A selection procedure for polytomous items in computerized adaptive testing (Measurement and Research Department Reports 2000-5). Arnhem, The Netherlands: Cito.
. (2000). Evaluation of selection procedures for computerized adaptive testing with polytomous items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 393-411.
. (2002). Evaluation of selection procedures for computerized adaptive testing with polytomous items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 393-411.
. (2002). El control de la exposicin de los items en tests adaptativos informatizados [Item exposure control in computerized adaptive tests]. Unpublished master’s dissertation, Universidad Autonma de Madrid, Spain.
. (1995). A monte carlo study of the feasibility of on-the-fly assessment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.
. (2001). Psychometric and psychological effects of item selection and review on computerized testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 791-808.
. (2003). A comparison of item exposure control methods in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35, 311-327.
. (1998). Una solución a la estimatión inicial en los tests adaptivos informatizados [A solution to initial estimation in CATs.]. Revista Electrónica de Metodología Aplicada, 2, 1-6.
. (1997). Psychometric and Psychological Effects of Item Selection and Review on Computerized Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 791-808. doi:10.1177/0013164403251282
. (2003). . (1996).
Estimating ability and item-selection strategy in self-adapted testing: A latent class approach. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 379-396.
. (2004). Health status assessment for the twenty-first century: item response theory, item banking and computer adaptive testing. Quality of Life Research, 6, 595-600. presented at the Aug.
. (1997). A simulated comparison of two content balancing and maximum information item selection procedures for an adaptive certification examination. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Atlanta.
. (1993). A simulated comparison of testlets and a content balancing procedure for an adaptive certification examination. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Atlanta.
. (1993). STAR Math 2 Computer-Adaptive Math Test and Database: Technical Manual. Wisconsin Rapids, WI: Author.
. (2002). STAR Early Literacy Computer-Adaptive Diagnostic Assessment: Technical Manual. Wisconsin Rapids, WI: Author.
. (2001). STAR Reading 2 Computer-Adaptive Reading Test and Database: Technical Manual. Wisconsin Rapids, WI: Author.
. (2000). . (2009).
. (2000).
. (1988).
Final Report: Computerized adaptive testing, assessment of requirements. Falls Church VA: Author.
. (1980). Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Medical Care, 45, S22-31. presented at the May.
. (2007). Establishing time limits for the GRE computer adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Atlanta GA.
. (1993). Incorporating content constraints into a multi-stage adaptive testlet design: LSAC report. Newtown, PA: Law School Admission Council.
. (1997). Incorporating content constraints into a multi-stage adaptive testlet design. (No. BBB16784). LSAC Computerized Testing Report. Princeton, NJ. USA: Law School Admission Council.
. (1999). An evaluation of a two-stage testlet design for computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Banff, Alberta, Canada.
. (1996). The Effects of Item Calibration Sample Size and Item Pool Size on Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 5(1), 11-19.
. (1981). v05n1p011.pdf (707.62 KB)Implementation of a Model Adaptive Testing System at an Armed Forces Entrance and Examination Station. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
. (1977). re77216.pdf (312.3 KB)How Adaptive is an Adaptive Test: Are all Adaptive Tests Adaptive?. In 2017 IACAT Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Nj-zDCKk3DvHA4Jlp1qkb2XovmHeQfxu
. (2017). Item pool design for computerized adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
. (2003). re03-01.pdf (134.72 KB)Final report: Procedures for criterion referenced tailored testing. Columbia: University of Missouri, Educational Psychology Department.
. (1981). Designing item pools to optimize the functioning of a computerized adaptive test. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 52, 127-141.
. (2010). The effect of item pool characteristics on the operation of a tailored testing procedure. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Murray Hill NJ.
. (1976). . (1977).
The design of p-optimal item banks for computerized adaptive tests. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing. {PDF file, 211 KB}.
. (2007). cat07reckase.pdf (210.85 KB)Computerized testing – the adolescent years: Juvenile delinquent or positive role model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
. (2000). Item Pool Design and Evaluation. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1ZAsqm1yNZlliqxEHcyyqQ_vOSu20xxZs
. (2017). Adaptive testing: The evolution of a good idea. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 8, 11-15.
. (1989). The effect of item choice on ability estimation when using a simple logistic tailored testing model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Washington, D.C.
. (1975). Identifying similar item content clusters on multiple test forms. In Paper presented at the Psychometric Society meeting. Gatlinburg, TN, June.
. (1997). The interpretation and application of multidimensional item response theory models; and computerized testing in the instructional environment: Final Report (Research Report ONR 89-2). Iowa City IA: The American College Testing Program.
. (1989). An interactive computer program for tailored testing based on the one-parameter logistic model. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 6, 208-212.
. (1974). Discussion: Adaptive and sequential testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 1982 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 290-294). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
. (1982). re82-01.pdf (287.3 KB)Computerized adaptive testing: a good idea waiting for the right technology. In Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, April 1988.
. (1988). A procedure for decision making using tailored testing. In New horizons in testing: Latent trait theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 237-254). New York, NY. USA: Academic Press.
. (1983). Reckase '83.pdf (474.81 KB)An application of the Rasch simple logistic model to tailored testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.. St. Loius MO.
. (1974). How Adaptive Is an Adaptive Test: Are All Adaptive Tests Adaptive?. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 7(1), 1-14. doi:10.7333/1902-0701001
. (2019). The selection of test items for decision making with a computer adaptive test. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
. (1994). Final report: The use of tailored testing with instructional programs (Research Report ONR 86-1). Iowa City IA: The American College Testing Program, Assessment Programs Area, Test Development Division.
. (1986). Some decision procedures for use with tailored testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1979 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 79-100). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
. (1980). re80-01.pdf (1.12 MB)The Influence of Computerized Adaptive Testing on Psychometric Theory and Practice. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 11(1). doi:10.7333/2403-1101001
. (2024). A generalization of sequential analysis to decision making with tailored testing. In Paper presented at the meeting of the Military Testing Association. Oklahoma City OK.
. (1978). An interactive computer program for tailored testing based on the one-parameter logistic model. In Paper presented at the National Conference on the Us of On-Line Computers in Psychology. St. Louis MO.
. (1973). Item pool design for computerized adaptive tests. In Invited small group session at the 6th Conference of the European Association of Psychological Assessment. Aachen, Germany.
. (2001). The use of the sequential probability ratio test in making grade classifications in conjunction with tailored testing (Research Report 81-4). Columbia MO: University of Missouri, Department of Educational Psychology.
. (1981). Procedures for computerized testing. In Paper presented at the sixth annual meeting of the National Conference on the Use of On-Line Computers in Psychology. St. Louis MO.
. (1976). Validation of a computer-adaptive test to evaluate generic health-related quality of life. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes.
. (2010). Adaptive computerized educational systems: A case study. In , Evidence-based educational methods (pp. 143-169). San Diego, CA. USA: Elsevier Academic Press.
. (2004). Timing behavior in computerized adaptive testing: Response times for correct and incorrect answers are not related to general fluid intelligence/Zum Zeitverhalten beim computergestützten adaptiveb Testen: Antwortlatenzen bei richtigen und falschen Lösun. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 24, 57-63.
. (2003). Pour une évaluation sur mesure pour chaque étudiant : défis et enjeux du testing adaptatif par ordinateur en éducation [Tailored testing for each student : Principles and stakes of computerized adaptive testing in education]. In Presented at the 23th Study Session of the ADMÉÉ. Québec: Association pour le développement de la mesure et de l’évaluation en éducation (ADMÉÉ).
. (2001).