Breithaupt, K., & Hare, D. R.. (2007). Automated Simultaneous Assembly of Multistage Testlets for a High-Stakes Licensing Examination. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 5-20. doi:10.1177/0013164406288162

Breithaupt, K., Ariel, A., & Hare, D. R.. (2010). Assembling an Inventory of Multistage Adaptive Testing Systems. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 247-266). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8

Breithaupt, K., Ariel, A., & Veldkamp, B.. (2004). Automated Simultaneous Assembly of Multi-Stage Testing for the Uniform CPA Examination. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego CA.

Breithaupt, K., Ariel, A., & Veldkamp, B. P.. (2005). Automated Simultaneous Assembly for Multistage Testing. International Journal of Testing, 5, 319-330. doi:10.1207/s15327574ijt0503_8

Bridgeman, B., Cline, F., & Hessinger, J.. (2003). Effect of extra time on GRE® Quantitative and Verbal Scores (Research Report 03-13). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing service.

Bridgeman, B., & Schaeffer, G. A.. (1995). A comparison of gender differences on paper-and-pencil and computer-adaptive versions of the Graduate Record Examination. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.

Bridgeman, B., & Cline, F.. (2000). Variations in mean response times for questions on the computer-adaptive GRE general test: Implications for fair assessment (GRE Board Professional Report No. 96-20P: Educational Testing Service Research Report 00-7).

Bridgeman, B., & Cline, F.. (2002). Fairness issues in adaptive tests with strict time limits. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.

Bringsjord, E. L. (2001). Computerized-adaptive versus paper-and-pencil testing environments: An experimental analysis of examinee experience.

Brooks, S. (1977). A comparison of the classification of students by two methods of administration of a mathematics placement test. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University, 1977.

Brooks, S., & Hartz, M. A.. (1978). Predictive ability of a branching test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38, 415-419.

Brossman, B. G., & Guille, R. A.. (2014). A Comparison of Multi-Stage and Linear Test Designs for Medium-Size Licensure and Certification Examinations. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 2(2), 18-36. presented at the 02-2014. doi:10.7333/1402-0202018

Brown, J. M., & Weiss, D. J.. (1977). An adaptive testing strategy for achievement test batteries (Research Rep No 77-6). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Bryson, R. (1971). A comparison of four methods of selecting items for computer-assisted testing (Technical Bulletin STB 72-5). San Diego: Naval Personnel and Training Research Laboratory.

Buck, D. E. (2000). An examination of the reliability and validity of performance ratings made using computerized adaptive rating scales. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 61, 570.

Buhr, D. C., & Legg, S. M.. (1989). Investigating the validity of a computerized adaptive test for different examinee groups. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.

Bull, J., Dalziel, J., & Vreeland, T.. (2003). Assessing question banks. In Reusing online resources: A sustanable approach to e-learning (pp. 171-230). London, UK: Kogan Page Ltd.

Bulut, O., & Cormier, D.. (2017). A Large-Scale Progress Monitoring Application with Computerized Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1uGbCKenRLnqTxImX1fZicR2c7GRV6Udc

Bunderson, C. V., Inouye, D. K., & Olsen, J. B.. (1988). The four generations of computerized educational measurement (Research Report 98-35). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Bunderson, C. V., Inouye, D. K., & Olsen, J. B.. (1986). The four generations of computerized educational measurement. In . In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational Measurement (3rd ed and pp. 367-407). New York: Macmillan.

Burke, M. J,, Normand, J., & Raju, N. M.. (1987). Computerized psychological testing: Overview and critique. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 1, 42-51.

Burt, W. M., Kim, S. - J., Davis, L. L., & Dodd, B. G.. (2003). A comparison of item exposure control procedures using a CAT system based on the generalized partial credit model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.

Butcher, J. N., Perry, J. L., & Hahn, J. A.. (2004). Computers in clinical assessment: Historical developments, present status, and future challenges. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60, 331-345.

Butcher, J. N., Keller, L. S., & Bacon, S. F.. (1985). Current developments and future directions in computerized personality assessment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 803-815.

Buyske, S. G. (1999). Optimal design for item calibration in computerized adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 59, 4220.

Buysse, D. J., Yu, L., Moul, D. E., Germain, A., Stover, A., Dodds, N. E., et al.. (2010). Development and validation of patient-reported outcome measures for sleep disturbance and sleep-related impairments. Sleep, 33, 781-92. presented at the Jun 1.

Candell, G. L. (1988). Application of appropriateness measurement to a problem in computerized adaptive testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois.

Carey, P. A. (1999). The use of linear-on-the-fly testing for TOEFL Reading. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Carlson, R. D. (1993). Computer adaptive testing: A comparison of four item selection strategies when used with the golden section search strategy for estimating ability. Dissertation Abstracts International, 54, 1772.

Carlson, R. (1994). Computer adaptive testing: A shift in the evaluation paradigm. Educational Technology Systems, 22 (3), 213-224.

Carlson, S. (2000). ETS finds flaws in the way online GRE rates some students. Chronicle of Higher Education, 47, a47.

Case, S. M., & Luecht, R. M.. (1997). Computer assembly of tests so that content reigns supreme. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Cella, D., Chang, C. - H., Lai, J. S., & Webster, K.. (2002). Advances in quality of life measurements in oncology patients. Seminars in Oncology, 29, 60-8. presented at the Jun.

Cella, D., Yount, S., Rothrock, N., Gershon, R. C., Cook, K. F., Reeve, B., et al.. (2007). The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Medical Care, 45, S3-S11.

Cella, D., & Nowinski, C. J.. (2002). Measuring quality of life in chronic illness: the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy measurement system. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 83, S10-7. presented at the Dec.

Cella, D., Gershon, R. C., Lai, J. - S., & Choi, S. W.. (2007). The future of outcomes measurement: item banking, tailored short-forms, and computerized adaptive assessment. Quality of Life Research, 16, 133-141.

Cetin-Berber, D. Duygu, Sari, H. Ibrahim, & Huggins-Manley, A. Corinne. (2019). Imputation Methods to Deal With Missing Responses in Computerized Adaptive Multistage Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 79, 495-511. doi:10.1177/0013164418805532

Chae, S. (1995). Item equivalence from paper-and-pencil to computer adaptive testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.

Chajewski, M., & Harnisher, J.. (2017). Considerations in Performance Evaluations of Computerized Formative Assessments. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.

Chajewski, M., & Lewis, C.. (2009). Optimizing item exposure control algorithms for polytomous computerized adaptive tests with restricted item banks. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Chakravarty, E. F., Bjorner, J. B., & Fries, J. F.. (2007). Improving patient reported outcomes using item response theory and computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Rheumatology, 34, 1426-31. presented at the Jun.

Chandra, I. (2017). Item Selection Strategies for Developing CAT in Indonesia. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata Japan: Niiagata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2KuFrRATq9Q

Chang, H. - H., & Ying, Z.. (1996). A global information approach to computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 20, 213-229.

Chang, S. - W., & Harris, D. J.. (2002). Redeveloping the exposure control parameters of CAT items when a pool is modified. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.

Chang, H. - H., & Guo, R.. (2017). Item Parameter Drifting and Online Calibration. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.

Chang, H. - H. (2004). Understanding computerized adaptive testing: From Robbins-Munro to Lord and beyond. In . D. Kaplan (Ed.), The Sage handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences (pp. 117-133). New York: Sage.

Chang, H. - H., & Ying, Z.. (2008). To Weight Or Not To Weight? Balancing Influence Of Initial Items In Adaptive Testing. Psychometrica, 73(3), 441-450. doi:10.1007/S11336-007-9047-7

Chang, H. - H., & van der Linden, W. J.. (2001). Implementing content constraints in a-stratified adaptive testing using a shadow test approach (Research Report 01-001). University of Twente, Department of Educational Measurement and Data Analysis.

Chang, H. - H., & Ying, Z.. (2002). To weight or not to weight – balancing influence of initial and later items in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.

Chang, C. - H. (2007). Patient-reported outcomes measurement and management with innovative methodologies and technologies. Quality of Life Research, 16 Suppl 1, 157-66.

Chang, S. - H. (1991). Inter-subtest branching in computerized adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 140-141.

Chang, H. - H. (2011). Building Affordable CD-CAT Systems for Schools To Address Today's Challenges In Assessment. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Chang, C. - H. (2004). Developing tailored instruments: Item banking and computerized adaptive assessment. In Paper presented at the conference “Advances in Health Outcomes Measurement: Exploring the Current State and the Future of Item Response Theory. Item Banks, and Computer-Adaptive Testing,” Bethesda MD.

Chang, H. - H., & van der Linden, W. J.. (2003). Optimal stratification of item pools in α-stratified computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 262-274.

Chang, H. - H., Chang, S., & Ansley,. (2000). Performance of item exposure control methods in computerized adaptive testing: Further explorations. In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans , LA.

Chang, H. - H., & Ying, Z.. (1999). a-stratified multistage computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 211-222.

Chang, H. - H., & Ying, Z.. (1997). Multi-stage CAT with stratified design. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Gatlinburg TN.

Chang, I. Y. (2004). Sequential estimation in variable length computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 121, 249-264.

Chang, S. - W. (1998). A comparative study of item exposure control methods in computerized adaptive testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa , Iowa City IA.

Chang, H. - H., Qian, J., & Ying, Z.. (2001). a-Stratified multistage computerized adaptive testing with b blocking. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25, 333-341.