Development, reliability, and validity of a computerized adaptive version of the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 63, 3485.
. (2003). Developments in measurement of persons and items by means of item response models. Behaviormetrika, 28, 65-94.
. (2001). Diagnostic adaptive testing: Effects of remedial instruction as empirical validation. Journal of Educational Measurement, 34, 3-20.
. (1997). Diagnostic classification models and multidimensional adaptive testing: A commentary on Rupp and Templin. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 7, 58-61.
. (2009). Diagnostische programme in der Demenzfrüherkennung: Der Adaptive Figurenfolgen-Lerntest (ADAFI) [Diagnostic programs in the early detection of dementia: The Adaptive Figure Series Learning Test (ADAFI)]. Zeitschrift für Gerontopsychologie & -Psychiatrie, 13, 16-29.
. (2000). Differences between self-adapted and computerized adaptive tests: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38, 235-247.
. (2001). Direct and inverse problems of item pool design for computerized adaptive testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 533-547.
. (2009). Direct and Inverse Problems of Item Pool Design for Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 533-547. doi:10.1177/0013164409332224
. (2009). Dispelling myths about the new NCLEX exam. Recruitment, Retention, and Restructuring Report, 9, 6-7. presented at the Jan-Feb.
. (1996). The distribution of indexes of person fit within the computerized adaptive testing environment. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21, 115-127.
. (1997). . (2000).
The D-optimality item selection criterion in the early stage of CAT: A study with the graded response model. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 33, 88-110.
. (2008). Dual-Objective Item Selection Criteria in Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 54, 165–183. doi:10.1111/jedm.12139
. (2017). Dynamic assessment of health outcomes: Time to let the CAT out of the bag?. Health Services Research, 40, 1694-1711.
. (2005). Dynamic health assessments: The search for more practical and more precise outcomes measures. Quality of Life Newsletter, 11-13.
. (1999). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
Dynamic scaling: An ipsative procedure using techniques from computer adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 56, 5824.
. (1996). A Dynamic Stratification Method for Improving Trait Estimation in Computerized Adaptive Testing Under Item Exposure Control. Applied Psychological Measurement, 44, 182-196. doi:10.1177/0146621619843820
. (2020). The effect of adaptive administration on the variability of the Mantel-Haenszel measure of differential item functioning. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 412-421.
. (1997). On the effect of adding clinical samples to validation studies of patient-reported outcome item banks: a simulation study. Quality of Life Research, 25, 1635–1644. doi:10.1007/s11136-015-1199-9
. (2016). Effect of Imprecise Parameter Estimation on Ability Estimation in a Multistage Test in an Automatic Item Generation Context . Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 4(1), 1-18. doi:10.7333/1608-040101
. (2016). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
. (2007).
The effect of individual differences variables on the assessment of ability for Computerized Adaptive Testing. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 57, 4085.
. (1996). . (1998).
The effect of item selection procedure and stepsize on computerized adaptive attitude measurement using the rating scale model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14, 355-386.
. (1990). The Effect of Item Selection Procedure and Stepsize on Computerized Adaptive Attitude Measurement Using the Rating Scale Model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14(4), 355-366.
. (1990). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
The effect of model misspecification on classification decisions made using a computerized test. Journal of Educational Measurement, 36, 47-59.
. (1999). The effect of population distribution and method of theta estimation on computerized adaptive testing (CAT) using the rating scale model. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 57, 422-439.
. (1997). The effect of population distribution and methods of theta estimation on computerized adaptive testing (CAT) using the rating scale model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 422-439.
. (1997). Effect of Rasch calibration on ability and DIF estimation in computer-adaptive tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 32, 341-363.
. (1995). The effect of review on student ability and test efficiency for computerized adaptive tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 33-40.
. (1992). The Effect of Review on Student Ability and Test Efficiency for Computerized Adaptive Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16(1), 33-40.
. (1992). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
The effect of review on the psychometric characteristics of computerized adaptive tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 211-222.
. (1994). The effect of review on the psychometric characteristics of computerized adaptive tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 7(3), 211-222.
. (1994). The effect of review on the psychometric characterstics of computerized adaptive tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 211-222.
. (1994). The effect of test characteristics on aberrant response patterns in computer adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, 62, 3363.
. (2002). The Effect of Upper and Lower Asymptotes of IRT Models on Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 39, 551-565. doi:10.1177/0146621615585850
. (2015). The Effect of Using Item Parameters Calibrated from Paper Administrations in Computer Adaptive Test Administrations. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 5.
. (2007). Effects and underlying mechanisms of self-adapted testing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 103-116.
. (1995). The effects of computer experience on computerized adaptive test performance. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 46, 727-733.
. (1986). Effects of Estimation Bias on Multiple-Category Classification With an IRT-Based Adaptive Classification Procedure. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 545-564. doi:10.1177/0013164405284031
. (2006). Effects of immediate knowledge of results and adaptive testing on ability test performance. Applied Psychological Measurement, 2, 259-266.
. (1977). Effects of Immediate Knowledge of Results and Adaptive Testing on Ability Test Performance. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(2), 259-266.
. (1977). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
The Effects of Item Calibration Sample Size and Item Pool Size on Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 5(1), 11-19.
. (1981). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
The effects of model specification error in item response theory-based computerized classification test using sequential probability ratio test. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, 64, 478.
. (2003). Effects of practical constraints on item selection rules at the early stages of computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 41, 149-174.
. (2004). The effects of test difficulty manipulation in computerized adaptive testing and self-adapted testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 12, 167-184.
. (1999). The effects of variable entry on bias and information of the Bayesian adaptive testing procedure. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 50, 785-802.
. (1990). . (2009).
. (1969).
Efficiency and sensitivity of multidimensional computerized adaptive testing of pediatric physical functioning. Disability & Rehabilitation, 30, 479-84.
. (2008). An Efficiency Balanced Information Criterion for Item Selection in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 49, 225–246. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2012.00173.x
. (2012). Efficiency of static and computer adaptive short forms compared to full-length measures of depressive symptoms. Quality of Life Research, 19(1), 125–136.
. (2010). Efficiency of Targeted Multistage Calibration Designs Under Practical Constraints: A Simulation Study. Journal of Educational Measurement, 56, 121-146. doi:10.1111/jedm.12203
. (2019). An EM approach to parameter estimation for the Zinnes and Griggs paired comparison IRT model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 208-227.
. (2002). Emergence of item response modeling in instrument development and data analysis. Medical Care, 38, II60-II65.
. (2000). An Empirical Evaluation of the Slip Correction in the Four Parameter Logistic Models With Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36, 75-87. doi:10.1177/0146621611432862
. (2012). Empirical initialization of the trait estimator in adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 21-29.
. (1999). An Empirical Investigation of the Stratified Adaptive Computerized Testing Model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(1), 141-152.
. (1977). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
An empirical study of computerized adaptive test administration conditions. Journal of Educational Measurement, 31, 251-263. presented at the Fal.
. (1994). . (1953).