Yao, L. (2013). Comparing the Performance of Five Multidimensional CAT Selection Procedures With Different Stopping Rules. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 3-23. doi:10.1177/0146621612455687

Yao, L. (2014). Multidimensional CAT Item Selection Methods for Domain Scores and Composite Scores With Item Exposure Control and Content Constraints. Journal of Educational Measurement, 51, 18–38. doi:10.1111/jedm.12032

Yao, L., Pommerich, M., & Segall, D. O.. (2014). Using Multidimensional CAT to Administer a Short, Yet Precise, Screening Test. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38, 614-631. doi:10.1177/0146621614541514

Yang, J., Chang, H. - H., Tao, J., & Shi, N.. (2020). Stratified Item Selection Methods in Cognitive Diagnosis Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 44, 346-361. doi:10.1177/0146621619893783

Yang, J., Tao, J., Chang, H. - H., & Shi, N. - Z.. (2017). A Simulation Study to Compare Classification Method in Cognitive Diagnosis Computerized Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1jCL3fPZLgzIdwvEk20D-FliZ15OTUtpr

Yang, L., & Reckase, M. D.. (2020). The Optimal Item Pool Design in Multistage Computerized Adaptive Tests With the p-Optimality Method. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 80, 955-974. doi:10.1177/0013164419901292

Yang, X., Poggio, J. C., & Glasnapp, D. R.. (2006). Effects of Estimation Bias on Multiple-Category Classification With an IRT-Based Adaptive Classification Procedure. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 545-564. doi:10.1177/0013164405284031

Yan, D., Lewis, C., & Stocking, M.. (2002). Adaptive testing without IRT in the presence of multidimensionality (Research Report 02-09). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Yan, D., Lewis, C., & Stocking, M.. (1998). Adaptive testing without IRT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego CA.

Yan, D., von Davier, A. A., & Lewis, C.. (2014). Computerized multistage testing: Theory and applications. Boca Raton FL: CRC Press.

Yan, D., Lewis, C., & Stocking, M.. (2004). Adaptive Testing With Regression Trees in the Presence of Multidimensionality. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 293-316. doi:10.3102/10769986029003293

Xu, H., Fang, G., Chen, Y., Liu, J., & Ying, Z.. (2018). Latent Class Analysis of Recurrent Events in Problem-Solving Items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 42, 478-498. doi:10.1177/0146621617748325

Xu, X., Chang, H. - H., & Douglas, J.. (2003). A simulation study to compare CAT strategies for cognitive diagnosis. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Xu, X., & Douglas, J.. (2006). Computerized adaptive testing under nonparametric IRT models. Psychometrika, 71, 121-137.

Xiong, X. (2018). A Hybrid Strategy to Construct Multistage Adaptive Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 42, 630-643. doi:10.1177/0146621618762739

Xing, D., & Hambleton, R. K.. (2001). Impact of several computer-based testing variables on the psychometric properties of credentialing examinations. In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.

Xing, D., & Hambleton, R. K.. (2001). Impact of several computer-based testing variables on the psychometric properties of credentialing examinations (Laboratory of Psychometric and Evaluative Research Report No 393). Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts, School of Education.

Xing, D., & Hambleton, R. K.. (2004). Impact of Test Design, Item Quality, and Item Bank Size on the Psychometric Properties of Computer-Based Credentialing Examinations. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 5-21. doi:10.1177/0013164403258393

Xing, D., & Hambleton, R. K.. (2002). Impact of test design, item quality and item bank size on the psychometric properties of computer-based credentialing exams. In Paper presented at the meeting of National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans.

Xiao, B. (1993). Computerized adaptive testing strategies: Golden section search, dichotomous search, and Z-score strategies (Doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University, 1990). Dissertation Abstracts International, 54-03B, 1720.

Xiao, B. (1990). Dichotomous search strategies for computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.

Xiao, B. (1989). Golden section search strategies for computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the Fifth International Objective Measurement Workshop. Berkeley CA.

Wyse, A. E., & Albano, A. D.. (2015). Considering the Use of General and Modified Assessment Items in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 28(2). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2014.1002921

Wu, M. - L., & Chen, S. - Y.. (2008). Investigating item exposure control on the fly in computerized adaptive testing. Psychological Testing, 55, 1-32.

Wu, I. L. (2001). A new computer algorithm for simultaneous test construction of two-stage and multistage testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 26, 180-198.

Wright, B. D., & Douglas, G. A.. (1975). Best test design and self-tailored testing (Research Memorandum No 19). Chicago: University of Chicago, Department of Education, Statistical Laboratory.

Wouda, J. T., & Eggen, T.. (2009). Constrained item selection using a stochastically curtailed SPRT. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Wouda, J. T., & Eggen, T.. (2009). Computerized classification testing in more than two categories by using stochastic curtailment. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Wood, R. L. (1971). Computerized adaptive sequential testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.

Wood, R. (1976). Adaptive testing: A Bayesian procedure for the efficient measurement of ability. Programmed Learning and Educational Technology, 13(2), 36.

Wood, R. L. (1973). Response-contingent testing. Review of Educational Research, 43, 529-544.

Wood, R. L. (1972). Fully adaptive sequential testing: A Bayesian procedure for efficient ability measurement. Unpublished manuscript, University of Chicago.

Wood, R. L. (1969). The efficacy of tailored testing. Educational Research, 11, 219-222.

Wolfe, J. H. (1986). Computerized testing technology. Advances in Reading/Language Research, 4, 71-78.

Wolfe, J. H. (1981). Optimal item difficulty for the three-parameter normal ogive model. Psychometrika, 46, 461-464.

Wolfe, J. H., & Larson, G. E.. (1990). Generative adaptive testing with digit span items. San Diego, CA: Testing Systems Department, Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

Wise, S. L. (1997). Examinee issues in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Wise, S. L., Plake, S. S., Johnson, P. L., & Roos, S. L.. (1992). A comparison of self-adapted and computerized adaptive achievement tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 29, 329-339.

Wise, S. L., & Kingsbury, G. G.. (2000). Practical issues in developing and maintaining a computerized adaptive testing program. Psicologica, 21, 135-155.

Wise, S. L. (2023). Expanding the Meaning of Adaptive Testing to Enhance Validity. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 10(2), 22-31. doi:10.7333/2305-1002022

Wise, S. L., Freeman, S. A., Finney, S. J., Enders, C. K., & Severance, D. D.. (1997). The accuracy of examinee judgments of relative item difficulty: Implication for computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago.

Wise, L. L., McHenry, J. J., Chia, W. J., Szenas, P. L., & McBride, J. R.. (1988). Refinement of the Computerized Adaptive Screening Test (CAST) (Final Report, Contract No MDA203 06-C-0373). Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.

Wise, S. L., Plake, B. S., & et. al.,. (1989). Providing item feedback in computer-based tests: Effects of initial success and failure. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49, 479-486.

Wise, S. L. (1996). A critical analysis of the argument for and against item review in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York.

Wise, S. L. (1999). The rationale and principles of stratum scoring. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Wise, S. L. (1995). Item review and answer changing in computerized adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the Third European Conference on Psychological Assessment. Trier, Germany.

Wise, S. L., Finney, S. J.,, Enders, C. K., Freeman, S. A., & Severance, D. D.. (1999). Examinee judgments of changes in item difficulty: Implications for item review in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 12, 185-198.

Wise, S. L., Kingsbury, G. G., & Webb, N. L.. (2015). Evaluating Content Alignment in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 34(4). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/emip.12094

Wise, S. L. (1999). Comparison of stratum scored and maximum likelihood scoring. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Wise, S. L., Roos, L. L., Plake, B. S.,, & Nebelsick-Gullett, L. J.. (1994). The relationship between examinee anxiety and preference for self-adapted testing. Applied Measurement in Education , 7, 81-91.

Wise, S. L., & G. Kingsbury, G.. (2016). Modeling Student Test-Taking Motivation in the Context of an Adaptive Achievement Test. Journal of Educational Measurement, 53, 86–105. doi:10.1111/jedm.12102

Wise, L. L., Curran, L. T., & McBride, J. R.. (1997). CAT-ASVAB cost and benefit analyses. In . W. A. Sands, B. K. Waters, and J. R. McBride (Eds.), Computer adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp. 227-236). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Wise, S. L. (1994). Understanding self-adapted testing: The perceived control hypothesis. Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 15-24.

Wise, S. L., Roos, L. L., & Plake, B. S.. (1994). Comparing computerized adaptive and self-adapted tests: The influence of examinee achievement locus of control. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.

Wise, S. L. (2014). The Utility of Adaptive Testing in Addressing the Problem of Unmotivated Examinees. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 2(1), 1-17. doi:10.7333/1401-02010001

Wise, S. L. (1997). Overview of practical issues in a CAT program. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Wise, S. L., Ponsoda, V., & Olea, J.. (2002). Self-adapted testing: An overview. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning, 12, 107-122.

Wise, S. L. (2011). From Reliability to Validity: Expanding Adaptive Testing Practice to Find the Most Valid Score for Each Test Taker. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.

Wise, S. L., Kingsbury, G. G., & Houser, R. L.. (1993). An investigation of restricted self-adapted testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Atlanta GA.

Wingersky, M. S. (1989). A consideration for variable length adaptive tests (Research Report 89-40). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.