Export 124 results:
Filters: First Letter Of Last Name is R  [Clear All Filters]
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
R
Rulison, K. L., & Loken, E.. (2009). I've Fallen and I Can't Get Up: Can High-Ability Students Recover From Early Mistakes in CAT?. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 83-101. doi:10.1177/0146621608324023
Rulison, K. L., & Loken, E.. (2009). I've Fallen and I Can't Get Up: Can High-Ability Students Recover From Early Mistakes in CAT?. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 83-101. doi:10.1177/0146621608324023
Ruiz, B., Fitz, P. A., Lewis, C., & Reidy, C.. (1995). Computer-adaptive testing: A new breed of assessment. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 95, 1326-1327.
Ruiz, B., Fitz, P. A., Lewis, C., & Reidy, C.. (1995). Computer-adaptive testing: A new breed of assessment. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 95, 1326-1327.
Rudner, L. M. (2009). An examination of decision-theory adaptive testing procedures. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat09rudner.pdf (202.22 KB)
Rudner, L. M. (2010). Implementing the Graduate Management Admission Test Computerized Adaptive Test. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 151-166). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8
Rudner, L. M. (2007). Implementing the Graduate Management Admission Test® computerized adaptive test. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat07rudner.pdf (134.53 KB)
Rudner, L. M. (1990). Computer testing: Pragmatic issues and research needs. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 9 (2), 19-20.
Rudner, L. M. (2002). An examination of decision-theory adaptive testing procedures. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA.
PDF icon ru02-01.pdf (45.1 KB)
Rudner, L. M. (1998). Item banking. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation.
Roussos, L. (1996). A Type I error rate study of a modified SIBTEST DIF procedure with potential application to computerized adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Alberta Canada.
Rotou, O., Patsula, L., Steffen, M., & Rizavi, S.. (2003). Comparison of multi-stage tests with computer adaptive and paper and pencil tests. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
PDF icon ro03-01.pdf (694.76 KB)
Rosso, M. A., & Reckase, M. D.. (1981). A comparison of a maximum likelihood and a Bayesian estimation procedure for tailored testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Los Angeles CA.
Ross, L. P., Nandakumar, R,, & Clauser, B. E.. (1997). A simulation study of the use of the Mantel-Haenszel and logistic regression procedures for assessing DIF in a CAT environment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
Roper, B. L. (1993). Comparability and validity of computerized adaptive testing with the MMPI-2. Dissertation Abstracts International, 53, 3791.
Roper, B. L., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Butcher, J. N.. (1995). Comparability and validity of computerized adaptive testing with the MMPI-2. Journal of Personality Assessment, 65, 358-71. presented at the Oct.
Roper, B. L., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Butcher, J. N.. (1990). Illustration of computerized adaptive testing with the MMPI-2. In Paper presented at the 98th Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association. Boston MA.
Roper, B. L., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Butcher, J. N.. (1991). Comparability of computerized adaptive and conventional testing with the MMPI-2. Journal of Personality Assessment, 57, 278-290. presented at the Oct.
Roos, L. L., Wise, S. L., & Plake, B. S.. (1997). The role of item feedback in self-adapted testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 85-98.
Roos, L. L., Wise, S. L., Yoes, M. E., & Rocklin, T. R.. (1996). Conducting self-adapted testing using MicroCAT. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 821-827.
Roos, L. L., Plake, B. S., & Wise, S. L.. (1992). The effects of feedback in computerized adaptive and self-adapted tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the NMCE. San Francisco.
Rocklin, T. R. (1994). Self-adapted testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 3-14.
Rocklin, T. R., & O’Donnell, A. M.. (1991). An empirical comparison of self-adapted and maximum information item selection. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago.
Rocklin, T. (1989). Individual differences in item selection in self adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.
Rocklin, T. (1997). Self-adapted testing: Improving performance by modifying tests instead of examinees. Stress & Coping: An International Journal, 10(1), 83-104.
Robin, F., Xing, D., Scrams, D., & Potenza, M.. (2000). Classification accuracy and test security for a computerized adaptive mastery test calibrated with different IRT models. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
Robin, F. (2000). CBTS: Computer-based testing simulation and analysis [computer software]. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts, School of Education.
Robin, F. (1999). Alternative item selection strategies for improving test security and pool usage in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education< Montreal. Canada.
Robin, F. (2001). Development and evaluation of test assembly procedures for computerized adaptive testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Ro, S., & Thompson, N. A.. (2007). Cutscore location and classification accuracy in computerized classification testing. In Paper presented at the international meeting of the Psychometric Society. Tokyo, Japan.
PDF icon ro07-01.pdf (93.59 KB)
Rizavi, S., & Swaminathan, H.. (2001). The effect of test and examinee characteristics on the occurrence of aberrant response patterns in a computerized adaptive test. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle WA.
Rizavi, S. M. (2002). The effect of test characteristics on aberrant response patterns in computer adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, 62, 3363.
Riley, B. B., Funk, R., Dennis, M. L., Lennox, R. D., & Finkelman, M.. (2011). The Use of Decision Trees for Adaptive Item Selection and Score Estimation. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.
PDF icon IACAT 2011 Riley Funk Dennis Lennox Finkelman Use of Decision Trees for Adaptive Item.pdf (456.04 KB)
Riley, B. B., & Carle, A. C.. (2011). Detecting DIF between Conventional and Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Monte Carlo Study. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.
PDF icon IACAT 2011 Riley Carle Detecting DIF between Conventional and Computerized Adaptive Testing.pdf (305.3 KB)
Revuelta, J., Ximénez, C. M., & Olea, J.. (2003). Psychometric and Psychological Effects of Item Selection and Review on Computerized Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 791-808. doi:10.1177/0013164403251282
Revuelta, J. (2004). Estimating ability and item-selection strategy in self-adapted testing: A latent class approach. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 379-396.

Pages