Multidimensional adaptive testing with a minimum error-variance criterion. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 24, 398-412.
. (1999). Strategies for controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with the generalized partial credit model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28, 165-185.
. (2004). Validation of CATSIB To investigate DIF of CAT data. In annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago, IL. USA.
. (1997). Evaluation of selection procedures for computerized adaptive testing with polytomous items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 393-411.
. (2002). The promise of PROMIS: using item response theory to improve assessment of patient-reported outcomes. Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, 23, S53-7.
. (2005). Patterns of alcohol and drug use among federal offenders as assessed by the Computerized Lifestyle Screening Instrument. Ottawa, ON. Canada: Research and Statistics Branch, Correctional Service of Canada.
. (1991). Altering the level of difficulty in computer adaptive testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 5, 137-149.
. (1992). Simulated computerized adaptive test for patients with shoulder impairments was efficient and produced valid measures of function. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59(3), 290-298.
. (2006). Application of computerized adaptive testing to the University Entrance Exam of Taiwan, R.O.C. Dissertation Abstracts International, 49, 3662.
. (1989). . (2002).
Computerized adaptive testing with multiple-form structures. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28, 147-164.
. (2004). . (2001).
Effects of practical constraints on item selection rules at the early stages of computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 41, 149-174.
. (2004). Alternative methods for the detection of item preknowledge in computerized adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 59, 3765.
. (1999). Capitalization on item calibration error in adaptive testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 13, 35-53.
. (2000). . (2000).
A comparison of computerized adaptive testing and multistage testing. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 60, 5829.
. (2000). An investigation of two combination procedures of SPRT for three-category classification decisions in computerized classification test. annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. presented at the 04/2004, San Antonio, Texas.
. (2004). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
Technical guidelines for assessing computerized adaptive tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 21, 347-360.
. (1984). An item response model for characterizing test compromise. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 27, 163-179.
. (2002). a-stratified multistage computerized adaptive testing with b blocking. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25, 333-41.
. (2001). The Influence of Computerized Adaptive Testing on Psychometric Theory and Practice. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 11(1). doi:10.7333/2403-1101001
. (2024). An empirical comparison of achievement level estimates from adaptive tests and paper-and-pencil tests. In annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA. USA.
. (2002). The development and evaluation of a software prototype for computer-adaptive testing. Computers and Education, 43, 109-123.
. (2004). Multidimensional adaptive testing using the weighted likelihood estimation. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, 61, 4746.
. (2001). . (2001).
Relationship between corresponding Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) and computerized adaptive testing (CAT) subtests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 8, 155-163.
. (1984). Constraining item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with shadow tests. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 273-291.
. (2004). Assessment of scaled score consistency in adaptive testing from a multidimensional item response theory perspective. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 55, 5598.
. (1995). The effect of test characteristics on aberrant response patterns in computer adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, 62, 3363.
. (2002). CAT for certification and licensure. In Innovations in computerized assessment (pp. 67-91). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
. (1999). Simulated computerized adaptive test for patients with lumbar spine impairments was efficient and produced valid measures of function. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59, 947–956. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.10.017
. (2006). Los tests adaptativos informatizados en la frontera del siglo XXI: Una revisión [Computerized adaptive tests at the turn of the 21st century: A review]. Metodología de las Ciencias del Comportamiento, 2, 183-216.
. (2000). An item response theory-based pain item bank can enhance measurement precision. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 30, 278-88.
. (2005). . (1999).
A comparison of the traditional maximum information method and the global information method in CAT item selection. In annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York, NY USA.
. (1996). The effect of population distribution and method of theta estimation on computerized adaptive testing (CAT) using the rating scale model. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 57, 422-439.
. (1997). Research antecedents of applied adaptive testing. In , Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to practice (xviii., pp. 47-57). Washington D.C. USA: American Psychological Association.
. (1997). Assembling a computerized adaptive testing item pool as a set of linear tests. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31, 81-99.
. (2006). The development and evaluation of a system for computerized adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 4304.
. (1992). The D-optimality item selection criterion in the early stage of CAT: A study with the graded response model. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 33, 88-110.
. (2008). Methods for restricting maximum exposure rate in computerized adaptative testing. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 3, 14-23.
. (2007). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
. (2003).
An applied study on computerized adaptive testing. Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences. University of Groingen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
. (1989). Computer adaptive testing: A comparison of four item selection strategies when used with the golden section search strategy for estimating ability. Dissertation Abstracts International, 54, 1772.
. (1993). How Do Trait Change Patterns Affect the Performance of Adaptive Measurement of Change?. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 10(3), 32-58. doi:10.7333/2307-1003032
. (2023). . (1985).
Increasing the homogeneity of CAT's item-exposure rates by minimizing or maximizing varied target functions while assembling shadow tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 42, 245-269.
. (2005). Computer adaptive testing: The impact of test characteristics on perceived performance and test takers' reactions. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 62, 3410.
. (2002). Assessment in the twenty-first century: A role of computerised adaptive testing in national curriculum subjects. Teacher Development, 5, 241-57.
. (2001). An application of Computerized Adaptive Testing to the Test of English as a Foreign Language. Dissertation Abstracts International, 53, 4257-4258.
. (1993). Using response times to detect aberrant responses in computerized adaptive testing. Psychometrika, 68, 251-265.
. (2003). Computerized adaptive testing for classifying examinees into three categories. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 713-34.
. (2000). Adaptive testing: The evolution of a good idea. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 8, 11-15.
. (1989). The equivalence of Rasch item calibrations and ability estimates across modes of administration. In Objective measurement: Theory into practice (Vol. 2, pp. 122-128). Norwood, N.J. USA: Ablex Publishing Co.
. (1994). Item Selection and Hypothesis Testing for the Adaptive Measurement of Change. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34(4), 238-254. doi:10.1177/0146621609344844
. (2010). . (2006).
A comparison of paper-and-pencil, computer-administered, computerized feedback, and computerized adaptive testing methods for classroom achievement testing. Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 1719.
. (1991). Simulating the use of disclosed items in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35, 48-68.
. (1998). A comparison of maximum likelihood estimation and expected a posteriori estimation in computerized adaptive testing using the generalized partial credit model. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 58, 453.
. (1997).