Statistical tests for person misfit in computerized adaptive testing (No. 98-01) (p. 28). Enschede, The Netherlands: Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Univeersity of Twente.
. (1998). The use of person-fit statistics in computerized adaptive testing. LSAC Research Report Series. presented at the September, 2005, Newton, PA. USA: Law School Administration Council.
. (2005). The use of unidimensional item parameter estimates of multidimensional items in adaptive testing (No. 87-13). ACT Research Reports (p. 33). presented at the September, 1987, Iowa City, IA: ACT.
. (1987). Manual for CATSim: Comprehensive simulation of computerized adaptive testing. St. Paul, MN: Assessment Systems Corporation.
. (2010). CATSIM Manual.pdf (1.49 MB)An applied study on computerized adaptive testing. Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences. University of Groingen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
. (1989). A comparative evaluation of two Bayesian adaptive ability estimation procedures with a conventional test strategy. Catholic University of America, Washington DC.
. (1980). Computerized adaptive testing in industrial and organizational psychology. University of Twente, Twente, The Netherlands.
. (2012). Guido Makransky Dissertation.pdf (2.72 MB)DEVELOPMENT, RELIABILITY, AND VALIDITY OF A COMPUTERIZED ADAPTIVE VERSION OF THE SCHEDULE FOR NONADAPTIVE AND ADAPTIVE PERSONALITY. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, University of Iowa, Iowa City Iowa.
. (2002). si02-01.pdf (1.06 MB)Effects of Different Computerized Adaptive Testing Strategies of Recovery of Ability. THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF NATURAL AND APPLIED SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY.
. (2011). kalender_dissertation1.pdf (993.04 KB)An evaluation of the self-scoring flexilevel testing model. Florida State University.
. (1974). An exploratory studyof the efficiency of the flexilevel testing procedure. University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
. (1976).