. (1973). Implementation of a Bayesian system for decision analysis in a program of individually prescribed instruction (Research Report No 60). Iowa City IA: American College Testing Program.
. (2001). Impact of several computer-based testing variables on the psychometric properties of credentialing examinations (Laboratory of Psychometric and Evaluative Research Report No 393). Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts, School of Education.
. (1990). Generative adaptive testing with digit span items. San Diego, CA: Testing Systems Department, Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.
. (1992). A general Bayesian model for testlets: theory and applications (Research Report 92-21; GRE Board Professional Report No 99-01P). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1990). Future directions for the National Council: The Computerized Adaptive Testing Project. Issues, 11, 1-5(National Council of State Boards of Nursing).
. (1987). Functional and design specifications for the National Council of State Boards of Nursing adaptive testing system. Unpublished manuscript.
. (1972). Fully adaptive sequential testing: A Bayesian procedure for efficient ability measurement. Unpublished manuscript, University of Chicago.
. (1987). Full-information item factor analysis from the ASVAB CAT item pool (Methodology Research Center Report 87-1). Chicago IL: University of Chicago.
. (1998). A framework for comparing adaptive test designs. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (2000). A framework for comparing adaptive test designs. Unpublished manuscript.
. (1988). The four generations of computerized educational measurement (Research Report 98-35). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1977). Flexilevel adaptive training paradigm: Hierarchical concept structures. AFHRL Technical Report 77-35 (II).
. (1977). Flexilevel adaptive testing paradigm: Validation in technical training. AFHRL Technical Report 77-35 (I).
. (1986). Final report: The use of tailored testing with instructional programs (Research Report ONR 86-1). Iowa City IA: The American College Testing Program, Assessment Programs Area, Test Development Division.
. (1981). Final report: Procedures for criterion referenced tailored testing. Columbia: University of Missouri, Educational Psychology Department.
. (1987). Final report: Feasibility study of a computerized test administration of the CLAST. University of Florida: Institute for Student Assessment and Evaluation.
. (1980). Final Report: Computerized adaptive testing, assessment of requirements. Falls Church VA: Author.
. (1980). Final report: Computerized adaptive performance evaluation. Minneapolis: Univerity of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
. (1985). Final report: Computerized adaptive measurement of achievement and ability. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
. (1981). Final report: Computerized adaptive ability testing. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
. (1983). Final report: Computer-based measurement of intellectual capabilities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
. (1986). Final report: Adaptive testing of spatial abilities (ONR 150 531). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1993). Field test of a computer-based GRE general test (GRE Board Technical Report 88-8; Educational Testing Service Research Rep No RR 93-07). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (2002). A feasibility study of on-the-fly item generation in adaptive testing (GRE Board Report No 98-12). Educational Testing Service RR02-23. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service. Note = “{PDF file, 193 KB}.
be02-01.pdf (192.6 KB). (1998). Feasibility studies of two-stage testing in large-scale educational assessment: Implications for NAEP. American Institutes for Research, CA.
. (1981). Factors influencing the psychometric characteristics of an adaptive testing strategy for test batteries (Research Rep. No. 81-4). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
ma81-04.pdf (1.65 MB). (1999). Exploring the relationship between item exposure rate and test overlap rate in computerized adaptive testing. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Montreal, Canada.
. (1967). An exploratory study of branching tests (Technical Research Note 188). Washington DC: US Army Behavioral Science Research Laboratory. (NTIS No. AD 655263).
. (1962). Exploratory study of a sequential item test. U.S. Army Personnel Research Office, Technical Research Note 129.
. (2002). An exploration of potentially problematic adaptive tests. Research Report 02-05).
. (2001). An examination of testlet scoring and item exposure constraints in the verbal reasoning section of the MCAT. MCAT Monograph Series: Association of American Medical Colleges.
. (2001). An examination of item review on computer adaptive tests. Manuscript in preparation, University of Virginia.
. (1978). Evaluations of implied orders as a basis for tailored testing using simulations (Technical Report No. 4). Los Angeles CA: University of Southern California, Department of Psychology.
. (1983). An evaluation of one- and three-parameter logistic tailored testing procedures for use with small item pools (Research Report ONR83-1). Iowa City IA: American College Testing Program.
. (1984). Evaluation of computerized adaptive testing of the ASVAB. San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center, unpublished manuscript.
. (1979). An evaluation of computerized adaptive testing. In Proceedings of the 21st Military Testing Association Conference. SanDiego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.
. (1995). An evaluation of alternative concepts for administering the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery to applicants for enlistment. DMDC Technical Report 95-013. Monterey, CA: Personnel Testing Division, Defense Manpower Data Center.
. (2000). Estimating item parameters from classical indices for item pool development with a computerized classification test (ACT Research 2000-4). Iowa City IA, ACT, Inc.
. (1987). Equivalent-groups versus single-group equating designs for the Accelerated CAT-ASVAB Project (Research Memorandum 87-6). Alexandria VA: Center for Naval Analyses.
. (1988). The equivalence of scores from automated and conventional educational and psychological tests (College Board Report No. 88-8). New York: The College Entrance Examination Board.
. (1973). An empirical study of computer-administered two-stage ability testing (Research Report 73-4). Minneapolis: Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
be73-04.pdf (2.45 MB). (1980). An empirical study of a broad range test of verbal ability. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (2002). An empirical investigation of selected multi-stage testing design variables on test assembly and decision accuracy outcomes for credentialing exams (Center for Educational Assessment Research Report No 469). Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts, School of Education.
. (1974). An empirical investigation of computer-administered pyramidal ability testing (Research Report 74-3). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
la74-03.pdf (2.97 MB). (1975). An empirical comparison of two-stage and pyramidal ability testing (Research Report 75-1). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
la75-01.pdf (1.73 MB). (1975). Empirical and simulation studies of flexilevel ability testing (Research Report 75-3). Minneapolis: Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
. (1976). Elements of a basic test theory generalizable to tailored testing. Unpublished manuscript.
. (1984). Efficiency and precision in two-stage adaptive testing. West Palm Beach Florida: Eastern ERA.
. (2003). The effects of model misfit in computerized classification test. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Chicago IL.
ji03-01.pdf (431.5 KB). (2000). Effects of item-selection criteria on classification testing with the sequential probability ratio test (Research Report 2000-8). Iowa City, IA: American College Testing.
. (1976). Effects of immediate knowledge of results and adaptive testing on ability test performance (Research Report 76-3). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
. (1980). Effects of computerized adaptive testing on Black and White students (Research Report 79-2). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
pi79-02.pdf (2.27 MB). (2007). The effect of using item parameters calibrated from paper administrations in computer adaptive test administrations. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment.
. (1987). The effect of item parameter estimation error on the decisions made using the sequential probability ratio test (ACT Research Report Series 87-17). Iowa City IA: American College Testing.
. (2003). Effect of extra time on GRE® Quantitative and Verbal Scores (Research Report 03-13). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing service.
br03-01.pdf (87.76 KB). (1998). Does adaptive testing violate local independence? (Research Report 98-33). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1994). DIF analysis for pretest items in computer-adaptive testing (Educational Testing Service Research Rep No RR 94-33). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.