 Riley Funk Dennis Lennox Finkelman Use of Decision Trees for Adaptive Item.pdf (456.04 KB). (2012). Comparison of two Bayesian methods to detect mode effects between paper-based and computerized adaptive assessments: a preliminary Monte Carlo study. BMC Med Res Methodol, 12, 124. presented at the 2012. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-12-124
. (2011). Detecting DIF between Conventional and Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Monte Carlo Study. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.
IACAT 2011 Riley Carle Detecting DIF between Conventional and Computerized Adaptive Testing.pdf (305.3 KB). (2010). A comparison of content-balancing procedures for estimating multiple clinical domains in computerized adaptive testing: Relative precision, validity, and detection of persons with misfitting responses. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34, 410-423.
. (2007). Relative precision, efficiency and construct validity of different starting and stopping rules for a computerized adaptive test: The GAIN Substance Problem Scale. Journal of Applied Measurement, 8, 48-65.
. (2010). A Comparison of Content-Balancing Procedures for Estimating Multiple Clinical Domains in Computerized Adaptive Testing: Relative Precision, Validity, and Detection of Persons With Misfitting Responses. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34, 410-423. doi:10.1177/0146621609349802