Betz, N. E. (1977). Effects of immediate knowledge of results and adaptive testing on ability test performance. Applied Psychological Measurement, 2, 259-266.

Betz, N. E. (1975). New types of information and psychological implications. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Computerized adaptive trait measurement: Problems and Prospects (Research Report 75-5), pp. 32-43. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Betz, N. E., & Weiss, D. J.. (1973). An empirical study of computer-administered two-stage ability testing (Research Report 73-4). Minneapolis: Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Betz, N. E. (1977). Effects of Immediate Knowledge of Results and Adaptive Testing on Ability Test Performance. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(2), 259-266.

Betz, N. E., & Weiss, D. J.. (1976). Psychological effects of immediate knowledge of results and adaptive ability testing (Research Report 76-4). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Bergstrom, B. A., & Lunz, M. E.. (1991). Comparisons of computer adaptive and pencil and paper tests. Chicago IL: American Society of Clinical Pathologists.

Bergstrom, B. A. (1992). Confidence in pass/fail decisions for computer adaptive and paper and pencil examinations. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 15(4), 435-464.

Bergstrom, B., & Gershon, R. C.. (1992). Comparison of item targeting strategies for pass/fail adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.

Bergstrom, B. A. (1996). Computerized adaptive testing for the national certification examination. AANA.J, 64, 119-124.

Bergstrom, B. A., Lunz, M. E., & Gershon, R. C.. (1992). Altering the level of difficulty in computer adaptive testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 5, 137-149.

Bergstrom, B. A., & Stahl, J. A.. (1992). Assessing existing item bank depth for computer adaptive testing. In ERIC Document No. TM022404.

Bergstrom, B. (1992). Computer adaptive versus paper-and-pencil tests. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.

Bergstrom, B. (1992). Ability measure equivalence of computer adaptive and paper and pencil tests: A research synthesis. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco.

Bergstrom, B. A. (1992). Confidence in pass/fail decisions for computer adaptive and paper and pencil examinations. Evaluation and The Health Professions, 15(4), 435-464.

Bergstrom, B. A., & Lunz, M. E.. (1999). CAT for certification and licensure. In Innovations in computerized assessment (pp. 67-91). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Bergstrom, B. B., & Lunz, M. E.. (1991). Confidence in pass/fail decisions for computer adaptive and paper and pencil examinations. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.

Bergstrom, B. A., & Lunz, M. E.. (1994). The equivalence of Rasch item calibrations and ability estimates across modes of administration. In Objective measurement: Theory into practice (Vol. 2, pp. 122-128). Norwood, N.J. USA: Ablex Publishing Co.

Bergstrom, B. A., & Lunz, M. E.. (1990). The stability of Rasch pencil and paper item calibrations on computer adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the Midwest Objective Measurement Seminar. Chicago IL.

Bergstrom, B. A. (1996). Computerized adaptive testing for the national certification examination.

Bergstrom, B. A., & Lunz, M. E.. (1992). Confidence in pass/fail decisions for computer adaptive and paper and pencil examinations. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 15, 453-464.

Bergstrom, B., & Gershon, R. C.. (1994). Computerized adaptive testing exploring examinee response time using hierarchical linear modeling. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.

Bergstrom, B. A., & Gershon, R. C.. (1994). Computerized adaptive testing for licensure and certification. CLEAR Exam Review, Winter 1994, 25-27.

Berger, S., Verschoor, A. J., Eggen, T., & Moser, U.. (2017). Efficiency of Targeted Multistage Calibration Designs under Practical Constraints: A Simulation Study. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ko2LuiARKqsjL_6aupO4Pj9zgk6p_xhd/view?usp=sharing

Berger, S., Verschoor, A. J., Eggen, T. J. H. M., & Moser, U.. (2019). Efficiency of Targeted Multistage Calibration Designs Under Practical Constraints: A Simulation Study. Journal of Educational Measurement, 56, 121-146. doi:10.1111/jedm.12203

Berger, M. P. F. (1994). A general approach to algorithmic design of fixed-form tests, adaptive tests, and testlets. Applied Psychological Measurement, 18, 141-153.

Berger, M. P. F.,, & Veerkamp, W. J. J.. (1997). Some new item selection criteria for adaptive testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 22, 203-226.

Berger, M. P. F. (1994). A General Approach to Algorithmic Design of Fixed-Form Tests, Adaptive Tests, and Testlets. Applied Psychological Measurement, 18(2), 141-153.

Berg, S. R. (1996). Dynamic scaling: An ipsative procedure using techniques from computer adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 56, 5824.

Bennett, R. E., Steffen, M., Singley, M. K., Morley, M., & Jacquemin, D.. (1997). Evaluating an automatically scorable, open-ended response type for measuring mathematical reasoning in computer-adaptive tests.

Bennett, R. E., Morley, M., & Quardt, D.. (1998). Three response types for broadening the conception of mathematical problem solving in computerized-adaptive tests (Research Report 98-45). Princeton NJ : Educational Testing Service.

Bengs, D., Brefeld, U., & Kröhne, U.. (2018). Adaptive Item Selection Under Matroid Constraints. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 6(2), 15-36. doi:10.7333/1808-0602015

Ben-Porath, Y. S., Waller, N. G., Slutske, W. S., & Butcher, J. N.. (1988). A comparison of two methods for the adaptive administration of the MMPI-2 content scales. In Paper presented at the 86th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association. Atlanta GA.

Ben-Porath, Y. S., Slutske, W. S., & Butcher, J. N.. (1989). A real-data simulation of computerized adaptive administration of the MMPI. Psychological Assessment, 1, 18-22.

Ben-Porath, Y. S., Roper, B. L., & Butcher, J. N.. (1990). An empirical study of the computer adaptive MMPI-2. In Paper presented at the 25th Annual Symposium on recent developments in the MMPI/MMPI-2. Minneapolis MN.

Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Roper, B. L.. (1992). Computerized adaptive testing with the MMPI-2: Reliability, validity, and comparability to paper and pencil administration. In Paper presented at the 27th Annual Symposium on Recent Developments in the MMPI/MMPI-2. Minneapolis MN.

Belov, D. I. (2014). Detecting Item Preknowledge in Computerized Adaptive Testing Using Information Theory and Combinatorial Optimization. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 2(3), 37-58. doi:10.7333/1410-0203037

Belov, D. I., & Armstrong, R. D.. (2009). Direct and inverse problems of item pool design for computerized adaptive testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 533-547.

Belov, D. I., & Armstrong, R. D.. (2005). Monte Carlo Test Assembly for Item Pool Analysis and Extension. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 239-261. doi:10.1177/0146621605275413

Belov, D. I., Armstrong, R. D., & Weissman, A.. (2008). A Monte Carlo Approach for Adaptive Testing With Content Constraints. Applied Psychological Measurement, 32, 431-446. doi:10.1177/0146621607309081

Belov, D.I., A. R. D. (2008). A Monte Carlo approach to the design, assembly, and evaluation of multistage adaptive tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 32, 119–137.

Belov, D. I., & Armstrong, R. D.. (2008). A Monte Carlo Approach to the Design, Assembly, and Evaluation of Multistage Adaptive Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 32, 119-137. doi:10.1177/0146621606297308

Belov, D. I., & Armstrong, R. D.. (2009). Direct and Inverse Problems of Item Pool Design for Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 533-547. doi:10.1177/0013164409332224

Belov, D. I., Armstrong, R. D., & Weissman, A.. (2008). A monte carlo approach for adaptive testing with content constraints. Applied Psychological Measurement, 32, 431-446. doi:10.1177/0146621607309081

Bejar, I. I. (1995). From adaptive testing to automated scoring of architectural simulations. In . L. E. Mancall and P. G. Bashook (Eds.), Assessing clinical reasoning: The oral examination and alternative methods (pp. 115-130. Evanston IL: The American Board of Medical Specialities.

Bejar, I. I., Lawless, R. R., Morley, M. E., Wagner, M. E., Bennett, R. E., & Revuelta, J.. (2002). A feasibility study of on-the-fly item generation in adaptive testing (GRE Board Report No 98-12). Educational Testing Service RR02-23. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service. Note = “{PDF file, 193 KB}.

Bejar, I. I., Lawless, R. R.,, Morley, M. E.,, Wagner, M. E.,, Bennett R. E.,, & Revuelta, J.. (2003). A feasibility study of on-the-fly item generation in adaptive testing. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 2 (3).

Bejar, I. I. (1977). A comparison of conventional and adaptive achievement testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Bejar, I. I. (1999). On-the-fly adaptive tests: An application of generative modeling to quantitative reasoning. In Symposium presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Bejar, I. I. (1986). Final report: Adaptive testing of spatial abilities (ONR 150 531). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Bejar, I. I. (1977). Applications of adaptive testing in measuring achievement and performance. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Applications of computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 77-1). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program. .

Bejar, I. I., Weiss, D. J., & Kingsbury, G. G.. (1977). Calibration of an item pool for the adaptive measurement of achievement (Research Report 77-5). Minneapolis: Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Bejar, I. I., Weiss, D. J., & Gialluca, K. A.. (1977). An information comparison of conventional and adaptive tests in the measurement of classroom achievement (Research Report 77-7). Minneapolis: Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Bejar, I. I., & Weiss, D. J.. (1978). A construct validation of adaptive achievement testing (Research Report 78-4). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Beeman, P. B., & Waterhouse, J. K.. (2001). NCLEX-RN performance: predicting success on the computerized examination. Journal of Professional Nursing, 17, 158-165. presented at the Jul-Aug.

Becker, J., Walter, O. B., Fliege, H., Bjorner, J. B., Kocalevent, R. D., Schmid, G., et al.. (2004). Validating the German computerized adaptive test for anxiety on healthy sample (A-CAT). Quality of Life Research, 13, 1515.

Becker, J., Fliege, H., Kocalevent, R. D., Bjorner, J. B., Rose, M., Walter, O. B., & Klapp, B. F.. (2008). Functioning and validity of a computerized adaptive test to measure anxiety (A CAT). Depression and Anxiety, 25, E182-E194.

Bayroff, A. G. (1964). Feasibility of a programmed testing machine.

Bayroff, A. G. (1969). Psychometric problems with branching tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association.

Bayroff, A. G., Thomas, J. J., & Anderson, A. A.. (1960). Construction of an experimental sequential item test (Research Memorandum 60-1). Washington DC: Personnel Research Branch, Department of the Army.

Bayroff, A. G., & Seeley, L. C.. (1967). An exploratory study of branching tests (Technical Research Note 188). Washington DC: US Army Behavioral Science Research Laboratory. (NTIS No. AD 655263).