Export 2294 results:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
C
Chang, H. - H., & Zhang, J.. (2003). Assessing CAT security breaches by the item pooling index. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
Chang, H. - H., & Ying, Z.. (1999). a-stratified multistage computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 211-222.
Chang, S. - H., & Zhang, J.. (2005). Rescuing CAT by fixing the problems. In National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
Chang, H. - H., & Ying, Z.. (1996). Building a statistical foundation for computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Banff, Alberta, Canada.
Chang, H. - H., & Ying, Z.. (1996). A Global Information Approach to Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 20(3), 213-229.
PDF icon v20n3p213.pdf (1.91 MB)
Chang, H. - H., & Ying, Z.. (1999). a-stratified multistage computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 211-222.
Chang, H. - H., & Zhang, J.. (2002). Identify the lower bounds for item sharing and item pooling in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
Chang, Y. - P., Chiu, C. - Y., & Tsai, R. - C.. (2017). Computerized Adaptive Testing for Cognitive Diagnosis in Classroom: A Nonparametric Approach. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.
Chang, H. - H. (1996). A model for score maximization within a computerized adaptive testing environment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the NMCE. New York NY.
Chang, S. - W., & Twu, B. - Y.. (2001). Effects of changes in the examinees’ ability distribution on the exposure control methods in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle WA.
PDF icon ch01-02.pdf (694.64 KB)
Chang, H. - H., & Guo, R.. (2017). Item Parameter Drifting and Online Calibration. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.
Chang, H. - H. (2004). Understanding computerized adaptive testing: From Robbins-Munro to Lord and beyond. In . D. Kaplan (Ed.), The Sage handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences (pp. 117-133). New York: Sage.
Chang, H. - H., & Ying, Z.. (2008). To Weight Or Not To Weight? Balancing Influence Of Initial Items In Adaptive Testing. Psychometrica, 73(3), 441-450. doi:10.1007/S11336-007-9047-7
Chang, H. - H., & Ying, Z.. (1996). A global information approach to computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 20, 213-229.
Chang, H. - H., & Ying, Z.. (2003). Test-score comparability, ability estimation, and item-exposure control in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
Chang, H. - H., & Ying, Z.. (1999). a-stratified multistage computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 211–222.
Chang, H. - H. (2011). Building Affordable CD-CAT Systems for Schools To Address Today's Challenges In Assessment. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon IACAT 2011 Affordable CAT Systems Chang.pdf (1.55 MB)
Chang, H. - H. (1995). A global information approach to computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco CA.
Chang, S. - H. (1991). Inter-subtest branching in computerized adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 140-141.
Chang, S. - W., & Harris, D. J.. (2002). Redeveloping the exposure control parameters of CAT items when a pool is modified. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
PDF icon ch02-02.pdf (1.09 MB)
Chang, H. - H., & Ying, Z.. (2002). To weight or not to weight – balancing influence of initial and later items in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
PDF icon ch02-01.pdf (251.46 KB)
Chang, S. - W. (1998). A comparative study of item exposure control methods in computerized adaptive testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa , Iowa City IA.
Chandra, I. (2017). Item Selection Strategies for Developing CAT in Indonesia. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata Japan: Niiagata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2KuFrRATq9Q
Chajewski, M., & Harnisher, J.. (2017). Considerations in Performance Evaluations of Computerized Formative Assessments. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.
Chajewski, M., & Lewis, C.. (2009). Optimizing item exposure control algorithms for polytomous computerized adaptive tests with restricted item banks. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat09chajewski.pdf (922.78 KB)
Chae, S. (1995). Item equivalence from paper-and-pencil to computer adaptive testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.
Cella, D., & Nowinski, C. J.. (2002). Measuring quality of life in chronic illness: the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy measurement system. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 83, S10-7. presented at the Dec.
Cella, D., Chang, C. - H., Lai, J. S., & Webster, K.. (2002). Advances in quality of life measurements in oncology patients. Seminars in Oncology, 29, 60-8. presented at the Jun.
Case, S. M., & Luecht, R. M.. (1997). Computer assembly of tests so that content reigns supreme. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
Carlson, R. (1994). Computer adaptive testing: A shift in the evaluation paradigm. Educational Technology Systems, 22 (3), 213-224.
Carlson, S. (2000). ETS finds flaws in the way online GRE rates some students. Chronicle of Higher Education, 47, a47.
Carey, P. A. (1999). The use of linear-on-the-fly testing for TOEFL Reading. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
Candell, G. L. (1988). Application of appropriateness measurement to a problem in computerized adaptive testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois.
B
Buyske, S. G. (1999). Optimal design for item calibration in computerized adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 59, 4220.
Burt, W. M., Kim, S. - J., Davis, L. L., & Dodd, B. G.. (2003). A comparison of item exposure control procedures using a CAT system based on the generalized partial credit model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.
PDF icon bu03-01.pdf (264.96 KB)
Burke, M. J,, Normand, J., & Raju, N. M.. (1987). Computerized psychological testing: Overview and critique. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 1, 42-51.
Bunderson, C. V., Inouye, D. K., & Olsen, J. B.. (1986). The four generations of computerized educational measurement. In . In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational Measurement (3rd ed and pp. 367-407). New York: Macmillan.
Bulut, O., & Cormier, D.. (2017). A Large-Scale Progress Monitoring Application with Computerized Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1uGbCKenRLnqTxImX1fZicR2c7GRV6Udc
Bull, J., Dalziel, J., & Vreeland, T.. (2003). Assessing question banks. In Reusing online resources: A sustanable approach to e-learning (pp. 171-230). London, UK: Kogan Page Ltd.
Buhr, D. C., & Legg, S. M.. (1989). Investigating the validity of a computerized adaptive test for different examinee groups. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.
Buck, D. E. (2000). An examination of the reliability and validity of performance ratings made using computerized adaptive rating scales. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 61, 570.

Pages