Export 2294 results:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
I
Schmidt, F. L., & Urry, V. W.. (1976). Item parameterization procedures for the future. In . C. K. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing (pp. 107-112.). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
PDF icon sc75-01.pdf (330.67 KB)
Do, B. - R., Chuah, S. C., & Drasgow, F.. (2004). Item parameter recovery with adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego CA.
PDF icon do04-01.pdf (378.66 KB)
Glas, C. A. W. (2010). Item Parameter Estimation and Item Fit Analysis. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 269-288). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8
Chang, H. - H., & Guo, R.. (2017). Item Parameter Drifting and Online Calibration. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.
Huebner, A. (2012). Item Overexposure in Computerized Classification Tests Using Sequential Item Selection. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 17(12).
PDF icon v17n12.pdf (296.59 KB)
Finkelman, M. D., Kim, W., He, Y., & Lai, A. M.. (2013). Item Ordering in Stochastically Curtailed Health Questionnaires With an Observable Outcome. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 1(3), 38-66. doi:10.7333/1304-0103038
PDF icon v08n2p147.pdf (573.02 KB)
Morrison, C., Subhiyah, R,, & Nungester, R.. (1995). Item exposure rates for unconstrained and content-balanced computerized adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.
Parshall, C., Hogarty, K., & Kromrey, J.. (1999). Item exposure in adaptive tests: An empirical investigation of control strategies. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Lawrence KS.
Hetter, R. D., & Sympson, J. B.. (1997). Item exposure control in CAT-ASVAB. In J. R. McBride, Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp. 141-144). Washington D.C., USA: American Psychological Association.
Chae, S. (1995). Item equivalence from paper-and-pencil to computer adaptive testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.
Parshall, C. G. (1998). Item development and pretesting in a computer-based testing environment. In Paper presented at the Educational Testing Service Sponsored Colloquium on Computer-Based Testing: Building the Foundation for Future Assessments. Philadelphia.
Wainer, H.,, & Kiely, G. L.. (1987). Item clusters and computerized adaptive testing: A case for testlets. Journal of Educational Measurement, 24(3), 185-201.
Sympson, J. B., & l. Hartmann,. (1982). Item Calibrations for Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT) Experimental Item Pools Adaptive Testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 1982 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 290-294). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon sy82-01.pdf (104.17 KB)
Wang, C., Chen, P., & Jiang, S.. (2020). Item Calibration Methods With Multiple Subscale Multistage Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 57, 3-28. doi:10.1111/jedm.12241
Stone, G. E., & Lunz, M. E.. (1994). Item calibration considerations: A comparison of item calibrations on written and computerized adaptive examinations. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
Glas, C. A. W. (2000). Item calibration and parameter drift. In . W. J. van der linden and C. A. W. Glas (Eds.). Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp.183-199). Norwell MA: Kluwer Academic.
Glas, C. A. W., & Veerkamp, W. J. J.. (1999). Item calibration and parameter drift. In . W. J. van der Linden and C. A. W. Glas (Eds.), Computer adaptive testing: Theory and practice. Norwell MA: Kluwer.
Rudner, L. M. (1998). Item banking. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation.
Nicewander, W. A. (2003). Issues in maintaining scale consistency for the CAT-ASVAB. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
Millman, J., & Arter, J. A.. (1984). Issues in item banking. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1, 315-330.
Veldkamp, B. P. (2016). On the Issue of Item Selection in Computerized Adaptive Testing With Response Times. Journal of Educational Measurement, 53, 212–228. doi:10.1111/jedm.12110
Jiao, H., Wang, S., & Lau, A.. (2004). An investigation of two combination procedures of SPRT for three-category decisions in computerized classification test. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego CA.
Jiao, H., Wang, S., & Lau, C. A.. (2004). An investigation of two combination procedures of SPRT for three-category classification decisions in computerized classification test. annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. presented at the 04/2004, San Antonio, Texas.
PDF icon ji04-01.pdf (648.87 KB)
Jennings, J. A., Dodd, B. G., & Fitzpatrick, S.. (2001). An investigation of the impact of items that exhibit mild DIF on ability estimation in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.
Wise, S. L., Kingsbury, G. G., & Houser, R. L.. (1993). An investigation of restricted self-adapted testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Atlanta GA.
Liu, O. Lydia, Bridgeman, B., Gu, L., Xu, J., & Kong, N.. (2015). Investigation of Response Changes in the GRE Revised General Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 75, 1002-1020. doi:10.1177/0013164415573988
Shyu, C. - Y., Fan, M., Thompson, T,, & Hsu.,. (2001). An investigation of procedures for estimating error indexes in proficiency estimation in a realistic second-order equitable CAT environment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle WA.
Shyu, C. - Y., Fan, M., Thompson, T,, & Hsu, Y.. (2002). An investigation of procedures for estimating error indexes in proficiency estimation in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
Haynie, K. A., & Way, W. D.. (1995). An investigation of item calibration procedures for a computerized licensure examination. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco, CA.
Zwick, R. (2010). The Investigation of Differential Item Functioning in Adaptive Tests. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 331-352). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8
Hansen, D. N. (1969). An investigation of computer-based science testing. In . R. C. Atkinson and H. A. Wilson (Eds.), Computer-assisted instruction: A book of readings. New York: Academic Press.
Hansen, D. N., & Schwarz, G.. (1968). An investigation of computer-based science testing. Tallahassee FL: Florida State University.
Hansen, D. N., & Schwarz, G.. (1968). An investigation of computer-based science testing. Tallahassee: Institute of Human Learning, Florida State University.
Buhr, D. C., & Legg, S. M.. (1989). Investigating the validity of a computerized adaptive test for different examinee groups. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.
Zenisky, A. L., & Hambleton, R. K.. (2004). Investigating the effects of selected multi-stage test design alternatives on credentialing outcomes. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego CA.
PDF icon ze04-01.pdf (128.97 KB)
Li, F., Cohen, A., & Shen, L.. (2012). Investigating the Effect of Item Position in Computer-Based Tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 49, 362–379. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2012.00181.x
Thompson, T., & Way, W. D.. (2007). Investigating CAT designs to achieve comparability with a paper test. In . In D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat07tthompson.pdf (140.23 KB)
Mead, A. D. (2006). An Introduction to Multistage Testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 19, 185-187. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame1903_1

Pages