Export 2294 results:
Filters: Filter is [Clear All Filters]
. (2013). Deriving Stopping Rules for Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 99-122. doi:10.1177/0146621612463422
. (2000). Assembling parallel item pools for computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans.
. (2011). National Tests in Denmark – CAT as a Pedagogic Tool. Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 12(1).
. (2010). Adaptive Tests for Measuring Anxiety and Depression. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 123-136). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8
. (2008). Transitioning from fixed-length questionnaires to computer-adaptive versions. Zeitschrift für Psychologie \ Journal of Psychology, 216(1), 22–28.
Transitioning from Fixed-Length Questionnaires to Computer-Adaptive Versions.pdf (214.47 KB). (2007). Development and evaluation of a computer adaptive test for “Anxiety” (Anxiety-CAT). Quality of Life Research, 16, 143-155.
. (1989). Computerized adaptive personality assessment. Unpublished master’s thesis, Harvard University, Cambridge MA.
. (1999). An examination of conditioning variables in DIF analysis in a computer adaptive testing environment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
. (2001). An examination of conditioning variables used in computer adaptive testing for DIF analyses. Applied Measurement in Education, 14, 3-16.
. (2000). Testlet response theory: An analog for the 3PL model useful in testlet-based adaptive testing. In . W. J. van der Linden and C. A. W. Glas (Eds.), Computerized Adaptive Testing: Theory and Practice (pp. 245-270). Norwell MA: Kluwer.
. (1991). Building algebra testlets: A comparison of hierarchical and linear structures. Journal of Educational Measurement, 8, xxx-xxx.
. (1990). Testing algorithms. In . H. Wainer (Ed.), Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (pp. 103-135). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
. (1990). Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (Eds.). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
. (1991). Some empirical guidelines for building testlets (Technical Report 91-56). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service, Program Statistics Research.
. (2000). Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (2nd edition). Hillsdale, N. J. : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
. (1990). Introduction and history. In . In H. Wainer (Ed.), Computerized adaptive testing: A Primer (pp. 1 - 21). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
. (1990). Item response theory, item calibration, and proficiency estimation. In . H. Wainer (Ed.), Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (pp. 65-102). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
. (1990). Important issues in CAT. In . H. Wainer et al., Computerized adaptive testing: A primer. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
. (1992). Some practical considerations when converting a linearly administered test to an adaptive format (Research Report 92-21 or 13?). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1995). Precision and differential item functioning on a testlet-based test: The 1991 Law School Admissions Test as an example. Applied Measurement in Education, 8, 157-187.
. (1993). Some practical considerations when converting a linearly administered test to an adaptive format. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 12 (1), 15-20.
. (1987). CATS, testlets, and test construction: A rationale for putting test developers back into CAT. Journal of Educational Measurement, 32, 185-202.
. (2000). Caveats, pitfalls, and unexpected consequences of implementing large-scale computerized testing. In . Wainer, H. (Ed). Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (2nd ed.). pp. 271-299. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
. (1983). On item response theory and computerized adaptive testing: The coming technical revolution in testing. Journal of College Admissions, 28, 9-16.
. (2000). Rescuing computerized testing by breaking Zipf’s law. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 25, 203-224.
. (1990). An adaptive algebra test: A testlet-based, hierarchically structured test with validity-based scoring. ETS Technical Report 90-92.
. (1992). A comparison of the performance of simulated hierarchical and linear testlets. Journal of Educational Measurement, 29, 243-251.
. (1990). Future challenges. In . H. Wainer (Ed.), Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (pp. 233-272). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
. (1987). Item clusters and computerized adaptive testing: A case for testlets. Journal of Educational Measurement, 24(3), 185-201.
. (1986). CATs, testlets, and test construction: A rationale for putting test developers back into CAT (Technical Report 86-71). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service, Program Statistics Research.
. (2001). A system for on-the-fly adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.
. (2001). A minimax procedure in the context of sequential testing problems in psychodiagnostics. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 54, 139-159.
. (2010). Testlet-Based Adaptive Mastery Testing. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 387-409). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8
. (2001). Multidimensional IRT-based adaptive sequential mastery testing. In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.
. (2000). A minimax solution for sequential classification problems. In . H. A. L. Kiers, J.-P.Rasson, P. J. F. Groenen, and M. Schader (Eds.), Data analysis, classification, and related methods (pp. 121-126). Berlin: Springer. .
. (1999). Using Bayesian decision theory to design a computerized mastery test. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 24(3), 271–292.
. (1999). A minimax procedure in the context of sequential mastery testing (Research Report 99-04). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.
. (1998). Optimal sequential rules for computer-based instruction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 19(2), 133-154.
. (1997). Applications of Bayesian decision theory to sequential mastery testing (Research Report 97-06). Twente, The Netherlands: Department of Educational Measurement and Data Analysis.
. (1997). A minimax sequential procedure in the context of computerized adaptive mastery testing (Research Report 97-07). Twente, The Netherlands: Department of Educational Measurement and Data Analysis.
. (2000). Testlet-based adaptive mastery testing, W. In . J. van der Linden (Ed.), Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp. 289-309). Norwell MA: Kluwer.
. (1992). Manual for the General Scholastic Aptitude Test (Senior) Computerized adaptive test. Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council.
. (2017). New Results on Bias in Estimates due to Discontinue Rules in Intelligence Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.
. (1982). Pros and cons of tailored testing: An examination of issues highlighted with an automated testing system. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 17, 301-304.
. (2001). Can examinees use judgments of item difficulty to improve proficiency estimates on computerized adaptive vocabulary tests?. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.
. (1998). Psychometric characteristics of computer-adaptive and self-adaptive vocabulary tests: The role of answer feedback and test anxiety. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35, 328-347 or 155-167.
. (1997). Computerized adaptive and fixed-item testing of music listening skill: A comparison of efficiency, precision, and concurrent validity. Journal of Educational Measurement, 34, 43-63.
. (1990). Computerized adaptive music tests: A new solution to three old problems. In Paper presented at the biannual meeting of the Music Educators National Conference. Washington DC.
. (1996). Effects of answer review and test anxiety on the psychometric and motivational characteristics of computer-adaptive and self-adaptive vocabulary tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York.
. (2005). A closer look at using judgments of item difficulty to change answers on computerized adaptive tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 42, 331-350.
. (2000). Limiting answer review and change on computerized adaptive vocabulary tests: Psychometric and attitudinal results. Journal of Educational Measurement, 37, 21-38.
. (1992). How review options and administration mode influence scores on computerized vocabulary tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco CA.
. (1998). Reviewing and changing answers on computer-adaptive and self-adaptive vocabulary tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35, 328-345.
. (1997). Computerized adaptive and fixed-item testing of music listening skill: A comparison of efficiency, precision, and concurrent validity. Journal of Educational Measurement, 34, 43-63.
. (1990). Creating adaptive tests of musical ability with limited-size item pools. In . D. Dalton (Ed.), ADCIS 32nd International Conference Proceedings (pp. 105-112). Columbus OH: Association for the Development of Computer-Based Instructional Systems.
. (1990). MusicCAT: An adaptive testing program to assess musical ability. In Paper presented at the ADCIS 32nd International Conference. San Diego CA.
. (1994). Computerized-adaptive and self-adapted music-listening tests: Features and motivational benefits. Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 25-51.
. (1993). The efficiency, reliability, and concurrent validity of adaptive and fixed-item tests of music listening skills. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Atlanta GA.
. (1993). The development and evaluation of a computerized adaptive test of tonal memory. Journal of Research in Music Education, 41, 111-136.