Guyer, R. D., & Weiss, D. J.. (2009). Effect of early misfit in computerized adaptive testing on the recovery of theta. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Guzmán, E., Conejo, R., & García-Hervás, E.. (2005). An Authoring Environment for Adaptive Testing. Educational Technology & Society, 8(3), 66-76.

H., Q., Staniewska, D., Reckase, M., & Woo, A.. (2016). Using Response Time to Detect Item Preknowledge in Computer?Based Licensure Examinations. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice., 35(1). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/emip.12102

Hadidi, A., & Luecht, R. M.. (1997). Psychometric mode effects and fit issues with respect to item difficulty estimates. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Hagge, S., Woo, A., & Dickison, P.. (2011). Impact of Item Drift on Candidate Ability Estimation. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.

Hahn, E. A., Cella, D., Bode, R. K., Gershon, R. C., & Lai, J. S.. (2006). Item banks and their potential applications to health status assessment in diverse populations. Medical Care, 44, S189-S197. presented at the Nov.

Hai-qi, D., De-zhi, C., Shuliang, D., & Taiping, D.. (2006). The comparison among item selection strategies of CAT with multiple-choice items. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 38, 778-783.

Haijing, L., & Shuliang, D.. (2007). An exploration and realization of computerized adaptive testing with cognitive diagnosis. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 39, 747-753.

Haley, S. M., Coster, W. J., Andres, P. L., Kosinski, M., & Ni, P.. (2004). Score comparability of short forms and computerized adaptive testing: Simulation study with the activity measure for post-acute care. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85, 661-6. presented at the Apr.

Haley, S. M., Siebens, H., Coster, W. J., Tao, W., Black-Schaffer, R. M., Gandek, B., et al.. (2006). Computerized adaptive testing for follow-up after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation: I. Activity outcomes. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 87, 1033-42. presented at the Aug.

Haley, S. M., Ni, P., Fragala-Pinkham, M. A., Skrinar, A. M., & Corzo, D.. (2005). A computer adaptive testing approach for assessing physical functioning in children and adolescents. Developmental Medicine and Child Neuropsychology, 47, 113-120. presented at the Feb.

Haley, S., Raczek, A., Coster, W., Dumas, H., & Fragalapinkham, M.. (2005). Assessing Mobility in Children Using a Computer Adaptive Testing Version of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 86, 932-939.

Haley, S. M., Raczek, A. E., Coster, W. J., Dumas, H. M., & Fragala-Pinkham, M. A.. (2005). Assessing mobility in children using a computer adaptive testing version of the pediatric evaluation of disability inventory. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 86, 932-9. presented at the May.

Haley, S. M., Ni, P., Dumas, H. M., Fragala-Pinkham, M. A., Hambleton, R. K., Montpetit, K., et al.. (2009). Measuring global physical health in children with cerebral palsy: Illustration of a multidimensional bi-factor model and computerized adaptive testing. Quality of Life Research, 18, 359-370. presented at the Apr.

Haley, S. M., Fragala-Pinkham, M. A., & Ni, P.. (2006). Sensitivity of a computer adaptive assessment for measuring functional mobility changes in children enrolled in a community fitness programme. Clin Rehabil, 20, 616-622.

Haley, S., Ni, P., Hambleton, R. K., Slavin, M., & Jette, A.. (2006). Computer adaptive testing improved accuracy and precision of scores over random item selection in a physical functioning item bank. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59, 1174-1182.

Haley, S. M., Ni, P., Ludlow, L. H., & Fragala-Pinkham, M. A.. (2006). Measurement precision and efficiency of multidimensional computer adaptive testing of physical functioning using the pediatric evaluation of disability inventory. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 87, 1223-9. presented at the Sep.

Haley, S. M., Gandek, B., Siebens, H., Black-Schaffer, R. M., Sinclair, S. J., Tao, W., et al.. (2008). Computerized adaptive testing for follow-up after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation: II. Participation outcomes. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 89, 275-283. presented at the Feb.

Haley, S. M., Ni, P., Jette, A. M., Tao, W., Moed, R., Meyers, D., & Ludlow, L. H.. (2009). Replenishing a computerized adaptive test of patient-reported daily activity functioning. Quality of Life Research, 18, 461-71. presented at the May.

Haley, S. M., Coster, W. J., Andres, P. L., Ludlow, L. H., Ni, P., Bond, T. L., et al.. (2004). Activity outcome measurement for postacute care. Medical Care, 42, I49-161.

Haley, S. M., Ni, P., Hambleton, R. K., Slavin, M. D., & Jette, A. M.. (2006). Computer adaptive testing improved accuracy and precision of scores over random item selection in a physical functioning item bank. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59, 1174-82. presented at the Nov.

Halkitis, P. N., & Leahy, J. M.. (1993). Computerized adaptive testing: the future is upon us. Nurs Health Care, 14, 378-85. presented at the Sep.

Halkitis, P. N. (1998). The effect of item pool restriction on the precision of ability measurement for a Rasch-based CAT: comparisons to traditional fixed length examinations. J Outcome Meas, 2, 97-122.

Hambleton, R. K., & Xing, D.. (2006). Optimal and nonoptimal computer-based test designs for making pass-fail decisions. Applied Measurement in Education, 19, 221-239.

Hambleton, R. K. (2005). Applications of item response theory to improve health outcomes assessment: Developing item banks, linking instruments, and computer-adaptive testing. In C. C. Gotay & Snyder, C., Outcomes assessment in cancer (pp. 445-464). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Hambleton, R. K. (2000). Emergence of item response modeling in instrument development and data analysis. Medical Care, 38, II60-II65.

Hambleton, R. K. (1974). Testing and decision-making procedures for selected individualized instruction programs. Review of Educational Research, 10, 371-400.

Hambleton, R. K., Zaal, J. N., & Pieters, J. P. M.. (1991). Computerized adaptive testing: Theory, applications, and standards. In . R. K. Hambleton and J. N. Zaal (Eds.), Advances in educational and psychological testing: Theory and Applications (pp. 341-366). Boston: Kluwer.

Hambleton, R. K., & Xing, D.. (2004). Computer-based test designs with optimal and non-optimal tests for making pass-fail decisions. Research Report, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.

Hambleton, R. K., & Eignor, D. R.. (1977). Adaptive Testing Applied to Hierarchically Structured Objectives-Based Programs. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Hambleton, R. K., Jodoin, M., & Zenisky, A. L.. (2002). Impact of selected factors on the psychometric quality of credentialing examinations administered with a sequential testlet design. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.

Hambleton, R. K. (1973). A review of testing and decision-making procedures (Technical Bulletin No. 15. Iowa City IA: American College Testing Program.

Hambleton, R. K. (2002). Impact of item quality and item bank size on the psychometric quality of computer-based credentialing exams. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.

Han, K. T., Dimitrov, D. M., & Al-Mashary, F.. (2019). Developing Multistage Tests Using D-Scoring Method. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 79, 988-1008. doi:10.1177/0013164419841428

Han, K. T. (2013). Item Pocket Method to Allow Response Review and Change in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 259-275. doi:10.1177/0146621612473638

Han, K. T. (2012). An Efficiency Balanced Information Criterion for Item Selection in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 49, 225–246. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2012.00173.x

Han, S. - Y., & Yoo, Y. Joo. (2017). Efficiency of Item Selection in CD-CAT Based on Conjunctive Bayesian Network Modeling Hierarchical attributes. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1RbO2gd4aULqsSgRi_VZudNN_edX82NeD

Han, K. T. (2009). A gradual maximum information ratio approach to item selection in computerized adaptive testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Han, N. (2003). Using moving averages to assess test and item security in computer-based testing (Center for Educational Assessment Research Report No 468). Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts, School of Education.

Han, N., & Hambleton, R. K.. (2004). Detecting exposed test items in computer-based testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego CA.

Han, K. T. (2016). Maximum Likelihood Score Estimation Method With Fences for Short-Length Tests and Computerized Adaptive Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 40, 289-301. doi:10.1177/0146621616631317

Han, K. T. (2010). SimulCAT: Windows application that simulates computerized adaptive test administration. Retrieved from http://www.hantest.net/simulcat

Han, K. T. (2009). Gradual maximum information ratio approach to item selection in computerized adaptive testing (No. RR-09-07). GMAC Research Reports. McLean, VA. USA: Graduate Management Admissions Council.

Han, K. T. (2020). Framework for Developing Multistage Testing With Intersectional Routing for Short-Length Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 44, 87-102. doi:10.1177/0146621619837226

Handel, R. W., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Watt, M.. (1997). Comparability and validity of computerized adaptive testing with the MMPI-2 using a clinical sample. In Paper presented at the 32nd Annual Symposium and Recent Developments in the use of the MMPI-2 and MMPI-A. Minneapolis MN.

Handel, R. W., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Watt, M. E.. (1999). Computerized adaptive assessment with the MMPI-2 in a clinical setting. Psychological Assessment, 11, 369-380.

Hankins, J. A. (1990). The effects of variable entry on bias and information of the Bayesian adaptive testing procedure. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 50, 785-802.

Hankins, J. A. (1987). The effects of variable entry on bias and information of the Bayesian adaptive testing procedure. Dissertation Abstracts International, 47 (8A), 3013.

Hansen, D. N. (1969). An investigation of computer-based science testing. In . R. C. Atkinson and H. A. Wilson (Eds.), Computer-assisted instruction: A book of readings. New York: Academic Press.

Hansen, D. N., & Schwarz, G.. (1968). An investigation of computer-based science testing. Tallahassee FL: Florida State University.

Hansen, D. N., & Schwarz, G.. (1968). An investigation of computer-based science testing. Tallahassee: Institute of Human Learning, Florida State University.

Hansen, D. N., Ross, S., & Harris, D. A.. (1977). Flexilevel adaptive training paradigm: Hierarchical concept structures. AFHRL Technical Report 77-35 (II).

Hansen, D. N., Ross, S., & Harris, D. A.. (1977). Flexilevel adaptive testing paradigm: Validation in technical training. AFHRL Technical Report 77-35 (I).

Hansen, D. N. (1976). Reflections on adaptive testing. In . C. K. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing (pp. 90-94). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Hansen, D. N., Johnson, B. F., Fagan, R. L., Tan, P., & Dick, W.. (1974). Computer-based adaptive testing models for the Air Force technical training environment: Phase I: Development of a computerized measurement system for Air Force technical Training. JSAS Catalogue of Selected Documents in Psychology, 5, 1-86 (MS No. 882). AFHRL Technical Report 74-48.

Hardwicke, S., Vicino, F., McBride, J. R., & Nemeth, C.. (1984). Evaluation of computerized adaptive testing of the ASVAB. San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center, unpublished manuscript.

Hardwicke, S., & White, K. E.. (1983). Predictive utility evaluation of adaptive testing: Results of the Navy research. Falls Church VA: The Rehab Group Inc.

Harman, H. H., Helm, C. E., & Loye, D. E.. (1968). Computer-assisted testing (Eds.). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Harmes, J. C., Parshall, C. G., & Kromrey, J. D.. (2003). Recalibration of IRT item parameters in CAT: Sparse data matrices and missing data treatments. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Harmes, J. C., Kromrey, J. D., & Parshall, C. G.. (2001). Online item parameter recalibration: Application of missing data treatments to overcome the effects of sparse data conditions in a computerized adaptive version of the MCAT. Unpublished manuscript.