Hsu, C. - L., & Wang, W. - C.. (2015). Variable-Length Computerized Adaptive Testing Using the Higher Order DINA Model. Journal of Educational Measurement, 52, 125–143. doi:10.1111/jedm.12069

Hsu, C. - L., Wang, W. - C., & Chen, S. - Y.. (2013). Variable-Length Computerized Adaptive Testing Based on Cognitive Diagnosis Models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 563-582. doi:10.1177/0146621613488642

Lunz, M. E., & Deville, C. W.. (1996). Validity of item selection: A comparison of automated computerized adaptive and manual paper and pencil examinations. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 8, 152-157.

Jensema, C. J. (1974). The validity of Bayesian tailored testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34, 757-756.

Huff, K. L., & Sireci, S. G.. (2001). Validity issues in computer-based testing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 20(3), 16-25.

Forbey, J. D., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Gartland, D.. (2009). Validation of the MMPI-2 computerized adaptive version (MMPI-2-CA) in a correctional intake facility. Psychological Services, 6, 279-292.

Simms, L. J., & Clark, L. J.. (2005). Validation of a computerized adaptive version of the Schedule of Non-Adaptive and Adaptive Personality (SNAP). Psychological Assessment, 17, 28-43.

Simms, L. J.,, & Clark, L. A.. (2005). Validation of a computerized adaptive testing version of the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality (SNAP). Psychological Assessment, 17(1), 28-43.

Barthel, D., Otto, C., Nolte, S., Meyrose, A. - K., Fischer, F., Devine, J., et al.. (2017). The validation of a computer-adaptive test (CAT) for assessing health-related quality of life in children and adolescents in a clinical sample: study design, methods and first results of the Kids-CAT study. Quality of Life Research, 26, 1105–1117. presented at the May. doi:10.1007/s11136-016-1437-9

Becker, J., Walter, O. B., Fliege, H., Bjorner, J. B., Kocalevent, R. D., Schmid, G., et al.. (2004). Validating the German computerized adaptive test for anxiety on healthy sample (A-CAT). Quality of Life Research, 13, 1515.

Sie, H., Finkelman, M. D., Riley, B., & Smits, N.. (2015). Utilizing Response Times in Computerized Classification Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 39, 389-405. doi:10.1177/0146621615569504

Velozo, C. A., Wang, Y., Lehman, L. A., & Wang, J. H.. (2008). Utilizing Rasch measurement models to develop a computer adaptive self-report of walking, climbing, and running. Disability and Rehabilitation, 30, 458-467.

Wise, S. L. (2014). The Utility of Adaptive Testing in Addressing the Problem of Unmotivated Examinees. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 2(1), 1-17. doi:10.7333/1401-02010001

Finkelman, M. D. (2008). On using stochastic curtailment to shorten the SPRT in sequential mastery testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 33, 442.

Huitzing, H. A. (2004). Using Set Covering with Item Sampling to Analyze the Infeasibility of Linear Programming Test Assembly Models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28, 355-375. doi:10.1177/0146621604266152

van der Linden, W. J., Scrams, D. J., & Schnipke, D. L.. (1999). Using response-time constraints to control for differential speededness in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 195-210.

van der Linden, W. J., & van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A.. (2003). Using response times to detect aberrant responses in computerized adaptive testing. Psychometrika, 68, 251-265.

van der Linden, W. J. (2008). Using response times for item selection in adaptive testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 33, 5–20.

H., Q., Staniewska, D., Reckase, M., & Woo, A.. (2016). Using Response Time to Detect Item Preknowledge in Computer?Based Licensure Examinations. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice., 35(1). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/emip.12102

Meijer, R. R. (2004). Using patterns of summed scores in paper-and-pencil tests and computer-adaptive tests to detect misfitting item score patterns. Journal of Educational Measurement, 41, 119-136.

Wei, H., & Lin, J.. (2015). Using Out-of-Level Items in Computerized Adaptive Testing. International Journal of Testing, 15(1). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2014.979492

Yao, L., Pommerich, M., & Segall, D. O.. (2014). Using Multidimensional CAT to Administer a Short, Yet Precise, Screening Test. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38, 614-631. doi:10.1177/0146621614541514

Millman, J. (1984). Using microcomputers to administer tests: An alternate point of view. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 3(2), 20-21.

Ward, W. C. (1984). Using microcomputers to administer tests. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 3(2), 16-20.

Thompson, D. L. (1986). Using microcomputer-based assessment in career counseling. Journal of Employment Counseling, 23, 50-56.

Betz, N. E., & Turner, B. M.. (2011). Using Item Response Theory and Adaptive Testing in Online Career Assessment. Journal of Career Assessment, 19, 274-286. doi:10.1177/1069072710395534

Flynn, K. E., Dombeck, C. B., DeWitt, E. M., Schulman, K. A., & Weinfurt, K. P.. (2008). Using item banks to construct measures of patient reported outcomes in clinical trials: investigator perceptions. Clinical Trials, 5, 575-86.

Gibbons, R. D., Weiss, D. J., Kupfer, D. J., Frank, E., Fagiolini, A., Grochocinski, V. J., et al.. (2008). Using computerized adaptive testing to reduce the burden of mental health assessment. Psychiatric Services, 59, 361-8. presented at the Apr.

Vos, H. J. (1999). Using Bayesian decision theory to design a computerized mastery test. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 24(3), 271–292.

Lewis, C., & Sheehan, K.. (1990). Using Bayesian Decision Theory to Design a Computerized Mastery Test. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14(4), 367-386.

Lewis, C.,, & Sheehan, K.. (1990). Using Bayesian decision theory to design a computerized mastery test. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14, 367-386.

Gierl, M. J., & Lai, H.. (2018). Using Automatic Item Generation to Create Solutions and Rationales for Computerized Formative Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 42, 42-57. doi:10.1177/0146621617726788

Ackerman, T. A. (1991). The use of unidimensional parameter estimates of multidimensional items in adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 15, 13-24.

Ackerman, T. A. (1991). The Use of Unidimensional Parameter Estimates of Multidimensional Items in Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 15(1), 13-24.

Samejima, F. (1977). A Use of the Information Function in Tailored Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(2), 233-247.

Velozo, C. A., Kielhofner, G., & Lai, J. - S.. (1999). The use of Rasch analysis to produce scale-free measurement of functional ability. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 53, 83-90.

Gershon, R. C., Rothrock, N., Hanrahan, R., Bass, M., & Cella, D.. (2010). The use of PROMIS and assessment center to deliver patient-reported outcome measures in clinical research. Journal of Applied Measurement, 11, 304-314.

Kappauf, W. E. (1969). Use of an on-line computer for psychological testing with the up-and-down method. American Psychologist, 24, 207-211.

Makransky, G., & Glas, C. A. W.. (2011). Unproctored Internet test verification: Using adaptive confirmation testing. Organizational Research Methods, 14, 608-630.

Wise, S. L. (1994). Understanding self-adapted testing: The perceived control hypothesis. Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 15-24.

Veldkamp, B. P., Matteucci, M., & de Jong, M. G.. (2013). Uncertainties in the Item Parameter Estimates and Robust Automated Test Assembly. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 123-139. doi:10.1177/0146621612469825

Revuelta, J., & Ponsoda, V.. (1997). Una solución a la estimatión inicial en los tests adaptivos informatizados [A solution to initial estimation in CATs.]. Revista Electrónica de Metodología Aplicada, 2, 1-6.

Cheng, Y., Chang, H. - H., & Yi, Q.. (2007). Two-phase item selection procedure for flexible content balancing in CAT. Applied Psychological. Measurement, 3, 467–482.

Ying Cheng,, Chang, H. - H., & Qing Yi,. (2007). Two-Phase Item Selection Procedure for Flexible Content Balancing in CAT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 31, 467-482. doi:10.1177/0146621606292933

Stocking, M. L. (1987). Two simulated feasibility studies in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 36, 263-277.

Walter, O. B., & Holling, H.. (2008). Transitioning from fixed-length questionnaires to computer-adaptive versions. Zeitschrift für Psychologie \ Journal of Psychology, 216(1), 22–28.

Li, Y. H. (2005). Trait parameter recovery using multidimensional computerized adaptive testing in reading and mathematics. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 3-25.

Li, Y. H., & Schafer, W. D.. (2005). Trait Parameter Recovery Using Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing in Reading and Mathematics. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 3-25. doi:10.1177/0146621604270667

Thissen, D., Steinberg, L., & Mooney, J. A.. (1989). Trace lines for testlets: A use of multiple-categorical-response models. Journal of Educational Measurement, 26, 247-260.

Kahler, C. W., Strong, D. R., Read, J. P., De Boeck, P., Wilson, M., Acton, G. S., et al.. (2005). Toward efficient and comprehensive measurement of the alcohol problems continuum in college students: The Brief Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire. Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research, 29, 1180-1189.

Wainer, H.,, & Lewis, C.. (1990). Toward a psychometrics for testlets. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27, 1-14.

Luo, X., & Kim, D.. (2018). A Top-Down Approach to Designing the Computerized Adaptive Multistage Test. Journal of Educational Measurement, 55, 243-263. doi:10.1111/jedm.12174

Hol, A. M., Vorst, H. C. M., & Mellenbergh, G. J.. (2001). Toepassing van een computergestuurde adaptieve testprocedure op persoonlijkheidsdata [Application of a computerised adaptive test procedure on personality data]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie en haar Grensgebieden, 56, 119-133.

Chang, H. - H., & Ying, Z.. (2008). To Weight Or Not To Weight? Balancing Influence Of Initial Items In Adaptive Testing. Psychometrica, 73(3), 441-450. doi:10.1007/S11336-007-9047-7

Rammsayer, T., & Brandler, S.. (2003). Timing behavior in computerized adaptive testing: Response times for correct and incorrect answers are not related to general fluid intelligence/Zum Zeitverhalten beim computergestützten adaptiveb Testen: Antwortlatenzen bei richtigen und falschen Lösun. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 24, 57-63.

Finkelman, M., & Wang, C.. (2019). Time-Efficient Adaptive Measurement of Change. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 7(2), 15-34. doi:10.7333/1909-0702015

Kingsbury, G. G., & Wise, S. L.. (2020). Three Measures of Test Adaptation Based on Optimal Test Information. Journal of Computerized Adaotive Testing, 8(1), 1-19. doi:10.7333/2002-0801001

Kingsbury, G. G., & Wise, S. L.. (2020). Three Measures of Test Adaptation Based on Optimal Test Information. Journal of Computerized Adaotive Testing, 8(1), 1-19. doi:10.7333/2002-0801001

Kolen, M. J. (1999). Threats to score comparability with applications to performance assessments and computerized adaptive tests. Educational Assessment, 6, 73-96.

Kolen, M. J. (1999). Threats to score comparability with applications to performance assessments and computerized adaptive tests. Educational Assessment, 6, 73-96.