Export 2294 results:
Journal Article
Wise, S. L., Kingsbury, G. G., & Webb, N. L.. (2015). Evaluating Content Alignment in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 34(4). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/emip.12094
PDF icon ra02-03.pdf (366.98 KB)
Carlson, S. (2000). ETS finds flaws in the way online GRE rates some students. Chronicle of Higher Education, 47, a47.
Cheng, P. E., & Liou, M.. (2000). Estimation of trait level in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 257-265.
Divgi, D. R. (1989). Estimating Reliabilities of Computerized Adaptive Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13(2), 145-149.
PDF icon v13n2p145.pdf (655.37 KB)
Crotts, K. M., Zenisky, A. L., Sireci, S. G., & Li, X.. (2013). Estimating Measurement Precision in Reduced-Length Multi-Stage Adaptive Testing . Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 1(4), 67-87. doi:10.7333/1309-0104067
Revuelta, J. (2004). Estimating ability and item-selection strategy in self-adapted testing: A latent class approach. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 379-396.
van der Linden, W. J. (2006). Equating scores from adaptive to linear tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 493-508.
Park, R., Kim, J., Chung, H., & Dodd, B. G.. (2014). Enhancing Pool Utilization in Constructing the Multistage Test Using Mixed-Format Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38, 268-280. doi:10.1177/0146621613515545
Wang, C., Zheng, C., & Chang, H. - H.. (2014). An Enhanced Approach to Combine Item Response Theory With Cognitive Diagnosis in Adaptive Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 51, 358–380. doi:10.1111/jedm.12057
Lunz, M. E., & Bergstrom, B. A.. (1994). An empirical study of computerized adaptive test administration conditions. Journal of Educational Measurement, 31, 251-263. presented at the Fal.
PDF icon v01n1p141.pdf (725.15 KB)
Han, K. T. (2012). An Efficiency Balanced Information Criterion for Item Selection in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 49, 225–246. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2012.00173.x
Wood, R. L. (1969). The efficacy of tailored testing. Educational Research, 11, 219-222.
PDF icon v05n1p011.pdf (707.62 KB)
PDF icon v01n2p259.pdf (571.01 KB)
Yang, X., Poggio, J. C., & Glasnapp, D. R.. (2006). Effects of Estimation Bias on Multiple-Category Classification With an IRT-Based Adaptive Classification Procedure. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 545-564. doi:10.1177/0013164405284031
Lee, J. A. (1986). The effects of computer experience on computerized adaptive test performance. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 46, 727-733.
Cheng, Y., & Liu, C.. (2015). The Effect of Upper and Lower Asymptotes of IRT Models on Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 39, 551-565. doi:10.1177/0146621615585850
Rizavi, S. M. (2002). The effect of test characteristics on aberrant response patterns in computer adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, 62, 3363.
PDF icon v16n1p033.pdf (584.06 KB)
PDF icon v14n4p355.pdf (885.93 KB)
Gershon, R. C. (1996). The effect of individual differences variables on the assessment of ability for Computerized Adaptive Testing. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 57, 4085.
PDF icon Colvin FINAL.pdf (630.27 KB)
Berg, S. R. (1996). Dynamic scaling: An ipsative procedure using techniques from computer adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 56, 5824.
PDF icon wa99-04.pdf (74.49 KB)

Pages