A closer look at using judgments of item difficulty to change answers on computerized adaptive tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 42, 331-350.
. (2005). Can examinees use judgments of item difficulty to improve proficiency estimates on computerized adaptive vocabulary tests? . Journal of Educational Measurement, 39, 311-330.
. (2002). Using judgments of item difficulty to change answers on computerized adaptive vocabulary tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
. (2002). Limiting answer review and change on computerized adaptive vocabulary tests: Psychometric and attitudinal results. Journal of Educational Measurement, 37, 21-38.
. (2000). Can examinees use a review option to obtain positively biased ability estimates on a computerized adaptive test? . Journal of Educational Measurement, 36, 141-157.
. (1999). Limiting answer review and change on computerized adaptive vocabulary tests: Psychometric and attitudinal results. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
. (1999). Computerized adaptive and fixed-item testing of music listening skill: A comparison of efficiency, precision, and concurrent validity. Journal of Educational Measurement, 34, 43-63.
. (1997). Effects of answer feedback and test anxiety on the psychometric and motivational characteristics of computer-adaptive and self-adaptive vocabulary tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education.
. (1996). The efficiency, reliability, and concurrent validity of adaptive and fixed-item tests of music listening skills. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Atlanta GA.
. (1993). How review options and administration mode influence scores on computerized vocabulary tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco CA.
. (1992).