Cook, K. F., O'Malley, K. J., & Roddey, T. S.. (2005). Dynamic assessment of health outcomes: Time to let the CAT out of the bag?. Health Services Research, 40, 1694-1711.

Zhang, J., & Chang, H.. (2005). The effectiveness of using multiple item pools in computerized adaptive testing. In Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education . presented at the 04/2005, Montreal, Canada.

Blais, J. - G., & Raîche, G.. (2005). Features of the estimated sampling distribution of the ability estimate in computerized adaptive testing according to two stopping rules. In . D. G. Englehard (Eds.), Objective measurement: Theory into practice. Volume 6.

Yi, Q., Zhang, J., & Chang, H. - H.. (2005). Identifying practical indices for enhancing item pool security. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME). Montreal, Canada.

Giouroglou, H., & Economides, A. A.. (2005). An implemented theoretical framework for a common European foreign language adaptive assessment. In . Proceedings ICODL 2005, 3rd ternational Conference on Open and Distance Learning 'Applications of Pedagogy and Technology',339-350,Greek Open University, Patra, Greece.

van der Linden, W. J., & Chang, H. - H.. (2005). Implementing content constraints in alpha-stratified adaptive testing using a shadow test approach. Law School Admission Council, Computerized Testing Report 01-09.

Li, Y. H., & Schafer, W. D.. (2005). Increasing the homogeneity of CAT's item-exposure rates by minimizing or maximizing varied target functions while assembling shadow tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 42, 245-269.

Huitzing, H. A., Veldkamp, B. P., & Verschoor, A. J.. (2005). Infeasibility in automated test assembly models: A comparison study of different methods. Journal of Educational Measurement, 42, 223-243.

Lai, J. - S., Cella, D., Dineen, K., Bode, R., Von Roenn, J., Gershon, R. C., & Shevrin, D.. (2005). An item bank was created to improve the measurement of cancer-related fatigue. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 58, 190-7. presented at the Feb.

Jun, Z., Dongming, O., Shuyuan, X., Haiqi, D., & Shuqing, Q.. (2005). [Item characteristic curve equating under graded response models in IRT]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 37, 832-838.

Ware, J. E., Gandek, B., Sinclair, S. J., & Bjorner, J. B.. (2005). Item response theory in computer adaptive testing: implications for outcomes measurement in rehabilitation. Rehabil Psychol, 50, 71-78.

Lai, J. - S., Dineen, K., Reeve, B. B., Von Roenn, J., Shervin, D., McGuire, M., et al.. (2005). An item response theory-based pain item bank can enhance measurement precision. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 30, 278-88.

Muñiz, J.. (2005). La Validez desde una óptica psicométrica [Validity from a psychometric perspective]. Acta Comportamentalia, 13, 9-20.

Siebens, H., Andres, P. L., Pengsheng, N., Coster, W. J., & Haley, S. M.. (2005). Measuring physical function in patients with complex medical and postsurgical conditions: a computer adaptive approach. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84, 741-8. presented at the Oct.

Belov, D. I., & Armstrong, R. D.. (2005). Monte Carlo Test Assembly for Item Pool Analysis and Extension. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 239-261. doi:10.1177/0146621605275413

Economides, A. A. (2005). Personalized feedback in CAT. In . WSEAS Transactions on Advances in Engineering Education, Issue 3, Volume 2,174-181, July 2005.

Fries, J. F., Bruce, B., & Cella, D.. (2005). The promise of PROMIS: using item response theory to improve assessment of patient-reported outcomes. Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, 23, S53-7.

Aguado, D., Rubio, V. J., Hontangas, P. M., & Hernández, J. M.. (2005). Propiedades psicométricas de un test Adaptativo Informatizado para la medición del ajuste emocional [Psychometric properties of an Emotional Adjustment Computerized Adaptive Test]. Psicothema, 17, 484-491.

Hol, A. M., Vorst, H. C. M., & Mellenbergh, G. J.. (2005). A randomized experiment to compare conventional, computerized, and computerized adaptive administration of ordinal polytomous attitude items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 159-183.

Hol, M. A., Vorst, H. C. M., & Mellenbergh, G. J.. (2005). A Randomized Experiment to Compare Conventional, Computerized, and Computerized Adaptive Administration of Ordinal Polytomous Attitude Items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 159-183. doi:10.1177/0146621604271268

Paek, P. (2005). Recent trends in comparability studies (No. 05-05). PEM Research Report 05-05. presented at the August, 2005, Pearson.

Chang, S. - H., & Zhang, J.. (2005). Rescuing CAT by fixing the problems. In National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Hart, D. L., Mioduski, J. E., & Stratford, P. W.. (2005). Simulated computerized adaptive tests for measuring functional status were efficient with good discriminant validity in patients with hip, knee, or foot/ankle impairments. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 58, 629-38.

Miceli, R., & Molinengo, G.. (2005). Somministrazione di test computerizzati di tipo adattivo: Un' applicazione del modello di misurazione di Rasch [Administration of computerized and adaptive tests: An application of the Rasch Model]. Testing Psicometria Metodologia, 12, 131-149.

Davis, L. L., & Dodd, B.. (2005). Strategies for controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with the partial credit model. Pearson Educational Measurement Research Report 05-01.

Henson, R. K., & Douglas, J.. (2005). Test construction for cognitive diagnosis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 262-277.

Kahler, C. W., Strong, D. R., Read, J. P., De Boeck, P., Wilson, M., Acton, G. S., et al.. (2005). Toward efficient and comprehensive measurement of the alcohol problems continuum in college students: The Brief Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire. Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research, 29, 1180-1189.

Li, Y. H. (2005). Trait parameter recovery using multidimensional computerized adaptive testing in reading and mathematics. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 3-25.

Li, Y. H., & Schafer, W. D.. (2005). Trait Parameter Recovery Using Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing in Reading and Mathematics. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 3-25. doi:10.1177/0146621604270667

Meijer, R. R., & van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A.. (2005). The use of person-fit statistics in computerized adaptive testing. LSAC Research Report Series. presented at the September, 2005, Newton, PA. USA: Law School Administration Council.

Simms, L. J.,, & Clark, L. A.. (2005). Validation of a computerized adaptive testing version of the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality (SNAP). Psychological Assessment, 17(1), 28-43.

Simms, L. J., & Clark, L. J.. (2005). Validation of a computerized adaptive version of the Schedule of Non-Adaptive and Adaptive Personality (SNAP). Psychological Assessment, 17, 28-43.

Häusler, J.. (2006). Adaptive success control in computerized adaptive testing. Psychology Science, 48, 436-450.

Penfield, R. D. (2006). Applying Bayesian item selection approaches to adaptive tests using polytomous items. Applied Measurement in Education, 19, 1-20.

van der Linden, W. J., Ariel, A., & Veldkamp, B. P.. (2006). Assembling a computerized adaptive testing item pool as a set of linear tests. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31, 81-99.

Yi, Q., Z. J., & Chang, H. - H.. (2006). Assessing CAT Test Security Severity. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30(1), 62–63.

Hol, A. M. (2006). A CAT with personality and attitude. Enschede, The Netherlands: PrintPartners Ipskamp B.

Lei, P. - W., Chen, S. - Y., & Yu, L.. (2006). Comparing methods of assessing differential item functioning in a computerized adaptive testing environment. Journal of Educational Measurement, 43, 245-264.

Lei, P. - W., Chen, S. - Y., & Yu, L.. (2006). Comparing Methods of Assessing Differential Item Functioning in a Computerized Adaptive Testing Environment. Journal of Educational Measurement, 43, 245–264. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2006.00015.x

Hai-qi, D., De-zhi, C., Shuliang, D., & Taiping, D.. (2006). The comparison among item selection strategies of CAT with multiple-choice items. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 38, 778-783.

Morgan, D. L., Way, W. D., & Augemberg, K. E.. (2006). A comparison of online calibration methods for a CAT. In Presented at the National Council on Measurement on Education. San Francisco, CA.

Jodoin, M. G., Zenisky, A., & Hambleton, R. K.. (2006). Comparison of the Psychometric Properties of Several Computer-Based Test Designs for Credentialing Exams With Multiple Purposes. Applied Measurement in Education, 19, 203-220. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame1903_3

Haley, S., Ni, P., Hambleton, R. K., Slavin, M., & Jette, A.. (2006). Computer adaptive testing improved accuracy and precision of scores over random item selection in a physical functioning item bank. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59, 1174-1182.

Haley, S. M., Ni, P., Hambleton, R. K., Slavin, M. D., & Jette, A. M.. (2006). Computer adaptive testing improved accuracy and precision of scores over random item selection in a physical functioning item bank. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59, 1174-82. presented at the Nov.

Drasgow, F., & Chuah, S. C.. (2006). Computer-based testing. In Handbook of multimethod measurement in psychology (Vol. xiv, pp. 87-100). Washington D.C. USA: American Psychological Association.

Haley, S. M., Siebens, H., Coster, W. J., Tao, W., Black-Schaffer, R. M., Gandek, B., et al.. (2006). Computerized adaptive testing for follow-up after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation: I. Activity outcomes. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 87, 1033-42. presented at the Aug.

Schwartz, C., Welch, G., Santiago-Kelley, P., Bode, R., & Sun, X.. (2006). Computerized adaptive testing of diabetes impact: a feasibility study of Hispanics and non-Hispanics in an active clinic population. Quality of Life Research, 15, 1503-18. presented at the Nov.

Xu, X., & Douglas, J.. (2006). Computerized adaptive testing under nonparametric IRT models. Psychometrika, 71, 121-137.

Cheng, Y., Chang, H. - H., & Wang, X. B.. (2006). Constraints-weighted information method for item selection of severely constrained computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco.

Davey, T., & Pitoniak, M. J.. (2006). Designing computerized adaptive tests. In . S.M. Downing and T. M. Haladyna (Eds.), Handbook of test development. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Yang, X., Poggio, J. C., & Glasnapp, D. R.. (2006). Effects of Estimation Bias on Multiple-Category Classification With an IRT-Based Adaptive Classification Procedure. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 545-564. doi:10.1177/0013164405284031

van der Linden, W. J. (2006). Equating scores from adaptive to linear tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 493-508.

Lee, Y. H., Park, J. H., & Park, I. Y.. (2006). Estimation of an examinee's ability in the web-based computerized adaptive testing program IRT-CAT. J Educ Eval Health Prof, 3, 4.

Kosinski, M., Bjorner, J., Warejr, J., Sullivan, E., & Straus, W.. (2006). An evaluation of a patient-reported outcomes found computerized adaptive testing was efficient in assessing osteoarthritis impact. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59, 715-723.

Georgiadou, E., Triantafillou, E., & Economides, A. A.. (2006). Evaluation parameters for computer adaptive testing. British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 37(No 2), 261-278.

Bode, R. K., Lai, J. - S., Dineen, K., Heinemann, A. W., Shevrin, D., Von Roenn, J., & Cella, D.. (2006). Expansion of a physical function item bank and development of an abbreviated form for clinical research. Journal of Applied Measurement, 7, 1-15.

Lai, J. - S., Crane, P. K., & Cella, D.. (2006). Factor analysis techniques for assessing sufficient unidimensionality of cancer related fatigue. Quality of Life Research, 15, 1179-90. presented at the Sep.

Weissman, A. (2006). A Feedback Control Strategy for Enhancing Item Selection Efficiency in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 84-99. doi:10.1177/0146621605282774

Chuah, S. C., Drasgow, F., & Luecht, R.. (2006). How Big Is Big Enough? Sample Size Requirements for CAST Item Parameter Estimation. Applied Measurement in Education, 19, 241-255. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame1903_5

Mead, A. D. (2006). An Introduction to Multistage Testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 19, 185-187. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame1903_1