Export 2016 results:
Filters: Filter is   [Clear All Filters]
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
Data Interpretation, Statistical
Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted/*instrumentation
McGlohen, M., & Chang, H. - H.. (2008). Combining computer adaptive testing technology with cognitively diagnostic assessment. Behavioral Research Methods , 40, 808-21. presented at the Aug.
Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted/*methods/statistics & numerical data
Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted/*statistics & numerical data
Cheng, Y., & Chang, H. - H.. (2009). The maximum priority index method for severely constrained item selection in computerized adaptive testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 62, 369-83. presented at the May.
Chen, S. - Y., & Doong, S. H.. (2008). Predicting item exposure parameters in computerized adaptive testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 61, 75-91. presented at the May.
PDF icon ba08618.pdf (266.26 KB)
Jacobusse, G., & Buuren, S.. (2007). Computerized adaptive testing for measuring development of young children. Statistics in Medicine, 26, 2629-38. presented at the Jun 15.
Diagnostic tests
Schouwstra, S. (2017). Adaptivity in a Diagnostic Educational Test. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.
dianostic information
Bontempo, B. D. (2011). Moving beyond Efficiency to Allow CAT to Provide Better Diagnostic Information. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.
PDF icon IACAT 2011 Bontempo - CAT for Diagnostic Information.pdf (283 KB)
differential item function
Riley, B. B., & Carle, A. C.. (2011). Detecting DIF between Conventional and Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Monte Carlo Study. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.
PDF icon IACAT 2011 Riley Carle Detecting DIF between Conventional and Computerized Adaptive Testing.pdf (305.3 KB)
differential item functioning
Paek, P. (2005). Recent trends in comparability studies (No. 05-05). PEM Research Report 05-05. presented at the August, 2005, Pearson.
Nandakumar, R., & Roussos, L. A.. (2004). Evaluation of the CATSIB DIF procedure in a pretest setting. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 177-199.
Disability Evaluation
PDF icon bj03913.pdf (285.58 KB)
Disabled Persons/classification/*rehabilitation
Disabled Persons/psychology/*rehabilitation
Jette, A. M., Haley, S. M., Ni, P., & Moed, R.. (2008). Adaptive short forms for outpatient rehabilitation outcome assessment. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 87, 842-52. presented at the Oct.

Pages