Comparison Between Dichotomous and Polytomous Scoring of Innovative Items in a Large-Scale Computerized Adaptive Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72, 493-509. doi:10.1177/0013164411422903
. (2012). A comparison of a standard and a computerized adaptive paradigm in Bekesy fixed-frequency audiometry. Journal of Auditory Research, 19, 1-22.
. (1979). Comparison of CAT item selection criteria for polytomous items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 419–440.
. (2009). Comparison of CAT Item Selection Criteria for Polytomous Items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 419-440. doi:10.1177/0146621608327801
. (2009). A comparison of computerized adaptive testing and multistage testing. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 60, 5829.
. (2000). A Comparison of Computerized Classification Testing and Computerized Adaptive Testing in Clinical Psychology. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 1(2), 19-37. doi:10.7333/1302-0102019
. (2013). A comparison of computer-simulated conventional and branching tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 31, 125-136.
. (1971). A Comparison of Constrained Item Selection Methods in Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 40, 346-360. doi:10.1177/0146621616639305
. (2016). A Comparison of Constraint Programming and Mixed-Integer Programming for Automated Test-Form Generation. Journal of Educational Measurement, 55, 435-456. doi:10.1111/jedm.12187
. (2018). A Comparison of Content-Balancing Procedures for Estimating Multiple Clinical Domains in Computerized Adaptive Testing: Relative Precision, Validity, and Detection of Persons With Misfitting Responses. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34, 410-423. doi:10.1177/0146621609349802
. (2010). . (2010).
A Comparison of Exposure Control Procedures in CAT Systems Based on Different Measurement Models for Testlets. Applied Measurement in Education, 26, 113-135. doi:10.1080/08957347.2013.765434
. (2013). A Comparison of Exposure Control Procedures in CATs Using the 3PL Model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73, 857-874. doi:10.1177/0013164413486802
. (2013). Comparison of Exposure Controls, Item Pool Characteristics, and Population Distributions for CAT Using the Partial Credit Model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72, 159-175. doi:10.1177/0013164411411296
. (2012). A Comparison of Four Item-Selection Methods for Severely Constrained CATs. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 74, 677-696. doi:10.1177/0013164413517503
. (2014). A Comparison of Four Methods for Obtaining Information Functions for Scores From Computerized Adaptive Tests With Normally Distributed Item Difficulties and Discriminations. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 1(5), 88-107. doi:10.7333/1312-0105088
. (2013). A Comparison of IRT Proficiency Estimation Methods Under Adaptive Multistage Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 52, 70–79. doi:10.1111/jedm.12063
. (2015). A Comparison of Item Calibration Media in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 18(3).
. (1994). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
A comparison of item calibration media in computerized adaptive tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 18, 197-204.
. (1994). A comparison of item exposure control methods in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35, 311-327.
. (1998). A comparison of item selection routines in linear and adaptive tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 32, 227-242.
. (1995). A comparison of item selection rules at the early stages of computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 241-255.
. (2000). A comparison of item selection rules at the early stages of computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 241-255.
. (2000). A comparison of item selection techniques and exposure control mechanisms in CATs using the generalized partial credit model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 147-163.
. (2002). A Comparison of Item Selection Techniques for Testlets. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34, 424-437. doi:10.1177/0146621609349804
. (2010). A comparison of item-selection methods for adaptive tests with content constraints. Journal of Educational Measurement, 42, 283-302.
. (2005). A comparison of item-selection methods for adaptive tests with content constraints. Journal of Educational Measurement, 42, 283-302.
. (2005). A comparison of maximum likelihood estimation and expected a posteriori estimation in computerized adaptive testing using the generalized partial credit model. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 58, 453.
. (1997). The comparison of maximum likelihood estimation and expected a posteriori in CAT using the graded response model. Journal of Elementary Education, 19, 339-371.
. (2007). A comparison of maximum likelihood estimation and expected a posteriori estimation in CAT using the partial credit model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 569-595.
. (1998). Comparison of methods for controlling maximum exposure rates in computerized adaptive testing. Psicothema, 21, 313-320. presented at the May.
. (2009). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
A Comparison of Multi-Stage and Linear Test Designs for Medium-Size Licensure and Certification Examinations. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 2(2), 18-36. presented at the 02-2014. doi:10.7333/1402-0202018
. (2014). A comparison of non-deterministic procedures for the adaptive assessment of knowledge. Psychologische Beitrge, 44, 495-503.
. (2002). A comparison of paper-and-pencil, computer-administered, computerized feedback, and computerized adaptive testing methods for classroom achievement testing. Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 1719.
. (1991). A comparison of procedures for content-sensitive item selection. Applied Measurement in Education.
. (1991). A comparison of procedures for content-sensitive item selection in computerized adaptive tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 4, 241-261.
. (1991). A comparison of self-adapted and computerized adaptive achievement tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 29, 329-339.
. (1992). Comparison of SPRT and sequential Bayes procedures for classifying examinees into two categories using a computerized test. Journal of Educational & Behavioral Statistics, 21, 405-414.
. (1996). A comparison of the nominal response model and the three-parameter logistic model in computerized adaptive testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49, 789-805.
. (1989). A comparison of the partial credit and graded response models in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 5, 17-34.
. (1992). A comparison of the performance of simulated hierarchical and linear testlets. Journal of Educational Measurement, 29, 243-251.
. (1992). Comparison of the Psychometric Properties of Several Computer-Based Test Designs for Credentialing Exams With Multiple Purposes. Applied Measurement in Education, 19, 203-220. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame1903_3
. (2006). A comparison of three decision models for adapting the length of computer-based mastery tests. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 6(4), 479-513.
. (1990). Comparison of two Bayesian methods to detect mode effects between paper-based and computerized adaptive assessments: a preliminary Monte Carlo study. BMC Med Res Methodol, 12, 124. presented at the 2012. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-12-124
. (2012). Comparisons of paper-administered, computer-administered and computerized adaptive achievement tests. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5, 311-326.
. (1989). . (1999).
Complete orders from incomplete data: Interactive ordering and tailored testing. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 259-302.
. (1975). . (1994).
. (2005).
. (2005).
Computer adaptive testing: A comparison of four item selection strategies when used with the golden section search strategy for estimating ability. Dissertation Abstracts International, 54, 1772.
. (1993). . (1993).
Computer adaptive testing: A shift in the evaluation paradigm. Educational Technology Systems, 22 (3), 213-224.
. (1994). Computer adaptive testing: a strategy for monitoring stroke rehabilitation across settings. Stroke Rehabilitation, 11, 33-39. presented at the Spring.
. (2004). A computer adaptive testing approach for assessing physical functioning in children and adolescents. Developmental Medicine and Child Neuropsychology, 47, 113-120. presented at the Feb.
. (2005). . (1994).
Computer adaptive testing for small scale programs and instructional systems. Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 12(1).
. (2011). Computer adaptive testing improved accuracy and precision of scores over random item selection in a physical functioning item bank. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59, 1174-82. presented at the Nov.
. (2006). Computer adaptive testing improved accuracy and precision of scores over random item selection in a physical functioning item bank. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59, 1174-1182.
. (2006). A computer adaptive testing simulation applied to the FIM instrument motor component. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 84, 384-393.
. (2003).