Export 2294 results:
Filters: Filter is [Clear All Filters]
Proceedings of the first conference on computerized adaptive testing. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
. (1976). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
Programmed testing in the examinations of the National Board of Medical Examiners. In . A. Anastasi (Ed.), Testing problems in perspective. Washington DC: American Council on Education.
. (1966). Progress in assessing physical function in arthritis: PROMIS short forms and computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Rheumatology, 36, 2061-2066. presented at the Sep.
. (2009). Progress report on the sequential item test. East Lansing MI: Michigan State University, Bureau of Educational Research.
. (1959). Projection-Based Stopping Rules for Computerized Adaptive Testing in Licensure Testing. Applied Psychological MeasurementApplied Psychological Measurement, 42(4), 275 - 290. presented at the 2018/06/01. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621617726790
. (2017). The promise of PROMIS: using item response theory to improve assessment of patient-reported outcomes. Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, 23, S53-7.
. (2005). The promise of tailored tests. In . H. Wainer and S. Messick (Eds.). Principals of modern psychological measurement (pp. 69-80). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
. (1983). Properties of ability estimation methods in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35, 109-135.
. (1998). Properties of some Bayesian scoring procedures for computerized adaptive tests (Research Memorandum CRM 87-161). Alexandria VA: Center for Naval Analyses.
. (1987). . (2005).
. (1996).
Proposta para a construo de um Teste Adaptativo Informatizado baseado na Teoria da Resposta ao Item (Proposal for the construction of a Computerized Adaptive Testing based on the Item Response Theory). Poster session presented at the Congresso Brasileiro de Teoria da Resposta ao Item, Florianpolis SC Brazil.
. (2009). Pros and cons of tailored testing: An examination of issues highlighted with an automated testing system. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 17, 301-304.
. (1982). Prospective evaluation of the am-pac-cat in outpatient rehabilitation settings. Physical Therapy, 87, 385-398.
. (2007). Protecting the integrity of computer-adaptive licensure tests: Results of a legal challenge. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Diego CA.
. (2004). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
Protecting the integrity of computerized testing item pools. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 17(4), 17-27.
. (1998). Protecting the integrity of the CAT item pool. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
. (1997). Providing item feedback in computer-based tests: Effects of initial success and failure. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49, 479-486.
. (1989). Psychological effects of immediate knowledge of results and adaptive ability testing (Research Report 76-4). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
. (1976). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
The psychological impacts of computerized adaptive testing methods. Educational Technology, 34, 41-47.
. (1994). Psychological reactions to adaptive testing. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8, 7-15.
. (2000). Psychometric and psychological effects of item selection and review on computerized testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 791-808.
. (2003). Psychometric and Psychological Effects of Item Selection and Review on Computerized Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 791-808. doi:10.1177/0013164403251282
. (2003). Psychometric and psychological effects of review on computerized fixed and adaptive tests. Psicolgia, 21, 157-173.
. (2000). Psychometric characteristics of computer-adaptive and self-adaptive vocabulary tests: The role of answer feedback and test anxiety. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35, 328-347 or 155-167.
. (1998). A psychometric comparison of computerized and paper-and-pencil versions of the national RN licensure examination. Chicago IL: Author, Unpublished report.
. (1991). Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Medical Care, 45, S22-31. presented at the May.
. (2007). Psychometric mode effects and fit issues with respect to item difficulty estimates. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
. (1997). Psychometric problems with branching tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association.
. (1969). Psychometric procedures for administering CAT-ASVAB. In . W. A. Sands, B. K. Waters, and J. R. McBride (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp. 131-140). Washington D.C.: American Psychological Association.
. (1997). Psychometric properties of an emotional adjustment measure: An application of the graded response model. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23, 39-46.
. (2007). Psychometric properties of several computer-based test designs with ideal and constrained item pools. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 64, 2978.
. (2003). Quality control of on-line calibration in computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 98-03). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.
. (1998). Quantifying the impact of compromised items in CAT. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
. (2009). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
A Randomized Experiment to Compare Conventional, Computerized, and Computerized Adaptive Administration of Ordinal Polytomous Attitude Items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 159-183. doi:10.1177/0146621604271268
. (2005). A randomized experiment to compare conventional, computerized, and computerized adaptive administration of ordinal polytomous attitude items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 159-183.
. (2005). The Random-Threshold Generalized Unfolding Model and Its Application of Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 179-200. doi:10.1177/0146621612469720
. (2013). A rapid item search procedure for Bayesian adaptive testing (Research Report 77-4). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
. (1977). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
The Rasch model and missing data, with an emphasis on tailoring test items. In annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. presented at the April 5-9, New Orleans, LA. USA.
. (1988). The Rasch model and multi-stage testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 13, 45-52.
. (1988). The Rasch model in computerized personality testing. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Missouri, Columbia, 1979.
. (1979). On a Rasch-model-based test for non-computerized adaptive testing. In . Langeheine, R. and Rost, J. (Ed.), Latent trait and latent class models. New York: Plenum Press.
. (1988). The rationale and principles of stratum scoring. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
. (1999). A real data simulation of computerized adaptive administration of the MMPI-A. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 83-96.
. (2000). A real data simulation of computerized adaptive administration of the MMPI-A. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 83-96.
. (2000). Real-data simulation of a proposal for tailored teting. In Third International Conference on Educational Testing. presented at the 06/1977, Leyden, The Netherlands.
. (1977). A real-data simulation of adaptive MMPI administration. In Paper presented at the 23rd Annual Symposium on recent developments in the use of the MMPI. St. Petersburg FL.
. (1988). A real-data simulation of computerized adaptive administration of the MMPI. Psychological Assessment, 1, 18-22.
. (1989). Realistic simulation procedures for item response data. In In T. Miller (Chair), High-dimensional simulation of item response data for CAT research. Psychometric Society. Gatlinburg TN.
. (1997). A rearrangement procedure for administering adaptive tests when review options are permitted. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University.
. (2001). A “rearrangement procedure” for administering adaptive tests with review options. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
. (2002). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
Recalibration of IRT item parameters in CAT: Sparse data matrices and missing data treatments. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
. (2003). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
Recent and projected developments in ability testing by computer. In . Earl Jones (Ed.), Symposium Proceedings: Occupational Research and the Navy–Prospectus 1980 (TR-74-14). San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.
. (1974). Recent trends in comparability studies (No. 05-05). PEM Research Report 05-05. presented at the August, 2005, Pearson.
. (2005). Recursive maximum likelihood estimation, sequential design, and computerized adaptive testing. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1996). Recursive maximum likelihood estimation, sequential designs, and computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the Eleventh Workshop on Item Response Theory. University of Twente, the Netherlands.
. (1995). Redeveloping the exposure control parameters of CAT items when a pool is modified. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
. (2002). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
Reducing bias in CAT trait estimation: A comparison of approaches. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 263-278.
. (1999). Reducing item exposure without reducing precision (much) in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, CA.
. (1999). Reducing the predictability of adaptive item sequences. In . Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Military Testing Association, San Diego, 43-48.
. (1985).