Morin, M. (2017). Adapting Linear Models for Optimal Test Design to More Complex Test Specifications. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.

Kingsbury, G. G. (1990). Adapting adaptive testing: Using the MicroCAT Testing System in a local school district. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 29 (2), 3-6.

Finkelman, M. (2003). An adaptation of stochastic curtailment to truncate Wald’s SPRT in computerized adaptive testing. presented at the Steptember, 2003, Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.

Wen, J. - B., Chang, H. - H., & Hau, K. - T.  . (2001). Adaptation of a-stratified method in variable length computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle WA.

Haley, S. M., Coster, W. J., Andres, P. L., Ludlow, L. H., Ni, P., Bond, T. L., et al.. (2004). Activity outcome measurement for postacute care. Medical Care, 42, I49-161.

Wang, X. B., & Wiley, A.. (2004). Achieving accuracy of retest calibration for a national CAT placement examination with a restricted test length. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego CA.

Li, Y. H., & Yu, N. Y.. (2002). Accuracy of the ability estimate and the item exposure rate under multidimensional adaptive testing with item constraints. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.

Li, Y. H., & Schafer, W. D.. (2003). Accuracy of reading and mathematics ability estimates under the shadow-test constraint MCAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.

Wise, S. L., Freeman, S. A., Finney, S. J., Enders, C. K., & Severance, D. D.. (1997). The accuracy of examinee judgments of relative item difficulty: Implication for computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago.

Orban, J. A. (1982). Ability measurement, test bias reduction, and psychological reactions to testing as a function of computer adaptive testing versus conventional testing. Dissertation Abstracts International, 42, 4233.

Orban, J. A. (1981). Ability measurement, test bias reduction, and psychological reactions to testing as a function of computer adaptive testing versus conventional. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. Dissertational Abstracts International, 1982, 42,(10-B), 4233.

Weiss, D. J., & Betz, N. E.. (1973). Ability measurement: Conventional or adaptive? (Research Report 73-1). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Bergstrom, B. (1992). Ability measure equivalence of computer adaptive and paper and pencil tests: A research synthesis. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco.

Gershon, R. C. (2004). The ABCs of Computerized Adaptive Testing. In . T. M. Wood and W. Zhi (Eds.), Measurement issues and practice in physical activity. Champaign, IL: Human kinetics.