Export 2294 results:
Filters: Filter is   [Clear All Filters]
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
P
Clark, C. K. (1976). Proceedings of the first conference on computerized adaptive testing. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
PDF icon cl76-01.pdf (7.42 MB)
Hubbard, J. P. (1966). Programmed testing in the examinations of the National Board of Medical Examiners. In . A. Anastasi (Ed.), Testing problems in perspective. Washington DC: American Council on Education.
Krathwohl, D. (1959). Progress report on the sequential item test. East Lansing MI: Michigan State University, Bureau of Educational Research.
Luo, X., Kim, D., & Dickison, P.. (2017). Projection-Based Stopping Rules for Computerized Adaptive Testing in Licensure Testing. Applied Psychological MeasurementApplied Psychological Measurement, 42(4), 275 - 290. presented at the 2018/06/01. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621617726790
Green, B. F. (1983). The promise of tailored tests. In . H. Wainer and S. Messick (Eds.). Principals of modern psychological measurement (pp. 69-80). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
Wang, T., & Vispoel, W. P.. (1998). Properties of ability estimation methods in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35, 109-135.
Cizek, G. J. (2004). Protecting the integrity of computer-adaptive licensure tests: Results of a legal challenge. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Diego CA.
PDF icon ci04-01.pdf (190.38 KB)
Way, W. D. (1998). Protecting the integrity of computerized testing item pools. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 17(4), 17-27.
Way, W. D. (1997). Protecting the integrity of the CAT item pool. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
Betz, N. E., & Weiss, D. J.. (1976). Psychological effects of immediate knowledge of results and adaptive ability testing (Research Report 76-4). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
PDF icon be76-04.pdf (2.36 MB)
Tonidandel, S.,, & Quiñones, M. A.. (2000). Psychological reactions to adaptive testing. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8, 7-15.
Revuelta, J., Ximénez, C. M., & Olea, J.. (2003). Psychometric and Psychological Effects of Item Selection and Review on Computerized Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 791-808. doi:10.1177/0013164403251282
Hadidi, A., & Luecht, R. M.. (1997). Psychometric mode effects and fit issues with respect to item difficulty estimates. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
Bayroff, A. G. (1969). Psychometric problems with branching tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association.
Segall, D. O., Moreno, K. E., Bloxom, B. M., & Hetter, R. D.. (1997). Psychometric procedures for administering CAT-ASVAB. In . W. A. Sands, B. K. Waters, and J. R. McBride (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp. 131-140). Washington D.C.: American Psychological Association.
Jodoin, M. G. (2003). Psychometric properties of several computer-based test designs with ideal and constrained item pools. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 64, 2978.
Q
Glas, C. A. W. (1998). Quality control of on-line calibration in computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 98-03). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.
Guo, F. (2009). Quantifying the impact of compromised items in CAT. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat09guo.pdf (310.61 KB)
R
Wang, W. - C., Liu, C. - W., & Wu, S. - L.. (2013). The Random-Threshold Generalized Unfolding Model and Its Application of Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 179-200. doi:10.1177/0146621612469720
Vale, C. D., & Weiss, D. J.. (1977). A rapid item search procedure for Bayesian adaptive testing (Research Report 77-4). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon va77-04.pdf (855.87 KB)
de Gruijter, D. N. M. (1988). The Rasch model and missing data, with an emphasis on tailoring test items. In annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. presented at the April 5-9, New Orleans, LA. USA.
Glas, C. A. W. (1988). The Rasch model and multi-stage testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 13, 45-52.
Kunce, C. S. (1979). The Rasch model in computerized personality testing. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Missouri, Columbia, 1979.
Kubinger, K. D. (1988). On a Rasch-model-based test for non-computerized adaptive testing. In . Langeheine, R. and Rost, J. (Ed.), Latent trait and latent class models. New York: Plenum Press.
Wise, S. L. (1999). The rationale and principles of stratum scoring. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
Killcross, M. C. (1977). Real-data simulation of a proposal for tailored teting. In Third International Conference on Educational Testing. presented at the 06/1977, Leyden, The Netherlands.
Slutske, W. S., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Butcher, J. N.. (1988). A real-data simulation of adaptive MMPI administration. In Paper presented at the 23rd Annual Symposium on recent developments in the use of the MMPI. St. Petersburg FL.
Davey, T., Nering, M., & Thompson, T.. (1997). Realistic simulation procedures for item response data. In In T. Miller (Chair), High-dimensional simulation of item response data for CAT research. Psychometric Society. Gatlinburg TN.
Papanastasiou, E. C. (2002). A “rearrangement procedure” for administering adaptive tests with review options. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
PDF icon pa02-01.pdf (409.97 KB)
Harmes, J. C., Parshall, C. G., & Kromrey, J. D.. (2003). Recalibration of IRT item parameters in CAT: Sparse data matrices and missing data treatments. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
PDF icon ha03-01.pdf (625.24 KB)
McBride, J. R., & Weiss, D. J.. (1974). Recent and projected developments in ability testing by computer. In . Earl Jones (Ed.), Symposium Proceedings: Occupational Research and the Navy–Prospectus 1980 (TR-74-14). San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.
Paek, P. (2005). Recent trends in comparability studies (No. 05-05). PEM Research Report 05-05. presented at the August, 2005, Pearson.
Ying, Z., & Chang, H. - H.. (1995). Recursive maximum likelihood estimation, sequential designs, and computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the Eleventh Workshop on Item Response Theory. University of Twente, the Netherlands.
Chang, S. - W., & Harris, D. J.. (2002). Redeveloping the exposure control parameters of CAT items when a pool is modified. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
PDF icon ch02-02.pdf (1.09 MB)
Holmes, R. M., & Segall, D. O.. (1999). Reducing item exposure without reducing precision (much) in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, CA.
Wetzel, C. D., & McBride, J. R.. (1985). Reducing the predictability of adaptive item sequences. In . Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Military Testing Association, San Diego, 43-48.

Pages